UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☑

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule §240.14a-12


F.N.B. Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

         

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 No fee required.
 Fee computed on the table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

 2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

 3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 

 4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 

 5) Total fee paid:
  
  

 

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

 2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No:

 

  

 

 3) 

Filing Party:

 

  

 

 4) 

Date Filed:

 

  

 

 


LOGOLOGO


LOGO

  

From the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

March 30, 201826, 2021

Dear Shareholder:

We will hold our Annual Meeting of Shareholders at 8:30 AM, Eastern Daylight Time, on Wednesday,Tuesday, May 16, 2018,11, 2021. This year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held in a virtual only format through a live webcast. We will provide the webcast of the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FNB21. The Virtual Annual Meeting presentation will be available online during the meeting and during the 30 days following the meeting, a replay of the meeting will be posted on F.N.B.’s website at https://www.fnb-online.com/about-us/investor-information/investor-relations/investor-analyst-presentations. For further information on how to participate in the Great Room at The Regional Learning Alliance located at 850 Cranberry Woods Drive, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066.meeting, please see About Our Annual Meeting on Page 92 in this Proxy Statement.

Agenda

At our Annual Meeting, our shareholders will act on the following matters: (i) election of thirteen (13) director nomineestwelve (12) director-nominees named in the accompanying proxy statementProxy Statement to our Board of Directors; (ii) adoption of an advisory(non-binding) resolution to approve the 20172020 compensation of our named executive officers; (iii) ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018;2021; and (iv) any other matter that is properly presented at our Annual Meeting in compliance with our bylaws.

Your Vote is Important

Your vote is important regardless of how many shares of F.N.B. Corporation stock you own. If you hold stock in more than one account or name, you will receive a proxy card for each.

Whether or not you plan to attendlog in to our Annual Meeting, please complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope we have provided to ensure that your shares are represented at our Annual MeetingMeeting.. Alternatively, you may vote by the Internet, by our QR Code feature or by telephone simply by following the instructions on your proxy card. By voting now, your vote will be counted even if you are unable to attend our Annual Meeting.Meeting virtually.

Please indicate on the card whether you plan to attendlogin to our Annual Meeting. If you attend and wish to vote in person,virtually during our Annual Meeting, you may withdraw your proxy at that time.

 

LOGOLOGO 

As always, our directors, management and staffemployees thank you for your continued interest in and support of F.N.B. Corporation.

 

LOGO

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 


 

LOGO

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

Date:

Wednesday

May 16, 2018

Time:

8:30 AM

(Eastern Daylight Time)

Place:

Great Room at The Regional Learning Alliance

850 Cranberry Woods Drive

Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066

Record Date:

March 7, 2018

Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 7, 2018, are entitled to notice of and to vote at our Annual Meeting. Please refer to responses to the frequently asked questions under the heading Voting in our 2018 proxy statement for additional information about how to vote your shares and attend our Annual Meeting.

Proposals:

1.Date

Election of the thirteen (13) nominees for directors named in the accompanying proxy statement (namely, Pamela A. Bena, William B. Campbell, James D. Chiafullo, Vincent J. Delie, Jr., Mary Jo Dively, Stephen J. Gurgovits, Robert A. Hormell, David J. Malone, Frank C. Mencini, David L. Motley, Heidi A. Nicholas, John S. Stanik and William J. Strimbu), each to serve as a director for a term of one year and until the election of his or her successor;May 11, 2021

 

2.Time

Adoption of an advisory(non-binding)8:30 A.M. Eastern Time resolution to approve the 2017 compensation of our named executive officers;

 

3.

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018; and

4.

Any other matter that is properly presented at our AnnualVirtual Meeting in compliance with our bylaws.

How to Vote

LOGO

BY TELEPHONE

You may vote by calling

1-800-690-6903

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at our Annual Meeting.Please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided or vote by the Internet at www.proxyvote.com (and entering the Control Number provided on your proxy card), by our QR Code feature, or by telephone at1-800-690-6903, whether or not you expect to attend our Annual Meeting in person.

We have included our 2017 annual report to shareholders with this notice and accompanying proxy statement.

BY ORDER OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

James G. Orie

Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

LOGO

BY INTERNET

You can vote online at www.proxyvote.com

LOGO

BY MAIL

You can vote by completingThis year’s meeting is a virtual only shareholders meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FNB21 and returning the enclosed proxy card.

LOGO

IN PERSON

All Shareholders are cordially invitedyou will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

Record Date

March 5, 2021 — Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

Proxy Voting

Make your vote count. Please vote your shares promptly to ensure the presence of a quorum during the Annual Meeting. Voting your shares now via the Internet, by telephone or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form will save the expense of additional solicitation. If you wish to vote by mail, we have enclosed an addressed envelope with postage prepaid if mailed in the U.S. Submitting your proxy now will not prevent you from voting your shares during the Annual Meeting, as your proxy is revocable at your option.

Items of Business

We are requesting your vote:

To elect the 12 nominees named in this proxy statement to serve on our Board of Directors until the 2022 Annual Meeting.

To provide an advisory vote for approval of the 2020 compensation of our named executives as disclosed in this proxy statement.

To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditor for 2021.

We will also act on any other timely business that is properly submitted.

Address of Corporate

 

Headquarters

LOGO

BY MOBILE DEVICEOne North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15212

You may vote from a smart phone by scanning the QR code.

Meeting Details

See About Our Annual Meeting — Frequently Asked Questions on Page 92.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

LOGO

James G. Orie

Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

March 30, 2018

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania26, 2021

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL

OUR NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING, OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 16, 2018:

THE F.N.B. CORPORATION2021 PROXY STATEMENT, AND 20172020 ANNUAL REPORT, TO SHAREHOLDERS

2020 FORM 10K AND OUR 2021 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT http:https://www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com

 

 


 

Table of Contents  

 

 

LOGO

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Proxy Statement

1

Summary

2

2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Response

   12 

About Our Annual MeetingHighlights of Superior Governance Practices

1
Voting1
Proposal 1. Election of Directors6

General Information Regarding Director Nominees

   6 

Directors

6

Identification and EvaluationSummary of Director NomineesRisk Management Oversight

6

Process Used to Identify and Approve Our Most Recently Appointed Directors

   7 

Executive Compensation Highlights

8

Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors

9

Current Directors and Nominees for Election at Our Annual Meeting

   810 

Biographical Information Concerning Director NomineesDirector-Nominees

   911 

Security Ownership of DirectorsCriteria and Executive OfficersConsiderations for Recommending Director-Nominees

   22

Executive Officers

2319 

Corporate Governance

20

Our Board of Directors and its CommitteesPrinciples

   2420 

Corporate GovernanceBoard Committees

   24 

PrinciplesBoard Succession and Refreshment

   2426 

Board Member Backgrounds Across a Wide
SpectrumSuccession Planning-Board, CEO and Management

   2426 

Board Structure and ResponsibilityKey Corporate Governance Documents

   2528 

Board CommitteesOversight of Risk

   2730 

Code of Conduct/ Code of EthicsShareholder Engagement

   2934 

Risk OversightEnhancements Resulting from Shareholder Engagement

   2935 

Corporate GovernanceDirector Independence

   3135 

Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Employee EngagementRelated Persons Transactions

   3336 

Director IndependenceCommunications with Our Board

37

Stock Ownership

38

Executive Officers

39

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

   41 

Director Independence DeterminationsExecutive Compensation and Other Proxy Disclosure

42

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   42 

Family RelationshipsCompensation Discussion and Analysis

43

Executive Summary

43

Say-on-Pay Support and Investor Engagement

   44 

Summary of 2020 Executive Sessions of Our Board

44

Director Stock Ownership Requirement

44
Communications with Our BoardCompensation Actions45

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   45 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

45
Related Person TransactionsTarget Pay Mix46
Executive Compensation and Other Proxy Disclosure48

Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation

   48 

Compensation Discussion and AnalysisDetermination Process

  

49

50

Executive SummaryCompensation Philosophy and Objectives

   4952 

Elements of Compensation Philosophy

   5354 

TaxAdditional Compensation Policies and Accounting Treatment of CompensationPractices

   6164 

Compensation Committee Report

  

62

66

20172020 Summary Compensation Table

63

2017 Other Compensation Table

64

2017 Perquisites Table

64

2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

66

2017 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End

   67 

2017 Option Exercises and Stock Vested2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

68

2017 Pension Benefits

68

Retirement Income Plan

69

ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

69

Basic Retirement Plan

69

2017 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

   70 

2017 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control2020 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

   71 

20172020 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

72

2020 Pension Benefits

72

Retirement Income Plan

73

ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

73

Basic Retirement Plan

73

2020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

74

2020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

75

2020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (Delie)

   7175 

20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (Calabrese)

   7276 

20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (Guerrieri)

   7377 

20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (Moorehead)

   7478 

20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (Robinson)

75

2017 Director Compensation

   79 

Executive DirectorCEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

80

Annual Board/Committee Retainer Fees

   81 

Annual Grant of Stock Awards

81
Proposal 2. Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation Governance and Risk Management

   82 

Why You Should Approve Our Executive Compensation Program

82
Proposal 3. Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm2020 Director Compensation

   84 

Annual Board/Committee Retainer Fees

85

ReportAnnual Grant of Audit CommitteeStock Awards

85

Director Stock Ownership Requirement

   85 
Audit and Non-Audit FeesProposal 2. Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation  

86

Audit and Non-Audit Services
Pre-Approval PolicyWhy You Should Approve our Executive Compensation Program

   86 
Shareholder Proposals and Nominations
Proposal 3. Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst  & Young LLP as F.N.B.’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the 2019 Annual Meeting2021
   8789 

SEC Rule 14a-8Audit Committee Report

90

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

91

Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy

   87

Advance Notice Requirements Under Our Bylaws

8791 
Other MattersAbout Our Annual Meeting-Frequently Asked Questions  88

“Householding” of Proxy Materials

88

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials92

88

 

 

 

2021 Proxy Statement    i  


 

About Our Annual Meeting    Table of Contents

 

 

This proxy statement contains forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipate,” “target,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “believe” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements provide F.N.B. Corporation’s current expectations or forecasts of future events, circumstances, results or aspirations, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could

cause the F.N.B. Corporation’s actual results to differ materially from those set forth in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties are described in F.N.B. Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. F.N.B. Corporation does not undertake to update the forward-looking statements included in this proxy statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that may arise after the date the forward-looking statements were made.

  ii    F.N.B. Corporation


Proxy Statement  

LOGO

One North Shore Center

12 Federal Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15212

 

  

 

Proxy Statement 

  
 

 

Our proxy statement2021 Proxy Statement (Proxy Statement) contains information relative to our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Wednesday,Tuesday, May 16, 2018,11, 2021, beginning at 8:30 AM, Eastern Daylight Time (EDT),(ET). This year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held in a virtual only format through a live webcast. We will provide the webcast of the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FNB21. The Virtual Annual Meeting presentation will be available online during the meeting and, during the 30 days following the meeting, a replay of the meeting will be posted on F.N.B.’s website at https://www.fnb-online.com/about-us/investor-information/investor-relations/investor-analyst-presentations. For further information on how to participate in the Great Room at The Regional Learning Alliance located at 850 Cranberry Woods Drive, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066 (our “Annual Meeting”).meeting, please see About Our Annual Meeting — Frequently Asked Questions on Page 92 in this proxy statement. This proxy statement also relates to any adjournment of our Annual Meeting. This proxy statement was prepared under the direction of the F.N.B. Corporation Board of Directors to solicit your proxy for use at the Annual Meeting. On March 30, 2018,26, 2021, we commenced the distribution of our proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card to our shareholders of record as of March 7, 2018.5, 2021. We will bear all costs of preparing and distributing our proxy materials to our shareholders. We will, upon request,

reimburse brokers, nominees, fiduciaries, custodians and other record holders for their reasonable expenses in forwarding our proxy materials to beneficial owners.

Throughout this Proxy Statement, we summarize, describe or make references to various F.N.B. Corporation corporate governance documents, committee charters, ethical codes and policies. Should you desire to review these corporate governance documents and policies, you will find the corresponding weblink for each under the section of this Proxy Statement titled, Key Corporate Governance Documents (Pages 28-29) and Resources (Page 100).

We use the following terms in this proxy statement:

 

“We,” “us,” “our,” “F.N.B.,” “Company,” or “Corporation” meanmeans F.N.B. Corporation;Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates;

 

“Board” means the joint F.N.B. Corporation and First National Bank of Pennsylvania Boards of Directors;

 

“FNBPA” or “Bank” means First National Bank of Pennsylvania;

 

“F.N.B. Capital” means F.N.B. Capital Corporation, LLC; and

 

“CEO” means Chief Executive Officer.

 

 

 About Our Annual Meeting 

What is a proxy?

Your proxy gives us authority to vote your shares and tells us how to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment. Three of our employees, who are called “proxy holders” (or “proxies” for short) and are named on the proxy card, will vote your shares at the Annual Meeting according to the instructions you give on the proxy card.

Why are you soliciting a proxy from me?

Our Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to make sure that your vote is properly submitted and received on time, and to improve the efficiency of the Annual Meeting. We may ask for, or solicit, proxies using several methods.

We may solicit proxies by mail, personal interviews, telephone or fax. We may also use the Internet to solicit proxies. F.N.B. officers or employees may solicit proxies, but will not receive any special compensation for doing so. We have engaged the firm of Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC to assist us with soliciting proxies.

What will our shareholders vote on at our Annual Meeting?

Our shareholders will act upon the following proposals at our Annual Meeting:

Election of the thirteen (13) nominees for directors named in this proxy statement, each to serve for a term of one year and until the election of their successors (Proposal 1);

Adoption of an advisory(non-binding) resolution to approve the 2017 compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 2);

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018 (Proposal 3); and

Any other business that may come before our Annual Meeting in compliance with the advance notice and other applicable provisions of our bylaws (described in theShareholder Proposals discussion in this Proxy Statement).

 

 Voting 

 2021 Proxy Statement    1  

Who is entitled to vote at our meeting?

Our Board has set March 7, 2018, as the record date for our Annual Meeting. Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at our Annual Meeting and any adjournment of our Annual Meeting. F.N.B. shareholders who plan to attend our Annual Meeting may obtain driving directions to the

meeting location by contacting our shareholder services representative at (888)981-6000 and asking to be connected to extension 4254.

What are the Board’s voting recommendations?

The Board recommends that you vote your shares:

“For” the election of each of the thirteen (13) nominees for election as directors named in this

2018 Proxy Statement    1  


 

  About Our Annual Meeting

proxy statement for a term of one year and until the election of their successors (Proposal 1);

“For” adoption of the advisory(non-binding) resolution to approve the 2017 compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 2); and

“For” ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018 (Proposal 3).

What is a quorum?

On March 7, 2018, our record date, we had 323,627,694 shares of common stock outstanding. Under Pennsylvania law, we must have a quorum before we can consider proposals at our Annual Meeting. A quorum is the number of shares that must be present at the meeting. In determining if a quorum exists, we count the number of shares represented by shareholders in person as well as the number of shares represented by proxies. If you return a signed and dated proxy card, vote by Internet, vote by our QR Code feature, vote by telephone or vote in person at our Annual Meeting, you will be considered present for purposes of establishing a quorum.

To have a quorum, we need the presence of shareholders or their proxies who are entitled to castat least a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast. If you return a proxy, whether you vote for or against a proposal, abstain from voting or only sign and date your proxy card, your holdings will be counted toward the quorum.

Although a quorum may be achieved, not all proposals will be subject to the same voting or approval requirement. Shareholders who hold their shares in an account at a bank or brokerage firm (street name) may need to take additional precautions to ensure that their vote counts. We discuss the vote required to approve each proposal under the question immediately below.

What vote is required to approve each matter?

In general, if you abstain from voting, it will not count as a vote “cast.” However, please see the summaries below for more specific information about how abstentions will be counted with respect to each proposal. With respect to Proposals 1, 2 and 3, if you desire to abstain, you must check the “Abstain” box on your proxy card, or select the appropriate option when voting by the Internet, by QR Code, or by telephone.

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our bylaws provide that in the circumstance of an uncontested director election, which is the case for this year’s director election, our directors are elected by a

majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at our Annual Meeting. Our Articles of Incorporation do not authorize cumulative voting for the election of directors. To receive a majority of votes cast means that the shares voted for a director’s election exceed the number of votes cast against that director’s election. Moreover, our bylaws provide that any incumbent director who does not receive a majority of votes cast will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board. Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board shall determine whether to accept the resignation. The director election is considered anon-routine item and, as such, there may be brokernon-votes. Any brokernon-votes or abstentions will not be included in the total votes cast and will not affect the director election results. If there is a contested election (which is not the case in 2018), directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast at the meeting.

PROPOSAL 2. “SAY ON PAY” ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

A majority of the votes cast will be required to approve the advisory vote on executive compensation. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board or the Corporation. This matter is considered anon-routine matter and, as a result, there may be brokernon-votes. Any brokernon-votes or abstentions will not be included in the total votes cast and will not affect the results.

PROPOSAL 3. RATIFICATION OF AUDITOR

A majority of the votes cast will be required to approve the ratification of our Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018. This matter is considered a routine item, and brokers have the discretion to vote uninstructed shares on behalf of clients. As a routine item, there will be no brokernon-votes, although brokers may fail to submit a vote. Any failure by brokers to vote or any abstentions will not be included in the total votes cast and will not affect the results.

What are the voting rights of our shareholders?

The only class of our securities that is outstanding and entitled to vote at our Annual Meeting is our common stock. As of the March 7, 2018, record date, we had 322,774,059 shares of our common stock each entitled to one vote per share with respect to each matter to be voted on at our Annual Meeting.

How do I vote?

You can vote either in person at our Annual Meeting or by proxy whether or not you attend our Annual Meeting.

  2    F.N.B. Corporation


About Our Annual Meeting  

When you or your authorizedattorney-in-fact grants us your proxy, you authorize us to vote your shares of our common stock in the manner you specify on your proxy card. Giving a proxy allows your shares to be voted at our Annual Meeting even if you do not attend the Annual Meeting in person. If your shares are held in street name, you will receive a separate card from your bank or brokerage firm with instructions about the manner in which you may vote your shares.

If you hold your shares directly, to vote by proxy you must do one of the following:

Vote by mail. Complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided (the envelope requires no postage if mailed in the United States) or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

Vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you are a registered shareholder and attend our Annual Meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person or request a voting ballot to vote in person at the meeting. Even if you returned a proxy to us before our Annual Meeting, you may revoke it and vote in person.

Vote by Internet* atwww.proxyvote.com. Instructions are provided on your proxy card. If you vote by Internet, you should not return your proxy card.

Vote by QR Code* by scanning the QR Code on your proxy card with your mobile device. If you vote by QR Code, you should not return your proxy card.

Vote by telephone* at1-800-690-6903. Instructions are provided on your proxy card. If you vote by telephone, you should not return your proxy card.

*Proxies voted by Internet, by telephone or by QR Code must be received by 11:59 PM, EDT on May 15, 2018, in order to be counted in the vote.

If you hold your F.N.B. shares in an account at a bank or brokerage firm, and you want to vote in person at our Annual Meeting, you will need to obtain a signed proxy card from the brokerage firm or the bank that holds your F.N.B. stock. If your F.N.B. stock is registered in the name of a bank or brokerage firm, you also may be eligible to vote your shares electronically by Internet, by the QR Code on your proxy card, or by telephone. Many banks and brokerage firms participate in programs such as the Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. online program. These programs provide eligible shareholders who receive a paper copy of this proxy statement the opportunity to vote by the Internet, by QR Code or by telephone. If your bank or brokerage firm is participating in one of these programs, your proxy card will contain instructions for voting by Internet, by QR

Code or by telephone. If your proxy card does not reference Internet, QR Code or telephone information, please complete and return the proxy card in the enclosed self-addressed, postage-paid envelope.

How will my shares be voted if I give my proxy but do not specify how my shares should be voted?

If you sign, date and return your proxy card, but do not provide voting instructions, or if you do not provide voting instructions when voting over the Internet, we will vote your shares represented by that proxy as recommended by our Board of Directors (seeWhat are the Board’s voting recommendations?), and this vote will count as a vote cast.

Who can attend our Annual Meeting?

All shareholders as of the close of business on March 7, 2018 (the record date), or their duly appointed proxies, may attend our Annual Meeting. Even if you currently plan to attend our Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote by any of the applicable methods described above so that your vote will be counted at our Annual Meeting if you later decide not to attend.

If your shares are held in street name by your bank or brokerage firm, you will need to bring a valid form of identification along with a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting your ownership of F.N.B. stock as of the March 7, 2018, record date, and check in at the registration desk at our Annual Meeting.

What are the requirements for admittance to the Annual Meeting?

Only shareholders as of the record date have a right to attend the Annual Meeting. In order to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you will need to present a government-issued photo identification (such as a driver’s license or passport) and, if you hold your shares in an account at a bank or brokerage firm, recent evidence of ownership of our common stock as of the record date (such as a brokerage account statement, a letter of proxy from your broker, or other intermediary). Entrance after the Annual Meeting has commenced will be prohibited. If you are representing an entity that is a shareholder, you must also present documentation showing your authority to attend and act on behalf of the entity (such as a power of attorney, written proxy to vote or letter of authorization on the entity’s letterhead). We reserve the right to limit the number of representatives for any entity that may be admitted to the meeting. No cameras, recording equipment, large bags or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting. The use of cell phones, smart phones, tablets and other personal communication devices during the Annual Meeting is also prohibited.

2018 Proxy Statement    3  


  About Our Annual Meeting

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before it is voted at our Annual Meeting. You may change your vote by delivering a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Suite 503, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, by signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date, by voting by the Internet, by scanning the QR Code on your proxy card with your mobile device at a later date, by telephone, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Only your latest instruction will be counted. However, your attendance at our Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at our Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering a written notice of revocation prior to our Annual Meeting to our Corporate Secretary at F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Suite 503, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212.

How do I vote if my shares are held in street name?

If you hold your shares in street name in an account at a bank or brokerage firm, we generally cannot mail our proxy materials directly to you. Instead, your bank or brokerage firm will forward our proxy materials to you and tell you how to give them instructions for voting your F.N.B. shares.

Please ensure that you instruct your bank or brokerage firm how to vote your shares. Under New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules applicable to brokers, your broker has discretionary authority to vote your shares without receiving your instructions on “routine” matters. The only routine matter before our Annual Meeting will be the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2018. All the other proposals that will be considered at our Annual Meeting are“non-routine” matters. Your bank or brokerage firm does not have discretionary authority to vote on anon-routine matter unless you provide them with your voting instructions. Therefore, please ensure that you instruct your bank or brokerage firm how to vote your shares with respect to election of our directors, the advisorynon-binding resolution to approve the 2017 compensation of our named executive officers, and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.

How do I vote my 401(k) Plan shares?

If you participate in the F.N.B. Corporation Progress Savings 401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan), you may vote the number of shares of common stock credited to your

account as of the record date. You may vote by instructing T. Rowe Price, the trustee of our 401(k) Plan, pursuant to the voting instruction card being mailed with this proxy statement to plan participants. The trustee will vote your shares in accordance with your duly executed voting instruction card, provided that the trustee receives it by 3:00 AM, EDT, on Friday, May 11, 2018.

In the case of the 401(k) Plan, if you do not return your voting instruction card, the shares credited to your plan account will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion that it votes the shares for which it timely received voting instruction cards.

You may also revoke a previously given proxy card until 3:00 AM, EDT, on Friday, May 11, 2018, by filing with the trustee either a written notice of revocation or a properly completed and signed voting instruction card or Internet vote or telephone vote having a later date.

How will we conduct the business of our Annual Meeting?

Our bylaws govern the organization and conduct of business at our shareholder meetings. Our bylaws specify that our Board Chairman shall preside at our shareholder meetings. Our Board Chairman, Vincent J. Delie, Jr., will serve as Chairman of our Annual Meeting and call the meeting to order. As Chairman of our Annual Meeting, Board Chairman Delie will determine, at his discretion, the order of the business to be conducted at our Annual Meeting and the procedure for our Annual Meeting. Board Chairman Delie will announce the opening and closing of the polls for each matter on which our shareholders will vote at our Annual Meeting.

Who can answer my questions?

Should you have questions concerning these proxy materials or our Annual Meeting or should you wish to request additional copies of this proxy statement or proxy card, you may contact Mr. James G. Orie, our Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary, at (888)981-6000 and ask to be connected to extension 3435.

How can I avoid receiving more than one set of proxy materials in future years?

If two or more registered shareholders live in your household or if a registered shareholder maintains two or more shareholder accounts, you may have received more than one set of our proxy materials. At your request, we will “household” your proxy materials, i.e., only one annual report and one proxy statement will be delivered to your address; however, a separate proxy card will be delivered for each account. On the proxy

  4    F.N.B. Corporation


About Our Annual Meeting  

card, there will be a householding election where you will indicate if you consent to receive your proxy materials in a single package per household. Please refer to the section titled,“Householding” of Proxy Materials at the end of this proxy statement.

Is my vote confidential?

We process proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders in a manner that protects your voting privacy. We will not disclose your vote either within the Company or to third parties, except:

As necessary to meet applicable legal requirements;

To allow for the tabulation and certification of votes; and

To facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

Occasionally, shareholders provide written comments on their proxy cards. At our discretion, we may forward your comments to our management or the Board.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

We will announce the preliminary voting results at our Annual Meeting. The judges of election will tally the final voting results and we will include the final voting results in a Form8-K, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) by May 22, 2018.

Who is paying for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

The Company is paying the costs of the solicitation of proxies. The Company has retained Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC to assist in obtaining proxies by mail, facsimile or email from registered holders, brokerage firms, bank nominees and other institutions for the Annual Meeting. The estimated cost of such service is $12,250 includingout-of-pocket expenses. Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC may be contacted at888-742-1305.

The Company will also reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares held in street name for their reasonable costs associated with:

Forwarding the Notice of our Annual Meeting to beneficial owners;

Forwarding printed proxy materials by mail to beneficial owners who specifically request them; and

Obtaining beneficial owners’ voting instructions.

In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, certain of our directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies on our behalf personally or by telephone, facsimile or email.

2018 Proxy Statement    5  


  Proposal 1. Election of DirectorsSummary

 

 

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORSSUMMARY

 

  

 

 General Information Regarding Director Nominees 2020 COVID-19

Pandemic Response 

  

 

Critical Risk Management Imperatives — Focus on Employees, Customers, Communities and Shareholders, Operational Response and Preparedness, Risk Management, and Preservation of Shareholder Value

 

Our Board determinesThe once in a century global pandemic presented the number of directors to nominate for election each year. The F.N.B. bylaws provide thatfinancial services industry with unprecedented broad-scale, complex and continually evolving risk management and business continuity challenges. These challenges tested and ultimately demonstrated our Board shall consist of not fewer than five nor more than 25 persons,Chairman and CEO’s critical leadership and crisis management skills, as well as the exact number to be determined from time to time by the Board.

Acting on the recommendationefficacy of the NominatingBoard’s governance and Corporate Governance Committee,oversight processes, the tireless dedication of executive management and the resiliency of our risk management processes. From the outset and throughout the various critical phases of the pandemic crisis, our Board fixedChairman and CEO spearheaded the numberdevelopment and implementation of directors asF.N.B.’s COVID-19 response by establishing four foundational pillars:

i.

Employee Protection and Assistance. To mitigate employee health risks and avoid business continuity issues, our CEO led efforts to develop and implement a comprehensive COVID-19 operating plan to provide full support for the health, safety and financial needs of our employees.

ii.

Operational Response and Preparedness. Rapid deployment of comprehensive continuity protocols, continuous monitoring of evolving COVID-19 circumstances and establishment of a critical response team comprised of senior leadership and key business and support areas.

iii.

Customer and Community Support. To protect and support our customers, we deployed rigorous health and safety precautions and provided appropriate relief through our substantial participation in the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and through fee waivers, loan deferrals, a residential mortgage foreclosure moratorium and other accommodations. Our efforts also included the provision of critical financial donations to support COVID-19 related communityhealth, safety and relief efforts.

iv.

Risk Management Protocols and Shareholder Value Preservation. We remained focused on our rigorous risk management practices and our commitment to our shareholders interests by continuing to pursue our strategic long-term plan objectives, including expense reduction initiatives, operational efficiency tactics, protection of strong capital and liquidity positions, prudent credit management practices and multidimensional enhancements to our profitability strategies.

The following are highlights of the Annual Meeting date at thirteen (13).actions we took as part of our four foundational COVID-19 response pillars which enabled F.N.B. to successfully navigate these unparalleled and difficult challenges and address the interests and needs of our important stakeholders:

1. Employee Protection and Assistance

Our CEO promptly implemented a comprehensive COVID-19 operating plan which prioritized employee health, safety and financial well-being, among other actions, and included the following:

a.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) compliant health, safety and sanitization protocols;

b.

An aggregate $7 million in special added support for our workforce for the purpose of protecting employees and maintaining our continued operations, including:

i.

Increasing wages by $2.25 per hour for frontline employees during the initial critical phase of the pandemic to cover their additional expenses related to COVID-19.

ii.

Providing five additional paid flex days to accommodate COVID-19 related illnesses impacting our employees and their family members.

 

  2    F.N.B. Corporation


Summary  

iii.

Furnishing financial relief and support payments to employees who facilitated customer access to critical financial services.

iv.

Offering no-cost employee access to telehealth medical services.

v.

Collaborating with state and local health agencies to offer COVID-19 testing on F.N.B. premises.

c.

Centralized prompt dissemination on the Company intranet of all important COVID-19 updates and alerts and informed employees of the following:

i.

Mandatory health, safety and sanitization protocols

ii.

Updates on COVID-19 case trends in our various geographic markets, as well as alerts regarding federal, state and local COVID-19 protocols

iii.

Location of COVID-19 testing sites

iv.

Process for scheduling COVID-19 vaccinations

v.

Updates regarding F.N.B.’s COVID-19 response, operating and safety plans

vi.

A forum for employees to ask questions and receive responses on COVID-19 related issues

d.

Distributed 24 messages to our Board and issued more than 133 articles in the COVID-19 Information Center on The Vault, our corporate intranet. In addition, during the critical phases of the pandemic, our CEO provided daily updates to our Board to keep them apprised of our strategies and risk management considerations regarding the pandemic.

e.

Instituted flexible work arrangements, including alternating A/B work schedules, remote work arrangements (more than 2,000 employees, or over 90 percent of our non-branch workforce, worked remotely or from home) and multiple operational centers to facilitate business and operational continuity.

2. Operational Response and Preparedness

a.

Advanced Preparedness. Prior to 2020, F.N.B. had in place a fully developed pandemic plan which it had successfully tested through a comprehensive pandemic exercise scenario in 2019 and which served

as an instrumental playbook as the Company managed through the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.

b.

Immediate and Continual Flow of Information Among Key Leadership. As soon as the COVID-19 crisis began to emerge, F.N.B.’s CEO, in collaboration with the F.N.B. Emergency Management Team, engaged the crisis management team comprised of key leadership members across our market footprint who met daily for the purpose of identifying critical issues, conducting a risk triage and prioritization process, monitoring and assessing the pandemic in our various markets and determining strategies and tactics to both promptly and prudently resolve the complex and evolving challenges presented by the pandemic. During critical phases of the pandemic crisis, our Board Chairman and CEO provided daily email communications to our Board regarding COVID-19 risk management issues and our Board conducted three special meetings dedicated exclusively to COVID-19 matters and financial planning and business continuity considerations.

c.

Regular Outreach to Regulatory and Industry Sources to Proactively Identify Emerging Pandemic Risks. F.N.B. senior leadership engaged in regular weekly meetings with the Federal Reserve Board, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to assess our COVID-19 responses relative to other large banks, to identify emerging industry issues and to stay ahead of regulatory expectations.

d.

Comprehensive Effective Procurement Process. We promptly developed and implemented a comprehensive COVID-19 operating plan which included a logistically based supply sourcing process and a coordinated supply chain and procurement process. This approach enabled us to quickly acquire, from multiple sources, the appropriate health and safety supplies (e.g., personal protective equipment (PPE), sanitization supplies, etc.), as well as the necessary tools and equipment to enable our Company to effectively and safely operate during the pandemic crisis.

e.

Comprehensive Credit Risk Management Process. From the outset of the public health crisis, our credit team conducted a thorough

2021 Proxy Statement    3  


  Summary

and continuous due diligence evaluation of commercial credits related to the industries and businesses most economically impacted by COVID-19 (e.g., travel and leisure, restaurants, senior living, retail trade, retail IRE, arts and entertainment, etc.) and strategically reduced exposure to these COVID-19 sensitive industries to enhance the overall position of the F.N.B. loan portfolio and mitigate risk attendant to the economic uncertainty related to these types of loan exposures. Also, throughout the pandemic, we deployed enhanced credit portfolio analytics to continuously track and assess critical credit quality metrics, loan payment deferral levels and key risk identifiers related to geography, loan product type, collateral, industry and supply chain dependencies. Furthermore, we evaluated the adequacy of our loan loss reserve levels under several stressed scenarios, including the Federal Reserve Board’s most rigorous Dodd-Frank Act Stress Tests (DFAST) “severely adverse scenario”, and other uniquely stressed economic scenarios specific to the COVID-19 environment.

3. Customer and Community Support

Uninterrupted Access to Banking Services Throughout COVID-19 Crisis. We developed a systematic and sophisticated statistical analysis to evaluate the COVID-19 impacts and trends for each of our markets, while also continuously monitoring the CDC, state and local restrictions to determine branch and office openings and closings. Our investment in technology enabled customers to seamlessly schedule in-branch appointments, using a new feature on our website (nearly 10,000 appointments scheduled online during 2020). In addition, we saw a significant increase in digital traffic, with approximately 6.1 million combined monthly online and mobile banking logins and a nearly 21 percent increase in the number of mobile banking users in 2020 compared to the full-year average for 2019.

COVID-19 Relief Programs. F.N.B. was one of the first U.S. banks to announce its COVID-19 customer relief program which included payment deferrals on loans totaling more than $2.5 billion, fee waivers and a residential mortgage foreclosure moratorium. These measures enabled our business customers to sustain their operations and allowed our consumer customers to weather the impact of the pandemic crisis and ultimately regain their financial footing.

Funded $2.5 million to the F.N. B. Foundation. We funded the F.N.B. Foundation for the purpose of providing critical financial assistance to local communities for COVID-19 health and safety relief efforts, including supporting the critical needs of local food banks, local businesses and healthcare organizations. Our financial contributions were also augmented by the volunteerism of our dedicated employees.

Participation in the SBA PPP Loan Program. We deployed an extensive cross-section of our business and support functions (e.g., Executive Management, Legal, Compliance, Audit, Credit Underwriting, Risk Management, Finance, Information Technology, SBA and Commercial Lenders, Operations and Project Management) to quickly develop and implement an easily accessible online portal for our PPP applicants which streamlined and simplified the customer loan application process. We made over 20,000 PPP loans aggregating approximately $2.6 billion for small businesses throughout our market footprint which resulted in $1.3 billion in additional demand deposits. Notably, following our targeted outreach to more than 100 nonprofit and community organizations, nearly 24% of our PPP loans were made to businesses in predominantly minority rural and low- to moderate-income areas.

4. Risk Management Protocols and Shareholder Value Preservation

We took significant steps to enhance future risk-adjusted returns through prudent balance sheet actions, notably the sale of a portion of our indirect automobile loan portfolio in November 2020, reduction of exposure to COVID-19 sensitive industries and prepayment of higher-cost liabilities. Despite the 2020 pandemic environment, the additional actions highlighted below reduced overall credit risk while enhancing overall profitability, bolstering capital levels and providing us with more liquidity moving forward:

a.

Strengthened F.N.B.s Funding Position. By continuing to grow non-interest-bearing deposits, F.N.B. surpassed a record of $9 billion in non-interest-bearing deposit balances as of December 31, 2020, driving total deposits to increase $4.3 billion and non-interest bearing deposits by $2.7 billion on a spot basis since year end 2019, thereby enabling F.N.B. to repay $715 million in higher cost Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings at a weighted average effective cost of 2.49 percent.

  4    F.N.B. Corporation


Summary  

b.

Operational Efficiency, Improved Liquidity and Expense Reductions. Contributions from low-cost customer deposits increased meaningfully, supported by growth in transaction deposits, reductions in the cost of interest-bearing deposits, strong growth in non-interest-bearing deposits and the termination of higher-rate FHLB borrowings, largely offsetting the impacts of a lower interest rate environment on asset yields. These efforts resulted in enhanced liquidity with a loan/deposit ratio of 87 percent at December 31, 2020. We also continued our branch optimization plan which entails consolidation of 16 retail locations in 2020 and 21 retail locations in 2021 as part of a $20 million cost-savings initiative. The plan is aimed at keeping expenses consistent with 2020 operating levels. Evolving changes in consumer preferences contributed to an acceleration of our branch optimization efforts. F.N.B. continues to leverage our significant investment in technology.

c.

Optimizing Capital and Shareholder Value. In 2019, our Board of Directors approved a $150 million share repurchase program, demonstrating their confidence in F.N.B.’s business model, as well as our increased capital generation capabilities. In addition to our strong dividend, repurchasing stock underscores our commitment to further optimizing capital and enhancing shareholder value. Internal capital generation was solid in 2020, despite the pandemic, and our tangible common equity (TCE) ratio, excluding PPP loans*, increased to 7.7 percent. Our Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio ended 2020 at 9.8 percent, the highest level in our history. In addition to the $157 million in

common dividends returned to shareholders during 2020, we repurchased nearly 4 million shares and have $112 million remaining under our current $150 million authorized share repurchase program. Repurchase activity during the fourth quarter of 2020 included 25 percent of the repurchased shares being below tangible book value (TBV)* per share, resulting in these repurchases having shorter earn back periods and being accretive to TBV* per share.

d.

Maintained Prudent Credit Culture and Credit Management Processes. As of year-end 2020, the amount of loans remaining on COVID-19 deferral continued to improve to $397 million, or 1.7 percent of total loans and leases (excluding PPP loans), a significant reduction from the June 30, 2020, level of 10.2 percent during the height of the COVID-19 economic impact.

e.

Transparent COVID-19 Risk Disclosures. Our CEO and executive management communicated transparent disclosures regarding F.N.B.’s COVID-19 related risk management considerations and response plan to our investors through our SEC filings, earnings calls, meetings with analysts, shareholder engagement meetings and media communications.

For more detailed information regarding our investments, donations and commitments related to COVID-19 health, safety, and customer relief, as well as our ongoing commitment to addressing social and economic inequity, please refer to our 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report under Resources.

*

Non-GAAP measures are used by management to measure performance in operating the business that management believes enhances investors’ ability to better understand the underlying business performance and trends related to core business activities. In this Proxy Statement, the following are references to non-GAAP measures: Operating Net Income Available to Common Shareholders; Operating Earnings per Diluted Common Share (EPS); Tangible Book Value (TBV) per Common Share; Operating Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (ROATCE); reported ROATCE; Efficiency Ratio; Tangible Common Equity (TCE) to Tangible Assets; Internal Capital Generation (ICG) Growth; Pre Provision Net Revenue (PPNR) / Average TCE; Operating Return on Average Tangible Assets (ROATA) and reported ROATA. Please refer to Annex A(Non-GAAP to GAAP Reconciliations) to this Proxy Statement, where we include information to reconcile the non-GAAP measures to GAAP. The * is a non-GAAP designation used throughout this Proxy Statement to identify non-GAAP measures.

2021 Proxy Statement    5  


  Summary

Highlights of Superior Governance 

Practices

Our governance practices promote Board effectiveness and the interests of shareholders. These practices adhere to widely recognized public company best practices and are described in additional detail under the Corporate Governance Principles section of this Proxy Statement. The corporate governance policies, guidelines and other documents referenced in this section may be reviewed by clicking on the links contained in the section of this Proxy Statement titled, Key Corporate Governance Documents.

LOGO

LOGO                     LOGO

  6    F.N.B. Corporation


Summary  

 

  

 

 DirectorsSummary of Board Risk Management Oversight 

Framework  

  

 

TheOur corporate governance practices are designed, in part, to ensure the Board acting on the recommendationmaintains appropriate and prudent oversight consistent with its fiduciary responsibilities, of the NominatingCompany’s risk management, operations, business, legal and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated for election as directorsregulatory obligations, strategic plan, employee welfare and financial performance. In addition to the nominees identified ingovernance practices highlighted above, our Board’s core oversight responsibilities include the table titledCurrent Directors and Nominees for Election at Our Annual Meeting. Each nominee is discussed in more detail in the section titledfollowing:

LOGO

2021 Proxy Statement    7  


Biographical Information Concerning Director Nominees of this proxy statement. If elected, the Company’s nominees will hold office for aone-year term until the next annual meeting of shareholders and the election and qualification of his or her successor. All of our nominees are currently directors.

  Summary

 

  

 

 Identification and Evaluation of Director NomineesExecutive Compensation Highlights 

  
 

Our Nominating and Corporate GovernanceWe are submitting an advisory resolution to approve the executive compensation of our Named Executive Officers (NEOs). In 2020, we received strong support of our Say-on-Pay proposal with 92% of our shareholders voting FOR Say-on-Pay proposal. The Compensation Committee identifies potential director nominees primarily through recommendations made by current or former Company Directors and contacts in business, civic, academic andnon-profit communities. Also,(Committee) maintained the following key features of our Company shareholders may propose persons to be nominated for electioncompensation program, which are important to our shareholders. The financial results in 2020, while being impacted by COVID-19, are a result of a multi-year business strategy that is supported by the Board, (see later discussions underShareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2019 Annual Meeting).

At least annually, in consultation with the Nominatingapproved by it as part of its annual review and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board assesses the skills, qualifications and experienceapproval of our Board and decides whether to recommend an incumbent director for reelection or nominating new director candidates for election to the Board. In evaluating incumbent directors or new director candidates (including any candidates who may be recommended by a shareholder), our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board consider each incumbent’s or new director candidate’s skills, background, experience and reputation,Operating Plan, as compared with the particular needs of the Board with respect to specific skill sets, background, experience and knowledge, and the other relevant criteria as moredemonstrated by:

fully described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Also, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board consider each incumbent director’s performance and contributions during the prior year (including the annual Board self-assessment results). Moreover, in evaluating the suitability of prospective Board candidates, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board take into account multiple criteria, including those described in our Company bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines (e.g., each director candidate’s general understanding of banking, finance, regulatory compliance and other disciplines relevant to the success of a publicly traded financial services company in today’s business and financial services regulatory environment; compatibility with our culture; understanding of our business; educational and professional background; personal accomplishment; adherence to the standards set forth in our Code of Conduct; and geographic, gender, age, racial, ethnic and other diversity considerations). Please see the section titledBiographical Information Concerning Director Nomineesfor more information on each of our director nominees.

 

 

  6    F.N.B. CorporationLOGO             LOGO

LOGO             LOGO

  8    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors  

 

 

PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

We are asking shareholders to elect the 2021 nominees named in this proxy statement and identified in the table belowto serve on the F.N.B. Board of Directors until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until each of their successors have been duly elected and qualified. In addition to all our outside directors being independent, our director-nominee candidates for election at our 2021 Annual Meeting are a highly-qualified group of individuals, who collectively possess diverse backgrounds and perspectives, skills and experience consistent with our Board Composition Criteria (described herein under the section titled, Criteria and Considerations for Recommending Director Nominees), and the requisite leadership qualities necessary to oversee F.N.B.’s management and business operations.

We do not know of any reason why any nominee named in this proxy statement would be unable to serve as a director if elected. If any nominee is unable to serve, the shares represented by all valid proxies will be voted for the election of such other person as may be nominated in accordance with our bylaws. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES

LOGO

2021 Proxy Statement    9  


  Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors

 

  

 

 Process Used to IdentifyCurrent Directors and Approve
Nominees for

 

Election at Our Most Recently Appointed DirectorsAnnual Meeting 

  
 

      
  Name  Age   

    Director   

    Since   

 Independent 

Other SEC-

Reporting
Public
Company
Boards
(1)

 Committee
Memberships
 Principal Background and
Relevant Experience
      

Pamela A. Bena

 56 2018 Yes 0 Audit; Compensation Finance Executive
      

William B. Campbell

(Independent Lead Director)

 82 1975 Yes 0 Executive; Nominating and Corporate Governance Former Business Owner
      

James D. Chiafullo

 63 2012 Yes 0 Credit Risk and CRA; Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair) Partner — Regional Law Firm
      

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

(Chairman, President and CEO)

 56 2012(2) No 0 Executive Credit Risk and CRA (Ex Officio); (Chair) F.N.B. CEO
      

Mary Jo Dively

 62 2018 Yes 0 Audit; Credit Risk and CRA; Risk General Counsel — Globally Top Tier Ranked University
      

Robert A. Hormell

 74 2015 Yes 0 Compensation; Nominating and Corporate Governance Regional Economic Development Professional
      

David J. Malone

 66 2005 Yes 0 Audit; Compensation (Chair) CEO — Investment and Insurance Advisory Firm
      

Frank C. Mencini

 56 2016 Yes 0 Audit (Chair); Executive; Nominating and Corporate Governance; Risk Healthcare Consulting, Accounting
      

David L. Motley

 62 2013 Yes 3 Compensation; Credit Risk and CRA; Risk Consultant — Strategic Planning and Executive Development
      

Heidi A. Nicholas

 66 2015 Yes 0 Audit; Executive; Risk (Chair) Commercial Developer — Housing
      

John S. Stanik

 67 2013 Yes 2* Credit Risk and CRA; Risk Former CEO/Director — Public Companies
      

William J. Strimbu

 60 1995 Yes 0 Compensation; Credit Risk and CRA (Chair); Executive; Nominating and Corporate Governance CEO — Transportation Company

(1)

Includes current or prior service on public company board(s).

(2)

Chairman Delie was elected to the FNBPA Board on June 16, 2009. Chairman Delie was elected to the F.N.B. Board on January 18, 2012.

 

 

Our Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly review our Board Succession Plan for the purpose of ensuring that the Board continually maintains a directorate who collectively possess an appropriate range of skills, backgrounds, and experience necessary for the Board to fulfill its oversight responsibilities for a public financial company operating in multi-state markets and subject to a comprehensive regulatory environment. Consistent with the Company’s Board succession process, Board leadership (consisting of the Chairman, CEO and Lead Director), along with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, spearheaded the process of identifying qualified director candidates who would be considered appropriate replacements for Directors Martz and McCarthy, who are retiring May 16, 2018, in accordance with the F.N.B. Board retirement policy. In accordance with our proactive board succession plan, the Board established a year-long transition between the Board Chair and committee chairs facilitating a smooth transition and strengthening of our oversight. In view of Director Martz’s strong audit background and Director McCarthy’s lengthy risk management experience, the search process focused on identifying director candidates possessing considerable audit, accounting, financial, cybersecurity, and risk management skills and experience. Board leadership identified prospective director candidates through referrals from other F.N.B. directors, consultation with knowledgeable industry

insiders and others with particular knowledge of persons who possess the specific experience and background consistent with F.N.B.’s identified qualifications criteria. Following a review of potential candidates and preliminary interviews, Board leadership identified Ms. Pamela A. Bena and Ms. Mary Jo Dively as the most suitable director candidates to address the Board’s needs relative to risk management, cybersecurity, financial expertise and accounting and audit experience. The Board leadership interviewed both Ms. Bena and Ms. Dively and recommended each of them for consideration by the F.N.B. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The F.N.B. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conductedin-person interviews with Ms. Bena and Ms. Dively, commissioned full background reviews of each candidate, and evaluated each candidate under the Board qualification and composition standards described above and more fully described in the F.N.B. Corporate Governance Guidelines. On December 19, 2017, the F.N.B. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee unanimously voted to recommend to the Board the election of Ms. Bena and Ms. Dively to the Board. On December 20, 2017, the F.N.B. and FNBPA Boards reviewed the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and unanimously voted to elect Ms. Bena and Ms. Dively to the F.N.B. and FNBPA Boards, effective January 1, 2018.

2018 Proxy Statement    7  

  10    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors

 

 

  

 

 Current Directors and Nominees for Election at Our  Annual Meeting Biographical Information Concerning Director-Nominees 

  

 

  Name Age  Director
Since
  Independent 

Committee

Memberships

 

Pamela A. Bena*

 

 

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

Audit; Risk

 

 

William B. Campbell*

(Lead Director)

 

 

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

 

 

 

1975

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

Executive; Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

 

James D. Chiafullo*

  60   2012  Yes 

 

Credit Risk and CRA; Nominating and Corporate Governance(Chair)

 

 

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.*

(Chairman, President and CEO)

 

  53   2012  No 

 

Credit Risk and CRA (Ex Officio); Executive (Chair);

 

 

Mary Jo Dively*

 

  59   2018  Yes 

Credit Risk and CRA;Risk

 

 

Stephen J. Gurgovits*

 

  74   1981  No 

Credit Risk and CRA; Executive

 

 

Robert A. Hormell*

 

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

Compensation; Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

 

David J. Malone*

 

 

 

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Audit; Compensation (Chair)

 

 

D. Stephen Martz(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Audit; Risk

 

 

Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Risk

 

 

Frank C. Mencini*

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

Audit (Chair); Nominating and Corporate Governance; Risk

 

 

David L. Motley*

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Audit; Compensation; Risk

 

 

Heidi A. Nicholas*

 

 

 

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Audit; Risk (Chair)

 

 

John S. Stanik*

 

 

 

 

 

 

64

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

 

 

 

Compensation

 

William J. Strimbu*

  57   1995  Yes Credit Risk and CRA (Chair); Nominating and Corporate Governance

*

Denotes director nominated by our Board for election at the May 16, 2018, F.N.B. Annual Meeting.

(1)

In accordance with the F.N.B. Board retirement policy, Directors Martz and McCarthy will each retire upon the expiration of his current director term at our 2018 Annual Meeting.

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE THIRTEEN (13) NOMINEES IDENTIFIED(*) IN THE ABOVE TABLE AS OUR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1 ON THE PROXY CARD).

 

Each of our director nominees has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected.

Proxies submitted to us, unless indicated to the contrary, will be voted “For” the election of Directors Bena, Campbell, Chiafullo, Delie, Dively, Gurgovits,

Hormell, Malone, Mencini, Motley, Nicholas, Stanik and Strimbu with terms expiring at our 2019 Annual Meeting and upon election and qualification of their respective successors.

  8    F.N.B. Corporation


Proposal 1. Election of Directors  

 Biographical Information Concerning Director Nominees 

Relevant biographical information concerning each of our director nomineesdirector-nominees for election at our Annual Meeting may be found below, including a brief discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to our Board’s conclusion regarding each director nominee’sdirector-nominee’s qualifications to serve on our Board in light of our business and structure. As a result In considering whether to re-nominate each

of a corporate governancethe director-nominees, the Board, with the assistance of the Nominating and risk management initiative undertakenCorporate Governance Committee and in 2015, which includedcollaboration with our Independent Lead Director and Board Chairman, reviewed the creationqualifications of a combined board structure, or interlocking directorate,each director-nominee and engaged in the process described later in this Proxy Statement in the section titled, Criteria and Considerations for the Company and FNBPA, each of our director nominees also serves on the board of directors of our principal bank subsidiary, FNBPA.Recommending Director-Nominees.

 

PAMELA A. BENA

 

LOGOLOGO

Committees:

  Audit Committee

  Risk Committee  Compensation

  

Director Since: 2018 2018

 

Age: 56 53

 

  

Pamela A. Bena joined the Board and began her service on the Audit Committee and Risk Committee in January 2018. Ms. Bena possesses an extensive and varied audit, accounting (including a CPA license) and finance background. Ms. Bena has been the

Professional Experience

Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium

•  Director of Finance (2020-present)

Heeter Printing, printing company

  Vice President of Finance at Heeter Printing (Heeter) (printing(2017-2019)

TMS International Corporation, industrial services company based in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania) since April 2017, and previously served in senior financial and accounting leadership positions with industrial and construction services companies, including as

  Manager of Financial Reporting at TMS International Corporation (industrial services(2015-2017)

EHS Support LLC, environmental, health and safety company formerly named Tube City IMS) from October 2015 until April 2017; as

  Chief Financial Officer at EHS Support LLC (environmental, health and safety) from March 2015 through October 2015; and as the(2015)

American Bridge Company, privately-held construction company

  Senior Vice President of Finance with the large privately held construction company, American

Bridge Company, from October 1994 through December 2013. Ms. Bena also was an auditor with Deloitte & Touche, LLP and an accounting officer with PNC Bank Corp.(1994-2013)

 

In additionCharitable Work and Community Involvement

Women for Economic Leadership Development (WELD), develops and advances women’s leadership to her high-level responsibilities with critical corporate functions, including financial reporting, treasury management, regulatory compliance, accounting and audit, Ms. Bena has also played a key role instrengthen the risk management responsibilitieseconomic prosperity of these companies. Moreover, the companies in which Ms. Bena has served in a senior-level capacity are engaged in a broad array of industries including printing, industrial, environmental, health and safety, commercial construction, banking, and accounting/auditing. Ms. Bena possesses a Masters of Business Administration degree (summa cum laudecommunities it serves.) from Duquesne University.

•  Member

•  Programming Subcommittee Member

Director Qualifications and Skills

Ms. Bena’s substantial and varied background, experience, and skills relative to audit, finance, accounting, regulatory compliance and risk management, including preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, preparation of periodic SEC disclosure filings and the attendant quarterly review process, make her an ideal addition to the Board and its Audit and RiskCompensation Committees. Her broad-based experience and thorough understanding of audit/accounting principles risk management decision-making,and regulatory compliance considerations and preparation of accurate financial statements provides Ms. Bena the necessary tools to effectively contribute to the Board and the Audit and RiskCompensation Committees.

2018 Proxy Statement    9  


  Proposal 1. Election of Directors

 

WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL

 

LOGOLOGO

Independent

Lead Director

Director

 

Committees:

  Executive

  Nominating and Corporate Governance

  

Director Since: 1975 (Founding Director) 1975

 

Age: 82 79

  

William B. Campbell is our independent Lead Director. Mr. Campbell has devoted more than 45 years of service to our Board during which time the Corporation has grown in asset size from $128 million to over $31 billion today. Mr. Campbell served as Chairman of our Board from 2009 until January 2012

Professional Experience

Retired CEO

Shenango Steel Erectors, Inc., commercial building construction company

•  Owner

Charitable Work and has been a director of F.N.B. since it commenced operations in 1975. Mr. Campbell was Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from 1999 until December 2017, and continues to serve on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Executive Committee. Mr. Campbell chaired the F.N.B. Succession Committee during the Company’s CEO succession planning in 2006 and 2007. Mr. Campbell was a director of FNBPA from 1973 until 2012, and was formerly Chair of FNBPA’s Building Committee and a member of FNBPA’s Executive and Loan Committees. Mr. Campbell served on the boards of Southwest Banks, Inc. (Southwest), a bank holding company in Naples, Florida, and its subsidiary, First National Bank of Naples, from 1997 to 2003, and served on Southwest’s Executive Committee. Most recently, in 2017, Mr. Campbell was formally recognized by the Community Involvement

National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD)

•  F.N.B. Corporation Member/Sponsor

  Three Rivers Chapter

(NACD) for his “Leadership in Public Company Governance.” This recognition by the NACD is particularly significant since it is intended to identify “independent directors of corporate boards who made courageous and/or valuable contributions to boards on which they serve.” Mr. Campbell’s successful professional career included his ownership of Shenango Steel Erectors, Inc., a commercial building construction company, and as a partner in Campbell-Kirila Realty, which developed and leased commercial property. After more than 30 years of developing high-level executive experience in the manufacturing, steel, commercial development and construction industries, including many Fortune 500 company clients, Mr. Campbell retired in 1992. During his career, Mr. Campbell also served in leadership capacities with a number of regional and national trade associations representing the steel, construction and manufacturing industries. Mr. Campbell served 14 years as director Director of the Year - 2017

Shenango Valley Industrial Development Authority in Sharon, Pennsylvania, and served on the Board of Trustees of

•  Former Director

Westminster College located in New Wilmington, Pennsylvania.

•  Former Trustee

Director Qualifications and Skills

As a founding director of the F.N.B. Corporation Board, Mr. Campbell’s background includingincludes his understanding of,historical knowledge and unique perspective on the various challenges that the financial services industry has confronted during his Board tenure,tenure. This provides him with the requisite decision-making experience,background and knowledge of bestregarding corporate practices andgovernance. His thorough understanding of Board responsibilities, to help him, as our independent Lead Director, assist the Boardalong with his ability to act as an effective liaison to promote a cohesive and effective deliberative body.board, qualify him as an excellent choice to serve as our Independent Lead Director. Mr. Campbell’s work experience in the steel, construction and manufacturing industries, his extensive experience in commercial real estate development,adherence to sound corporate governance principles, high ethical standards and his lengthy experience on ourstrong commitment to the maintenance of a clear independence of the Board from management, qualify him to serve as a member of our Board, its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Executive Committee.Committee and to serve as our Independent Lead Director. As Independent Lead Director, Mr. Campbell attends each of the Board Committee meetings.

 

 

  10    F.N.B. Corporation

2021 Proxy Statement    11  


 

Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors

 

 

JAMES D. CHIAFULLO

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Credit Risk and
CRA

  Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

  

Director Since: 2012 2012

 

Age: 63 60

  

James D. Chiafullo joined our Board in October 2012 and became the Chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, effective December 2017. He is also a member of the FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA (Community Reinvestment Act) Committee. Mr. Chiafullo is a shareholder/director with the

Professional Experience

Dentons, Cohen & Grigsby, P.C., law firm in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Mr. Chiafullo is a member of the firm’s Business Group and chairs its Commercial Finance Group. Earlier in his tenure with Cohen & Grigsby, Mr. Chiafullo served for three years as the firm’s Vice President-Technology during which time he was principally responsible for the development and implementation of the firm’s technology services, business continuity plans and cybersecurity protective measures. In this role, Mr. Chiafullo had oversight of the development and implementation of fully redundant servers in a hardened site outside of the firm’s principal office location. Mr. Chiafullo led a team of 12 IT specialists who regularly conducted specialized testing and retesting for vulnerability from outside incursions. In addition to leading his firm’s technology and cybersecurity efforts, Mr. Chiafullo worked with law enforcement agencies and security specialists in connection with his firm’s representation of major U.S. retailers who have experienced significant data breaches, and regularly advises corporate clients on matters related to data privacy and cybersecurity threats. Prior to joining the Cohen & Grigsby law firm, Mr. Chiafullo was a partner for over ten years with the Thorp Reed & Armstrong, LLP law firm in Pittsburgh (now known as Clark Hill PLC), and was in-house counsel with Gulf Oil Corporation in Houston, Texas. The focus of Mr. Chiafullo’s law practice is finance, corporate governance, general corporate,

securities, commercial and real estate law, shareholder disputes, lender liability, mergers and acquisitions, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, and regulatory requirements that apply to publicly traded companies. Mr. Chiafullo’s clients operate in a variety of industries, including financial institutions, general contractors, real estate developers, physicians, manufacturers, specialty contractors, television stations, geotechnical engineers, franchisors and franchisees.•  Partner (1999-present)

 

Since 2004, Mr. Chiafullo has received recognition numerous times fromThe Best Lawyers in America publication for his accomplishments in corporate lawCharitable Work and mergers and acquisitions. Moreover, in 2013, Mr. Chiafullo was selected as a “leader in law” practitioner in the area of commercial finance by the prestigiousChambers USA which uses a rigorously independent methodology to identify the best lawyers in the United States by practice area. Mr. Chiafullo frequently lectures and publishes articles on various current issues concerning corporate, finance and franchise law.Community Involvement

Mr. Chiafullo is a member of the Board of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Three Rivers Chapter and served as its Chair from 2008 to June 2015. He has served on the Board of Directors of the Epilepsy Foundation of Western/Central Pennsylvania since 1998 and is the chair of its governance and nominating committee. Mr. Chiafullo is active with PA

•  Board Member Emeritus (active)

The Pittsburgh Foundation as

  Director, of the Chiafullo Family Fund with the

Verland Foundation as counsel, and through committee service work and fundraising activities, as well as in service leadership roles with various other social and

•  Counsel

NACD — Three Rivers Chapter

non-profit•  Chairman Emeritus (active) organizations related to his profession and his community.

Director Qualifications and Skills

The breadth and depth of Mr. Chiafullo’s corporate and transactional legal experience, along with his particular focus in the areas of corporate governance, fiduciary duties and responsibilities, regulatory compliance and finance, provide him the necessary background to assist the F.N.B. Board with the myriadits oversight responsibilities of challenges faced by publicly tradedF.N.B.’s strategies, financial services companies in today’s economicperformance, business operations and regulatory environment. With his extensiveBoard succession process. Moreover, Mr. Chiafullo’s hands-on experience working with sophisticated technology systems, and his legal work involving a major U.S. retailer in connection with cybersecurity threats and breaches Mr. Chiafulloamply illustrate that he possesses the requisite background to offer the Board insight into these critical issues facingchallenges. Mr. Chiafullo is currently in the industry.process of obtaining a Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight, issued by the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Division of the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. Mr. Chiafullo anticipates that he will receive the certification in 2021. Mr. Chiafullo’s extensive corporate governance, credit, transactional and legal expertise provides the Board, and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Credit Risk and CRA Committee with the essential experience and backgrounda director who is uniquely qualified to help itthe Board to properly evaluate the governance, cyber security, business, credit, financial, regulatory and risk issues that the Corporation confronts on a regular basis.issues.

2018 Proxy Statement    11  


  Proposal 1. Election of Directors

 

VINCENT J. DELIE, JR.

 

LOGOLOGO

Chairman

 

Committees:

  Credit Risk and CRA (Ex Officio)

  Executive (Chair)

  

Director Since: 2012 2012

 

Age: 56 53

 

  

Vincent J. Delie, Jr. is our

Professional Experience

F.N.B. Corporation, financial services corporation

•  CEO, President and Board Member (2012-present)

  Board Chairman (December 2017-present)

First National Bank of Pennsylvania

•  President, Board Member (2009-present)

•  CEO (2011-present)

Charitable Work and CEO. Mr. Delie joined F.N.B. in 2005 as PresidentCommunity Involvement

United Way of Allegheny County

•  Board Member

Allegheny Conference on Community Development

•  Board Member

Team Pennsylvania

•  Board Member

Pittsburgh History and CEO of the Company’s Pittsburgh Region. Beginning in 2008, he was promoted into a number of key executive leadership roles, including Chief Revenue Officer; President of the Banking Group, where he was largely responsible for all revenue-producing lines of business including commercial banking, consumer banking and wealth management; and President and CEO of FNBPA. In 2011, Mr. Delie was additionally named President of F.N.B. Corporation and in 2012, he became CEO and elected to theLandmark Foundation

  Board of Directors. Mr. Delie serves as Chairman of our Board, Chair of our Executive Committee,Trustees

John V. Heher Humanitarian 2020 Awardee

•  For outstanding contributions to further the National Kidney Foundation mission and as ex officio of the Credit Risk and CRA Committee.

Under Mr. Delie’s leadership as CEO, the Company has experienced significant growth, nearly tripling its market capitalization while maintaining strong revenue growth and profitability. Despite the difficult economic environment, this was accomplished in large part through the execution of a unique business model centered on organic growth, strategic acquisitions, and strong risk management. In its largest market, the Pittsburgh metropolitan statistical area, F.N.B. has grown to a number three retail deposit market share position and a leading market share position in Small Business and Middle Market Banking. Today F.N.B. is the second largest bank basedinvolvement in the city of Pittsburgh by total assets.community

Director Qualifications

An industry-leading expert on mergers and acquisitions, Mr. Delie has played a significant role in the completion and seamless integration of the last 15 bank acquisitions by F.N.B. Under Mr. Delie’s leadership as CEO, F.N.B. has expanded into five new major metropolitan markets, including the Washington, D.C., MSA, and has completed eight acquisitions. F.N.B. maintains a significant retail deposit market share position in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Baltimore,

Maryland; Cleveland, Ohio; and Charlotte, Raleigh-Durham, and the Piedmont Triad in North Carolina.

Mr. Delie has more than 3033 years of extensive experience in the financial services industry which includeshas included executive roles at National City Bank, in addition to capital markets and investment banking positions held at several prominent financial institutions. Mr. Delie earned a degree in Business Administration and Finance from the Pennsylvania State University’s Smeal College of Business.

Active in the community and the financial services industry, he currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the United Way of Allegheny County, the Allegheny Conference on Community Development and Team Pennsylvania. Mr. Delie is also involved in a number of trade associations including the Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia Bankers Associations and the American Bankers Association.

Mr. Delie has received a number of honors, including the Society of Industrial and Office Realtors® Industrialist of the Year Award in 2016 in recognition of his contributions to economic, cultural and civic development in Western Pennsylvania. He also received the prominent Adam Smith Distinguished Leadership Award in 2015 from EconomicsPennsylvania. Under Mr. Delie’s leadership, F.N.B. has been a recipient of Greenwich Associates Excellence in Banking Awards for seven consecutive years, receiving ten national and regional awards in 2016 for client satisfaction in Middle Market and Small Business Banking. Also, under Mr. Delie’s leadership, F.N.B. has been honored as a leading workplace a total of 18 times based on employee feedback, and in 2016 he was individually recognized for leadership in the large company category by thePittsburghPost-Gazette Top Workplaces. Mr. Delie has also made multiple appearances onPennsylvania Business Central’s ranking of the Top 100 People in Central Pennsylvania.

Qualifications and Skills

Mr. Delie has more than 30 years’ experience in the financial services industry, including various executivemanagement roles with F.N.B. and other prominentlarge financial institutions. During his leadership tenure with F.N.B., including serving as the Company’s CEO since 2012, as President of FNBPA since 2009 and as CEO of FNBPA since 2011, F.N.B. has grown from $8.36$8 billion in assets (2008) to now approaching $32more than $37 billion. During this time,Mr. Delie’s leadership of F.N.B. has experiencedproduced significant expansion in terms of scale, geographic market (through numerous successfully integrated acquisitions, complexity of operations, revenue growth, earnings growth, capital expansion and the scope of its available products and services. Under Mr. Delie’s stewardship, F.N.B. has successfully experienced record profitability. FNBPA has been recognized by various regional and national publications and firms which evaluate the quality of bank products and service offerings and deployment of innovative technology. In addition, Mr. Delie has built a strong risk management foundationframework including cybersecurity, which will enableenables F.N.B. to continue on its trajectory to remain one of the leading financial services companies in the United States.U.S.. Throughout the years, Mr. Delie has served on numerous boards and received recognition related to his extensive philanthropic and leadership work with various organizations. Mr. Delie’s significant accomplishments, experience, knowledge and leadership make him uniquely qualified to serve on our Board.

 

 

  12    F.N.B. Corporation

  12    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors  

 

 

MARY JO DIVELY

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Audit

  Credit Risk and CRA

  Risk

  

Director Since: 2018 2018

 

Age: 62 59

 

  

Mary Jo Dively joined our Board and began her service on the Risk Committee and Credit Risk and CRA Committee in January 2018. Ms. Dively is

Professional Experience

Carnegie Mellon University, private, non-profit, research-based university

  Vice President and General Counsel of Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) since 2002. CMU is a top 25 global research university recognized worldwide for its interdisciplinary research and education in technology, the humanities, and the arts. Ms. Dively’s responsibilities at CMU encompass oversight of the local, national, and international legal affairs of the university, and management responsibility over the university’s Security, Risk Management, and Government Relations Offices. Ms. Dively plays an integral role as a member of CMU’s senior management team, including serving as one of the key strategic advisors to the university President and CMU Board of Trustees. Ms. Dively’s accomplishments as CMU’s General Counsel are significant and include the development of legal structures which house the university’s world-class cybersecurity assets and protocols, aggressive measures to protect and secure CMU’s critical technologies, innovations, patents and valuable intellectual property rights, and the global expansion of the CMU campus.(2002-present)

 

Prior to joining CMU, Ms. Dively was in private law practice for 19 years including partnership at Klett Rooney LieberCharitable Work and Schorling (Pittsburgh, PA) and the international law firm, Reed Smith, where she developed a well-recognized reputation for business and corporate law, and was at the forefrontCommunity Involvement

Children’s Hospital of leading legal developments in the digital age through her leadership of the Reed Smith global Technology, Media, and Communications Group. Ms. Dively’s representation included assisting a number of large and emerging technology companies, including Microsoft, Reed Elsevier and America Online, as well as many companies in other industries, navigating the myriad of challenges of adapting business models to digital technology and managing through the resulting novel legal issues arising from new digital technologies. Ms. Dively has been a frequent advisor to

Congress, state governors and legislatures around the country one-commerce issues and the development of legal standards in the continually evolving digital technology. Among her valued achievements is the recognition Ms. Dively received in being named in the “Best Lawyers in America” under the Cyber Law Category.Pittsburgh Foundation

•  Board Member

In addition to her extensive professional achievements, Ms. Dively has devoted her considerable skills to promoting and assisting various civic and charitable endeavors. Ms. Dively brings her legal and nonprofit governance expertise to bear in favor of a number of nonprofit institutions, both as a member and as a volunteer. She is a current member and past Chair (for 14 years) of the Board of Trustees of Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh and is a current member of the

•  Member

Board of Visitors of the UPMC Health System. During her tenure as Chair of the Board of Trustees of Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Ms. Dively led the negotiations to merge the hospital into the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and oversaw the development of a new $800 million hospital and research complex for Children’s Hospital. She was a14-year member of the Board of Trustees of UPMC, where she served on the Executive Committee for 12 years,co-chaired the Information Technology (IT) Committee which oversaw the development of that entity’s IT strategic plan and associated IT spend, and served on the Governance Committee. She is a current member and past Chair of the Board of Shady Side Academy, and she serves on the Board of the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary. She also has served local government in a variety of initiatives, including being appointed to and serving on the Pittsburgh/Allegheny Joint City/County Task Force on the Integration of City and County Information Systems. Ms. Dively has authored numerous articles on novel and emerging business technology legal issues.System

•  Member

Director Qualifications and Skills

Ms. Dively’s extensive and substantialunique legal background and experience with respect to challenges being confronted by the financial services industry, especially with respect to such contemporaryemerging risk management issues, such as business technology and cybersecurity, and the higher educationattendant regulatory environment, make her particularly suited to assist F.N.B. and its Board and Risk Committee in its oversight responsibilities of these critical matters. Ms. Dively is currently in the process of obtaining a Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight, issued by the CERT Division of the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. Ms. Dively anticipates that she will receive the certification in 2021. In addition, Mrs. Dively also brings significant international experience in opening and maintaining operations around the world including in Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, South America and the Middle East. Ms. Dively will help the Board, our Audit, Risk Committee and the FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA CommitteeCommittees remain diligent and proactive with evolving technology and cybersecurity issues, confronting the financial services industry.

2018 Proxy Statement    13  


  Proposal 1. Election of Directors

STEPHEN J. GURGOVITS

LOGO

Committees:

  Credit Risk and
CRA

  Executive

Director Since: 1981

Age: 74

Stephen J. Gurgovits served as Chairman of our Board from January 2012 until December 2017, and has been a director on our Board since 1981. Mr. Gurgovits served as our CEO in every year from 2004 until January 2012, and is a member of our Executive Committee and the FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA Committee. Throughout his lengthy tenure with the Company, Mr. Gurgovits has served the Company and FNBPA in various retail, commercial banking, and executive capacities. Under Mr. Gurgovits’ leadership as CEO, the Company grew from approximately $4 billion in asset size in 2004 to $11.6 billion by the time he retired as CEO in 2012. In view of Mr. Gurgovits’ extensive knowledge of, and experience with the Company and FNBPA, he has served as an important “sounding board” for senior management and provided a valuable perspective in connection with our acquisition and growth strategies. From 2013 until August 2014, Mr. Gurgovits served on the Board of Directors of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Norfolk, Virginia (publicly-held bank holding company), and served as a member of its Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Gurgovits joined the Board of BP Express (intermodal trucking company) in 2017. Mr. Gurgovits also serves on the Board of Directors and as a member of the Compensation Committee of the Joy Cone Company.

Mr. Gurgovits authored a well-recognized lending primer, “Financing Small Business.” Mr. Gurgovits’ leadership experience includes his servicewell as the chair of the Pennsylvania Bankers Association (PBA) from 2003legal issues related to 2004, a director of the American Bankers Association (ABA) from 2005 through 2008, and a member

of the American Bankers Council. In leading the PBA and ABA, Mr. Gurgovits gained valuable experience working with large financial institutions and community banks, along with national and state policymakers, legislators, and regulators, for the purpose of vigorously advocating that financial regulations serve the competitive interests of banks and other financial institutions and their customers. Mr. Gurgovits’ leadership positions with the PBA and the ABA are indicative of his reputation in the financial industry. This experience, coupled with his Board and executive leadership experience with F.N.B., make him an integral component of our Board. Mr. Gurgovits completed the Graduate School of Banking at the University of Wisconsin. In addition, Mr. Gurgovits is a recognized leader in regional economic development and currently serves or previously served on the boards of various educational, developmental and health care organizations, including Penn-Northwest Development Corporation, Sharon Industrial Development Authority, and as a director on the Boards of the Christian Buhl Legacy Trust and the Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio. Mr. Gurgovits previously served as President of the F.H. Buhl Trustees, a community-centerednon-profitthese matters. organization offering recreational, social, fitness and educational programs for families in Mercer County, Pennsylvania. Mr. Gurgovits is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Youngstown State University Foundation, which is dedicated to promoting the university’s endowment and supporting its educational mission, and also serves as a member of its Investment Committee.

Qualifications and Skills

Mr. Gurgovits’ lengthy and significant experience with F.N.B. and its affiliates for more than five decades, including his operational, financial, executive and industry leadership roles, qualify him as a member of our Board, Executive Committee and the FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA Committee.

  14    F.N.B. Corporation


Proposal 1. Election of Directors  

 

ROBERT A. HORMELL

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Compensation

  Nominating and Corporate Governance

  

Director Since: 2015 2015

 

Age: 74 71

  

Robert A. Hormell joined the Corporation’s Board in January 2015 and previously served on the FNBPA Board from 2008 through October 2014. Mr. Hormell serves as a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee. Mr. Hormell possesses over 35 years of experience in regional, economic and community development, having worked from 1973 to 2006 with the Susquehanna Economic Development Association (SEDA)-Council

Professional Experience

Retired CEO/CFO

SEDA Council of Governments, a large public development organization which servesserving 11 counties in centralCentral Pennsylvania having an aggregate population of close to one million people. The focus of Mr. Hormell’s work with the SEDA-Council of Governments included promoting and assisting the development of comprehensive initiatives designed to create jobs, promote small businesses, enhance public transportation, and procure financing for large public infrastructure and regional projects, including water, sewer, rail lines and industrial parks. During his tenure with the SEDA-Council of Governments, Mr. Hormell developed an extensive and significant network of governmental, municipal, business, community and civic contacts and established relationships with various communities and government leaders across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Mr. Hormell authored a significant report titled, “New Frontiers for Pennsylvania’s Heartlandcounties,” which has contributed to community and governmental policy-related discussions regarding Pennsylvania’s aging infrastructure. In addition, Mr. Hormell has extensive

experience on boards of directors of financial institutions, having served as a director of Omega•  Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Corporation, a publicly-held bank holding company based in State College, Pennsylvania, and its principal subsidiary Omega Bank (2004-2008; acquired by F.N.B. in 2008), where he was a member of the Executive, Compensation and Loan Committees of the holding company, and as a director of Sun Bancorp, Inc., a publicly-held bank holding company based in Sunbury, Pennsylvania (1994-2004), where he also served as Chair of the Board of Directors and on the company’s Executive and Compensation Committees.Officer

 

From 2003 to 2016, Mr. Hormell was a member of the Board of Trustees of Charitable Work and Community Involvement

Presbyterian Senior Living (PSL), a large multi-faceted senior care organization with facilities serving 4,100 individuals across three states. He served asServices Corporation

•  Chair

Presbyterian Senior Living Investment Corporation

•  Board Member

Faith Affordable Housing Corporation (Cape Coral, FL)

•  Board Member

SEDA-COG Joint Rail Authority

•  Board Member

Warrior Run Community Corporation, encourages communication and cooperation between six municipalities within the PSLWarrior Run School District

  Board Chair from 2010Member

Warrior Run Education Foundation, foundation supporting educational improvements in the Warrior Run School District

•  Special Advisor to 2011. He currently serves as chair of the PSL Services CorporationChairman

•  School Board and as a member of the PSL Investment Board. Additionally, Mr. Hormell served on the National Policy Congress for Leading Age, a national advocate for improved senior care. Mr. Hormell’s vital contributions to local communities include his past service with the Delaware Township Planning Commission, Union-Snyder Agency of Aging, Inc., the Lycoming County Health Improvement Coalition, Pennsylvania Rural Development Council Board of Directors and Executive Committee, Milton Area YMCA Board, and the Central Pennsylvania Health Systems Agency Board.Member

Director Qualifications and Skills

Mr. Hormell offers the Corporation a unique background, which includes not only previous financial institution board service and community and governmental advisory experience, but also his cultivation of numerous and variedexperience. Mr. Hormell’s key governmental, community and civic contacts.contacts have been important to F.N.B.’s efforts to identify the needs of and to serve various communities within its markets. In addition, Mr. Hormell serves as an advocate on issues related to senior housing and medical care and has a fundamental understanding of challenges attendant to economic and regional development within Pennsylvania. Mr. Hormell’s background positions him to make significant contributions to the continued success of F.N.B., particularly within the centralCentral Pennsylvania communities in which the Corporation’s principal subsidiary, FNBPA, operates. Mr. Hormell’s extensive knowledgenetwork of community and leadership experiencegovernmental leaders, coupled with his problem-solving skills qualifies him for service on our Board, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee.

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    15  

2021 Proxy Statement    13  


 

                         Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors

 

 

DAVID J. MALONE

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Audit

  Compensation (Chair)

  

Director Since: 2005 2005

 

Age: 66 63

  

David J. Malone has been a director on our Board since 2005, is Chair of our Compensation Committee and is a member of our Audit Committee. Mr. Malone previously served on the Company’s Executive Committee from 2013 through 2017. Mr. Malone is the President and CEO of

Professional Experience

Gateway Financial Group, Inc. (Gateway Financial),financial services group

•  Chairman and CEO (2005-present)

Highmark, Inc., health insurer

•  Board Member and Compensation Committee Member

Allegheny Health Network,non-profit, eight hospital academic medical system in Western Pennsylvania

•  Board Member

Charitable Work and Community Involvement

Allegheny Conference on Community Development

•  Board Member, Executive Committee Member, Personnel & Compensation Committee Member, and Workplace Committee Chair

Robert Morris University Board of Trustees

•  Trustee, Executive, Finance and Governance Committee Member

United Way, Board of Trustees

•  Trustee, Governance and Executive Committee Chair

Strategic Investment Fund

•  Chair

Pittsburgh Foundation

•  Investment Committee Member

Pittsburgh Penguins Foundation

•  Board Member

Director Qualifications

Mr. Malone’s experience as CEO of a financial services firm, located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, thatwhich specializes in administeringproviding financial and designing insurance portfolios foradvice to businesses and high net worth personsindividuals, and businesses. Prior to Mr. Malone’s appointment as President and CEO of Gateway Financial in 2005, he served as that company’s Chief Financial Officer from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2004. Mr. Malone’s many years of executive leadership and financial experiencehis board position with Gateway Financiala major health care provider provide him with substantial experience in analyzingthe requisite background and performing financial strategic planning,

which, in turn, enhances his value toappropriate perspective for assisting our Board with confronting challenges and our Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Malone currently isissues attendant to a member of the board of directors of Highmark, Inc. (health insurer) and previously served on its Compensation and Audit Committees. Mr. Malone also previously served on the boards of directors of Pennsylvania Capital Management, Inc., and NSD Bancorp, Inc. (publicly held bank holding company basedfinancial services organization operating in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; acquired by F.N.B. in 2005), including the Audit and Executive Committees of the board of NSD Bancorp. In addition, during his career, Mr. Malone has been extensively involved in civic, academic, healthcare, cultural and community organizations whose principal mission is to improve business, medical care, educational and cultural opportunities in Western Pennsylvania.

Qualifications and Skills

a heavily regulated industry. Mr. Malone’s experience in the financial sector and his priordiverse board experience, along with his demonstrated community involvement, qualify him for our Board, specifically for our Audit Committee and to lead our Compensation Committee.

  16    F.N.B. Corporation


Proposal 1. Election of Directors  

 

FRANK C. MENCINI

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Audit (Chair)

  Executive

  Nominating and Corporate Governance

  Risk

  

Director Since: 2016 2016

 

Age: 56 53

  

Frank C. Mencini joined our Board

Professional Experience

Inova Medical Group (Inova Health System), non-profit health organization in January 2016. Mr. Mencini is Chair of our Audit Committee, effective December 2017, and is a member of our Risk Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Mencini, a CPA by background (since 1988), is a strategic business consultant and has more than 30 years of leadership experience in accounting, finance, and business. Mr. Mencini now leads Northern Virginia

•  Chief Financial Officer (2017-present)

Mencini Healthcare Associates, from which he provides strategichealth care consulting firm

•  President and advisory services to clients across the country. Mr. Mencini began his career in 1988 in Arthur Andersen’s Washington, D.C., office and gained valuable accounting, audit, transaction, and financial advisory experience, including extensive work with many publicly traded companies. Following his graduation from Harvard Business School, he returned to CEO (2002-present)

Arthur Andersen and helped initiate the firm’sMid-Atlantic Strategy and Operational Consulting Practice, focused principally on the financial services and healthcare industries. He was then instrumental in helping to structure and initiate industry-focused practices within Arthur Andersen, with primary involvement in the financial services and healthcare industries. He gained a rapid promotion to

  Partner and served as thePartner-in-Charge of Arthur Andersen’sMid-Atlantic Healthcare Consulting Practice, with responsibility for leading more than 300 professionals and serving many of the firm’s top clients. Following his tenure at Arthur Andersen, he served as a key member of the leadership team of Patient Financial Services, Inc. (July 2002 - July 2012), a healthcare

revenue cycle and financial services outsourcing and technology company. His principal responsibilities included business development and margin growth, client service and relationship management, and strategic partnerships. Mr. Mencini was instrumental in collaborating with operations, technology, finance, and company leadership in developing successful strategies to diversify and expand the client base and the company’s service offerings, streamline the business model, and promote enhanced profitability. Following the 2012 sale of Patient Financial Services, Inc. to private equity backed Optimum Outcomes, Inc., Mr. Mencini honored atwo-year retention commitment and assisted with the eventual recapitalization and subsequent merger of the successor company with Adreima, Inc., which was also a private equity portfolio company.(1988-2002)

 

Mr. Mencini is active in the Washington, D.C., metro area with severalnon-profit boardsCharitable Work and committees. He is an activeCommunity Involvement

Inova Loudoun Hospital

•  Various fundraising and finance volunteer with Inova Health System ($3 billionnon-profit healthcare system), Team Ashburn Synchronized Skating (Washington Figure Skating Club), United Way, Special Olympics, and the Loudounpositions

Loudon County Public Schools. Mr. Mencini earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in AccountingSchools

•  Volunteer classroom reader and Finance from The Pennsylvania State University,fundraising assistance

Broadlands Community

•  Fundraising and his Master of Business Administration Degree from Harvard Business School.social event assistance

Special Olympics

•  Volunteer and supporter — D.C. Metro Area

Director Qualifications and Skills

As an experienced CPA with extensivecertified public accountant (CPA) who possesses high-level audit, regulatory compliance, technology and business consulting experience, coupled with significant experience growing and leading ana successful entrepreneurial business enterprise, including developing strategies to grow customers and profits, Mr. Mencini is uniquely qualified to serve onhas a unique understanding of the challenges and issues confronting our Board and, specifically, to serve as a vital resource for our Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Risk Committee.shareholders. His deep and varied public accounting experience, and his background in internal controls and regulatory compliance matters, are extremely valuable to F.N.B. as the company becomes increasingly complex.in view of our Company’s complex operations. Likewise, Mr. Mencini’sin-depth experience with providing direction to heavily-regulated financial services and healthcare firms relative to assessing data securityand cybersecurity risks and developing effective response and remediation plans, enable him to offer our Board knowledgeable and strategic insight regarding the dynamic and ever-increasing focus on thewith respect to fraud, technology, cybersecurity, environment. His long career and many business contacts and relationships in theMid-Atlantic market (including Baltimore, Maryland, one of F.N.B.’s important growth markets), also are of great value to the Company. Additionally, Mr. Mencini’s strategic advisory perspective, along with his extensive experience advising businesses on operational technological, financial, and client development matters, provides him with practical experience to assist with many of the broader challenges currently confronting the industry.issues. Mr. Mencini is a key resource for F.N.B. in overseeing and providing counsel on critical risk management, audit and Board governance matters.

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    17  

  14    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors

 

 

DAVID L. MOTLEY

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Audit

  Compensation

  Credit Risk and CRA

  Risk

  

Director Since: 2013 2013

 

Age: 62 59

  

David L. Motley joined our Board in August 2013 and is a member of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Risk Committee. Mr. Motley is currently a General Partner with

Professional Experience

BlueTree Venture Fund, a venture fund based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, focused on early-stage life science andIT-related opportunities at the Series B stage of funding.funding

Mr. Motley is also a  General Partner with(2014-present)

DLM-WCM, LLC, a DDRC327, real estate development company focused on Pittsburgh’s urban infill opportunities. During Mr. Motley’s

•  General Partner (2016-present)

31-yearMCAPS, LLC, professional services company providing construction management and IT capabilities and services

•  CEO, President (2017-present)

Public Company Experience

Koppers, global wood treatment solutions company

•  Board Member (2018-present)

Deep Lake Capital Acquisition Corporation, a special purpose acquisition company

•  Board Member (2021-present)

II-VI, corporate career, he has held positionsInc., manufacturer of progressive responsibility, including most recently the roleoptical materials and semiconductors

•  Board Member (2021-present)

Private Company Experience

Armada Supply Chain Management, creates innovative, fully integrated supply chain solutions

•  Board Member (2017-present)

ALung, Inc., a leading developer of Senior Managing Director of the Life Sciences Practice of Headwaters SC (HWSC) headquartered in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, advanced medical devices for treating respiratory failure

•  Board Member (2016-present)

Forest Devices, Inc, a position he held from 2011 until July of 2017 when HWSC was acquired by Ernst and Young. In 2009, Mr. Motley served as Vice President and General Manager at Covidien, Inc. (a medical device company acquiredstartup creating the first objective, electronically determined test for stroke for use by Medtronic), where his principal responsibilities were franchise management, portfolio management and strategy for its $2 billion portfolio of surgical products. Prior to that. Mr. Motley served as Vice President and General Manager at Respironics, Inc. (medical device company acquired by Philips), from 2006 through 2008, securing white space opportunities via acquisitions, equity/convertible debt investments and licensing. During his tenure with Respironics, Mr. Motley was Director, Corporate Strategic Planning, leading the strategic planning process for all of Respironics’ businesses and, during that time, the company grew from $800 million toEMS

$1.4 billion prior to its acquisition by Philips in 2008. Prior to 2006, Mr. Motley held various executive and management positions with large multinational corporations. Mr. Motley was the recipient of the University of Pittsburgh Swanson Engineering School 2016 Distinguished Alumni Award.•  Board Member (2017-present)

 

Mr. Motley has been instrumental in promoting corporate diversity efforts in the United States including spearheading theCharitable Work and Community Involvement

Pittsburgh Gateways Corporation, community-based economic development of the group

•  Board Member

African American DirectorsPublic Company Leadership Forum (AADF). The AADF includes prominent United States government and public company participants from across the United States with the goal of promoting the common objective of increasing the level of diversity on public company boards, particularly with regard to African Americans. The Company was the lead sponsor and principal underwriter of the AADF’s inaugural event.

•  Founder

In addition, Mr. Motley has significant experience serving as a director on variousnon-profit, charitable foundations and educational organizations, including: Vice Chair, Strategy Committee for Heritage Valley Health Systems, a $400 million community hospital system based in Sewickley, Pennsylvania; University of Pittsburgh Coulter Foundation Oversight Committee, Commercialization Initiative; University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering; Manchester Craftsmen’s Guild (Pittsburgh-based community organization); and the National Center for Arts and Technology (Pittsburgh-based arts and science organization).Engineering

•  Advisory Board Member

Inner City Junior Tennis Program

•  Executive Director

Director Qualifications and Skills

With over three decades of working and consulting with corporate and business leaders regarding strategic development, implementation and executive counselingadvising executives for more than 40 businesses in the United StatesU.S. across multiple industry sectors, Mr. Motley offersis especially qualified to serve as a unique perspectivekey resource for the Corporation’s strategic planning processes and executive leadership development. Moreover, since the previous ten10 years of Mr. Motley’s career have been spent in the heavily regulated life sciences sector, he is specially positioned to be sensitive to the heightened financial services regulatory environment that F.N.B. must navigate in order to succeed. Mr. Motley is involved in developing and participating in various forums and programs designed to promote African American public company board members and C-suite leadership positions, as well as providing unique insight into F.N.B.’s diversity and inclusion initiatives. Mr. Motley’s public company board experience enables him to offer unique insight on governance and risk management processes. Mr. Motley’s background and experience enables him to make significant contributions to our Board, Compensation Committee, Credit Risk and the Audit, Compensation,CRA Committee and Risk Committees.Committee.

  18    F.N.B. Corporation


Proposal 1. Election of Directors  

 

HEIDI A. NICHOLAS

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Audit

  Executive

  Risk (Chair)

  

Director Since: 2015 2015

 

Age: 66 63

  

Heidi A. Nicholas joined our Board in January 2015 and previously served on the FNBPA Board from 2012 through October 2014. Ms. Nicholas serves as Chair of our Risk Committee, effective December 2017, and is a member of our Audit Committee. Ms. Nicholas is a Principal (since 2001) in

Professional Experience

Nicholas Enterprises, a State College, Pennsylvania, firm that engages in the development and management of commercial and multi-tenant residential real estate in Central Pennsylvania. Ms. Nicholas began her business careerPennsylvania

•  Principal (2001-present)

Charitable Work and Community Involvement

Central Pennsylvania Festival of the Arts, a five-day visual and performing arts festival

•  Board Member

Penn State University — Hospitality Real Estate Strategy Group, conducts teaching, research and outreach in real estate and strategy in the Financial Institutions Group at Dean Witter Reynolds and has also held positions at Cargill, Inc., Houlihan Lokey, Howard & Zukin, and Pacific Telesis Group, where she was Executive Directorhotel industry

•  Advisor

Palmer Art Museum Advisory Board, art museum of Corporate Development. Her responsibilities involved structuring and negotiating mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, investor relations, communications with institutional investors, oversight of financePennsylvania State University

•  Board Member (2020-Present)

and accounting operations, coordinating transactional activities, financial advisory and valuation analysis, and the development and structuring of complex transactions. Ms. Nicholas’ broad and extensive financial and residential real estate experience offers the Company a valuable perspective and a solid foundation to advise and assist our Board and management with respect to the valuation of mergers and acquisitions, shareholder relations, the commercial and residential real estate industry, and critical finance and accounting considerations. Also, Ms. Nicholas has been involved in various civic and community organizations in the State College, Pennsylvania area, including Board positions with the Girl Scouts in the Heart of PA and the Centre County Community Foundation, where she previously served as Chair, and Chair of the Finance and Audit Committees.

Director Qualifications and Skills

We believe that Ms. Nicholas’ experienceinvestment in, theand management of, a large, complex commercial and multi-family residential portfolio and her deep familiarity with the real estate industry, andcoupled with her significant and comprehensive finance and complex transaction experience, and skills, makeafford her the necessary background to be an important contributor to our Board and enableBoard. Her experience enables her to behave a strong contributorfirm understanding of the critical issues and provide significant insight tochallenges facing F.N.B. and has been valuable in her roles on the Audit Committee, Executive Committee and as Chair of the Risk Committee.

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    19  

2021 Proxy Statement    15  


 

                         Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors

 

 

JOHN S. STANIK

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Compensation  Credit Risk and CRA

•  Risk

  

Director Since: 2013 2013

 

Age: 67 64

  

John S. Stanik joined our Board in January 2013 and serves as a member of our Compensation Committee. Also, since January 1, 2015, Mr. Stanik has served on the board and as

Professional Experience

Retired CEO of

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, a publicly-heldpublicly held international company, which specializesspecializing in manufacturing forged and cast rolls for the metals industry and other specialty industrial equipment for its customers. From February 2003 until 2012, Mr. Stanik was the

  CEO and a director, including four years as Board Chair of Director (2015-2018)

Calgon Carbon Corporation, a publicly-held internationalenvironmental products and services company with multiple

•  CEO, President and Director (2003-2012)

•  Chairman (2007-2012)

Huber Engineered Chemicals, privately-held industrial chemicals manufacturing and sales offices throughout the world and over 1,000 employees, headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. During his23-yearcompany tenure with Calgon Carbon Corporation, Mr. Stanik served as CEO and in various senior-level executive and managerial roles and developed extensive business

leadership experience and core competencies which enable him to make significant contributions to the Corporation’s Board, especially in the areas of organizational leadership, investor and analyst relations, risk management, corporate strategy development and deployment, succession planning and mergers and acquisitions. Additionally, since 2011, Mr. Stanik has served as a director on the management board of the Engineered & Materials Division of J. M. Huber Corporation (manufacturing), one of the largest privately-held companies in the United States, with operations in more than 20 countries.•  Director (2012-present)

 

Mr. Stanik is actively engaged in the Charitable Work and Community Involvement

Greater Pittsburgh American Heart Association. Mr. Stanik was also selected by ErnstAssociation

•  Volunteer

Fair Oaks Foundation, foundation supporting botanical gardens, zoos, food banks and Young LLP as a national judge for its 2012 Entrepreneur of the Year program.community centers and organizations involved with orchestras, higher education, animal welfare and human services

•  Board Member

Director Qualifications and Skills

Mr. Stanik’s extensive CEO, senior-level executiveC-suite and board experience with large public companies operating in very competitive industries enables him to offer the Corporation and its Board a unique combination of leadership, strategic, and business planning and risk management skills.skills, as well as a critical perspective on investor expectations. Moreover, Mr. Stanik’s prior experience as a public-companypublic company CEO and director adds further benefit to the Board and its Compensation CommitteeCredit Risk and CRA and Risk Committees in view of his extensive experience with investors, risk management, executive compensation and financial disclosures, as well as his full understanding of strategic considerations attendant to the Corporation’s expanding business growth opportunities and investment thesis.

  20    F.N.B. Corporation


Proposal 1. Election of Directors  

 

WILLIAM J. STRIMBU

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Committees:

  Compensation

  Credit Risk and CRA (Chair)

  Executive

  Nominating and Corporate Governance

Director Since: 1995

 

  

Director Since: 1995

Age: 60 57

  

William J. Strimbu has been a member of our Board since 1995 and serves as Chair of the FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA Committee and as a member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Strimbu previously served on the FNBPA Executive Committee from 2009 through 2016, and the Company’s Executive Committee from 2014 through October 2017. Mr. Strimbu is President of

Professional Experience

Nick Strimbu, Inc., a trucking company with common carrier authority. Mr. Strimbu’s responsibilitiesauthority

•  President (1982-present)

Charitable Work and Community Involvement

Teamsters Local 261 and Employers Welfare Fund, health consortium in Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio with Nick Strimbu, Inc. include strategic, financial and business planning and negotiations with customers, vendors and the Teamsters Union. He manages and responds to a myriad of financial and operational challenges faced by a company in a highly-competitive and rapidly changing industry. He also manages a real estate holding company. Mr. Strimbu has been a member of the board of directors of a regional community foundation since 1994 and is its Vice President. He has assisted the foundation’s management in growing the endowment of approximately 400 individual funds and $100 million in assets. From 1997 to 2014, Mr. Strimbu was a director and served on the Audit Committee of the Board for Sharon Regional Health System, a regional health care facility that employed more than 1,800 professionals. Mr. Strimbu also served as Board Chair for Sharon Regional Health5,000 constituents

System from 2013 until its sale in 2014. Mr. Strimbu was instrumental in negotiating the transaction to sell the Health System at a favorable price for his community. He now serves on the •  Trustee

Christian H. Buhl Legacy Trust which was formed to wind-down the operations

•  Board Member

Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and protect the proceeds from the saleEastern Ohio

•  Vice President, Board Member of the institution. Mr. Multiple Affiliates

Shenango Valley Foundation

•  Board Member

Strimbu is a trustee of Teamsters #261Memorial Fund

•  Board Member and Employer’s Welfare Fund, an entity which provides healthcare benefits for approximately 50 companies that insure more than 5,000 lives. He also served as Board Chair of the “Voyager” Offshore Captive Insurance Group advisory board from 2013 through 2015, and remains a board member. The captive is a group consisting of approximately 50 trucking companies located throughout the United States. The group is underwritten by National Interstate Insurance Company, one of the largest truck and bus insurance companies in the country. Mr. Strimbu is also involved in numerous charitable organizations as well as various regional and national trade groups in the trucking industry. Executive Committee Member

Director Qualifications

Mr. Strimbu’s long-term executive and leadership experience in regional transportation, healthcarehealth care and philanthropic entities provide him a valuable perspective from which to contribute to our Board.

Qualifications and Skills

We believe that Mr. Strimbu’s executive, operational, economic development, philanthropic and financial experience qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board, as Chair of the FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA Committee and as a member of our Compensation, Executive, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.Committees.

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    21  

  16    F.N.B. Corporation


 

  Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors

Director-Nominee Profile and Director 

Skill Matrix

As demonstrated by the Director-Nominee Profile highlights below (excluding our Independent Lead Director from the age and tenure figures and excluding our non-independent Chairman/CEO from the independence percentage), we have a well-balanced Board composition, which is a product of our careful Board succession planning and refreshment processes.

LOGO

LOGO

2021 Proxy Statement    17  


  Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors  

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board have identified the skills, experience and background criteria highlighted below as key necessary qualifications criteria and attributes that enable our Board to effectively discharge its oversight and fiduciary responsibilities. Moreover, in evaluating the background, skills and experience of our director-nominees, both our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board understand that certain intangible qualities and attributes, such as each nominee’s commitment to shareholder interests, leadership skills, temperament and judgment, ability to challenge management, integrity and understanding of F.N.B.’s values and culture are critical to an effectively functioning Board. The F.N.B. Corporation Director Skill Matrix (Director Skill Matrix) below highlights that the collective expertise, experience and skills of our directors are aligned with F.N.B.’s strategy, risks and shareholder interests.

Director Skill Matrix

  9

Accounting / Auditing. Understanding of financial institution audit processes, controls and financial statements.

  9

Financial Services Experience. Possesses a fundamental understanding of financial institution business and operations, along with an understanding of the challenges that the industry faces.

  9

Business. Has experience across various business lines and business developments that our Company maintains.

  7

Legal / Regulatory / Government. Understanding of the heavily-regulated environment in which we operate, in addition to the role that the various regulatory agencies play in our industry.

  6

Environmental, Social, Governance. Experience with the development and oversight of an effective corporate responsibility strategy.

  6

Human Capital Management and Succession Planning. Can provide insight on how our Company can develop and retain talent, as well as oversee the succession planning of both our Board and management.

  7

Public Company Board Service and Corporate Governance. Current or prior experience serving on a public company board or counseling such boards on governance and fiduciary matters.

  10

Risk Management. Possesses the ability to understand, identify and oversee the various types of risk which challenge financial institutions.

  4

Cybersecurity / Technology(3). Meaningful understanding of the critical aspects of financial institution technology and the challenges posed by the myriad of cybersecurity risks.

  12

Strategic Planning. Possesses experience with oversight of our strategic plan development, implementation and execution.

(3)

Two of our directors are currently in the process of obtaining a Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight, issued by the CERT Division of the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.

  18    F.N.B. Corporation


  Proposal 1. Election of Our Board of Directors  

 

 

  

 

 Security Ownership of DirectorsCriteria and Executive OfficersConsiderations for 

Recommending Director-Nominees

  

 

The following table setsNominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board with reviewing and evaluating individuals qualified to become F.N.B. Board members. The committee’s evaluative process entails consideration of our Board-approved director qualification criteria set forth certain information asin our F.N.B. Corporation Corporate Governance Guidelines (see Key Corporate Governance Documents), application of our Director Skill Matrix (see Current Directors and Nominees for Election at Our Annual Meeting) and the Board Composition Criteria described below for purposes of making its determinations relative to recommending nominees for directors at Annual Meetings and filling vacancies on the Board. Directors chosen to fill

vacancies will hold office for a term expiring at the end of the March 7, 2018, record date with respectnext Annual Meeting.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate all candidates suggested by the Board Chair, other directors or third-party search firms, which the Company may retain from time to beneficial ownershiptime to help identify potential new director candidates, or a person recommended by a shareholder for nomination as a director in the same manner. For information on recommending a candidate for nomination as a director, see Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2021 Annual Meeting.

The Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee have concluded that each of our common stock by: (i) each director and nominee; (ii) each currently employed Named Executive Officer (NEO) listed in the table entitled2018 Summary Compensation Table under the section of this proxy statement entitledExecutive Compensation and Other Proxy Disclosure; and (iii) allincumbent directors and executive officersshould be recommended for re-nomination as a group. Asdirector. Each of the record date, we had 323,627,694 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Unless otherwise indicated, all persons namednominees for election as beneficial ownersa director was elected as a director at our 2020 Annual Meeting. Our Board believes that each of the Company’s common stock have sole voting powernominees continue to meet the criteria described above with high levels of professionalism, leadership, independence and sole investment power with respecta dedicated commitment to F.N.B. shareholder and other stakeholders’ interests. Moreover, our Board believes that, individually and collectively, the shares indicatednominees possess the necessary corporate values, commitment to ethical conduct, diversity, depth and breadth of experience that enable them to oversee management of the Company as beneficially owned.an effective and engaged Board. No director or nominee has a family relationship to any other director-nominee for director or executive officer.

  Name of Beneficial Owner  Shares Beneficially 
Owned
   Percentage 
Owned

Pamela A. Bena

  4,050  *

William B. Campbell

  83,142(1)  *

James D. Chiafullo

  47,237(2)  *

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.#

  278,262  *

Mary Jo Dively

  2,200  *

Stephen J. Gurgovits

  305,468(3)  *

Robert A. Hormell

  65,619  *

David J. Malone

  79,746  *

D. Stephen Martz

  140,902(4)  *

Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.

  314,048(5)  *

Frank C. Mencini

  24,611  *

David L. Motley

  25,020  *

Heidi A. Nicholas

  228,653(6)  *

John S. Stanik

  33,930  *

William J. Strimbu

  99,851(7)  *

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.#

  132,237  *

Gary L. Guerrieri#

  76,772(8)  *

Robert M. Moorehead#

  32,206  *

Barry C. Robinson#

  44,688  *

All executive officers and directors as a group (21 persons)

  2,033,627(9)  0.63%

 

The amount includes performance-based restricted stock units granted to NEOs at the target level. The amount of the restricted stock units may change in the future based on the Company’s performance.

#

Denotes a person who served as an executive officer of the Corporation during 2017.

*

Unless otherwise indicated, represents less than 1% of all issued and outstanding common stock.

(1)

Includes 2,072 shares owned by Mr. Campbell’s wife and 3,000 shares held in an IRA for Mr. Campbell.

(2)

Includes 300 shares held in a custodial account for Mr. Chiafullo’s grandson.

(3)

Includes 220 shares held in an IRA for Mr. Gurgovits.

(4)

Includes 9,264 shares held in an IRA for Mr. Martz.

(5)

Includes 39,204 shares that Mr. McCarthy has the right to acquire within 60 days upon exercise of his vested stock options.

(6)

Includes 121,936 shares owned by the Fred Nicholas Marital Trust (Ms. Nicholas isCo-Trustee) and 90,990 shares owned by Nicholas Family Limited Partnership.

(7)

Includes 1,900 shares owned by Mr. Strimbu’s children.

(8)

Includes 671 shares held in a custodial account for Mr. Guerrieri’s daughter.

(9)

Includes the amount of shares beneficially owned by Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer, James L. Dutey, and Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary, James G. Orie.

  22    F.N.B. Corporation


Board Composition Criteria
  Shareholders’ Interests

  Paramount

The individual’s strong commitment to the diligent pursuit of shareholders’ long-term best interests, as well as their understanding of their fiduciary obligations to our shareholders, including their adherence to the Investor Stewardship Group Principles (see Corporate Governance - Principles).

  Professional Background

  and Experience

The individual’s specific experience, background and education, as they pertain to the Director Skill Matrix under Current Directors and Nominees for Election at Our Annual Meeting.

  Leadership Roles

The individual’s sustained record of substantial accomplishments and leadership in executive, C-suite, senior-level management, entrepreneurship and/or policy-making positions in finance, law, business, government, education, technology or not-for-profit enterprises, as well as public company board experience and prior F.N.B. board experience.

  Judgment and Gravitas

The individual’s seriousness of purpose in evaluating complex business issues, willingness to confront challenging circumstances and ability to exhibit sound judgments including, when necessary, constructively challenging management’s recommendations and actions.

  Diversity

The individual’s contribution to the diversity of the Board including differences of viewpoints, professional experience, education, skills and demographics considerations, such as race, gender and ethnicity, as well as the variety of personal attributes and life experiences that contribute to the Board’s collective strength and perspective.

  Character and Integrity

The individual’s commitment to ethical conduct, with character and integrity, along with the requisite interpersonal skills to work with other directors on our Board and executive management in ways that are effective and beneficial to the interests of the Company and its shareholders, employees, customers and communities.

  Time

The individual’s willingness and ability to commit the necessary time and effort required for effective service on our Board and committees.

  Independence

The individual’s qualifications as “independent” under the NYSE and F.N.B.’s stringent categorical standards and their freedom from conflicts of interest that could interfere with their duties as a director, including outside board service and other affiliations for actual or perceived conflicts of interest.

  Understands F.N.B.’s

  Corporate Culture and

Proposal 1. Election  Values

The individual’s ability to effectively represent F.N.B. core values in the communities in which the Company operates, including adherence to Board and Company policies, including F.N.B.’s Code of Directors  

Conduct and policies concerning F.N.B. stock ownership and continuing education requirements.

 

 

 Executive Officers 

 

The table below lists the names of our current Executive Officers with their positions and ages. The table below does not include this information for CEO Vincent J. Delie, Jr. whose information is in the section of this proxy statement entitledBiographical Information Concerning Director Nominees.

  Name2021 Proxy StatementPosition with CompanyAge as of the
   Annual Meeting     
    19  

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

55

James L. Dutey

Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer

44

Gary L. Guerrieri

Chief Credit Officer

58

Robert M. Moorehead

Chief Wholesale Banking Officer

63

James G. Orie

Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

59

Barry C. Robinson

Chief Consumer Banking Officer

55

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2009. Mr. Calabrese joined the Company in 2007, serving as our Corporate Controller from 2007 to 2009. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Calabrese was Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of People’s Bank, Connecticut, from 2003 to 2007. During his19-year tenure at People’s Bank, Mr. Calabrese’s principal responsibilities included financial planning and reporting, accounting policies, general accounting operations and investor relations.

James L. Duteyhas served as our Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer since March 2017. Mr. Dutey has more than 20 years of accounting experience in the banking and financial services sectors. During the past 12 years, Mr. Dutey has served in various senior management roles at Huntington Bancshares, Inc., including most recently as Assistant Corporate Controller, with a primary focus on SEC and bank regulatory financial reporting requirements. Prior to joining Huntington Bancshares, Inc., Mr. Dutey was employed at KPMG LLP, ending his tenure there as senior manager for the assurance practice, primarily serving the banking industry. Mr. Dutey is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Gary L. Guerrieribecame our Chief Credit Officer in April of 2011. Prior to his promotion, Mr. Guerrieri had been an Executive Vice President and the Chief Credit Officer of FNBPA since 2005. In his role as Chief Credit Officer of the Company, Mr. Guerrieri is responsible for managing the entire credit function for the Company, including commercial and retail underwriting, credit administration, credit policy and credit risk management. He also has oversight of FNBPA’s special assets, loan servicing and indirect lending functions. Prior to joining FNBPA in 2002, Mr. Guerrieri was an Executive Vice President of commercial banking

with Promistar Financial Corporation, a bank holding company that had been acquired by F.N.B. in 2002.

Robert M. Moorehead became our Chief Wholesale Banking Officer in September 2015. From 2011 through 2015, Mr. Moorehead served as President of FNBPA’s Pittsburgh Region. In his role as Chief Wholesale Banking Officer of the Company, Mr. Moorehead is responsible for managing Commercial Banking, Treasury Management, Investment Real Estate, Wealth Management, Private Banking, Insurance and International and Capital Markets. Prior to joining FNBPA, Mr. Moorehead was Senior Vice President and Regional Chief Credit Officer for First Niagara Bank from 2009 through 2011. Mr. Moorehead began his43-year career at Equibank and, subsequently, joined National City Bank, where he served as Executive Vice President and Group Manager of Corporate Banking.

James G. Orie has been our Chief Legal Officer since 2004 and became Corporate Secretary in January 2015. Mr. Orie is principally responsible for the Corporation’s legal, regulatory, transactional and governance matters. Prior to joining F.N.B. as Corporate Counsel in 1996, Mr. Orie began his33-year career as a financial services counsel with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, Office of Thrift Supervision and, prior to joining F.N.B., as business leader of the Financial Services Practice Group of a Pittsburgh-based law firm.

Barry C. Robinson has served as our Chief Consumer Banking Officer since August 2015. As Chief Consumer Banking Officer, Mr. Robinson is responsible for leading the team which provides our full range of consumer financial products and services to our customers. Mr. Robinson joined our Company in July 2010 as Executive Vice President of our Consumer Banking operations, for which he had principal responsibility for

2018 Proxy Statement    23  


 

  Proposal 1. Election of DirectorsCorporate Governance  

 

 

strategic planning and oversight of the Company’s consumer retail operations, including leading the development of our digital banking platform. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Robinson held several key leadership and executive positions with large regional

banks, including regional leader in Cleveland, Ohio, of wealth management and private banking for PNC Bank and National City Bank, and head of corporate banking in Kentucky and Tennessee for National City Bank.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEESCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

  

 

 Corporate GovernancePrinciples 

  

 

The foundation of our corporate governance principles is our commitment to our shareholders, customers, employees, communities and other stakeholders based on the fundamental principles of fairness, transparency, integrity, diversity and accountability. Our corporate governance standards are highlighted in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (see Key Corporate Governance Documents), which are reviewed and, if required, updated annually by our Board. These guidelines are designed to adhere to regulatory requirements, including the NYSE corporate governance listing standards, SEC governance standards, other widely accepted “best” practices promoted by proxy advisory firms, institutional investors and national organizations dedicated to promoting sound governance practices, and, most notably, are modeled after the globally recognized “best practice” corporate governance framework established by the Investor Stewardship Group (ISG) for U.S. listed companies. The information below highlights the complete alignment of our corporate governance practices with the ISG standards (Note: references below to F.N.B. governance policies, guidelines and charters may be accessed by clicking on the weblinks found in the section of this Proxy Statement titled Key Corporate Governance Documents):

  ISG Principle 1: Boards are accountable to Shareholders.

Maintain a Declassified Board

•  The full Board of Directors is elected annually.

Directors Committed to their Board Responsibilities and to Shareholders

•  Directors will attend all shareholder and Board meetings and those committee meetings of which they are a member, and at a minimum, at least 75 percent of Board and committee meetings in the aggregate.

•  As a collective group our director-nominees attended 99 percent of all our Board and committee meetings in the aggregate in 2020 and all our directors attended our 2020 Annual Meeting.

Shareholder Right to Call Special Meeting and to Act by Written Consent

•  A special meeting of shareholders may be called by the consent of shareholders holding at least 25 percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Shareholder Access to Board

•  Shareholders may communicate directly with our Board or any Board Committee or any individual director (see section of this Proxy Statement titled Communications with Our Board).

Anti-Hedging Policy

•  Directors, executive officers and other employees of F.N.B. are prohibited from engaging in pledging and hedging strategies involving F.N.B. stock and other derivative securities transactions based on the value of F.N.B. common stock.

  ISG Principle 2: Shareholders should be entitled to voting rights in proportion to their economic
  interests.

One Share, One Vote Policy

•  Each shareholder of the Company entitled to vote on any matter at any meeting of shareholders is entitled to one vote for every share outstanding in such shareholder’s name on the record date for the meeting.

  ISG Principle 3: Boards should be responsive to shareholders and be proactive in order to understand
  their perspectives.

Active Shareholder Engagement Program

•  We met with more than 100 of our institutional shareholders for the purpose of discussing our financial performance, strategic and business plans, compensation practices, environmental, social and governance (ESG) topics and other topics of importance to them and reported these meetings to our Board.

•  For additional information regarding our 2020 shareholder engagement efforts, please see Active Engagement with Shareholders, Governance Enhancements Informed by Shareholders and Say-on-Pay and Investor Engagement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) in this Proxy Statement.

  20    F.N.B. Corporation 

Our commitment to “best in class” corporate governance is integral to our business. Our key governance practices are described below.


  Corporate Governance  

  ISG Principle 4: Board should have a strong, independent leadership structure.

Independent Lead Director

•  Our Board has determined that our unified board structure is effectively counterbalanced by the fact that 100 percent of our directors, excluding our CEO, are independent under SEC and NYSE independence standards, as well as our strict adherence to a robust governance structure and our effective empowerment of our Independent Lead Director.

•  For a full description of our Independent Lead Director’s responsibility and authority, please see our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Overwhelmingly Independent Board and Board Committees Composed of Independent Directors

•  Excluding our CEO, 100 percent of our Board is independent.

•  Each of our Standing Committees and the FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA Committee conduct regular meetings during the year and are composed entirely of independent directors.

  ISG Principle 5: Boards should adopt structures and practices that enhance their effectiveness.

Detailed Board Composition Criteria, Including the Director Skill Matrix

•  Our Director Skill Matrix is used by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to assess each of our director nominees in connection with the nomination of prospective director candidates for election at our 2021 Annual Meeting.

Strive for Board Diversity and Broad Range of Perspectives and Backgrounds

•  Diverse Board.Presently, 33 percent of our Board and 25 percent of the F.N.B Standing Committee Chair positions are composed of minority and/or women directors.

•  Practices Designed to Promote a Diverse Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s practices provide that we shall consider diversity, among other important factors, in connection with identifying and recruiting prospective director candidates and in connection with Board composition determinations and Board succession planning.

•  Values the Benefits of a Diverse Board. In addition to skills and experience, we believe that a Board composed of a mix of diverse backgrounds, including gender, age, race and ethnicity, creates a diversity of perspectives among the Board and thereby supports a more nuanced and broader scope consideration of Company strategies and opportunities, and, ultimately, results in a more productive Board. In 2017 and 2018, F.N.B. was the lead sponsor of the African American Directors Forum which drew participation from public company board leaders across the U.S. for the purpose of measurably improving diverse, and particularly African American representations on public company boards of directors. F.N.B. continues to financially support the efforts of the African American Directors Forum as well as other initiatives designed to support and promote diversity within U.S. companies, and as is more fully described in our 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report, is committed to furthering economic opportunity for our historically underserved communities.

Proactive Board Oversight of Board, CEO and Executive Management Succession Planning Process

•  Succession planning is a priority for the Board and our senior management, with the goal of ensuring a strong pipeline of leaders for the future, and the Board annually reviews the Board and management succession plans.

•  For additional, detailed information, please see the section of this Proxy Statement titled Succession Planning — Board, CEO and Management.

2021 Proxy Statement    21  


  Corporate Governance  

Combined Chair/CEO Structure

•  The advantage of the combined Chair/CEO position is a better Board-level understanding of the daily and long-term inherent critical regulatory risk, business and financial risks associated with the operation of our business, and eliminating confusion by ensuring that the Company has a clear single public “face” for our shareholders, customers, employees, regulators, analysts and other key stakeholders.

•  Our Independent Lead Director possesses the necessary authority to facilitate independent board oversight of management and serves as an effective counterbalance under a unified board structure.

•  Many other financial institutions recognize the value of, and effectively utilize, a similar board structure with a combined Chair/CEO, coupled with an Independent Lead Director.

Board Retirement Policy

•  Our directors are required to retire at age 75(4).

Limit Service on Other Public Company Boards and Audit Committees

•  No Board member may serve on more than three other public company boards.

•  Our Board policy provides that Audit Committee members cannot serve on the audit committees of more than two public companies at the same time.

Conduct Annual Board Self-Assessment Evaluations.

•  The Board and its committees conduct rigorous annual self-evaluations. The results are reported to the Board and committees and are a consideration in the director re-nomination process.

Conduct Executive Sessions of Directors

•  Our Board conducted four executive sessions in 2020 (two attended only by independent directors), all presided over by our Independent Lead Director.

Comprehensive Board Orientation and Continuing Director Education Program

•  The F.N.B. Director orientation and education program includes an annual extensive internal training curriculum designed to provide education about insider trading, fiduciary standards, our Code of Conduct requirements, other critical regulatory compliance matters, a stipend to incentivize participation in local, regional and national director educational conferences, director onboarding and mentoring programs and periodic management presentations to the Board on business, regulatory, cybersecurity and other topics related to current industry issues.

Board Oversight of Corporate Responsibility and ESG Matters

•  Our commitment to identifying corporate responsibility best practices is an essential part of our culture and corporate values. Our commitment to ESG begins with our Board Chairman and CEO and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has oversight of the Company’s corporate ESG strategies.

•  F.N.B. publishes an annual Corporate Responsibility Report which provides, among other highlights, an overview of our commitment to the environment, overall community well-being, diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, and socially responsible Company endeavors (please see our 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report under Resources).

•  To view F.N.B.’s 2020 public announcements, including those concerning our COVID-19 response and social equality, as well as other significant initiatives and contributions benefiting our customers, employees and communities, please visit the Press Releases section of our Newsroom at fnbcorporation.com.

(4)

Our board has “grandfathered” our Independent Lead Director, William B. Campbell, who has served on our Board since 1975 (shortly after F.N.B. was organized in 1974). In its decision to grandfather Director Campbell, the Board took into account the considerable benefits that Director Campbell’s Board tenure offers to us, including his indispensable historical perspective, experience and institutional knowledge as a Board member regarding significant prior U.S. economic and banking crises and the recurring challenges that confront financial institution boards. Moreover, Director Campbell’s dedicated commitment and proactive engagement has enabled him to exercise his unique and effective leadership skills, which provide him the respect of his Board colleagues, and executive management, and the necessary gravitas to serve effectively as our Independent Lead Director. However, the Board’s succession planning process includes consideration for when Director Campbell retires.

  22    F.N.B. Corporation


  Corporate Governance  

Board Access to Management and External Auditors or Counsel

•  Our Board and committees have access to the Company officers, external auditors and legal counsel in order to discharge their fiduciary and legal duties and responsibilities.

Board Approves and Oversees the Company’s Long-Term Strategic Plan

•  Our Board engages with management and oversees significant business plans and risk management strategies. In 2020, the Board reviewed and approved F.N.B.’s 2020-2023 Strategic Plan.

  ISG Principle 6: Boards should develop management incentive structures that are aligned with the
  long-term strategy of the company.

Maintain Stock Ownership Requirement

•  Our Board has implemented stock ownership policies for our Board, Section 16 officers, NEOs and other members of senior management which are designed to ensure that their interests are meaningfully aligned with shareholders’ interests, as is more fully detailed in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Annual Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote

•  Per our Board recommendation, our shareholders approved continuing to hold our advisory Say-on-Pay vote on an annual basis. In 2020, 92 percent of our shareholders voted in favor of our compensation practices. As a result, the Compensation Committee and the Board are again submitting for the vote of shareholders an advisory resolution to annually approve the compensation of our NEOs.

Properly Align Executive Compensation and Use of an Independent Compensation Consultant

•  As discussed more fully in the CD&A of this proxy statement, our Compensation Committee consults with an independent compensation consulting firm, whose independence is annually reviewed and evaluated to assess whether it possesses the necessary experience of consulting with other public companies, particularly those in the financial services industry, for the purpose of developing appropriate policies and practices to align executive compensation with shareholder interests and to avoid inappropriate risk.

•  We annually engage with our shareholders regarding our executive compensation practices.

•  A majority of the incentive compensation opportunities available to key executives are not guaranteed, since they are tied to Company performance and aligned with shareholder interests.

•  For additional information regarding how our incentive structures are aligned with our long-term strategy and our shareholders’ interests, see Compensation Governance and Risk Management in our CD&A.

Incentive Plans that Do Not Encourage Excessive Risk-Taking

•  We annually conduct risk assessments of each of our compensation plans, which the Compensation Committee reviews with our Chief Risk Officer to ensure our various compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk-taking or otherwise pose material harm to our customers or our financial condition.

2021 Proxy Statement    23  


  Corporate Governance  

 

  

 

 Principles 

In performing its role, our Board of Directors is guided by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which establish a framework for the governance of the Board and the management of our Company. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are annually reviewed, updated as appropriate, and approved by the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines reflect broadly recognized and evolving “best practice” governance standards and regulatory requirements, including the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate

governance listing standards, SEC governance standards, and other widely accepted practices promoted by proxy advisory firms and institutional investors. The full text of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is posted on our website at www.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading.

 Board Member Backgrounds Across a Wide Spectrum 

We believe the diverse and strong mix of skill sets, background, and experience provides the Board a well-rounded and depth of knowledge capacity to prudently oversee F.N.B.’s business and operations.

Financial Services and Banking

Strategic Planning

Risk Management

Public Policy

Technology

Cybersecurity

Regulatory

Healthcare

Finance, Accounting and Auditing

Legal

Corporate Governance

Construction

Public Company Experience

Commercial, Residential and Retail Development

Investment and Financial Advisory

Transportation

Insurance

Municipal Planning

  24    F.N.B. Corporation


Our Board of Directors and its Committees  

 Board Structure and Responsibility 

The Board is responsible for the oversight of management on behalf of the Company’s shareholders. The Board and its committees meet regularly throughout the year to: (i) review and, where appropriate, approve long- and short-term strategies, business and financial planning and performance, risk management, regulatory compliance, internal control and financial reporting and audit matters, compensation, Board and management succession, corporate culture, and public, social and environmental responsibility matters; and (ii) provide oversight and guidance to, and regularly assess the performance of, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and other senior executives.

The Board believes that its longstanding approach to our leadership structure has proven to be effective in promoting Company performance and the interest of F.N.B. shareholders since it is designed to optimize the directors’ exercise of their fiduciary oversight as well as properly allocate authority and responsibility between the Board and management. The Board considers its leadership structure frequently as part of its assessment regarding the most effective governance practices for the Company, as well as a succession planning process for the Board. The Board and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee formally review the leadership structure not less than annually as part of this self-assessment process, taking into consideration the following:

The potential impact of particular leadership structures on the Company’s performance;

The Company’s circumstances including financial and business performance, economic and regulatory environment, and governmental policies;

The Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified individuals for Company and Board leadership positions;

Legislative and regulatory developments and prevailing industry practices regarding board leadership structures;

The views of our shareholders;

Trends in corporate governance, including practices at other public companies, proxy advisory firms, and influential academic studies on board leadership structures and the impact of leadership structures on shareholder value;

The respective responsibilities for the positions of Board Chairman, CEO, Independent Lead Director and the Board committee chairs; and

Regular executive session meetings of the independent directors to engage in open discussions regarding CEO and Company performance, strategic considerations and other matters considered important and in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

The Board believes it is important to retain flexibility to determine its leadership structure based on the particular composition of the Board (specifically, the fact that a majority of the Board is independent), the individuals serving in leadership roles and the needs and opportunities of the Company.

During 2017, our Board reviewed its leadership structure, taking into consideration the factors outlined above, and determined to maintain its well-established approach to board leadership structure since this structure, coupled with a strong and experienced independent Lead Director and an overwhelmingly independent and experienced Board, will continue to provide appropriate leadership for and oversight of the Company and promote effective, fully engaged and efficient functioning of both the Board and management, which ultimately serves the best interests of our shareholders. A unified board leadership structure has presented critical advantages for the Board, including promoting a more transparent understanding ofday-to-day management matters, deeper consideration of key issues affecting the Company’s operations, initiatives and business priorities, greater engagement with respect to the long-term strategy of the Company, and better overall consistency in internal and external communication of the Company’s strategic and business priorities. This structure provides free and open input from our experienced independent Lead Director, as well as active engagement by a Board composed almost entirely of independent directors. Moreover, the Board’s extensive and significant leadership skills (over 61% of our Board members possess CEO or principal business experience along with other high caliber professionals) creates an environment for an active and engaged Board. The Board regularly evaluates our leadership structure with the focus on promoting the shareholders’ best interests and believes this dynamic approach offers the most flexibility with respect to making certain the Board adopts the leadership structure which best serves the interests of F.N.B. shareholders.

Notwithstanding the strong oversight roles of the Independent Lead Director and committee chairs described below, all directors share equally in their responsibilities as members of the Board.

2018 Proxy Statement    25  


  Our Board of Directors and its Committees

Independent Oversight. All of our directors are independent, with the exception of our Board Chairman and CEO, Vincent J. Delie, Jr., and our former CEO, Stephen Gurgovits, who retired more than six years ago. The independent directors meet at regular intervals in executive session with no management present, where they discuss any matter they deem appropriate, including CEO and Company performance and Board meeting agendas and materials.

Board Chairman. Our Board Chairman is appointed annually by all the directors. The Chairman’s responsibilities include:

calling Board and shareholder meetings;

presiding at Board and shareholder meetings; and

preparing meeting schedules, agendas and materials, in consultation with the Independent Lead Director and input from other Board members.

Independent Lead Director. The Independent Lead Director is appointed annually by the independent directors. In considering the appointment of the Independent Lead Director, the Board not only takes into account such person’s qualifications under applicable NYSE, F.N.B. categorical and SEC independence standards, but also examines such person’s personal attributes such as strength of character, unyielding integrity and commitment to facilitate open and meaningful communication between the Chairman, CEO, the Board and Board committees. The duties and responsibilities of the Independent Lead Director are more fully described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and include, but are not limited to, the following:

Preside over Board meetings when the Chairman is absent or his participation raises a possible conflict and may call Board meetings or convene executive sessions of the independent directors;

Collaborates with the Board Chairman and other Board members to establish Board meeting agendas and add agenda items;

Preside over executive sessions of independent directors;

Meet regularlyone-on-one with the CEO;

Coordinate the annual performance evaluation of the CEO by the Board and discuss the results with the CEO;

Collaborate with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on the annual self-assessment of the full Board;

Facilitate communications between management and the independent directors;

When necessary, act as a liaison to and facilitate communications among the Corporation’sChairman-CEO, management and directors for the purpose of coordinating information flow among the parties with the goal of optimizing the effectiveness of the Corporation’s Board and Board Committee meetings;

Serve as a conduit of information and feedback among the Corporation’sChairman-CEO and directors between Board meetings; and

Coordinate the review and resolution of conflict of interest issues with respect to members of the Corporation’s Board as they may arise.

Committee Chairs. The Board’s committee structure is designed for effective and efficient Board operations. All committee chairs are independent and are appointed annually by the Board. See discussion underBoard Committees of this proxy statement for further information about our committees. Committee chairs are responsible for:

Calling meetings of their committees;

Presiding at meetings of their committees;

Approving agendas, adding agenda items, and reviewing materials for their committee meetings;

Serving as a liaison between committee members and the Board, and between committee members and senior management, including the CEO; and

Working directly with the members of senior management responsible for the matters reviewed by the committees.

The Board oversees the Company’s CEO and other senior management in the competent and ethicalday-to-day operation of the Company and ensures that our officers are serving the long-term interests of the shareholders. We expect each director to take a proactive and focused approach to his or her position, and to assist in setting standards to ensure that the Company is committed to business success through the maintenance of high standards of responsibility, fiduciary conduct and ethics, as embodied in our Statement of Directors’ Duties and Responsibilities, Code of Ethics, Code of Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Statement of Directors’

  26    F.N.B. Corporation


Our Board of Directors and its Committees                      

Duties and Responsibilities describes the legal, regulatory and fiduciary duties which our directors must adhere to in the conduct of their Board responsibilities. Each of our Directors is required to participate in an annual Code of Conduct training program and affirm that they understand their obligations under the Code of Conduct. Our Code of Conduct applies to all of the Company’s employees and directors and our Code of Ethics applies to senior officers and employees. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines outline the key practices and procedures that our Board follows. These codes and standards may be found on our website atwww.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading.

Our Board met eight times in 2017. Each director attended 100% of the meetings of the Board and the respective committees on which such director served, with the exception of Directors Martz, Motley and Stanik. Director Martz and Director Stanik each missed one Board meeting due to illness. Director Martz attended at least 97.06% and Director Stanik attended at least 95% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and of each committee on which they served. Director Motley missed two committee meetings and attended 94.74% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and his committee meetings. We expect the members of our Board to attend our Annual Meeting as a matter of policy, and all of our current Board members attended our 2017 Annual Meeting with the exception of Directors Bena and Dively, who were not directors in 2017.

Board Committees 

  

 

Our principal Board committees serve as joint committees for both the Corporation and FNBPA and consist of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Nominating Committee), and Risk Committee (collectively, the Standing Committees). The Board has determined that all directors who served as members of the Standing Committees (including their Chairs) during 20172020 are independent under the applicable NYSE standards and SEC rules and otherwise meet the specific eligibility requirements for these committees. The Corporation also has an Executive Committee. Each member of the Executive Committee has been determined by our Board to be independent except for Mr. Gurgovits (former CEO) and Mr. Delie (current CEO). FNBPA has a Credit Risk and CRA Committee. Each member of FNBPA’s Credit Risk and CRA Committee has been determined by our Board to be independent except for Mr. Gurgovits (former CEO).independent. The composition of the Credit Risk and CRA Committee is consistent with federal bank regulatory standards. Board Chairman Delie is an ex officio member of the Credit Risk and CRA Committee. We identify the current members and chairs of our Board and FNBPA committees in the table titled Current Directors and Nominees for Election at Our Annual Meeting in this proxy statement.

Executive Committee.

The Executive Committee, consistent with Pennsylvania law, our bylaws and the committee charter, assists the Board by offering an efficient means of considering matters and issues during intervals between regular meetings of our Board. The Executive Committee met two times in 2017.

Audit Committee

In accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Audit Committee is responsible primarily for selecting and overseeing the services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit department, evaluating our accounting policies and system of internal controls and reviewing significant financial transactions and compliance matters. In addition, the Audit Committee approves all audit services and permittednon-audit services, as well as all engagement fees and terms related thereto. The Audit Committee met 11 times during 2017. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee, Directors Bena, Malone, Martz, Mencini, Motley and Nicholas, qualify as being “financially literate,” and each of these Audit Committee members also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. The determination that each of the Audit Committee members qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” included an evaluation of each person’s qualifications and other relevant experience under applicable SEC rules and definitions, including consideration of each person’s work, financial, business and professional experience. (For more detail regarding the work, financial, business and professional experience of Directors Bena, Malone, Martz, Mencini, Motley and Nicholas considered by the Board in determining financial literacy and expertise, see the section titledBiographical Information Concerning Director Nominees.) Each Audit Committee member also meets the additional criteria for independence of audit committee members set forth under the SEC rules, NYSE listing standards, F.N.B. categorical independence standards, and the applicable federal bank regulatory requirements. We refer you to the Report of the Audit Committee in this proxy statement.

Audit Committee (met 10 times in 2020)

•  Responsible primarily for selecting and overseeing the services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and Internal Audit Department (Internal Audit), evaluating our accounting policies and system of internal controls and reviewing significant financial transactions and compliance matters.

•  Approve all audit services and permitted non-audit services, as well as all engagement fees and terms related thereto.

•  The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as “financially literate,” and each of these Audit Committee members also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. The determination that each of the Audit Committee members qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” included an evaluation of each person’s qualifications and other relevant experience under applicable SEC rules and definitions, including consideration of each person’s work, financial, business and professional experience and educational background. Each Audit Committee member also meets the additional criteria for independence of audit committee members set forth under the SEC rules, NYSE listing standards, F.N.B. categorical independence standards and the applicable federal bank regulatory requirements.

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    27  

Compensation Committee (met 7 times in 2020)

•  Responsible primarily for structuring, reviewing and monitoring the compensation arrangements for our executive officers, including the CEO, administering our equity compensation plans and reviewing and approving the compensation of the Board.

•  Provide a compensation structure that is aligned with strong financial performance and shareholder interests. Works directly with our independent consultant to achieve the Committee’s objectives.

•  For a description of the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures, including the roles of our executive officers and our independent compensation consultant in the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, we refer you to Executive Compensation and Other Proxy Disclosure.

•  The Board has affirmatively determined that each member of the Compensation Committee qualifies under the NYSE, F.N.B. categorical and Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) compensation committee “independence” rules.

  24    F.N.B. Corporation


 

  Our Board of Directors and its CommitteesCorporate Governance  

 

 

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee (also referred to as the “Committee” in theExecutive Compensation and Other Proxy Disclosure discussion of this proxy statement) is responsible primarily for reviewing the compensation arrangements for our executive officers, including the CEO, administering our equity compensation plans, and reviewing the compensation of the Board. For a description of the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures, including the roles of our executive officers and independent compensation consultants in the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, we refer you toExecutiveCompensation and Other Proxy Disclosureelsewhere in this proxy statement. The Compensation Committee met nine times in 2017. The F.N.B. Board has affirmatively determined that each member of the Compensation Committee, Directors Hormell, Malone, Motley and Stanik, qualifies under the NYSE, F.N.B. categorical, and Dodd-Frank compensation committee “independence” rules and as an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Code).

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating Committee assists in the development of standards concerning the qualifications and composition of our Board and conducts succession planning for our Board. In addition, the Nominating Committee recommends director candidates to stand for election to our Board and seeks to promote the best interests of the Company and its shareholders through implementation of prudent and sound corporate governance principles and practices. We refer you to the discussions underIdentification and Evaluation of Director Candidates located elsewhere in this proxy statement. The Nominating Committee met six times in 2017. Each member of the Nominating Committee, Directors Campbell, Chiafullo, Hormell, Mencini and Strimbu, meets the criteria for independence under the NYSE rules and F.N.B. categorical standards.

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee’s principal responsibility is to assist the Board with the review and oversight of the Company’s management of its enterprise-wide risk

program (see discussion underRisk Oversight later in this proxy statement), including establishing, in consultation with senior management, acceptable risk tolerance levels for the Company and reporting this information to the Board. Each member of the Risk Committee, Directors Bena, Dively, Martz, McCarthy, Mencini, Motley and Nicholas, meet the independence criteria under the NYSE rules and F.N.B. categorical standards. The Risk Committee met seven times in 2017.

Credit Risk and CRA Committee

The purpose of the Committee is to oversee the credit and lending strategies and objectives of FNBPA, including: (i) oversight of credit risk management and strategies, including approval of internal credit policies and establishment of loan portfolio concentration limits; (ii) review of the quality and performance of the Bank’s loan portfolio; (iii) approval of intercompany loans subject to Regulation W and loans to Bank “insiders” (as defined under Regulation O) in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements; and (iv) oversight of the Bank’s Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) responsibilities, including the monitoring of the Bank’s community lending and investment activities relative to CRA laws, regulations and requiring guidance, including the CRA Policy, fair lending, affirmative credit programs, and the Bank’s community development activities, and collaborations with national, regional and local community development organizations. The Credit Risk and CRA Committee met nine times in 2017.

The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Executive Committee, Nominating Committee, Risk Committee and Credit Risk and CRA Committee each operate under written charters adopted by the Board. You may review these charters on our website at www.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading. The principal responsibilities of the Standing Committees described above are qualified by reference to the charters of these committees and relevant sections of our bylaws.

Credit Risk and CRA Committee (met 7 times in 2020)

•  Oversee the credit and lending strategies and objectives of FNBPA, including:

•  Credit risk management and strategies, including approval of internal credit policies and establishment of loan portfolio concentration limits;

•  Review of the quality and performance of the Bank’s loan portfolio;

•  Approval of intercompany loans subject to Regulation W and loans to Bank “insiders” (as defined under Regulation O) in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements; and

•  Oversight of the Bank’s Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) responsibilities, including the monitoring of FNBPA’s community lending and investment activities relative to CRA and federal fair lending laws and regulations, our CRA Policy, and our community development activities and collaborations with national, regional and local community development organizations.

•  Oversee of our affirmative credit programs and fair lending matters.

 

 

  28    F.N.B. Corporation

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (met 6 times in 2020)

•  Review and recommends to the Board governance policies, practices and processes.

•  Lead our process to develop standards concerning the qualifications and composition of our Board and conducts succession planning for our Board.

•  Recommend director candidates to stand for election to our Board and seeks to promote the best interests of the Company and its shareholders through implementation of prudent and sound corporate governance principles and practices, including oversight of the Company’s corporate responsibility strategies.

•  Conduct annual Board self-assessment process, evaluates results and reports results to the Board.

•  Oversee the Company’s ESG strategies and reporting.

Risk Committee (met 4 times in 2020)

•  Assist the Board with review and oversight attendant to Company management of its enterprise-wide risk program (see discussion under Oversight of Risk), including establishing, in consultation with the Chief Risk Officer and senior management, an appropriate risk management framework and acceptable risk tolerance levels for the Company and reporting this information to the Board.

Executive Committee (did not

meet in 2020)

•  Assist the Board by offering an efficient means of considering matters and issues requiring immediate attention during intervals between regular meetings of our Board or considering specific responsibilities which may be delegated to it from time to time by the Board.

2021 Proxy Statement    25  


 

Our Board of Directors and its Committees  Corporate Governance  

 

 

Succession Planning 

Board, CEO and Management 

Board Succession and Refreshment

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for leading, in collaboration with our Independent Lead Director and Board Chair, our Board succession and refreshment processes. Our Board’s succession plan and refreshment practices are the culmination of a thoughtful and methodical process that is carried on throughout the year. The chart below describes in detail our Board succession planning process objectives and the ways in which those objectives are met throughout the year.

LOGO

  26    F.N.B. Corporation


  Corporate Governance  

Management and Employee Succession and Refreshment

The CEO, in collaboration with his executive management team, regularly reviews the management and employee succession plan for our Chairman/CEO,

key executives, senior management and other employee positions and periodically consults with the Board, which includes formal presentations to both groups regarding the management succession plan.

Succession planning is a priority for the Board and our senior management, with the goal of ensuring a strong pipeline of leaders for the future. The chart below describes in detail our management and employee succession planning process objectives and the ways in which those objectives are met throughout the year:

LOGO

For additional, detailed information about our succession planning processes, as well as our human capital management program, please see our 2020 Form 10-K and our 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report(see Resources).

2021 Proxy Statement    27  


  Corporate Governance  

 

  

 

 Code of Conduct / Code of EthicsKey Corporate Governance Documents 

  

 

The CompanyOur Board has a Code of Conduct that applies to each ofadopted the Company’s Directors and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, and a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s senior officers and employees. The Company annually requires all directors and employees to certify that they understand their responsibilities under the Code of Conduct. Also, the Company’s directors and employees are required to participate in annual training relative to the standards set forth in the Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics.following key corporate governance documents. You may view copies of our Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics on our websitethese, along with other important governance documents, at

www.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading. In addition, thelinks set forth below. The Company will provide copies of its Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics,these documents, without charge, to any person upon written request sent to our Corporate Secretary at F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212. The Company will disclose any changes in or waivers from its Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics by posting the revised Code(s) or other related information on its website or by filing a Form8-K.

F.N.B. - FNBPA Audit                  Committee Charter

•  The charter governs the operations of the joint F.N.B. - FNBPA Audit Committee and is reviewed on an annual basis, with any changes being recommended and approved by the Board of Directors.

•  You may view the Audit Committee Charter on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/audit-committee-charter-final-101718.pdf

F.N.B. - FNBPA Compensation Committee     Charter

•  The charter governs the operations of the joint F.N.B. - FNBPA Compensation Committee and is reviewed on an annual basis, with any changes being recommended and approved by the Board of Directors.

•  You may view the Compensation Committee Charter on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/compensation-committee-charter-121620.pdf

FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA Committee Charter       

•  The charter governs the operations of the FNBPA Credit Risk and CRA Committee and is reviewed on an annual basis, with any changes being recommended and approved by the FNBPA Board of Directors.

•  You may view the Credit Risk & CRA Committee Charter on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/credit-risk-and-cra-committee-charter-121620.pdf

F.N.B. - FNBPA Executive      Committee Charter

•  The charter governs the operations of the joint F.N.B. - FNBPA Executive Committee and is reviewed on an annual basis, with any changes being recommended and approved by the Board of Directors.

•  You may view the Executive Committee Charter on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/executive-committee-charter-171019.pdf

F.N.B. - FNBPA
Nominating and
Corporate Governance         Committee Charter

•  The charter governs the operations of the joint F.N.B. - FNBPA Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and is reviewed on an annual basis, with any changes being recommended and approved by the Board of Directors.

•  You may view the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/nominating-and-corporate-governance-charter-101619.pdf

F.N.B. - FNBPA Risk               Committee Charter

•  The charter governs the operations of the joint F.N.B. - FNBPA Risk Committee and is reviewed on an annual basis, with any changes being recommended and approved by the Board of Directors.

•  You may view the Risk Committee Charter on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/risk-committee-charter-121819.pdf

  28    F.N.B. Corporation


  Corporate Governance  

F.N.B. Corporation
Corporate Governance
Guidelines (Corporate
Governance Guidelines)

•  The Corporate Governance Guidelines establish a framework for the governance of the Board and the management of our Company.

•  The Company will disclose any changes in its Corporate Governance Guidelines by posting the revised Guidelines or other related information on its website.

•  You may view the Corporate Governance Guidelines on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-guidelines-102120.pdf

F.N.B. Code of Conduct
(Code of Conduct)

•  The Code of Conduct applies to all Company directors and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer.

•  The Code of Conduct reflects F.N.B.’s policy of responsible and ethical business practices and states that the Company’s reputation for integrity depends on the conduct of its representatives.

•  The Company annually requires all directors and employees to certify that they understand their responsibilities under the Code of Conduct.

•  The Company’s directors and employees are required to participate in annual training relative to the standards set forth in the Code of Conduct.

•  The Company will disclose any changes in or waivers from its Code of Conduct by posting the revised Code or other related information on its website.

•  You may view the Code of Conduct on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/code-of-conduct-180919.pdf

F.N.B. Code of Ethics for
Senior Executives and
Financial Managers (Code
of Ethics)

•  The Code of Ethics applies to the Company’s senior officers and employees.

•  The Code of Ethics advocates for, among other things, honest behavior and integrity, compliance with statutes, rules and regulations of any federal, state and local government that are applicable to the Company’s operations and acting in order to maintain the Company’s reputation.

•  The Company’s directors and employees are required to participate in annual training relative to the standards set forth in the Code of Ethics.

•  The Company will disclose any changes in or waivers from its Code of Ethics by posting the revised Code or other related information on its website.

•  You may view the Code of Ethics on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/code-ethics.pdf

F.N.B. Corporation Policy
with Respect to Related
Person Transactions
(Related Persons
Transactions Policy)

•  This policy sets forth the procedures with respect to the review and approval of all transactions involving the Company and a related person.

•  You may view the Related Persons Transactions Policy on our website at: https://www.fnb-online.com/-/media/fnbonline/files/feature/pagecontent/au/corporate-governance/policy-respect-180118.pdf

2021 Proxy Statement    29  


  Corporate Governance  

 

  

 

Oversight of Risk Oversight 

  
 

 

TheOur Board recognizes that as a financial institution, theeffective management of our Company takes on a certain amount ofrequires identifying, understanding, and prudently and proactively managing risk in every business decision, transactionattendant to our businesses and activity. The Company’soperations. Our Board and management manage our risk appetite to optimize long-term shareholder value while supporting our employees, customers and communities. We approve our Enterprise Risk Appetite and critical risk policies at the Board level. We discuss ouroversees risk management approach in the Risk Management sectionthrough multiple layers of Item 7 of this year’s Annual Report on Form10-K. The Company’s Boarddefense and management have identified the following major categories of risk: credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, strategic alignment and reputation, operational risks (legal, fiduciary, compliance, regulatory, technology), economic risk, succession planning and compensation practices, and capital adequacy. In its oversight role of the Company’s risk management function, the Board is mindful that risk management is not about eliminating risk, but rather is about identifying, accepting and managing risks so as to optimize total shareholder value, while balancing prudent business considerations, maintaining safety and soundness and mitigating potential customer impact.

receives reports regarding F.N.B.’s corporate culture emphasizes a strong compliance culture, and places critical value on risk management at all levels, from the Board level to each of our employees. The importance of effectively managing risks in the execution of our strategic objectives is reinforced throughout our workforce through incentive compensation and training programs, with particular emphasis on ensuring that such strategic execution is consistent with our risk appetite.

The Company supports its risk management process through a governance structure involving its Board and senior management. The Board Risk Committee

establishes risk tolerance limits for monitoring significant business regulatory matters, and oversees senior management in monitoring business and strategic decisions with respect to the Company’s risk profile. The Risk Committee oversees senior management in the following activities: (i) identification, measurement, assessment, monitoring and controlling of enterprise-wide risk across the Company and its subsidiaries; (ii) development of appropriate and meaningful risk metrics to use in connection with the oversight of the Company’s businesses and strategies; (iii) review and assessment of Company policies and practices to manage the Company’s credit, market, liquidity, operating and regulatory risk (including technology, operational, compliance and fiduciary risks); and (iv) identification and implementation of risk management best practices. The Board Risk Committee serves as the primary point of contact between our Board and the FNBPA Risk Management Committee, which is the senior management-level committee responsible for FNBPA’s risk management. The combined board structure, which includes an interlocking directorate for the F.N.B. and FNBPA Boards and a joint meeting schedule, was implemented in 2015 as part of an initiative to streamline and further strengthen the governance, oversight and risk management processes, challenges and issues from

our Audit, Risk and Credit Risk and CRA Committees (each of which is composed entirely of independent directors who qualify under the requirements of the Company’sSEC and FNBPA’s Boards of Directors.

Generally, we use a variety of key risk metrics at the businessNYSE), executive management, internal information security and operational unit level, as well as by risk category, to develop a quarterlycompliance departments, and our Chief Risk Appetite Dashboard to enable the Board Risk Committee and the Board, as well as our various management level risk committees, to oversee, manage and monitor our adherence to our risk appetite. As noted above, the Company’s principal subsidiary, FNBPA, has a Risk Management Committee composed of seniorOfficer.

 

 

LOGO

2018 Proxy Statement    29  LOGO

LOGO

  30    F.N.B. Corporation


 

  Our Board of Directors and its CommitteesCorporate Governance  

 

 

management. The purposeWe have established a complaint process with regard to the following matters:

COMPLAINT PROCEDURES

LOGO

We also encourage active engagement among the different areas within the Company responsible for our risk management oversight. Since certain risk management issues and processes are considered by both our Audit and Risk Committees, our governance structure ensures that appropriate information and knowledge is disseminated between these two committees by having certain interlocking members of this committeeboth committees, and providing these committees authority to conduct joint sessions to hear reports and discuss key risk management and audit matters affecting our Company.

2021 Proxy Statement    31  


  Corporate Governance  

Each of our business areas is required to provide regular oversight of specific areas of risk with respectensure that decisions relative to new business initiatives, products and services or material changes to our business model or operations conform to the Company’s Statement of Risk Appetite approved by our Board’s Risk Committee. Moreover, each of our various lines of business and operations and support areas include appropriate governance processes in considering the limits incorporated into our Risk Appetite Statement, including, but not limited to, policy, risk tolerance limits, key risk indicators, risk and control self-assessments, model validation, capital planning and stress testing and strategic planning.

LOGO

We believe our comprehensive internal risk framework facilitates an appropriate level of risk oversight by our Risk Committee, including such critical features as:

Providing that risks are identified, monitored and reported properly;

Defining and measuring the type and amount of risk the Company is willing to take;

Communicating the type and amount of risk taken to the appropriate management level;

Promoting a strong risk management structure. The FNBPA Risk Management Committee reportsculture that encourages a focus on a regular basis to the Company’s Board Risk Committee regarding the enterprise-wide risk profile of the Company, trackingrisk-adjusted performance; and monitoring of risk-related matters and other significant risk management issues. F.N.B.’s Chief Risk Officer is principally responsible for the design and implementation of the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management strategy and framework, consistent with tolerance limits established by the Board Risk Committee, and ensures the coordinated and consistent implementation of risk management initiatives and strategies on aday-to-day basis. Our Compliance Department, which reports to the Chief Risk Officer, is responsible for developing policies and procedures and monitoring the Bank’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Further, the Company’s audit function performs an independent assessment of the Company’s internal controls environment and plays an integral role in testing the operation of our internal controls systems and reporting findings to management and the Company’s Audit Committee. Both the Company’s Board Risk Committee and Audit Committee regularly report on risk-related matters to the Company’s Board. Significant risk-related matters, including regulatory, financial, economic, industry, transactional, business, cybersecurity, technology, litigation, compliance and other matters are regularly monitored, evaluated and reported to, and discussed by the various management-level risk committees along with the Board and Risk Committee.

Our compensation philosophy supports and reflects F.N.B.’s risk appetite and risk management culture. Our Compensation Committee, in consultation with an experienced and independent executive compensation advisor, monitors and evaluates our compensation practices from

Maintaining a risk management perspective to ensureorganization that such compensationis independent of risk-taking activities. We incorporate both front-line risk-monitoring at the business level, and incentive practices do not encourage unduea second-line of defense consisting of monitoring oversight by our risk and compliance functions (which are consistent withindependent of our business operations). In addition, we have an independent check of both of our first- and second-line risk management processes through our internal and external audit function.

  32    F.N.B. Corporation


  Corporate Governance  

Our primary risk exposures, as well as our risk management framework and methodologies, are discussed more fully under Item 1A — Risk Factors (pages 22-35) and the Risk Management discussion (pages 77-78) in the Company’s risk appetite. Our risk policies2020 Form 10-K. Also see Compensation Governance and procedures guide our management’s decisions, including how we pay employees. By setting and communicating our risk appetite in advance, we seek to manage and controlRisk Management within the risks that employees can take or effectively influence, consistent with their roles and responsibilities to serve our clients.

All employees have performance objectives tied to business and individual performance, but each employee also has customer and compliance focus and risk management responsibilities. We evaluate employee performance against these objectives, in addition to considering risk outcomes from actions taken in prior years. We incorporate our comprehensive evaluation of employee risk management into our performance and incentive compensation decisions. In addition, all employees are encouraged to collaborate across groups to identify and mitigate risks and elevate and address identified risk-related issues or concerns.

Our compensation program is designed to encourage managementCompensation Committee Report for a discussion of risk within our appetite and discourage inappropriate risk-taking and conduct relativeassessment as it relates to our customers, by offering incentive compensation awards to our executives and employees designed, in part, to reward appropriate conduct relative to our customers. Specifically, we balance our incentive awards between fixed and variable compensation; cash and equity-based compensation; and annual and long-term compensation. We base awards to Section 16 officers on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of a variety of quantitative and qualitative performance measurements, both on an absolute and a relative basis. Likewise, the CEO, in consultation with senior management, performs a similar assessment fornon-Sectionprogram. 16 employees. Compensation decisions also rely on discretion to consider other factors, such as effective risk management, commitment to delivering a superior customer experience, compliance with controls and ethical duties, competition for top talent, market-based pay levels and the need to attract and engage our leaders.

The Board believes that the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management process is effective since it includes the following material components: (i) enables the Board, Risk and Audit Committees, Chief Risk Officer and senior management to properly assess the quality of the information it receives;receives and the adequacy of strategies deployed to manage various risk matters; (ii) enables the Board, the Audit and Risk Committees and senior management to monitor the risk management considerations concerning the Company’s businesses, investments and financial, accounting, regulatory and legal compliance, investments, financial performance, technology and operations, cybersecurity effectiveness, audit and accounting methods and practices, and strategic considerations of F.N.B. and its subsidiaries, and the risks that they face;plan; (iii) enables the Board and the Audit, Credit Risk and CRA, and Risk Committees to oversee and assess how senior management evaluates risk; and (iv) provides the Board and its Audit, Credit Risk and CRA, and Risk Committees appropriate oversight perspective to assess the quality of the Company’s enterprise-wide risk management process.

 

 

  30    F.N.B. Corporation

2021 Proxy Statement    33  


 

Our Board of Directors and its Committees  Corporate Governance  

 

 

  

 

Shareholder Engagement  

Our Company has an effective, robust engagement program with shareholders and other stakeholders on a wide range of topics throughout the year. Engagement and transparency with our shareholders help the Company gain useful feedback on these topics. Shareholder feedback also helps us to better tailor the public information we provide to our shareholders and other interested parties. Our engagement efforts in 2020 included:

LOGO

In connection with its engagement with shareholders and other interested parties, management and the Board limit the discussions in accordance with the requirements of Federal Regulation FD.

  34    F.N.B. Corporation


  Corporate Governance  

Enhancements Resulting From 

Shareholder Engagement 

  
 

We have developed and operate under corporate governance principles and practices which are designed

As part of our commitment to optimize long-term shareholder value, align the interests ofeffective engagement with investors, our Board and management with those ofteam evaluate and respond to the views communicated by our shareholders and promote the highest ethical conduct amongproxy advisory firms, including vote results at our directors, managementAnnual Meeting. After considering input from shareholders, a recognized proxy advisory firm and employees.

Highlights of portions ofother stakeholders, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, as well as some ofCompany has made enhancements to our corporate governance policies, practices, procedures and related matters are as follows:2021 Proxy Statement, including:

 

  

Maintain an Overwhelmingly Independent Board. Of the Board’s current 15 members, 13 are independent,Additional detail describing our Board succession planning and refreshment processes, including theconsiderations relative to our Board leadership positions and our Independent Lead Director.Director (see section of Proxy Statement titled, Succession Planning — Board, CEO and Management).

 

  

StriveProvided more detail in the proxy statement regarding our Board diversity (see Current Directors and Nominees for Board Diversity Election at our Annual Meeting and Seek Best Director Candidates. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines expressly state that we shall consider diversity, among other important factors, in connection with Board composition determinations. In addition to skillsCriteria and experience, we believe that a Board composed of a mix of diverse backgrounds, including gender, age, race and ethnicity, creates a diversity of perspectives among the Board and thereby supports a more complex consideration of Company strategies and opportunities, and ultimately a more productive Board. Our Board reflects an appropriate range of skills and professional expertise,Considerations for Recommending Director-Nominees), as well as our initiatives and strategies to continue to build a broad range of diverse backgrounds. Presently, almost 27% ofworkforce (see our Board is composed of directors who qualify as diverse 2021 Corporate Responsibility Reportunder traditionally accepted diversity standards (assuming the Board recommended slate of nominees is elected at the 2018 F.N.B. Annual Meeting, this percentage will increase to 31%Resources).

Continued to add metric-related data to our 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report.

 

Shareholder Access to Board. Shareholders may communicate directly with our Board or any Board Committee or any individual director.

Incorporated information regarding certain ESG-related financial and investment commitments in our 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report).

 

  

Maintain Independent Committees.Discussed the Company’s COVID-19 Our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Risk Committees are composed entirely of independent directors. Each of these committees operates under a written charter (posted on the Corporation’s website atwww.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading) approved by the Board and annually reviewed by each committee.

All Audit Committee Members Qualify Under All SEC, NYSE and Federal Bank Regulatory Standards. Each of our Audit Committee members qualifiesresponse, as financially literate, a financial expert and independent under applicable SEC and

NYSE standards. Audit Committee members cannot serve on more than one other public company audit committee without the approval of our Board.

Internal Auditor Reports Directly to Audit Committee. Our internal auditor, who oversees our internal audit function, reports directly to our Audit Committee.

Independent Compensation Consultant. Our Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant whose sole service to F.N.B. is to provide the Compensation Committee with advice and guidance on our executive and Board compensation and incentive programs.

Shareholder Nominations and Proposals. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders. For details regarding our policy with regard to the consideration of director candidates recommended by our shareholders, we refer toShareholder Proposals and Nominations for 2019 Annual Meetingand Identification and Evaluation of Director Nominees elsewhere in this proxy statement and our Corporate Governance Guidelines on our corporate website.

Conduct Annual Board and Individual Director Self-Assessment Evaluations. The Board and its committees conduct rigorous annualself-evaluations. The self-assessment process is designed to evaluate Board, committee and individual director performance, and to promotebest-in-class governance practices and serve as one of the considerations as to whether tore-nominate a director for election to the Board.

Facilitate a Comprehensive Director Education Program. The F.N.B. director orientation and education program, more fully detailed in the information provided under Summary — 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Response, as well as our 2021 Corporate Governance Guidelines, provides the opportunity for new directors to participate in orientation sessions, including meetings with Board leadership and senior management, and mentorship arrangements, and to receive associated written materials describing, among other matters, company policies, fiduciary responsibilities, regulatory requirements and strategic plan objectives. Directors are provided an annual education stipend to encourage them to

2018 Proxy StatementResponsibility Report.    31  


  Our Board of Directors and its Committees

 

attend outside board and director educational conferences, including the ability to attend regional and national conferences, and each director is required to annually complete a full curriculum designed to inform them on critical regulatory compliance matters. Each F.N.B. director attended at least one outside director education session or conference in 2017 (several F.N.B. directors attended multiple director education sessions) and complete F.N.B.’s internal compliance curriculum. Additionally, our directors and committees are routinely provided materials to stay well-informed of current trends, issues and best practices with respect to corporate governance, risk management, compensation, audit, regulatory and other related topics.

Expect Director Attendance at Meetings. The average attendance by directors at Board and committee meetings during 2017 was 98.82%. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the expectation that directors will attend all shareholder and Board meetings and those committee meetings of which they are a member, and at a minimum, at least 75% of Board and committee meetings in the aggregate. Ten members of the Board have attended all meetings, with the exception of Directors Martz and Stanik, who each missed a meeting due to illness, and Mr. Motley who missed two meetings (seeOur Board of Directors and its Committees — Board Structure and Responsibilities).

Corporate Governance Policies Published on Website. The Board has adopted strong governance policies which are disclosed on the Company’s website at www.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading.

Provide for Strong Clawback Policy. Our compensation recoupment or clawback policy allows our Board to recoup any excess compensation paid to our NEOs if the Company restates its financial results upon which an award is based due to fraud, intentional misconduct or gross negligence.

No Hedging of Company Stock. Our directors, NEOs (as described in theExecutive CompensationandOther Proxy Disclosure sections of this proxy statement) and all other employees are not permitted to engage in hedging strategies using puts, calls or other derivative securities based on the Company’s common stock.

Independent Lead Director. In view of our combinedChairman-CEO Board structure, the Board recognizes the importance of independent and proactive leadership on the Board, as evidenced by its designation of an independent Lead Director. For details regarding our Lead Director’s qualifications and responsibilities, we refer you toBiographical Information Concerning Director Nominees (refer to director William B. Campbell’s biography) and the “Independent Lead Director” description under theOur Board of Directors and Its Committees discussion and the description contained in ourCorporate Governance Guidelines at our corporate website www.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading.

Maintain Robust Stock Ownership Requirement. Appropriate stock ownership policies for our senior management and Board designed to ensure that their interests are meaningfully aligned with shareholders’ interests, as more fully detailed under the caption,Director Stock Ownership Requirements of this proxy statement and described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Board and Committee Access to Outside Advisors. Our Board and its committees may retain their own legal counsel and other professional advisors without management approval and at the Company’s expense.

Regularly Conduct Board Executive Sessions. Our Board conducted six executive sessions in 2017, of which two were attended by all directors and the CEO, two were attended exclusively by independent directors and two were attended exclusively bynon-management directors. William B. Campbell, our Independent Lead Director, sets the agenda for each executive session and presides at all executive sessions.

Maintain aDe-Classified Board. The full Board of Directors is elected annually.

Properly Align Executive Compensation. We have specific policies and practices to align executive compensation with long-term stockholder interest. These policies and practices are routinely reviewed by the Compensation Committee in conjunction with advice and counsel of a qualified independent consultant. A majority of the incentive compensation opportunities allocated to key executives is not guaranteed; executive

  32    Explained our rationale for holding the 2020 F.N.B. Corporation Annual Meeting in a virtual format (COVID-19 health and safety considerations).


Our Board of Directors and its Committees                      

compensation is tied to Company performance and aligned with the long-term interest of stockholders.

Regular Review of Management and Succession Planning. The Board proactively engages in the review of the Board, CEO, executive, senior andmid-level management succession planning.

Continuous Focus on Strategic Planning. The Board and management regularly focus on strategy and planning, including Board oversight of the strategic planning development process and Board approval of the Strategic Plan. The Board regularly receives updates on the Company’s progress under the Strategic Plan.

Remain Socially Responsible. We have longstanding and significant commitments to various corporate social, community, civic and charitable endeavors throughout our markets,

including commitments relative to moderate-income andlow-income communities. Also, the Company offers a number of programs and benefits designed to promote long-term employee welfare, including a Diversity Committee whose mission is to promote and maintain a diverse workforce. Among other things, the Diversity Committee assists the Company with developing and implementing plans and practices to promote diverse leadership through recruitment, mentoring, and other innovative programs (See discussion underOur Environmental, Social and Governance Leadership of this proxy statement).

No Adoption of a “Poison Pill.” There is no stockholder rights plan or “poison pill.”

No Family Relationships Among Directors and Executive Officers. No immediate family relationships exist between any of our directors or executive officers.

 

We encourage you to visitDisclosed our corporate website at www.fnbcorporation.com undercompensation considerations in view of the “About Us” tab, selectingCOVID-19 pandemic impact.

Also, see Say-on-Pay Support and Investor Engagement in our CD&A for our 2020 Say-on-Pay vote, which describes our compensation-related shareholder engagement discussions and the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrollingresulting disclosure enhancements we made in response to the “Corporate Governance” heading for additional information about our Board, its committees, our Corporate Governance

Guidelines, our Code of Ethics, our Code of Conduct and our Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, Risk, Executive, Credit Risk and CRA, and Compensation Committee Charters. We also include additional information on these topics in other sections of this proxy statement.shareholder discussions.

 

 

  

 

 Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and

Employee Engagement 

Effective and meaningful strategies relative to ESG matters and employee engagement, welfare and inclusion are critical components of our efforts to manage our company for the long term and remain a trusted and respected company by our four key constituencies: shareholders, customers, communities, and employees. F.N.B. communicates information about its ESG and employee engagement, welfare and inclusion initiatives through a variety of means, including reports and presentations, regulatory filings,

press releases and direct engagement with our shareholders, customers, employees and communities, in our efforts to remain responsive to the concerns of our key constituencies. The following discussion highlights important 2017 ESG and employee engagement, welfare and inclusion initiatives, commitments and achievements which reflect on how we build and maintain trust and credibility as a company that people want to work for, invest in, do business with, and be proud to have as a part of their community.

2018 Proxy Statement    33  


  Our Board of Directors and its Committees

Our Environmental Leadership

F.N.B. Focused on Green Initiatives

g  Promoted green workplace practices (e.g., recycling, paperless electronic filing and records management, etc.) and behavior among our employees, as well as deploy environmentally-responsible practices with respect to the operation and construction of F.N.B. offices and branch facilities, with a focus on reducing energy and water consumption and carbon emissions, conserving resources, and recycling waste. In 2017, we announced plans to build our Southeast regional headquarters office, First National Bank Tower, in Raleigh, North Carolina, which will include office, residential and retail space, along with achieving U.S. Green Building Council LEED Platinum certifications.

g  Promoted paperless billing and account statements for customers and strongly encouraged use of mobile devices and computers for paperless communication with F.N.B.

g  Continued the F.N.B. “green” operations strategy whereby we have instituted various strategies and tactics to reduce our environmental footprint. As an example, our Operations Area’s “War on Paper” commitment has resulted in a reduction of 6.7 million pieces of paper, with more significant reductions to come. Moreover, we continuously monitor our “clean” initiatives to track and measure our progress to ensure we remain focused on our environment.

Environmentally Sound Lending Practices

g  Leveraged our financial skills and expertise to workside-by-side with our clients to achieve their business and strategic objectives that, increasingly, include a focus on sustainability, green facilities, clean energy and other environmentally beneficial projects.

g  Increased our focus on energy efficiency financing, providing credit for clean and sustainable businesses and for enterprises with an environmental focus.

g  Provided millions of dollars toward renewable energy financing for entities engaged in renewable and clean energy projects and initiatives.

g  Included environmental considerations as part of the broad spectrum of risks in assessing client transactions and F.N.B. activities.

  34    F.N.B. Corporation


Our Board of Directors and its Committees                      

Our Social Leadership

Innovative Banking Products and Services for the Economically “At Risk” and Promoting Financial Literacy

g  Provided a variety of specialized consumer, home mortgage and small business loan programs to benefit economically disadvantaged communities and individuals and providelow-income and moderate-income homebuyers access to socially responsible mortgage lending products which offer affordable entry-level rates and terms. Additionally, we participate in programs intended to drive expansion, including Low Income Housing and Educational Improvement Tax Credit programs and the Small Business Administration Preferred Lender Program. We continue to strengthen our efforts to servelow-income to moderate-income members of our communities, such as through access to proprietary mortgage programs designed to make homeownership more accessible to clients meeting certain qualifications.

g  Continued to partner with organizations such as the National Community Reinvestment Coalition and the NeighborWorks’ regional agencies within our markets, who serve lower income persons and communities and promote efforts to improve economic and housing opportunities for these communities and individuals.

g  Initiated an innovative digital financial literacy program which harnesses technology to deliver financial educational programs online through more device access at our branches, and in the communities, to enable people to bridge gaps and overcome barriers which historically prevented economically disadvantaged people from achieving financial security and owning their own home. Topics for our financial literacy program include managing checking accounts, borrowing wisely, identity protection, and first time home buying. These educational tools are available in our branch offices and accessible through mobile devices and can be viewed at the customer’s convenience.

g  Maintained policies, procedures and practices designed to simplify our products, services and operations to focus on the customer’s particular needs, promote a consultative experience and empower our customers to make informed choices about their finances.

g  Continually deployedstate-of-the-art technology to deliver our customers, employees and shareholders with convenient and secure access to allow for a more universally consistent and meaningful experience through mobile and online devices. S&P Global Marketing Intelligence conducted a survey in 2017 which concluded that F.N.B.’s mobile application is a leader in both features and innovation when compared with large national and regional financial services companies.

2018 Proxy Statement    35  


  Our Board of Directors and its Committees

Committed Community Partner

g  Implemented a $6.1 billion multi-year community development commitment initiative to support mortgages, community development and small business lending and investments in economically disadvantaged and predominantly minority communities. To further support this initiative, F.N.B. has developed strategic partnerships with community andnon-profit organizations that focus on community and economic development issues across its footprint.

g  Embraced our ongoing mission of improving the quality of life in the communities we serve. During the first half of 2017, we made a $5.5 million contribution to our Foundation, which provides grants for a range ofnon-profits throughout our footprint. This contribution was part of a broader community benefit plan focusing on charitable giving, community development investments and lending efforts serving financially-vulnerable and historically underserved populations.

g  Honored employees with our Community Spirit Award recognizing those who embrace our culture of innovation and teamwork along with an outstanding history of community service. In keeping with the theme of the award, recipients have the opportunity to choose a qualified charity to receive a significant contribution from F.N.B.

g  Recognized the need to provide support to our communities and others in times of crisis and national disasters, and toward that end, F.N.B. and its employees contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to provide relief and support for flood and hurricane victims in North Carolina, Florida and Texas.

g  Supported the armed services by employing veterans and/or their spouses and offering specialized loan and consumer products for members of the armed services.

g  Continued to leverage our employees’ skills, passion, energy and expertise to help local community, civic, charitable andnon-profit organizations fulfill their missions and enhance their capabilities. In 2017, passionate and community-oriented employees collectively (at all levels) volunteered approximately 30,000 hours of their personal time.

g  Community commitment starts at the top as our Board members collectively provided more than 1370 hours of their time in 2017 to support more than 49 national, regional and local charitable,non-profit, community and civic organizations dedicated to improving the lives, health and welfare of persons residing in our communities. (SeeBiographical Information Concerning Director Nominees of this proxy statement which includes details regarding our directors’ charitable,non-profit, civic and community work.) Our directors served in leadership roles at more than 37 of these organizations.

g  Again recognized by Greenwich Associates as a 2018 Greenwich Excellence in Banking Award winner, receiving high scores both nationally and regionally for satisfaction among Small Business clients. Since 2009, F.N.B. has received a total of 43 Greenwich Excellence Awards for its commercial banking client experience. F.N.B.’s six most recent awards include national honors for Branch Satisfaction and Northeast regional honors for Overall Client Satisfaction and Likelihood to Recommend in the Small Business segment. The company also received honors in the Cash Management category, including national recognition for Customer Service and Overall Satisfaction, as well as for Overall Satisfaction in the Northeast region.

  36    F.N.B. Corporation


Our Board of Directors and its Committees                      

Promoted Diversity Within F.N.B. and at Other Companies

g  Acted as lead sponsor and principal underwriter of the inauguralAfrican American Directors Forum which promotes increased diversity, particularly with respect to African American representation on boards of public companies. Director Motley was instrumental in organizing this program and Chairman Delie participated as a panelist in the program. This Forum’s invitees included leadership from large U.S. public companies and prominent African American corporate and governmental leaders from across the U.S.

g  Director Chiafullo assisted in the development of the National Association of Corporate Directors’ conference,National Conversations on Board Diversity, and served as the moderator/panelist for this forum.

g  F.N.B. was included onJust Capital’s 2017 list ofAmerica’s Most Just Companies, which ranks the largest publicly-traded U.S. corporations on various measures relative to “just corporate behavior” toward workers, customers, products, environment, communities, jobs and shareholder management.

g  For further information, see discussion under the subheadingOur Employee Engagement, Welfare and Inclusion Commitment.

2018 Proxy Statement    37  


  Our Board of Directors and its Committees

Our Governance Leadership

Highly Qualified and Diverse Board Composition andBest-in-Class Governance Practices

g  Our Board reviews progress under the Company Strategic Plan at each Board meeting and reviews CEO and senior management succession at least annually.

g  Our Board and committees conduct intensive and thoughtful self-assessments with an emphasis on evaluating Board performance and composition, practices, culture and effectiveness of meetings and Board materials.

g  The Board receives regular update reports on ESG strategies that are central to F.N.B.’s diversity, social, employee welfare and environmental initiatives.

g  F.N.B.’s dynamic Board refreshment and succession process is demonstrated by the fact that 78% of the directors who served on our Board in 2017 joined the Board in 2008 or later, with 55% of them joining the Board since 2012. Our Board refreshment philosophy is best illustrated by the fact that, since 2010, 14 directors have transitioned from our Board (this will increase to 16 in 2018 when two directors retire in May 2018).

g  More than 61% of our directors have CEO experience.

g  Our independent andnon-management directors meet privately in executive session at least four times a year.

g  Our Independent Lead Director’s expansive and well-defined responsibilities set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, extend well beyond those typically assigned to public company lead directors.

g  Our Board regularly receives input regarding shareholder outreach efforts and input provided by shareholders.

g  During 2017, our Board and Board committees held 63 Board, committee meetings, executive sessions and other meetings.

g  Our Board regularly evaluates optimal Board leadership strategies.

g  Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engages in an ongoing consideration of potential Board candidates by considering not only professional skills and knowledge, but also gender, race, ethnicity, nationality and background. Our approach has resulted in a Board consisting of almost 27% diverse members (which should increase to 31% when considering mandatory retirements in accordance with our Board succession planning and the successfulre-election of our current slate of director nominees at the Annual Meeting) who collectively possess a strong mix of skill sets, background, and experience provides the Board a well-rounded capacity to oversee F.N.B.’s business and operations.

g  For further information, see discussion under the subheadingBiographical Information Concerning Director Nominees.

  38    F.N.B. Corporation


Our Board of Directors and its Committees                      

Our Employee Engagement, Welfare and Inclusion Commitment

As we strive to make our Company a fulfilling place to work, we listen to our employees to build upon our programs and resources to enhance their experience,

help them deepen their skill sets and further develop their careers with us. We focus our human capital management efforts on key areas, including:

Promoted Inclusive Workforce Environment

g  Utilized our Diversity Council, chaired by our EVP of Human Resources, to promote an inclusive culture that attracts, retains and develops an exceptional and diverse workforce by deploying appropriate strategies and tactics specially designed to offer increased opportunities for employment, advancement, and leadership opportunities for diverse employees within our Company. The Diversity Council is designed to elevate individual performance at all levels and provide our employees with valuable career mentoring and coaching. When deployed on a broader scale, the intended outcome is an organizational lift that we are able to return to our clients in the form of an improved experience and performance.

g  Maintained a diverse and inclusive company where our employees are actively encouraged to contribute their unique background talents and experiences for the benefit of F.N.B. and our customers and shareholders. Currently, our workforce is 71% female. Moreover, more than 53% of our Company leadership positions are held by females and minorities.

g  Engaged in training and other initiatives to reinforce policies and practices relative to sexual harassment, discrimination, and ethical standards.

2018 Proxy Statement    39  


  Our Board of Directors and its Committees

Competitive and Socially Responsible Compensation and Benefit Practices

g  All of our compensation plans are reviewed and certified annually by our risk management function to ensure that our compensation plans do not encourage undue risk and are consistent with the risk profile established by our Board’s Risk Committee. We continually evaluate our Company’s compensation and benefit practices relative to competitors, with the ultimate goal of retaining and hiring the highest caliber employees.

g  During recent years, FNB has engaged in ongoing adjustments to our compensation practices, including increases to hourly wages and pay grade levels, broadening many job grades to permit higher salaries and reasonable incentive opportunities for higher performers, retooling FNB’s stock ownership plans to reach more of our employees and offering competitive benefit packages that stack up not only to our peers but to some of the largest competitors in our market.

g  Historically, we have paid our hourly,non-commissioned employees at a rate higher than federal, state and local minimum wage requirements, and in early 2018, F.N.B. announced its intent to accelerate its existing plan to raise the minimum hourly wage for its employees to $15.00 by the end of 2019. This pay increase will have a particularly meaningful impact for our tellers, customer service representatives, operations employees, and other employees.

g  Our tuition reimbursement program provides thousands of employees up to $6,000 per year for undergraduate programs and up to $10,000 per year for graduate programs, totaling $122,974 paid toward courses related to current or future roles at our company.

g  Our 401(k) offers our employees competitive matching contributions and investment options. In early 2018, F.N.B. announced a planned discretionary,one-time 401(k) contribution, totaling $1 million, to benefit employees on the lower end of our compensation ranges.

g  Aligned the cost of health coverage with compensation through progressive premiums to provide more affordable coverage for employees on the lower range of our pay scale. Our approach is built on the things we can do together with our employees to address health risks and manage health care costs, including focusing on wellness, physical and emotional well-being, providing health education and support, and partnering with efficient, cost effective and accountable health care providers.

g  We plan to launch a program to cover a portion of the cost of adoption services and anticipate implementation of additional similar employee welfare programs in the future.

  40    F.N.B. Corporation


Our Board of Directors and its Committees                      

Highly Engaged and Satisfied Workforce

g  Conducted a biennial company-wide employee culture and engagement survey to assess our employees’ satisfaction with their job, the F.N.B. culture and leadership, and various other important employee engagement measures. In 2017. F.N.B.’s “overall employee engagement” score was in the “outstanding” range as compared to peers and across all U.S. industries.

g  Our employees’ satisfaction with the culture and opportunities offered by F.N.B. is best illustrated by our consistent recognition through rational independent third-party surveys identifying F.N.B. as an attractive workplace as demonstrated by the following:

  Finalist, Best Places to Work in Baltimore (Baltimore Business Journal2017)

  Top Workplaces in Northeast Ohio (The Plain Dealer2015-2017)

  Top Workplaces in Pittsburgh (PittsburghPost-Gazette 2011-2017)

  Best Places to Work in Western Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh Business Times2011-2017)

  Special Award for Leadership in the Large Company Category — Vincent J. Delie, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer (Top Workplaces in Pittsburgh,PittsburghPost-Gazette2016)

Director Independence 

  
 

 

Background.Applicable Standards for Determining Director Independence.

As a company that has securities listed on theThe NYSE listing standards require a majority of the membersour directors and each member of our Board mustAudit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees to be independent (which can be found in the NYSE: Corporate Governance Guide at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/listing/NYSE_Corporate_Governance_Guide.pdf). In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require a substantial majority of our directors to be independent. UnderOur Board has adopted Director Independence Categorical Standards (Categorical Standards) which are contained in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (see Key Corporate Governance Documents), to assist it in determining each director’s independence. The Categorical Standards allow for the NYSE’s corporate governance standards, no director qualifies asassessment of independence based upon the specified categories and types of transactions which conform to, or, in part, are more rigorous than, the independence requirements of the NYSE.

F.N.B. Director Independence Determinations.

In early 2021, the independent unlessdirectors on our Board, affirmatively determines thatin coordination with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, evaluated the director has no “material relationship” with F.N.B. The fact that a directorrelevant relationships between each director/director-nominee (and his or member of a director’sher immediate family may have a material relationship withmembers and affiliates) and F.N.B. directly, or as a partner, owner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with F.N.B., will not necessarily preclude such director from being nominated for election to our Board. In assessing director independence, the Board must consider all relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether a material relationship exists. This portion of the proxy statement describes the NYSE independence standards for directors and the categorical independence standards that our Board adopted to guide it in evaluating director independence. The types of material relationships that the Board may considerits subsidiaries under the NYSE and F.N.B. categorical independence standards include commercial, legal, industrial, banking, business, consulting, accounting, charitable (collectively, F.N.B. Independence Standards) described more fully in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (see Key Corporate Governance Documents) and family relationships.affirmatively determined that all our directors/director-nominees are independent, except for Mr. Delie, due to his position as CEO of our Company. Specifically, the following 11 of our 12 directors/director-nominees are independent under the F.N.B. Independence Standards: Ms. Bena, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Chiafullo, Ms. Dively, Mr. Hormell, Mr. Malone, Mr. Mencini, Mr. Motley, Ms. Nicholas, Mr. Stanik and Mr. Strimbu.

The NYSE’s bright-line independence tests. The NYSE established director independence requirements in order to increase the quality of Board oversight at listed companies and to lessen the possibility that damaging conflicts of interests will influence Board decisions.

Some of the relationships that are deemed to automatically impair a director’s independence under NYSE’s “bright-line” tests include the following:

a director employed by F.N.B.;

a director’s immediate family member is an F.N.B. executive officer;

a director’s (or immediate family member’s) receipt of more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from F.N.B.;

a director (or immediate family member) who has been an executive officer of a company where an F.N.B. executive officer serves on that company’s compensation committee;

a director’s (or immediate family member’s) relationship involving companies that make business-related payments to, or receive business-related payments from, F.N.B. in excess of certain amounts;

any of the above relationships that existed within the prior three years; or

a director is currently a partner or employee of a firm that is F.N.B.’s internal or external auditor, or has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such firm or who is a current employee of such firm and personally works on F.N.B.’s audit; or the director or an immediate family member was an employee or partner of such firm within the last three years and personally worked on F.N.B.’s audit during such time.

 

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    41  

2021 Proxy Statement    35  


 

  Our Board of Directors and its CommitteesCorporate Governance  

 

 

More detail regardingIn making their independence determination, the NYSE’s bright-line director independence tests, including the explanatory commentary, may be found at the NYSE’s website atwww.nyse.com. The NYSE’s corporate governance standards do not define every relationship that may be considered byindependent directors of our Board to be material for purposes of determining a director’s independence.

F.N.B. Corporation categorical standards of director independence. In addition to the NYSE bright-line independence standards, F.N.B. has adopted categorical independence standards. F.N.B. categorical independence standards are described in its Corporate Governance Guidelines which may be found on our website atwww.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading. The categorical independence standards define certain ordinary course of business transactions and other relationships that F.N.B.’s Board has concluded would not cause a director to cease to be independent. F.N.B.’s categorical standards include the following:

Financial relationship whereby a service or product provider that is an affiliated entity of a director or immediate family member has made payments to, or received payments from us or our affiliates in an amount that, in any of the last five fiscal years, does not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of such provider’s consolidated gross revenue;

Business or financial transactions (e.g., loans, deposit accounts, or trust-, insurance- or investment-related services) with an affiliate of F.N.B., provided that such transaction is entered into in the ordinary course of business and on terms substantially similar to those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions fornon-affiliated persons of F.N.B. or its affiliates; such transaction conforms with applicable federal regulatory standards; such transaction is not a loan that is disclosed in the most recent federal bank examination asnon-accrual, past due, restructured or having significant potential problems; and termination of the business or financial relationship in the ordinary course of business would not reasonably be expected to have

a material and adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or business of F.N.B. or its affiliate;

A director or immediate family member is associated as a partner or associate of, or of counsel to, a law firm that provides services to F.N.B. or its affiliates and the payments relating to such services do not exceed $1,000,000 or 2%, whichever is greater, of the law firm’s revenues in each of the past five years. Moreover,considered the F.N.B. Board adopted guidelines which provide that directors associated with law firms that provide servicesIndependence Standards relative to F.N.B. adopt appropriate measures which are designed to preclude directors from participating in, or otherwise receiving, pecuniary or other benefits in connection with law firm services provided to F.N.B.; and

A director or an immediate family member is an officer, director or trustee of a charitable ornot-for-profit entity that F.N.B., its subsidiaries or any foundation sponsored by or associated with F.N.B. or its subsidiaries, supports through grants or other support and the contributions by F.N.B. do not exceed the greater of $250,000 or 2% of the charitable organization’s ornot-for-profit entity’s annual receipts.

In applying the NYSE and F.N.B. categorical independence standards, an “immediate family member” includes a director’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- andfathers-in-law, sons- anddaughters-in-law, brothers- andsisters-in-law and anyone who resides in such director’s home.

All relevant facts and circumstances. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that our Board “broadly consider all relevant facts and circumstances” especially in particular situations not covered by the NYSE bright-line independence standards or our categorical independence standards.

As required by the NYSE’s corporate governance rules, we will disclose any relationship that a director has with us that is not consistent with either the NYSE bright-line independence standards or our categorical independence standards in this proxy statement.

 Director Independence Determinations 

On February 21, 2018, our Board, with the assistance of the Nominating Committee, conducted an evaluation of F.N.B. director independence based on the director independence standards set forth in the F.N.B. Corporate Governance Guidelines, the NYSE corporate governance standards, and applicable SEC rules and regulations. As a result of this evaluation, our Board

affirmatively determined that each of Directors Bena, Campbell, Chiafullo, Dively, Hormell, Malone, Martz, McCarthy, Mencini, Motley, Nicholas, Stanik and Strimbu is an independent director. Additionally, our Board affirmatively determined that former director Ms. Laura Ellsworth, who resigned from our Board on September 30, 2017, also was an independent director.

  42    F.N.B. Corporation


Our Board of Directors and its Committees                      

In making these determinations, the Board considered various categories of transactions, relationships and arrangements that existed between each independent director and the Company or its subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, business, legal, family and charitable. The following chart reflects relationships between F.N.B and each independent director, such director’s spouse and immediate family members (Personal or Family Relationships), and related interests, including a

company or charitable organization of which such director or the director’s spouse is, or was, during 2017, a partner, officer, director, employee, or in which the director or the director’s spouse holds a significant ownership position (Affiliated Entity Relationships). All of these transactions meet our Board guidance on independence (i.e., made in the ordinary course, of business, not preferential and fair market value, and involving normal risk of collectability).

Personal, Family and Affiliated Entity Relationships of F.N.B. Director Nomineesnon-preferential

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

 Personal or Family

 Relationships

Deposit, Wealth Management, and Similar Banking Products(1)

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Credit Relationships(2)(4)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Charitable Contributions(3)

xxxxxx

 Affiliated Entity

 Relationships

Deposit, Wealth Management, and Similar Banking Products(1)

xxxxxxx

Credit Relationships or Commercial Banking Products(2)(4)

xxxx

(1)

Includes deposit accounts, trust accounts, certificates of deposit, safe deposit boxes, workplace banking or wealth management products.

(2)

Includes extensions of credit, including mortgages, commercial loans, home equity loans, credit cards, or similar products, as well as credit and credit-related products.

(3)

Includes charitable contributions made to entities affiliated with directors.

(4)

Includes extensions of credit, including commercial loans, credit cards or similar products, as well as credit, credit-related products, and other commercial banking products, including treasury management, foreign exchange and global trading services.

Customer Relationships. We provide financial services to most of our directors. We also provide financial services to some of their immediate family members and affiliated entities. We offer these services in relationships that existed during the ordinary course of our business. We provide the services on substantially the same terms and conditions,preceding three years, including price, as we provide to other similarly situated customers.

Credit Relationships. We also extend credit to some of our directors and their immediate family members and affiliated entities. Federal Banking law (Regulation O) governs these extensions of credit. We have incorporated the Regulation O requirements as part of the F.N.B. categorical independence standards.

Business/Law Firm Relationships. We may also have other business relationships or professional services

arrangements with entities affiliated with our directors or their immediate family members. These relationships are in the ordinary course of business. During 2017, the law firms with which Director Chiafullo and former Director Ellsworth are associated provided legal services to F.N.B. or FNBPA and received aggregate legal fees of $330 and $63,100, respectively. Director Chiafullo and former Director Ellsworth were not personally involved in providing such legal services, and former Director Ellsworth was reassigned from the Compensation Committee shortly after her law firm was engaged. Additionally, Director Chiafullo’s law firm frequently represents borrowers in lendingthose transactions and, from time to time, represents borrowers in transactions where FNBPA is a lender. Director Chiafullo is not personally involved in providing legal services to these clients and any associated legal fees are paid out of the borrower’s loan proceeds, as is

2018 Proxy Statement    43  


  Our Board of Directors and its Committees

customary practice. Under his law firm’s procedures, Mr. Chiafullo is restricted from access to information regarding the borrower’s transaction with FNBPA and he does not receive any compensation related to such transactions. Under his law firm’s procedures, Mr. Chiafullo is restricted from access to information regarding the borrower’s transaction with FNBPA and he does not receive any compensation related to such transactions. The Board determined that such relationships are not material.

Also during 2017, Heeter, a commercial printing company where Director Bena serves as Vice President of Finance, provided printing services to subsidiaries of F.N.B. and received fees of approximately $500,000, or less than 2% of Heeter’s gross revenues for 2017. Heeter is one of five printing vendors employed by F.N.B.’s subsidiaries across their markets and has served as a printing vendor since 2010,pre-dating Director Bena’s assumption of her position at Heeter in April 2017. Director Bena does not receive special compensation from Heeter related to the business relationship between F.N.B. and Heeter and was not identified as a potential director nominee through such business relationship.

Certain Charitable Contributions. We make contributions to charitable organizations where our directors serve as directors or trustees or have other affiliations with the charity. Such contributions, donations and grants are in accordance with our applicable policies and practices.

As part of FNBPA’s community reinvestment outreach initiative, during 2017, FNBPA donated $100,000 to Imani Christian Academy, a Pittsburgh-based nonprofit organization that offers an alternative to the public education system, particularly for minority children from under-performing school districts. This donation is eligible for a 90% Pennsylvania tax credit which will reduce overall Company expense. Former Director Ellsworth is Chair of the Academy’s Board of Directors.

Additional transactions, relationships and arrangements that were considered by the Board are disclosedreported underRelated Person Transactions.

Our Board affirmatively, and determined that Mr. Gurgovits (former CEO), Board Chairman Delie (current CEO), former Director Gary Nalbandian (former Chairnone of the relationships constituted a material relationship between the director/director-nominee and CEO of Metro Bancorp, Inc., (Metro) who retired from our Board on February 28, 2017) and former Director Scott M. Custer (former Chair and CEO of Yadkin Financial Corporation (Yadkin) who retired from our Board on March 24, 2017) are not independent under the NYSE corporate governance standards and F.N.B.’s categorical director independence standards by virtue of their former (Mr. Gurgovits) or current employment (CEO Delie) with the Corporation or the change in control compensation they received in connection with their former leadership roles with companies acquired by F.N.B. (see discussion underRelated Persons Transactions).Company:

RelationshipDirector Relationship in 2020

Material-Related Party Transactions with Directors.

•  None

Family Relationships Among Directors and Executive Officers.

•  None

Customer Relationships. Transactions with the Company and its affiliates are in the ordinary course and not preferential.

•  None

Credit Relationships. Loans are not preferential and comply with the Federal Reserve’s Regulation O governing insider loan transactions.

•  All credit transactions comply with the requirements of the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation O.

Business/Law Firm Relationships. Exceeds the greater of $1,000,000 or 2 percent of annual revenue.

•  None

Certain Charitable Contributions. Exceeds the greater of $250,000 or 2 percent of charitable organization’s total annual receipts.

•  None

 

  

 

 Family RelationshipsRelated Persons Transactions 

  
 

We have adopted a written policy formalizing the manner in which we review a proposed transaction involving the Company and any of our directors, any director-nominees, any executive officers, any 5 percent or greater shareholder or any immediate family member of the foregoing (related persons) because of the possibility of a conflict of interest. A related persons transaction is generally defined as a transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant, and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A copy of the Related Persons Transactions Policy is posted on our website (see Key Corporate Governance Documents). Under our policy, all proposed related person transactions, except for (i) transactions generally available to all employees or shareholders of the Company, and (ii) compensatory transactions consistent with the plans, policies and decisions approved by the Company’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee, must receive the prior approval of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board before we can

take part in the transaction, and if such transaction continues for more than one year, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board must annually approve the transaction.

In 2020, no Company directors, director nominees, executive officers, nor immediate family members of the foregoing persons nor any entity owned or controlled by the foregoing persons conducted any related persons transactions with the Company. BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock), the Vanguard Group (Vanguard), Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc., and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP indicated that they beneficially owned more than 5 percent of our outstanding shares of common stock (including through certain of their subsidiaries) as of December 31, 2020 (see Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners). We may in the ordinary course of business engage in transactions with BlackRock and Vanguard mutual funds, including selling BlackRock and Vanguard investment products to our customers, placing our customer funds in BlackRock and/or Vanguard mutual and exchange traded funds, and using Vanguard funds as an investment vehicle for the F.N.B. 401(k) accounts.

  36    F.N.B. Corporation 

There are no family relationships among the executive officers and directors of the Company.


  Corporate Governance  

 

  

 

 Executive Sessions ofCommunications with Our Board 

  
 

Our Board conducted six executive sessions in 2017, of which two were attended by all directors and the CEO, two were attended exclusively by independent directors

and two were attended exclusively bynon-management directors. William B. Campbell, our Lead Director, presided at all executive sessions.

 Director Stock Ownership Requirement 

Our Board believes that each director’s equity ownership in the Corporation should be aligned with the Corporation’s shareholders. Accordingly, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require each of our directors to have beneficial ownership of the lesser of 40,000 shares of Corporation common stock (or common stock

equivalent) or $400,000 in value of the Corporation’s common stock (or common stock equivalent). The Corporation’s director stock ownership requirement is progressively phased in over asix-year period. As of March 30, 2018, each F.N.B. director is in compliance with the stock ownership requirement.

  44    F.N.B. Corporation


Communications with Our Board                      

COMMUNICATIONS WITH OUR BOARD

 

Shareholders or other interested parties may send communications to our Board, the independent directors as a group, the Board Chairman, any committee chair, and/or any individual director, including our Independent Lead Director, by addressing such communications to the Board, c/o Corporate Secretary, F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212. The

Corporate Secretary, or his designee, will promptly forward all such communications submitted and addressed in this manner to the members of our Board or any designated individual director or directors, as the case may be. Our Corporate Secretary will forward all shareholder communications withis

authorized to open and review any mail that is addressed to the Board or individual directors without prior screening bydirector(s) unless the envelope is marked “Confidential” or “Personal.” If so marked, it will be delivered, unopened, to the Chairman of the Board (addressed to the Board) or to the individual director addressee. If the Corporate Secretary opens an unmarked envelope which contains a magazine, solicitation or any other employee.advertisement, the contents may be discarded.

 

 

 Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance 

 2021 Proxy Statement    37  


  Stock Ownership  

 

Section 16(a)STOCK OWNERSHIP

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information as of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) requires our executive officers and directors, as well as certain persons who beneficially own 10% or moreMarch 5, 2021, record date with respect to beneficial ownershipa of our common stock to file reportsby: (i) each director and nominee; (ii) each currently employed NEO listed in the table entitled, 2021 Summary Compensation Table under the section of their ownership of our securities, as well as statements of changes in such ownership, with the SEC. To our knowledge, based solely on written representations received from ourthis proxy statement entitled Executive Compensation and Other Proxy Disclosure; and (iii) all directors and executive officers

and directors and copies as a group. As of the statementsMarch 5, 2021, record date, we had 320,533,058 shares of ownership changes furnished to us by our executive officers and directors during 2017, we believe that all such filings required during 2017 were made on a timely basis. We do not have any shareholders who own 10% or more of our common stock who are required to file reports under Section 16(a)issued and outstanding. All persons named as beneficial owners of the Exchange Act.Company’s common stock have sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned, otherwise we include a notation where the director or executive officer has shared voting or investment power with other persons.b

  
  Name of Beneficial Owner  Shares Beneficially
  Owned
  

     Percentage     

Owned

  

Pamela A. Bena

  43,466      *
  

William B. Campbell

  103,403(1)      *
  

James D. Chiafullo

  94,317(2)      *
  

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.#+

  695,971      *
  

Mary Jo Dively

  48,156      *
  

Robert A. Hormell

  89,517      *
  

David J. Malone

  107,792      *
  

Frank C. Mencini

  62,785      *
  

David L. Motley

  48,188      *
  

Heidi A. Nicholas

  249,454(3)      *
  

John S. Stanik

  62,500      *
  

William J. Strimbu

  122,849(4)      *
  

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.#+

  315,377      *
  

Gary L. Guerrieri#+

  129,515(5)      *
  

Robert M. Moorehead#+

  62,992      *
  

Barry C. Robinson#+

  78,425      *
  

All executive officers and directors as a group (18 persons)+

  2,404,933(6)        0.75%

a

The term “beneficial ownership” means any person who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, agreement, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, has or shares voting or investment power with respect to F.N.B. common stock.

b

Includes shares held or obtainable by the person within 60 days of March 5, 2021. This figure does not include time-based and performance-based restricted stock units (RSUs) granted to NEOs that do not vest within such sixty (60) day period (see footnote + below).

#

Denotes a person who served as an executive officer of the Corporation during 2020.

*

Unless otherwise indicated, represents less than 1% of all issued and outstanding common stock.

+

The table does not include time-based or performance based RSUs granted to NEOs, except to the extent that any of the same will vest within 60 days of March 5, 2021. Upon vesting, shares of common stock are issued on a one-for-one basis for such units. The amount of RSUs presently held by each NEO (with the performance-based RSUs being presented at target level) is as follows: Mr. Delie, 414,722 units; Mr. Calabrese, 125,466 units; Mr. Guerrieri, 60,934 units; Mr. Moorehead, 52,366 units; Mr. Robinson, 49,769 units; and all executive officers and directors as a group, 759,755 units. The number of shares actually issued upon the vesting of the units may be different based upon the Company’s performance.

(1)

Includes 2,072 shares owned by Mr. Campbell’s wife and 3,000 shares held in an IRA for Mr. Campbell.

(2)

Includes 600 shares held in a custodial account for Mr. Chiafullo’s grandson.

(3)

Includes 121,936 shares owned by the Fred Nicholas Marital Trust (Ms. Nicholas is Co-Trustee) and 90,990 shares owned by Nicholas Family Limited Partnership.

(4)

Includes 1,900 shares owned by Mr. Strimbu’s children.

(5)

Includes 748 shares held in a custodial account for Mr. Guerrieri’s daughter.

(6)

Includes the amount of shares beneficially owned by Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer, James L. Dutey, and Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary, James G. Orie.

  38    F.N.B. Corporation


  Stock Ownership  

 

  

 

Executive Officers 

The table below lists the names of our current Executive Officers with their positions and ages. The table below does not include this information for CEO Vincent J. Delie, Jr. whose information is in the section of this proxy statement entitled Biographical Information Concerning Director-Nominees.

  NamePosition with CompanyAge as of
   Annual Meeting     

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.        

Chief Financial Officer

58

James L. Dutey

Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer

47

Gary L. Guerrieri

Chief Credit Officer

61

David B. Mitchell, II

Chief Wholesale Banking Officer

63

Robert M. Moorehead*

Chief Wholesale Banking Officer

66

James G. Orie

Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

62

Barry C. Robinson

Chief Consumer Banking Officer

58

*

Mr. Moorehead retired from his position, effective January 1, 2021.

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr. has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2009. Mr. Calabrese joined the Company in 2007, serving as our Corporate Controller from 2007 to 2009. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Calabrese was Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of People’s Bank, Connecticut, from 2003 to 2007. During his 19-year tenure at People’s Bank, Mr. Calabrese’s principal responsibilities included financial planning and reporting, accounting policies, general accounting operations and investor relations.

James L. Dutey joined our Company in January 2017 and has served as our Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer since March 2017. Mr. Dutey has more than 25 years of accounting experience in the banking and financial services sectors. During his 12 years at Huntington Bancshares, Inc., Mr. Dutey served in various senior management roles, including Assistant Corporate Controller, with a primary focus on SEC and bank regulatory financial reporting requirements. Prior to joining Huntington Bancshares, Inc., Mr. Dutey was employed at KPMG LLP, ending his tenure there as senior manager for the assurance practice, primarily serving the banking industry. Mr. Dutey is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Gary L. Guerrieri became Chief Credit Officer of F.N.B. in April of 2011 and has been an Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of FNBPA since 2005. In his role as Chief Credit Officer, Mr. Guerrieri is responsible for managing the entire credit function for the Company, including commercial and retail underwriting, credit administration, credit policy and credit risk management. He also has oversight of FNBPA’s special assets, loan servicing

and indirect lending functions. Prior to joining FNBPA in 2002, Mr. Guerrieri was an Executive Vice President of commercial banking with Promistar Financial Corporation, a bank holding Company acquired by F.N.B. in 2002.

David B. Mitchell II became our Chief Wholesale Banking Officer in January 2021. As Chief Wholesale Banking Officer, Mr. Mitchell oversees commercial lines of business and functional areas across FNBPA’s market footprint including Commercial Banking, Capital Markets and the Wealth Management group. Prior to his position as Chief Wholesale Banking Officer, Mr. Mitchell served as Executive Vice President of FNBPA’s Capital Markets and Specialty Finance businesses. Mr. Mitchell joined FNBPA in January 2018 after more than 36 years with The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc (“PNC”). During his tenure with PNC, Mr. Mitchell served in various bank officer positions and most recently in the following leadership roles: Executive Vice President with responsibility over the company’s National Large Corporate, Energy, Metals and Mining businesses and Executive Vice President, Public Finance, where he led the company’s banking and capital markets activities in the government, higher education and non-profit spaces.

Robert M. Moorehead became our Chief Wholesale Banking Officer in September 2015. From 2011 through 2015, Mr. Moorehead served as President of FNBPA’s Pittsburgh Region. In his role as Chief Wholesale Banking Officer of the Company, Mr. Moorehead was responsible for managing Commercial Banking, Treasury Management, Investment Real Estate, Wealth Management, Private Banking, Insurance, International Banking and Capital Markets. Prior to joining FNBPA, Mr. Moorehead was

2021 Proxy Statement    39  


  Stock Ownership  

Senior Vice President and Regional Chief Credit Officer for First Niagara Bank from 2009 through 2011. Mr. Moorehead began his 46-year career at Equibank and, subsequently, joined National City Bank, where he served as Executive Vice President and Group Manager of Corporate Banking. Mr. Moorehead retired from his position as Chief Wholesale Banking Officer of F.N.B., effective January 1, 2021.

James G. Orie has been our Chief Legal Officer since 2004 and became Corporate Secretary in January 2015. Mr. Orie is principally responsible for advising the Corporation, its Board and executive management team on all legal and regulatory affairs impacting the Corporation, as well as advising on corporate governance, legal risk mitigation, litigation management, merger and acquisition and other critical transaction matters, and compliance guidance on business and corporate strategies and activities. Prior to joining F.N.B. as Corporate Counsel in 1996, Mr. Orie began his 36-year career in financial services with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Later, he served as counsel with the Federal Home

Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and Office of Thrift Supervision during the “thrift crisis” and led the Financial Services Practice Group of a regional Pittsburgh-based law firm.

Barry C. Robinson has served as our Chief Consumer Banking Officer since August 2015. As Chief Consumer Banking Officer, Mr. Robinson is responsible for leading the team that provides our full range of consumer financial products and services to our customers. Mr. Robinson joined our Company in July 2010 as Executive Vice President of our Consumer Banking operations, for which he had principal responsibility for strategic planning and oversight of the Company’s consumer retail operations, including leading the development of our digital banking platform. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Robinson held several key leadership and executive positions with large regional banks, including as regional leader of wealth management and private banking in Cleveland, Ohio, for PNC and National City Bank, and as head of corporate banking in Kentucky and Tennessee for National City Bank.

  40    F.N.B. Corporation


  Stock Ownership  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners 

  
 

We are not aware of any shareholder who was the beneficial owner of more than 5%5 percent of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2017,2020, except for the entities identified in the table below:

 

Name and Address

Amount and Nature

of Beneficial  Ownership(1)

Percent of

Outstanding Common Stock        
Beneficially Owned
(2)

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

29,210,42332,349,803(3)9.0%10.0%

The Vanguard Group Inc.

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

28,019,61431,858,021(4)8.66%9.9%

Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc

411 Borel Avenue, Suite 300

San Mateo, CA 94402

23,177,168(5)7.2%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP

6300 Bee Cave Road

Building One

Austin, TX 78746

16,369,883(6)5.1%

 

 (1)

Under the regulations of the SEC, a person who has or shares voting or investment power with respect to a security is considered a beneficial owner of the security. Voting power is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares, and investment power is the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of shares.

 

 

 (2)

Based on 323,465,140 shares ofthe Corporation common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2017.2020.

 

 

 (3)

According to Schedule 13G filed under the Exchange Act on January 29, 2018,27, 2021, by BlackRock, Inc. The Schedule 13G states that BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power as to 28,004,33831,197,509 shares and sole dispositive power as to 29,210,42332,349,803 shares.

 

 

 (4)

According to Schedule 13G filed under the Exchange Act on February 9, 2018,10, 2021, by The Vanguard Group, Inc.Group. The Schedule 13G states that The Vanguard Group Inc. has sole voting power over 171,039 shares, shared voting power over 28,255233,557 shares, sole dispositive power over 27,846,54431,345,959 shares, and shared dispositive power over 173,070512,062 shares.

(5)

According to Schedule 13G filed under the Exchange Act on February 11, 2021, by Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. The Schedule 13G states that Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc has sole voting power over 22,641,085 shares and sole dispositive power over 23,177,168 shares. Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. states in its Schedule 13G that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of certain of the securities reflected in the Schedule 13G pursuant to separate arrangements whereby it acts as investment adviser to certain persons. Each person for whom Fuller & Thaler Asset Management, Inc. acts as investment adviser has the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, the Common Stock.

(6)

According to Schedule 13G filed under the Exchange Act on February 12, 2021, by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. The Schedule 13G states that Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power over 15,929,725 shares and sole dispositive power over 16,369,883 shares. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP states in its Schedule 13G that it is an investment adviser, furnishes investment advice to four investment companies, and serves as investment manager or sub-adviser to certain other commingled funds, group trusts and separate accounts (such investment companies, trusts and accounts, collectively referred to as the “Funds”). In certain cases, subsidiaries of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP may act as an adviser or sub-adviser to certain Funds. In its role as investment advisor, sub-adviser and/or manager, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP or its subsidiaries (collectively, “Dimensional”) may possess voting and/or investment power over the securities of the issuer that are owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of the issuer held by the Funds. However, all securities reported in the Schedule 13G are owned by the Funds. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities.

 

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    45  


  Related Person Transactions2021 Proxy Statement

    41  

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

We have adopted a written policy formalizing the manner in which we review a proposed transaction involving the Company and any of our directors, any director nominees, any executive officers, any 5% or greater shareholder or any immediate family member of the foregoing (related persons) because of the possibility of a conflict of interest. A copy of this “Policy with Respect to Related Person Transactions” is posted on our website atwww.fnbcorporation.com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading. Under our policy, all proposed related person transactions except for (i) transactions generally available to all employees or shareholders of the Company, and (ii) compensatory transactions consistent with the plans, policies and decisions approved by the Company’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee, must receive the prior approval of the Nominating Committee of our Board before we can take part in the transaction, and if such transaction continues for more than one year, the Nominating Committee and Board must annually approve the transaction. For purposes of this policy, a related person transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant, and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. The category of related persons generally consists of the Company’s Directors, director nominees and executive officers, holders of 5% or more of the Company’s common stock, immediate family members of the foregoing persons and any entity owned or controlled by the foregoing persons.

Mr. Gurgovits’ son is the former employee and managing director of F.N.B. Capital Corporation, LLC, a merchant banking subsidiary of the Corporation. Due to the uncertainty as to whether the F.N.B. Capital investment activities would continue to be permissible under the final Dodd-Frank Volcker rules, Mr. Gurgovits’ son, along with the other F.N.B. Capital principals, resigned from F.N.B. Capital effective July 31, 2013. Mr. Gurgovits’ son and his fellow principals established a new company called Tecum Capital Partners, as a Small Business Investment Company licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBIC Fund) in 2013. Mr. Gurgovits’ son and the other principals are the sole owners of Tecum Capital Management (Tecum), the general partner of the SBIC Fund. In view of the detailed knowledge and experience that the Tecum principals had with respect to the F.N.B. Capital

investment portfolio, F.N.B. Capital entered into an asset management agreement whereby Tecum manages the F.N.B. Capital investment portfolio for a quarterly fee based on the amount of assets under management. The economics and terms of the asset management arrangement were agreed to pursuant to an arms-length negotiation between F.N.B. Capital and Tecum. In 2017, F.N.B. Capital made total payments to Tecum of approximately $52,813 in fees pursuant to terms of the asset management advisory arrangement.

In addition, as of December 31, 2017, as anchor investor, F.N.B. committed to invest an aggregate amount of $14,700,000 (representing a 21.94% equity interest) in the SBIC Fund, subject to the same material terms and conditions as those of otherco-investors in the SBIC Fund. The SBIC Fund has 61co-investors, including sixnon-affiliated bank investors. The total commitment of all investors in the SBIC Fund is $66,900,000. Mr. Gurgovits has a 0.75% equity investment in the SBIC Fund. Mr. Gurgovits is on the SBIC Fund Board of Advisors and the fund’s Investment Committee. F.N.B. had a net book value of funded commitments at December 31, 2017, of $14,032,029 after investing $12,191,054 into the SBIC Fund (leaving a remaining unfunded commitment of $2,508,946).

Mr. Gurgovits and members of his immediate family also haveco-invested an aggregate of $140,000 in a portfolio company of F.N.B. Capital on the same terms negotiated by F.N.B. Capital.

Also during 2017, Heeter, the commercial printing company where Director Bena serves as Vice President of Finance, provided printing services to subsidiaries of F.N.B. and received fees of approximately $500,000.00, or less than 2% of Heeter’s gross revenues for 2017. Heeter is one of five printing vendors employed by F.N.B.’s subsidiaries across their markets and has served as a printing vendor since 2010,pre-dating Director Bena’s assumption of her position at Heeter in April 2017. F.N.B. uses a competitive bidding and evaluation process in selecting printing firms for large-scale projects. Director Bena does not receive special compensation from Heeter related to the business relationship between F.N.B. and Heeter, and was not identified as a potential director nominee through such business relationship. Also, Heeter Printing has aggregate outstanding loans in the amount of approximately $5.7 million with FNBPA which are performing in accordance with their terms. The Board determined that such relationship is not material.

  46    F.N.B. Corporation


Related Person Transactions                      

Gary Nalbandian, the former Chairman, President and CEO of Metro Bancorp, Inc., was elected to the F.N.B. Board of Directors, effective February 12, 2016, upon consummation of the merger by which F.N.B. acquired Metro. In connection with the completion of the merger and related transactions, Mr. Nalbandian received approximately $2.4 million in 2016 as a change in control payment, as well as immediate vesting of all unvested incentive compensation awards, including equity awards, and is entitled to (i) continuation of disability and life insurance benefits until three years after completion of the merger; (ii) medical insurance coverage for Mr. Nalbandian and his dependents during his lifetime; (iii) directors’ and officers’ liability and fiduciary liability insurance coverage until six years after completion of the merger; and (iv) customary rights to indemnification and advancement of expenses with respect to actual or threatened third party claims. Additionally, FNBPA leases 4,744 square feet in a local business center from NN&S Associates, of which Mr. Nalbandian is a partner. FNBPA utilizes this leased space as a storage facility. The lease was originally entered into by NN&S Associates and FNBPA’s predecessor by merger, Metro Bank, on November 1, 2006, and was renewed by FNBPA, as successor to Metro Bank, in 2016 (the monthly lease amount at the time the lease expired was $5,161.05) for another five-year term that will expire on October 31, 2021. Under the terms of the lease arrangement, Mr. Nalbandian and his family members received approximately $44,164 in lease payments in 2017.

Scott Custer, the former Chairman, President and CEO of Yadkin, was elected to the F.N.B. Board of Directors, effective March 11, 2017, upon consummation of the merger by which F.N.B. acquired Yadkin. In connection with the completion of the merger and related transactions, Mr. Custer received approximately $2.0 million, which included change in control,pro-rated bonus (including vesting of prior equity awards),

healthcare benefits and life/disability benefits, and a distribution of shares of F.N.B. common stock then valued at $3,751,578.34 from a rabbi trust previously established by Yadkin. F.N.B. also must provide Mr. Custer with directors’ and officers’ liability and fiduciary liability insurance coverage for a period of six years after completion of the merger and customary rights to indemnification and advancement of expenses with respect to actual or threatened third party claims. Mr. Custer entered into aone-year term Consulting Agreement which commenced on March 11, 2017 (effective date of the F.N.B.-Yadkin merger), which provided for Mr. Custer to furnish services to assist F.N.B. with the retention of employees and customers and to meet with customers for purposes of obtaining business. In exchange for his services under the consulting arrangement, F.N.B. was to compensate Mr. Custer in the annual amount of $600,000 netted against his F.N.B. director compensation. Mr. Custer resigned from the F.N.B. Board, effective March 24, 2017. Mr. Custer terminated the Consulting Agreement effective as of his March 24, 2017, resignation from the F.N.B. Board. Mr. Custer was paid $12,676.61 under the Consulting Agreement for his consulting services between March 11, 2017, and March 24, 2017.

In the ordinary courseof our business, we have engaged and expect to continue engaging in ordinary banking transactions with our directors, executive officers, their immediate family members and entities in which they hold a position or ownership interest, including loans to such persons. Any loan to those persons or entities was made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time such loan was made as loans made to persons who were not related to us. These loans do not involve more than the normal credit collection risk and do not present any other unfavorable features.

2018 Proxy Statement    47  


 

  Executive Compensation and Other Proxy Disclosure

 

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER PROXY DISCLOSURE

 

  

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks 

and Insider Participation 

  
 

 

The members of the Compensation Committee (“Committee”) during 2017 were(Committee) are Committee Chair Malone and Directors Ellsworth,Bena, Hormell, Malone, Motley and Stanik. Mr. Hormell joined the Committee in October, at which time Ms. Ellsworth left the Committee.Strimbu. Neither we nor FNBPA hashave ever employed any member of the Committee. No such member has, during our last fiscal year, any relationship with us requiring disclosure under Item 404 of RegulationS-K or under the Compensation Committee Interlocks disclosure requirements of Item 407(e)(4) of RegulationS-K. We have determined that the Committee members are independent under both the NYSE corporate governance standards and Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Act and arenon-employees under the meaning of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Our Board has delegated to the Committee the responsibility of setting the compensation of our directors and all Section 16 officers, including our CEO and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Section 16 officers.(CFO). The Committee met 9seven times in 2017.2020.

Authority and Responsibilities

The Committee administers our executive compensation programs, including the oversight of executive compensation policies and decisions, administration of our equity incentive plan and the annual cash incentive award plan applicable to Section 16 officers. TheAdditionally, the Committee administersoversees and interprets our qualified andnon-qualified benefit plans, establishes guidelines, approves participants in thenon-qualified plans, approves grants and awards and exercises other power and authority required and permitted under the plans and its Charter. The Committee also reviews and approves executive officer, including CEO, compensation, including, as applicable, salary, short-term incentive and long-term incentive compensation levels, perquisites and equity compensation.ownership. The Committee Charter reflects its responsibilities and the Committee reviews the Charter annually and recommends any proposed changes to the Board. A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter is available aton our website atwww.fnbcorporation com under the “About Us” tab, selecting the “Investor Relations and Shareholder Services” option and scrolling to the “Corporate Governance” heading.(see Key Corporate Governance Documents).

Delegation

From time to time, and subject to statutory and regulatory limitations, the Committee may delegate authority to fulfill various administrative and ministerial functions of administeringattendant to the

Company’s plans to our employees. Currently, it delegates administration of

our qualified plans to the Pension Committee, a committee comprised of our senior officers who have the appropriate expertise, experience and background in handling defined benefit and defined contribution plans.

Independent Compensation Consultant

The Committee engaged an independent compensation consultant, McLagan, an AONAon company, (Consultant), to assist with evaluating our compensation practices and to provide ongoing advice and recommendations regarding CEO, NEO, Section 16 officer and director compensation that are consistent with our business goals and pay philosophy. The Consultant is not affiliated with us. The Committee selected the Consultantconsultant for, among other reasons, its reputation for providing comprehensive solutions to complex compensation challenges facing companies and specific expertise in the financial services industry. In addition to services provided to the Committee, with the permission of the Committee, the Consultant provided advice and analysis to us regarding compensation practices of our mortgage department. In addition to McLagan, an AON affiliate,another Aon company, Radford, provided accounting services to us related to our long-term incentive plan and the valuation of the Yadkin stock options.program (LTIP). The Committee has reviewed all services provided by the ConsultantsMcLagan in 2017,2020 and has determined that they are independent with respect to NYSE and SEC standards.

The ConsultantIn performing its duties, McLagan reported directly to the Chairman of the Committee. In performance of its duties, the ConsultantCommittee, and interacted with our CEO, CFO, Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Corporate Services, Chief Legal Officer and other employees. The CEO had various discussions with the Consultant related to our compensation programs, philosophy and Peer Group. Additionally, the CEO regularly attended Compensation Committee meetings and discussed with the ConsultantMcLagan and the Committee members, both during meetings and outside meetings, the appropriate base salary and short-term and long-term compensation offor the other Section 16 officers. The CFO regularly attended meetings of the Committee to discuss Company performance relative to the short-term and long-term plans versus peers. In addition, the ConsultantMcLagan communicated with, took direction from and regularly interacted with the Chairman of the Committee and other members of the Committee in addition to attending Committee meetings on anas-needed basis. Executive officers are not involved with setting the amount or form of their own compensation. The Committee considers our CEO’s insight and recommendations before approving compensation for our executive officers.

 

 

 

  48    F.N.B. Corporation

  42    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

 

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) describes the philosophy, objective and structure of our fiscal year 2020 (the year ending December 31, 2020) executive compensation program. This CD&A is intended to be read in conjunction with the tables following this section which provide further historical compensation information for our NEOs as identified below.

  NamePosition

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

Chairman, President and CEO

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

Gary L. Guerrieri

Chief Credit Officer

Robert M. Moorehead

Chief Wholesale Banking Officer*

Barry C. Robinson

Chief Consumer Banking Officer

*

Mr. Moorehead retired effective January 1, 2021.

Executive Summary

43

Compensation Determination Process

50

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

52

Elements of Compensation

54

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices

64

 

  

 

Executive Summary 

  
 

 

The Board of Directors supports management’s vision and strategic plan that have allowed us to grow into a multi-state regional financial services company with plans to continue to successfully and profitably grow organically and strategically. The Board approved the F.N.B. 2020-2023 Strategic Plan in September 2020 and approves the Company’s annual Operating Plan and regularly receives reports from executive management regarding execution of the objectives of the Operating Plan. Management continues to focus on profitability and shareholder value while our strategic investments in technology and our rigorous risk management and business continuity processes enabled us to continue uninterrupted operations, prioritize employee and customer health and safety and successfully manage through a myriad of challenges we faced during the COVID-19 pandemic (see Overview2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Response

in the Summary of this Proxy Statement). The Board believes that management should be compensated appropriately for the Company’s 2020 performance and for positioning F.N.B. for longer-term future success (for additional details, please see Compensation Philosophy and Objectives). We have designed our compensation programs to align strongour corporate performance and strategic goals with our executives’ total compensation. We review our philosophy and our compensation programs annuallyopportunities. In doing so, we seek to ensure that we are being competitive in attracting and retaining the appropriate executive

talent while maintaining goodsound corporate governance practices.practices and aligning management interests with those of our shareholders.

After receiving shareholder feedback, in 2019 we modified our incentive compensation programs as specifically detailed in our 2019 Proxy Statement. Overall, the goal was to provide management with appropriate short- and long-term compensation that properly rewarded strong financial performance by F.N.B., consistent with our shareholders’ interests. In determining executive compensation for 2017,the second quarter of 2020, the Committee consideredrecognized that the overwhelming supportunusual circumstances unfolding due to the COVID-19 pandemic required it to review the compensation programs to ensure that, despite the“Say-On-Pay” proposal received at uncertain health and economic challenges, F.N.B.’s compensation program properly rewarded executives during this pandemic crisis for taking critical steps to protect shareholder value and position F.N.B. for the changed environment. In reviewing our May 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (2017 Annual Meeting) pertaining to 2016 compensation andplans under the relatedCompensation Discussion and Analysis disclosure of 2016 compensation and certain 2017 items. Over 96%specter of the shareholders who voted on our proposal supported our compensation program. As a result, the Committee continued to applyCOVID-19 potential impact, we were mindful that most companies were doing the same effective principlestype of review. Upon completion of our review, we determined that both our short-term and philosophy it has used in previous years in determining executivelong-term incentive compensation and will continueplans did not need to consider shareholder input and future advisory votes. We have provided an advisory vote to shareholders on an annual basis consistent with the frequency vote first supported by the shareholders at our 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and again at our 2017 Annual Meeting. In addition to ongoing shareholder engagement discussions in 2017, following the 2017 Annual Meeting we conducted an outreach program directed to our largest shareholders to seek input regarding our executive compensation and governance practices. Furthermore, our CEO and CFO will continue to frequently meet with shareholders and prospective investors, while our Investor Relations Department will remain continually available to shareholdersbe modified in order to ensure adequate methods to receiveour plans properly balance our shareholders’ interests and appropriately rewarding management for enhancing and protecting shareholder sentiment. In addition to peer-based performance comparisons, shareholder and investor relations are regularly discussed at our scheduled Board meetings.value. To accomplish this objective, both

Board Engagement

The Board plays a key role in the oversight of the Company’s strategy and commitment to engaging in a proactive outreach with our investors. The Board, as a group or as a subset of one or more directors, meets throughout the year with the Company’s senior executives, shareholders, regulators and organizations interested in our strategy, performance, corporate governance, or business practices. The board receives periodic updates from senior executive management regarding investor relations and shareholder

engagement at each Board meeting and offers advice and counsel regarding such engagements.

Engagement and transparency with our shareholders helps the Company to gain useful feedback on a wide variety of topics. This information is shared regularly with the Company’s management and the Board and is considered in the processes that set the governance practices and strategic direction for the Company. Shareholder feedback also helps us to better tailor the public information we provide to our shareholders and other interested parties.

The Company routinely interacts and communicates with shareholders in a number of forums, including quarterly earnings presentations, SEC filings, the Annual Report and proxy statement, the annual meeting, industry conferences and other investor communications. Discussions preceding our annual meeting are usually focused on specific issues related to the proxy statement while discussions at other times of the year cover a broader range of topics, including our strategy and financial results and corporate governance matters.

In 2017, shareholder outreach activities included participation in more than 100 shareholder engagement discussions, covering shareholders representing in the aggregate more than 35% of our outstanding common stock, similar to our 2016 outreach program; presentations by senior management multiple investor conferences; and numerousin-person meetings in cities across the U.S. between members of senior management and existing and prospective domestic and international investors and other interested parties. Engagement topics included:

Company strategy, performance and operations;

Management and Board compensation;

Board structure and composition;

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Bylaws, including proxy access;

Succession planning;

Environmental and social issues, including diversity; and

Disclosures, including the format and content of our proxy.

 

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    49  

2021 Proxy Statement    43  


 

  Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In addition, following our 2017 Annual Meeting, we reached out to our largest shareholders and two proxy advisory firms, ISS and Glass Lewis, specifically to review our executive compensation program and discuss any concerns they may have regarding it or our governance practices. As a result, we conducted a series of calls andin-person meetings during which we received valuable investor input regarding the design and disclosure of our executive compensation program, which was instrumental in the Compensation Committee’s decision to modify the Company’s long-term incentive plan to incorporate two performance metrics, as discussed in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. This round of dialogue with our investors also provided beneficial insights on a number of the other topics listed above.

Shareholders and interested parties who wish to contact our Board of Directors, any Board member, including the Lead Independent Director, any committee chair, or

the independent directors as a group, may mail their correspondence to: F.N.B. Corporation, Attention (name of Board member(s)), c/o Corporate Secretary’s Office, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Suite 503, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, ore-mail the Office of the Secretary atFNBCorporateSecretaryOffice@fnb-corp.com.

Corporate Performance

In 2017, we reported net income available to common stockholders of $191.2 million, an increase of 17% from 2016. On an operating basis, our 2017 net income available to common stockholders was $282.2 million, or 50% higher than 2016. Our 2017 operating earnings per diluted common share increased 3.3% to $0.93. As the charts below demonstrate, we have grown rapidly while simultaneously remaining profitable and efficient. This combination positions us to meet our long-term growth objectives in order to create shareholder value.

LOGO

The following accomplishments during 2017 were key to our success and should serve us well moving forward:

Successful completion of the largest acquisition in F.N.B. history and expansion into the attractive Carolina markets through the acquisition of Yadkin.

Total revenue exceeded $1 billion for the first time in our history.

Continued investments in our infrastructure, while maintaining a peer-leading efficiency ratio.

Strong credit quality throughout 2017.

Strong dividend returned to our shareholders. Our dividend yield, as measured atyear-end, was at the 84th percentile of our Regional Peer Group.

Exceed federal bank regulatory agency “well-capitalized” thresholds.

  50    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

 

 

We believeour short- and long - term plans contain the following key design features: (i) utilize financial performance metrics; (ii) are specifically tailored to drive shareholder value; and (iii) rely on a significant use of peer metrics, rather than absolute measures being used by many of our peers. Therefore, we are well-positioneddetermined during 2020 to deliver greater shareholder value through a sustained earnings growth trajectory.

maintain the plan structure and metrics for 2020 incentive compensation. We have concentratedalso recognized over the last few years that, due to the narrow structure of our former LTIP awards that were based solely on moving F.N.B. into markets with more opportunities. Duringtotal shareholder return (TSR), management’s actual realized compensation has been below the previous 5 years, under our Chairman’s leadership, we have grown organically and by acquisition, with our acquisition strategy focused on attractive metropolitan markets. Specifically, we acquired financial services franchisestarget amount utilized in the contiguous markets of Baltimore, Maryland, and Cleveland, Ohio, through whole bank acquisitions,Summary Compensation Table, while expanding our presence in both Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, through both whole bank and branch acquisitions. Most recently in March 2017, wethe Company’s financial performance for those periods was better than peer

expanded intomedians and top quartile for several key measures that are important to shareholders. While executives at many peer institutions utilized absolute performance metrics and their CEOs and executives received full payouts under their incentive plans during the highly attractive market2016 through 2020 period, the Committee made no adjustments to our Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) nor LTIP and LTIP awards failed to vest three times and vested at 50% of North Carolina, including Charlotte, Raleigh,target the first and last year of this period, despite the Piedmont Triad (Winston-Salem, Greensboro and High Point) throughfact that F.N.B.’s financial performance in several important areas exceeded these peers during the completionrelevant period. Accordingly, the total amount of vested awards was significantly below the largest transactionamounts shown for the corresponding years in the history of F.N.B. We have a proven track record for gaining market share and significantly increasing scale as a result of our acquisition strategy. Through our acquisitions, we continue to produce strong financial returns by focusing on expanding our core competencies in the new and expanded markets. Our acquisition activity has resulted in significant growth in profits and changes in our overall financial results in a short period of time, including the impact of merger-related items on our financial results.respective Summary Compensation Table.

 

 

F.N.B. 2017 Performance - GAAP vs. Operating

LOGOOur recognition is grounded in various metrics for which we continue to show performance, such as:

 

Earnings

  

ROAACapital

Return on average assets; net income as a percent of average assetsMeasures

Growth (PPNR* and Operating EPS*)

  

Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio (CET1) (+)

ROATA*

Efficiency (Efficiency Ratio*, Loan / Deposit Ratio (#), Net Interest Margin (*)

Dividend Payout Ratio (#)

PPNR/Average TCE*

Asset Quality (Net Charge Offs /Average Loans (#), Allowance for Credit Losses/Period End Loans (#)

ICG Growth*

TBV */ Share Growth

ROATCE*

 

(*)

Operating ROAA — Operating net income return on average assetsNon-GAAP

 

(#)

ROATCE — Net income, adjusted fortax-affected amortization of intangibles, as a percent of average tangible common equityGAAP

 

(+)

Operating ROATCE — Operating net income as a percent of average tangible common equityRegulatory Ratio

EPS — Diluted earnings per share, after extraordinary items if applicable

Operating EPS — Operating income, on a dilutedper-share basis. Operating income includes adjustments that impact EPS results by approximately $0.30 per share, due to the exclusions of merger-related items of $0.12 per share and $0.18 per share related to the impact of a reduction in the valuation of net deferred tax assets due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017.

 

For additional information regarding these metrics, please see Vesting of Performance Awards.

Say-on-Pay Support and Investor Engagement

Since we last modified our incentive compensation programs in 2019, we believe that our shareholders recognized our strong financial performance and its direct link to our incentive compensation, as evidenced by the 92% of shareholders that voted FOR the Say-on-Pay proposal. Our acquisition strategy generally resultsCompany has been, and continues to be, committed to ongoing shareholder engagement discussions and outreach, and we value the shareholder input from these discussions since they have been helpful in accompanying merger-related itemsdesigning our compensation program and corresponding disclosures. In 2020, despite the challenges of COVID-19, we continued seeking shareholder feedback from 25 of our top investors, which represented approximately 56% of

our shares owned at that are commensurate with the sizetime, as well as a leading proxy advisory firm, to discuss, among other topics, executive compensation. Notably, of the transactiontop 25 investors from who we received feedback in connection with our shareholder engagement meetings, each was supportive and size of the acquired entity. Nonetheless, we attempt to minimize these items when possible such that we are able to reduce the financial impact of those merger-related items below those modeled. Therefore, in evaluationdid not express any issues or negative view of our NEOs’ compensation in comparisonprogram.

In addition to peers,our 2020 ESG and compensation-related shareholder engagements, we believe it is appropriatealso continued to exclude merger-related items associatedcollaboratively engage with our growthinstitutional investors throughout the year (over 100 meetings) to discuss our financial performance, strategies, plans and to make comparisons relative to peer performance on an operating basis. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2017, we incurred a $54.0 million expense associated with the valuation of our net deferred tax assets dueCOVID-19 response. These shareholder engagements are reported to the enactment ofCommittee and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Accordingly, the financial impact of that item is excluded fromBoard. For detailed information regarding our operating results.

Furthermore, in order to ensure our compensation levels remain appropriate and we properly compensate our NEOs for successful completion of strategically important and profitable growth, we rely on our operating results as a measure of success. We routinely evaluate our Peer Group on a pro forma basis due to our rapid and significant growth. The Peer Group we used for 2017 compensation contemplated our Yadkin acquisition and excluded companies with assets below $10 billion. We review our performance versus peers and our executive compensation analysis with such matters in mind in an effort to properly assess our relative performance. We expect to continue to review our NEOs in light of their ability to continue to create shareholder value through organic growth and acquisition-related growth and other strategic initiatives.outreach efforts, please see Shareholder Engagement under Corporate Governance.

 

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    51  

  44    F.N.B. Corporation


 

  Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Based on feedback that we received in recent years in connection with these shareholder engagement meetings and consistent with our efforts to optimize the alignment of shareholder interests with our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, we modified our compensation programs and made changes to the manner in which we disclose information and the presentation format of various matters in our CD&A. During our shareholder engagement in 2020, we found investors particularly interested in our COVID-19 response (more fully discussed in the Summary section of this Proxy Statement, under 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Response) and whether we planned to modify our executive incentive compensation plan metrics and design due to the pandemic impact. Described below, under Summary of 2020 Executive Compensation Actions, are our considerations and rationale for not making any changes to our executive compensation plan metrics and design.

For topics related to corporate governance, please see Enhancements Resulting from Shareholder Engagement under Corporate Governance and for additional information regarding compensation matters relative to COVID-19, please see 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Response in the Summary of our Proxy Statement.

Summary of 2020 Executive Compensation Actions

Base and Incentive Compensation Structure

Consistent with our philosophy of tying pay to performance, we highlight key compensation actions and summarize our 2020 executive compensation structure, incentive compensation performance metrics and corresponding weightings of these measures and

considerations relevant to the Committee’s decision-making process regarding the optimization of incentive plan designs.

(i)

Base Salaries: Given the current environment, we are not increasing our Section 16 officers’ base salaries in 2021. At the commencement of 2020, we increased the base salary of our CEO and each of our named executive officers 2.5% to position salaries to the approximate median of our peer group.

(ii)

STIP

a.

Target Incentive Opportunity: For each NEO, target short-term incentive opportunity for 2020 remained the same as 2019.

b.

Performance Metrics: We maintained the same performance metrics in 2020 that were used in 2019. In 2019, we modified one of three metrics used for payouts under our annual incentive plan. As a result, in 2020, as in 2019, our annual incentive plan had the following components and corresponding weightings Operating EPS* versus Operating Plan, and two peer-based measures, PPNR divided by Average TCE* and Efficiency Ratio*, with the weightings as detailed below:

c.

Payout: We made a discretionary STI payment to the CEO and NEOs as more particularly detailed later under 2020 Performance and Annual Incentive Awards.

LOGO

2021 Proxy Statement    45  


  Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

(iii)

LTIP

a.

Target Incentive Opportunity: In 2020, we maintained the long-term opportunity for our NEOs at their current levels detailed in the CD&A.

b.

Plan Structure: We granted our executives equity-based awards using a pre-defined matrix which assigns grant values as a percentage of salary. We delivered time-based RSUs equal to 40% of the value. We delivered the 60% remaining target LTI value in performance-based RSUs and, for Mr. Delie, a combination of performance-based RSUs and cash-based Performance Units (PeUs) to incentivize performance compensation opportunities on the same metrics and across levels for all executives, consistent with the limitations and types of performance awards available under the F.N.B. Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan (F.N.B. Incentive Plan). The significant weighting of performance-based awards underscores our pay-for-performance alignment.

c.

Performance Metrics: In 2020, we maintained the LTIP structure established in 2019 as more specifically detailed in the 2020 Proxy Statement and in the Elements of Compensation section below. Despite the challenges presented due to the global pandemic, the Committee reviewed the LTIP structure and determined that no changes were necessary to either LTIP design or metrics due to the peer nature of the LTIP

structure. Shareholders responded positively during our 2020 shareholder outreach program that our LTIP was flexible to account for the unusual circumstances.

d.

Payout: We anticipate our performance awards for 2018 will vest at approximately at 143% of target on the scheduled vesting date, April 1, 2021.

(iv)

Peer Group Selection

We annually review our peers to determine whether any changes to the group are necessary to ensure that the peer group is diverse and provides the necessary depth to be meaningful from which to benchmark our compensation. With the assistance of McLagan, we identified 20 comparable U.S. commercial banks with assets ranging from approximately $19 billion to $140 billion (as of the time of peer group selection in mid-2019 for 2020 compensation decision making). We compete for talent with the institutions in our peer group, as well as large financial institutions in our metropolitan markets. We believe the peer group below is diverse and provides the necessary depth to be meaningful in setting salary and incentive goals and is an appropriate group from which to benchmark our compensation. We used the peer financial institutions listed below for the following purposes: 2020 base salary, STIP, LTIP and target incentive compensation levels:

  46    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

 

 

Benchmarks

We desire our compensation programs to be competitive in the marketplace. Thus, for purposes of 2017 compensation, we compared ourself against commercial banks with assets in the $21 billion to $73 billion range as of December 31, 2016, located in the Continental United States (Peer Group) that includes the following financial institutions:Peer Group

 

Associated Banc-Corp.

Comerica, Inc.

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

East West Bancorp, Inc.

First Horizon National Corp.

First Republic Bank

Hancock Holding Co.

Investors Bancorp, Inc.

New York Community Bancorp

People’s United Financial, Inc.

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.

Synovus Financial Corp.

TCF Financial Corporation

Umpqua Holdings Corp.

  

Peer

 Ticker 2020 Total
Assets
 
  

KeyCorp

 KEY $170,336,000 
  

Huntington Bancshares Inc.

 HBAN $123,038,000 
  

First Horizon National Corporation(1)

 FHN $84,209,000 
  

Zions Bancorporation

 ZION $81,479,000 
  

People’s United Financial, Inc.(2)

 PBCT $63,091,800 
  

New York Community Bancorp, Inc.

 NYCB $56,306,120 
  

Synovus Financial Corp.

 SNV $54,394,159 
  

TCF Financial Corporation (2)

 TCF $47,802,487 
  

Wintrust Financial Corporation

 WTFC $45,080,768 
  

Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.

 CFR $42,391,317 
  

Valley National Bancorp

VLY$40,686,076

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

PNFP$34,932,860

Hancock Whitney Corporation

HWC$33,638,602

Associated Banc-Corp

ASB$33,419,783

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

CBSH$32,922,974

Webster Financial Corporation

WBS$32,590,690

WintrustUmpqua Holdings Corporation

UMPQ$29,235,175

United Bankshares, Inc.

UBSI$26,184,247

Fulton Financial Corporation

FULT$25,906,733

Zions Bancorporation25th Percentile of Peer Group

 

$33,171,379

For purposes50th Percentile of comparing base salary, annual incentives, and long-term compensation, the Committee conducts a reviewPeer Group

$42,391,317

75th Percentile of its benchmarks throughout the yearPeer Group

$59,698,960

F.N.B. Corporation

FNB$37,354,351

Percent Rank

42%

(1)

Merged with assistance from its independent compensation consultant using a variety of methods such as direct analysis of proxy statements of companiesIBERIABANK Corporation in the peer group, as well as a review of a compilation of survey data of companies of a similar size published by several sources. At the time of setting 2017 base salary and making short-term and long-term compensation awards for 2017, there were 19 organizations noted in the Peer Group. We compete for talent with the institutions in our Peer Group, as well as large financial institutions in our geographic markets. As we grow, we continue to add talent from large financial institutions with which we compete in many metropolitan markets. We believe the Peer Group is diverse and provides the necessary depth to be meaningful in setting salary and incentive goals and is an appropriate group from which to benchmark our compensation. After setting 2017 base salaries, we believe our NEOs’ base salaries and total target compensation approximates the 50th percentile of the Peer Group.

Summary of 2017 Executive Compensation Actions

Salaries

Increases: From 2016 to 2017, salary increases ranged from 4% to 13% for the named executive officers.

Current Positioning: We believe the officers’ current salaries are in line with median pay for similar positions in the market.

Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (EIC Plan)

Performance Metrics: Incentive payouts for 2017 performance were based on operating EPS vs. budget, operating return on average tangible common equity (ROATCE) vs. peers, and operating efficiency ratio vs. peers. We believe these measures closely align our annual performance goals and shareholder interests, support our long term expectations and properly reward management.

Payout: Based on our performance, we paid executives’ bonuses under the plan at 127.08% of target.

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

Plan Structure: We granted our executives equity based on a predefined matrix defining grant values as a percentage of salary.

67% of award is performance-based

33% of award is service-based

Performance Metric: Total Shareholder Return (TSR) as a long-term incentive measure provides a peer comparison that aligns executives with the shareholders. However, after shareholder outreach sessions and an analysis of peer practices, the 2018 awards will incorporate a new metric, making performance vested equity subject to both Return on Average Tangible Assets (ROATA) and TSR. This change is discussed in more detail in the long-term awards section below. We believe, as long-term measures, ROATA and TSR provide a good peer comparison that creates shareholder value, while appropriately compensating management when delivering value in 2018.

  52    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

2020

 

(2)

Key Compensation Governance Highlights

  PolicyDescription

Stock Ownership Policy

Our directors and certain senior level managers who participate in the long-term incentive plan, including our NEOs, are currently in compliance with a robust stock ownership policy.

Anti-Hedging Policy

Our anti-hedging policy prohibits our directors, NEOs, and executive officers from engaging in hedging transactions with Company stock.

Clawback Policy

Our compensation recoupment or clawback policy allows our Board to recoup any excess compensation paid to our NEOs if the Company restates its financial results upon which an award is based due to fraud, intentional misconduct or gross negligence.

Risk Assessment

We annually conduct a risk assessment of all of our compensation plans and the Committee annually reviews the assessment to ensure the compensation programs do not encourage inappropriate risk taking.Pending mergers

 

 Compensation Philosophy 

During 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed and determined it appropriate to continue the formal executive compensation philosophy it adopted in 2015 to guide future compensation decisions. The overall goal of our compensation program is to pay at the median for relative peer median performance, below median pay for

below relative peer median performance, and above median pay for above relative peer median performance. We believe it is important to continually monitor peers, plan design and all aspects of our performance, paying attention to financial metrics and strategic directions, including successful mergers and acquisitions.

20182021 Proxy Statement    53      47  


 

  Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following table shows why we pay each component and how we intend to position our compensation relative to our Peer Group.

Percentile Rank to
Market
  ComponentWhy We Pay this ComponentMedian Performance

Salary

We provide base salary to all salaried employees, including the NEOs, in order to provide each employee with a degree of financial certainty. Competitive base salaries further our compensation program objectives by allowing us to attract and retain talented employees by providing a fixed portion of compensation upon which all employees can rely.

50th Percentile

Annual Incentive

(EIC Plan)

We believe that a significant amount of our NEOs’ compensation should be contingent on our performance. Our annual incentive plan focuses on our operating EPS, ROATCE and efficiency ratio. We believe a focus on those metrics will increase our total shareholder return. By paying a portion of the NEOs’ total compensation in variable incentive pay, we expect to drive our annual performance while increasing long-term shareholder value.

Long-Term

Incentive Plan

We believe providing performance-based (2/3 of total equity) and service-based (1/3 of total equity) restricted stock units is an effective means of promoting long-term stock ownership by NEOs and rewards management for creating long-term shareholder value. We also believe that placing a significant portion of an executive’s compensation in stock, through restricted stock units, causes executives to focus on long-term performance resulting in risk mitigation and clearly aligns management and shareholder interests. We presently do not grant stock options.

Direct

Compensation

Includes salary, annual incentive plan payouts, and LTIP payouts. To maintain a strong link between pay and performance, we place more weight on performance-based incentives rather than benefits like a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), pensions and other forms ofnon-direct compensation. By targeting a higher compensation positioning for direct compensation, we expect to be approximately at our targeted positioning for total compensation.

60th Percentile

Other Benefits and

Perquisites

We do not have an active SERP or pension, and instead promote performance-based compensation. Other perquisites are intended to be in line with market practice, including health and welfare benefits on the same basis as our general employee population.

Total

Compensation

Includes all elements in this table.

50th Percentile

  54    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

 

 

(V)

Target Pay Mix

The variousCommittee believes that a significant portion of compensation should be contingent on our performance. We also believe that a large portion of compensation should be long-term in nature and align the management team with shareholders. For this reason, Mr. Delie’s target direct compensation is made up of 22% fixed compensation and 78% variable compensation. The pie chart below on the left shows the division

of fixed and variable compensation, along with the split between time- and performance-based compensation. The pie chart on the right shows each of the financial measures used in the performance-based incentive compensation plans and their relative percentage to total incentive compensation. Furthermore, this composite metric structure reinforces the use of a balanced and diverse set of metrics, of which no one measure represents an abundance of weighting in determining overall pay.

LOGO

LOGO

Our Ongoing Compensation Review

From 2014 through 2017, our NEOs and other executives received LTI performance awards based on a sole metric: TSR. While TSR is an important measure of share price performance, as is the case with many of our financial institution peers, we have come to understand that certain aspects of this measure as a sole metric is prone to a disconnect between stock price performance and actual financial results. Despite strong performance versus peers in many financial measures, the Committee did not deviate from the performance metrics used in the LTIP, or alter the LTIP results, and the long-term awards failed to vest in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Therefore, in 2018, the Committee reviewed the construct of the incentive plans and determined that management’s long-term incentive compensation was not properly aligned with our financial performance due to, among other things, the use of TSR as a single performance metric. At that time, the Committee modified the delivery of long-term incentive compensation by adopting ROATA* as the primary financial measure and using TSR as a modifier. In 2019, the Committee continued its review and employed additional new metrics to ensure that both

the STIP and LTIP would properly reward management for strong performance, while also ensuring proper alignment with shareholder interests. As a result of the continued analysis and in conjunction with shareholder engagement, the Committee determined it appropriate to modify the structure of long-term awards and the metrics used for both long-term and short-term awards for purposes of 2019 compensation. In awarding long-term incentive compensation, the Committee determined that a use of multiple metrics would ensure that corporate performance would align closely with shareholder interests and result in management compensation being appropriately tied to performance. Therefore, for purposes of long-term incentive awards in 2019, the Committee divided the performance portion of awards equally into two components, ROATCE* and ICG Growth*, all as detailed in the 2020 Proxy Statement. Additionally, based on the recommendation of our independent compensation consultant, the Committee determined it appropriate to adjust one of the metrics of the STIP to remove potential redundancy between the STIP and LTIP. We believe these changes bolster our pay-for-performance philosophy as reflected in the strong Say-on-Pay results over the last several years.

  48    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

Results of Ongoing Compensation Review

  YearFocal PointRationaleResult

2018

LTI metrics modificationTSR as sole plan metric disproportionately affected compensationROATA* used as primary metric with TSR as modifier

2019

LTI metrics modificationContinued analysis of structure change to enhance pay-for- performance linksMetrics changed to ICG Growth*, ROATCE* and TSR Modifier
STI metric modificationTo continue use of multiple metrics when appropriatePPNR / Avg TCE* replaced ROATCE*
NEO LTI target adjustmentTo ensure appropriate incentive opportunitiesReduced CEO target and increased two NEO targets

2020

COVID-19 LTIP and STIP modificationsConsideration of pandemic impact on financial resultsNo change to metrics due to peer-based nature of LTIP and STIP

2021 Proxy Statement    49  


  Compensation Determination Process  

COMPENSATION DETERMINATION PROCESS

Role of the Compensation Committee

We believe strongly that compensation should be rooted in a pay-for-performance philosophy. It is the goal of the Committee to reward long-term results that are aligned with shareholder interests by regularly evaluating our NEO compensation programs for both reasonableness and competitiveness to market and to ensure we attract and retain top talent. In addition, the Committee evaluates Board of Director compensation with assistance from its independent compensation consultant as highlighted below. The Committee also reviews the Company’s LTIP, risk factors for the Company’s performance plans and other factors as highlighted in the Compensation Committee’s Charter.

Our Committee meets regularly during the year and continually reviews any developments that occur related to all aspects of executive compensation, including developing trends, shareholder and proxy advisory service pronouncements, adherence to our risk appetite statement, the structure of our compensation programs and their effectiveness and our financial performance and its relationship to compensation. The compensation decisions and information detailed in the CD&A and accompanying tables below result from that on-going review of compensation-related considerations and matters by our Committee and with our independent compensation consultant that we address throughout the year as set forth below.

January-February

•  Receive management’s report on corporate performance and corresponding plan compensation payouts for all outstanding plans.

•  Review Company performance for prior year against corresponding objectives in the STIP.

•  Review corresponding peer results.

•  Certify achievement of performance results for the STIP for the preceding fiscal year.

•  Determine STIP awards payable to executive officers for the prior year.

•  Consider risks arising from all incentive plans and compensation programs.

•  Consider shareholder engagement feedback.

•  Review compensation consultant industry and market updates.

March-April

•  Receive management’s report on corporate performance and corresponding plan compensation payouts for all outstanding plans.

•  Review Company performance for prior year against corresponding objectives in the LTIP.

•  Review corresponding peer results.

•  Certify achievement of performance results for the LTIP for the preceding performance period.

•  Review and approve corporate performance measures and goals for annual and long-term incentive compensation for the upcoming year.

•  Set the structure and performance targets for the STIP and LTIP for the upcoming year.

•  Review a detailed analysis of our incentive compensation program design, including structure, realized targets, relationship between fixed and variable compensation, as well as realized pay, relevant peer groups, market comparability data and compliance.

•  Grant annual LTIP awards for the next three-year performance period.

•  Review market data, industry updates and overall feedback from compensation consultant based upon recently released proxy information.

•  Consider shareholder engagement feedback.

  50    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Determination Process  

May-August

•  Receive management’s report on corporate performance and corresponding plan compensation progress or status of all outstanding plans.

•  Review the Committee’s compensation philosophy statement and overall effectiveness of program.

•  Review compensation consultant’s report on compensation practices.

•  Review all key Company policies related to compensation, including Stock Ownership Policy and Recoupment Policy.

•  Review Say-on-Pay voting recommendations from proxy advisors and consider the results of the shareholder vote.

•  Consider shareholder engagement feedback.

September-October

•  Receive management’s report on corporate performance and corresponding plan compensation progress or status of all outstanding plans.

•  Review and reassess Committee Charter and advise the Nominating Committee of the Board of any recommended changes, as needed.

•  Receive annual and ongoing trends and developments, and education session from compensation consultant.

•  Review the performance of the Committee’s compensation consultant and related contract.

•  Review the annual market compensation evaluation of executive officer positions, including the CEO, together with the compensation consultant’s opinion on the reasonableness and appropriateness of the total compensation program.

•  Review non-employee director compensation.

•  Preliminary review of annual and long-term incentive compensation program performance measures and goals for discussion and feedback to management.

•  Discuss with CEO preliminary plans and approach for compensation adjustments for the upcoming year for other executives.

•  Consider shareholder engagement feedback.

November-December

•  Receive management’s report on anticipated year-end results and corresponding results for current year STIP and LTIP.

•  Receive management feedback from shareholder engagement.

•  Ongoing review and discussion of annual and long-term incentive compensation program performance measures and goals, as needed for feedback to management.

•  Review compensation consultant reports related to anticipated financial results and upcoming events on subsequent year compensation issues.

•  Review preliminary assessment of incentive performance outcomes for the current year and expected award payouts.

•  Review and approve the compensation program of the CEO and the executive officers for the upcoming year, including base salary adjustments, target incentive opportunities and any individual employment arrangements, as needed.

Role of Independent Consultant

The Committee selected McLagan to provide advisory assistance during 2020. During 2020, the Committee directed McLagan to assist with benchmarking its Board and executive officer compensation. In addition, McLagan assisted with the review of the LTIP, proxy development and other requests as directed by the Committee and consulted with the Committee on shareholder outreach.

2021 Proxy Statement    51  


  Compensation Determination Process  

The Committee annually evaluates the compensation consultant’s independence and performance under the applicable NYSE listing standards. The Committee believes that working with an independent compensation consultant furthers the Company’s objectives to recruit and retain qualified executives, aligns their interests with those of shareholders and ensures that their compensation packages will appropriately motivate and reward ongoing achievement of business goals. In 2020, the Committee determined that McLagan continued to be independent under applicable NYSE listing standards and retained them to advise the Committee with respect to compensation of the CEO and other executive officers.

Use of Market-Based Comparisons

We desire our compensation programs to be competitive in the marketplace and, with the assistance of McLagan, we identify comparable U.S. commercial banks with a broad asset range for purposes of setting salary and incentive goals. For additional detail regarding our peer group selection, please see the chart under STIP- Performance Metrics.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives 

During 2020, the Committee reviewed and determined it was appropriate to continue its executive compensation philosophy to guide future compensation decisions that are in alignment with shareholder value creation. The overall goal of our compensation program is to pay within a reasonable range of the median for relative peer median financial performance for various performance metrics, below median pay for below relative peer median performance and above median pay for above relative peer median performance, all while considering the skills and experience of each of our NEOs. The Committee uses competitive compensation data from the annual total compensation study of peer companies to support its decisions about overall compensation opportunities and specific compensation elements. Additionally, the Committee uses multiple reference points when establishing targeted

compensation levels. The Committee does not benchmark specific compensation elements or total compensation to any specific percentile relative to the peer companies or the broader U.S. market. Instead, the Committee applies judgment and discretion in establishing targeted pay levels, taking into account not only competitive market data, but also factors such as Company, business and individual performance, scope of responsibility, historical performance compensation results, including relative equity ownership, critical needs and skill sets, leadership potential and succession planning. We believe it is important to continually monitor our peers’ compensation practices and plan designs and all aspects of our performance metrics, paying particular attention to financial measures and strategic objectives, including successful transactions and other capital actions.

  52    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Determination Process  

The following table shows why we pay each component and how we intend to position our compensation relative to our peer group.

  ComponentWhy We Pay this Component

Salary

We provide base salary to all salaried employees, including the NEOs, in order to provide each employee with a degree of financial certainty. Competitive base salaries further our compensation program objectives by allowing us to attract and retain talented employees by providing a fixed portion of compensation upon which all employees can rely.

Annual STIP

We believe that a significant amount of our NEOs’ compensation should be contingent on our performance. Our annual incentive plan focuses on our Operating EPS*, PPNR/Average TCE* and Efficiency Ratio*. We believe a focus on those metrics will increase our TSR. By paying a portion of the NEOs’ total compensation in variable incentive pay, we expect to drive our annual performance while increasing long-term shareholder value.

LTIP

We believe providing performance-based (60%) and time-based (40%) RSUs are detailed below.effective means of promoting long-term stock ownership by NEOs and rewards management for creating long-term shareholder value. We also believe that placing a significant portion of an executive’s compensation in stock, through RSUs, causes executives to focus on long-term performance resulting in risk mitigation and clearly aligns management and shareholder interests. Our LTIP focuses on ROATCE*, ICG Growth* and TSR as a modifier to the aforementioned metrics. We believe these measures offer a good peer comparison that balances financial performance and delivers shareholder value, while aligning to our corporate strategy.

Base SalaryDirect Compensation

Includes salary, annual incentive plan payouts and LTIP payouts. To maintain a strong link between pay and performance, we place more weight on performance-based incentives.

Other Benefits and Perquisites

We do not have an active supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) or pension, and instead promote performance-based compensation. Other perquisites are intended to be in line with market practice, including executive life and long-term disability insurance and health and welfare benefits, on the same overall basis as our general employee population.

 

2021 Proxy Statement    53  


How We Determine the Amount

Each year the Committee reviews salaries and determines adjustments to each NEO’s base salary based upon an assessment of the NEO’s performance versus job responsibilities, including the impact of such performance and contributions on our financial results. We target base salary for NEOs at the median of the peer group. We review base salary annually and adjust it as the Committee deems appropriate. In certain cases, the Committee increases base salary in order to raise the NEO’s annual salary to reflect more closely the annual salaries of comparably performing peer group executives.

Typically, we preliminarily review the compensation levels of the CEO and other NEOs in the last quarter of the year in order to evaluate compensation for the upcoming year, including potential salary adjustments. This review determined that our Section 16 officers’ base salaries generally approximated the 35th percentile of the Peer Group.

Based on the above information and the continued strong performance compared to peers over a long period, including a strong dividend, strong credit quality and top quartile efficiency ratio, effective January 1, 2017, we increased Mr. Delie’s annual base salary to approximate the median of the Peer Group we used for setting base compensation. We believe that Mr. Delie’s total compensation level is competitive with chief executive officers’ salaries within the financial services industries and the Peer Group and is consistent with the Company’s philosophy.

 

Accordingly, the Committee increased each of the NEOs’ salaries to remain at or approximate the 50th percentile of the Peer Group and set their 2017 salaries as noted in the table below.  Compensation Determination Process  

 

  Name 2016 Salary 2017 Salary % Increase Approximate Market
Positioning After
Increase

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

 928,008 1,050,000 13.2% 50th percentile

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

 460,008 480,000 4.3% 50th percentile

Gary L. Guerrieri

 390,000 440,000 12.8% 50th percentile

Robert M. Moorehead

 375,000 425,000 13.3% 50th percentile

Barry C. Robinson

 350,016 375,000 7.1% 50th percentile

 

In 2017, we set the NEOs’ 2018 salaries as follows:

 

Delie

 $1,076,000 

Calabrese

 $492,000 

Guerrieri

 $451,000 

Moorehead

 $436,000 

Robinson

 $384,000 

Relation of Base Salary to Other ComponentsElements of Compensation

An NEO’s base salary is a reference point for the executive’s annual incentive opportunities. The Committee determines the level at which each NEO participates in the annual EIC Plan under the F.N.B. Corporation 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated May 20, 2015 (2007 Plan or Incentive Plan). his level is typically expressed as a percentage amount. For example, if an NEO participates in the EIC Plan at the 40% level, it means that the NEO’s target incentive opportunity is the NEO’s base salary multiplied by 40%. In addition, prior to 2007, base salary was the only component of compensation in

the formula used to calculate an NEO’s pension benefit accrual under the Company’s Pension Plan. An NEO may also defer a portion of his or her base salary and bonus into the Company’s 401(k) Plan.

The various components of the NEOs’ total compensation are detailed below.

Base Salary

Each year the Committee reviews salaries and determines adjustments to each NEO’s base salary based upon an assessment of the performance of the NEO’s job responsibilities, including the impact of such performance and contributions to our financial results. In certain cases, the Committee increases base salary to raise the NEO’s annual salary to reflect more closely the annual salaries of comparably performing peer group executives. Typically, we preliminarily review the compensation levels of the CEO and other NEOs in the last quarter of the year to evaluate compensation for the upcoming year, including potential salary adjustments. Accordingly, the Committee increased each of the NEOs’ salaries to remain within a reasonable range of the median of the peer group and set their 2020 salaries as noted in the table under 2020 Incentive Opportunities. The Committee does not intend to increase the NEOs’ base salary in 2021.

Incentive Compensation Changes

As discussed above, we have a process and philosophy of continuing to review all aspects of compensation. Early in 2020, we recognized the need to review the potential impacts of the global pandemic on our compensation. We believed that it was imperative that our compensation program properly reward executives for managing through the unusual circumstances created by COVID-19 and for continuing the overall success of the Company. In order to ensure such, we undertook a review of the structural changes we made to our incentive compensation programs in recent years in an effort to ensure the proper alignment between pay and performance. In our review, and in conjunction with our compensation consultant, we recognized many organizations were conducting a similar review. We learned during our process that many of our peers maintained incentive programs using absolute metrics. However, when we modified our STIP and LTIP over the last several years, we focused on using peer-based metrics in both our STIP and LTIP, where appropriate. In conducting our analysis of the potential

impacts of the pandemic on our plan performance, we believe that this use of peer-based metrics will allow our plan performance to properly exhibit our financial performance. Therefore, we determined that we would not modify our plan design or change its metrics for either our STIP or LTIP for 2020. Nonetheless, we believe it appropriate to analyze certain unusual items and their impact on Operating EPS* versus our Operating Plan as part of our STIP and, where appropriate, to recognize individual exemplary leadership and accomplishment of strategic objectives during the unusual circumstances created by events in 2020, including the COVID-19 crisis and the continued need to address social inequities.

Annual Incentive Awards

We intend our EIC PlanSTIP to provide additional compensation to our NEOs in the form of performance-based cash awards that are based on our achievement of certain annual financial objectives. The EIC Plan is open to each NEO.

How We Determine the Amount

Philosophy

We target short-term, annual incentive compensation of the CEO and the other NEOs such that their compensation is tied directly to the Company’s performance.performance and accomplishment of individual objectives. We measure our Company’s annual performance against three weighted target goals set by the Committee: operating EPS, ROATCE and efficiency ratio. Committee, as set forth in the table below.

We believe these performance goals are critical to F.N.B.’s growth and profitability, as well as

2018 Proxy Statement    55  


  Compensation Discussion and Analysis

contributors to the long-term creation and preservation of shareholder value. In evaluating performance, the Committee considers in the calculation items not in the normal course of annual operations and their resulting effect on our performance (i.e., significant merger and acquisition transactions, investment gains or losses, corporate and balance sheet restructuring, significant asset

sales and other items it deems appropriate in measuring our operating performance against the target goal). We set the target incentive award level for each NEO based upon market-competitive incentive opportunities as provided by McLagan for executives performing similar duties, and the Committee has the sole discretion to determine all annual bonuses for the CEO and other NEOs.

 

 

  54    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Determination Process  

Calculation2020 Performance Goals

Our 20172020 Company performance goals are reflected in the table below.

Performance Goals

  Key Performance MeasurementWeight WeightThreshold ThresholdTarget TargetMaximum
 Maximum

Operating EPSEPS* vs. Operating BudgetPlan

 70% 

$0.860

1.01

(90% Budget)Operating

Plan)

 

$0.956

1.12

(100% Budget)Operating
Plan)

 

$1.052

1.23

(110% Budget)Operating
Plan)

 Operating ROATCEPPNR / Average TCE* vs. Peer Group

 20% 25th Percentile 50th Percentile 75th Percentile

 Operating Efficiency RatioRatio* vs. Peer Group

 10% 25th Percentile 50th Percentile 75th Percentile

 Total

100%

 

We calculate performance for each specific key performance measurement independently to determine the payout for that key performance measurement. The sum of the awards for each key performance measurement determines the total incentive award.award portion based on Company performance. The Committee independently evaluates the achievement of individual performance objectives that are aligned with the Company’s Operating Plan.

 

2020 Incentive Opportunities

The CEO and other NEOs have an incentive opportunity expressed as a percentage of each of their base salaries, with the possibility of achieving an incentive payout as more particularly set forth in the table below.

salaries.

The payout potential incentive opportunities established for each NEO in 2017 was2020 were the same as 2019 and were as follows:

 

   
Name    

Below

Threshold

     

Threshold

(50%)

     

Target

(100%)

     

Maximum

(200%)

  2021 Salary  2020 Salary  2019 Salary  Below
Threshold
 Threshold
(50%)
 Target
(100%)
 Maximum
(200%)
   

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

     0%         50%         100%       200%   $1,157,285  $1,157,285  $1,129,800 0% 50% 100% 200%
   

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

     0%         40%         80%       160%    524,800  524,800  512,000 0     40     80     160    
   

Gary L. Guerrieri

     0%         30%         60%       120%    481,750  481,750  470,000 0     30     60     120    
   

Robert M. Moorehead

     0%         30%         60%       120%    N/A   469,245  457,800 0     30     60     120    
   

Barry C. Robinson

     0%         30%         60%       120%    405,388  405,388  395,500 0     30     60     120    

20172020 Performance and Annual Incentive Awards

The chart below reflectsCompany achieved strong performance relative to peers for both PPNR/Average TCE* and Efficiency Ratio*. Our final award determination results in an Operating EPS* metric payout that was reduced to less than 75% of the Company’s 2017formulaic payout when adjusted for COVID-19 related impacts. The Board requested management to conduct an analysis of the 2020 Operating Plan of key financial metrics that were related to, and impacted by, the COVID-19 pandemic economic environment. Those items were largely related to provision for credit losses, expenses and lost revenue attributable to the global pandemic operating and economic environment. Management’s analysis revealed that the Company achieved strong 2020 Operating EPS* as compared to the 2020 Operating Plan, the only non-peer metric in our LTIP or STIP, when adjusting for these pandemic-related items. This performance level would have resulted in an award of 105% considering the 70% weighting for

this key performance indicator (KPI), and when combined with the calculation of the incentive plan results from our two peer-based metrics, would have resulted in a total 2020 payout achievement level of 159%. However, the Compensation Committee used its discretion to reduce the 2020 incentive payout level for purposesthe Operating EPS* metric after considering the impact of the pandemic on our shareholders as reflected in our share price performance during 2020.

The Compensation Committee reviewed the analysis of the key financial performance metrics and considered the impacts on Operating EPS* to be unusual and nonrecurring, due to the COVID-19 pandemic economic impacts. The Committee also recognized that our performance during this period as reflected by many key financial measures was strong, especially relative to peers, as both of our EICOperating Plan and is more particularly detailed inpeer-based metrics achieved near top quartile levels at 70th percentile performance. Accordingly, the narrative that follows:Committee determined it appropriate to consider other

Incentive Plan

2017 Performance Calculations

 

  Key Performance Indicator   Weight    

Target

100%

   Actual Results   

Actual
Performance

(% of Target
Payout)(1)

    Payout Percent   

Operating EPS vs.

Operating Budget

  70 $0.956 $0.948  95.8  67.08

Operating ROATCE vs.

Peer Group (Percentile)

  20 50th percentile 94th percentile  200.0  40.00

Operating Efficiency Ratio vs.

Peer Group (Percentile)

  10 50th percentile 84th percentile  200.0  20.00

Total

  100          127.08

 

(1)

Performance results between target and maximum is interpolated between levels.

2021 Proxy Statement    55  

  56    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Compensation Discussion and AnalysisDetermination Process  

 

 

After adjustments for certain items, adjustedfactors rather than rely solely on a formulaic approach which would not produce a result in alignment with our Operating Plan’s objective of appropriately incentivizing executive management to take actions in alignment with shareholders’ long-term interests. In view of the fluid pandemic economic environment, the Board requested management to conduct an alternative analysis of our only non-peer-based incentive plan metric, Operating EPS* vs. Operating Plan, by evaluating Operating PPNR* vs. Operating Plan. The result of this analysis indicated solid performance on a PPNR* basis given the pandemic operating EPS was $0.9481. Operating ROATCE was 15.74% and the operating efficiency ratio was 54.25%, exceeding peer median performance and in the top quartile.environment. The Committee certifiednoted that F.N.B. achieved record revenue in 2020 despite the adjustmentchallenging pandemic economic environment, while continuing to add long-term shareholder value by successfully executing on our 2020 Operating Plan and long-term strategic plan.

Based on the GAAP EPSanalysis described above, the Committee concluded that it would not solely rely on a formulaic approach to determine the 2020 annual incentive payment, but rather, use its discretion to base the 2020 incentive award on a discretionary determination of the payout percentage for our 2020

Operating EPS* versus 2020 Operating Plan at an achievement level of 101%, which translates into a 77% payout for that measure given the 70% weighting. When combined with the results of $0.319 per share, predominantly due to an exclusion of a deferred tax asset (DTA) valuation adjustment of $0.178 stemming from tax reform, merger-related expenses of $0.124, merger-related securities gains of $0.006, SBA purchase accounting adjustments reflected in Goodwill of $0.008, and $0.015 related to lost mortgage revenue due to the unanticipated departure of North Carolina mortgage personnel. Based on these results, the formula under our EIC Plan provided for a payment for corporate performance for each NEO at 127.08% of their target award amount. These continued strong financial

results versus our Peer Group and performance relative to our financial plan provide each NEO with an annual incentive bonus of 127.08% of the NEO’s target,two peer-based metrics, as more particularly reflected in the 2017table below, the Committee determined the 2020 annual incentive award level at 131% of target for each of the 2020 Section 16 officers, except for Mr. Delie, whose award we adjusted further to 149% of target in recognition of his extraordinary leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic (see Summary, Compensation Table.2020 COVID-19 Pandemic Response of this Proxy Statement) and his efforts in spearheading F.N.B.’s considerable commitments and investments to address social inequities and the needs of the underserved communities within our markets (see the 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report).

Relation of Annual IncentivesThe following charts show how our 2020 performance for PPNR/Average TCE* and Efficiency Ratio* compared to Other Components of Compensation

As notedpeers. Operating EPS* is not included in the Base Salary discussion above,charts as it is an absolute measure which is compared to the annual incentive compensationOperating Plan set by the Board. For 2020, it is directly relatedimportant to base compensation. An NEO may also defer a portionnote that PPNR/Average TCE* and the Efficiency Ratio* are both at the 70th percentile of his bonus into the Company’s 401(k) Plan. Previously, we used any cash bonus paid to any participant in the defined benefit plan, including NEOs to calculate each participant’s retirement benefit. Since 2011, no additional accruals have been made for any participant in the defined benefit plan.peers.

 

 

LOGO

  56    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Determination Process  

LOGO

    
 

 

  Peer
Median
   FNB   Rank   Percent
Rank
 
    

2020 Efficiency Ratio*

   58.3   56.1   7    70
    

2020 PPNR / Average TCE*

   18.5   20.9   7    70

     
  Key Performance Indicator Weight  

Target

100%

  Results as Adjusted  

Actual

Performance

(% of Target

Payout)(1)

  Payout Percent 
     

PPNR/Average TCE* vs.

Peer Group (Percentile)

  20  50th percentile  70th percentile  180.0%  36.00
     

Efficiency Ratio* vs.

Peer Group (Percentile)

  10  50th percentile  70th percentile  180.0%  18.00

(1)

Performance results between target and maximum are interpolated between levels.

The Committee believes these awards reflect the tremendous work of our executive leadership in successfully managing through the significant and myriad challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic environment, while continuously maintaining focus on 2020 financial performance and long-term shareholder value. Based on the analysis and considerations explained above, the Committee reasonably believes the 2020 incentive award determination appropriately balances long-term shareholder interests and rewards executive compensation for successfully executing on F.N.B.’s 2020 Operating Plan and the long-term strategic plan.

Long-Term Awards

Service-basedF.N.B. believes a significant portion of an executive’s pay package should align executive interests with those of shareholders. Therefore, annually we grant our executives a mix of time-based and performance-based restricted stocklong-term incentive awards, were provided to our NEOs under our 2007 Plan as statedwhich also include performance-based cash units in the 2017 Grantscase of Plan-Based Awards table. The restricted stock unitsour CEO.

These grants reward NEOs based on the Company’s achievement of certain

financial objectives, in the case of performance-based awards, and assist with the retention of key executives. The 2007 Plan is open to each NEO and all other salaried personnel selected by our CEO andexecutives, in the case of time-based awards.

Our Committee for participation.

How We Determine the Amount

Aestablishes a target award level is established for each NEO based upon the executive officer’s level of responsibility and setsets the levels such that the award amount increases as the officer’s level of responsibility in the organization increases. Our current targets areAt the time of granting the awards, the Committee sets the award amount for each participant level in a manner designed to provide competitive long-term compensation based on data provided by our independent compensation consultant, McLagan, as set forth below:

NameLTI Plan Opportunity
(% of Salary)

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

270%        

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

175%        

Gary L. Guerrieri

75%        

Robert M. Moorehead

75%        

Barry C. Robinson

75%        

1

A reconciliation of reported EPS to adjusted EPS amounts is as follows (the amount represents the after tax amount):

EPS After Tax Adjustments Amount 

As reported (GAAP)

   $0.629 
  DTA valuation adjustment due to tax reform  0.178 
  Merger-related expenses, net  0.124 
  Merger-related securities gains, net  (0.006
  SBA purchase accounting adjustment  0.008 
  Mortgage revenue loss  0.015 

As adjusted

   $0.948 

2018 Proxy Statement    57  


  Compensation Discussion and Analysis

market-competitive incentive opportunities for executives performing similar duties and at a similar executive level in the organization. In setting target levels, we also believe it is appropriate to understandconsider the ownership levels of our NEOs that resulted from prior award grants and the ultimate vested amount of stock, including our NEOs ownership levels as compared to

2021 Proxy Statement    57  


  Compensation Determination Process  

peers. We periodically conduct a review of the ownership levels of our NEOs compared to peers and their overall ownership levels. Our most recent analysis indicates that our NEOs as a group, and our CEO and CFO individually, are in the bottom quartile of stock ownership compared to our peers despite our continued growth and strong performance.

Atfinancial performance measuring consistently better than peers, with several measures in the timetop quartile.

In view of granting the awards,this circumstance, in making its long-term performance award determinations, the Committee setsis mindful of the impact on NEOs’ realized pay in recent years due to the disconnect between the long-term incentive performance metrics and the Company’s financial performance compared to peers during that period.

In 2020, consistent with the changes to the plan made in 2019, long-term incentive awards were divided into time and performance awards:

LOGO

Time-Based Awards

We believe this award amountgrant allocation is appropriate to properly reward NEOs for each participantcommitment to the Company, encourage stock ownership and retain our key executives. The time-based awards provide management with a continued increase in share ownership at a level in a manner designed to provide competitive

long-term compensation based on data provided by McLagan as market-competitive incentive opportunities for executives performing similar duties. The time-based awards vest in three equal installments on the first business day of January in each of the first three years of the grant. The NEO will forfeit the award was divided into two components,one-thirdif the NEO terminates employment before the vesting date, other than as a service-based award (Service-Based Awards) andresult of retirement, death, or disability.

  58    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Determination Process  

two-thirdsPerformance-Based Awards as a

The performance-based award (Performance-Based Awards). The performance awards only vest if certain performance requirements are met as set forth in the awards. We believe this allocation of equity awards is appropriate to reward NEOs for loyalty to the Company, encourage stock ownership, provide increased ownership and retain our key executives. The Performance-Based Awards help drive our performance, while creating shareholder value by linking the shareholders’ interests and the NEOs’ interests in creating shareholder value through long-term success. The NEO will forfeit both types of awards ifFrom 2014 through 2017, the NEO terminatessole long-term measure was TSR. In 2018, we added ROATA* as the primary performance measure and used TSR as a modifier. We believe TSR and ROATA* are useful measures, however, as discussed in our 2020 Proxy Statement, we modified the 2019 measures and used ROATCE*

employment beforeand ICG Growth*, both modified by TSR, as our long-term performance measures for the cliff vesting date,2019 and 2020 LTI awards. Shareholders commented positively that in the current operating environment, focus on TBV* growth, while continuing to pay an attractive dividend, and capital expansion are important considerations in an LTIP. ROATCE*, ICG Growth* and TSR provide for a good peer comparison that balances both financial return as well as delivering shareholder value. The chart below illustrates how our performance-based awards and payout are calculated:

LOGO

As shown above, the performance award component of our LTIP is split into two components. The first component uses ROATCE* as the primary metric and measures our annual performance versus peer performance for each of the three years in the award time horizon. Each LTIP measure is calculated independently for each of the three years and then averaged for F.N.B. and each of its peers. We determine the payout level based upon how this average measure compares to our peers. This payout level is then increased or decreased based on TSR performance to determine the final payout percentage. TSR performance at median results in no adjustment to the award. If our TSR performance is at or below the 25th percentile of peers, the award is adjusted downward 25%. If our TSR performance is at or above the 75th percentile, the award is adjusted upward

25%. The final payout percentage is calculated by multiplying the metric result by the TSR result (1+/-25%).

The second component is ICG Growth* which is defined as the annual change in TBV* per common share plus the dividends declared per common share during the annual period, divided by TBV* per common share at the beginning of the performance period versus the same measures for our peers. Similar to ROATCE*, the award level associated with this measure is calculated independently for each of the three years of the award time horizon, and then averaged. Thereafter, the award is modified for TSR performance versus peers the same as described above for ROATCE* performance.

2021 Proxy Statement    59  


  Compensation Determination Process  

In 2020, the Committee maintained the targets for the CEO and all other than as a result of retirement, death or disability.NEOs. The Committee used survey data from McLagan when positioningfollowing table shows the target long-term incentive compensation such that an award when realized byvalue of the NEO at target, as a percent2020 grants for each of salary, would approximate the 60th percentile of direct compensationNEOs. The performance awards will not vest until

2023 and the 50th percentile of total compensation. The Committee also consideredPerformance-Based Awards only vest if our performance meets the accounting impact on earnings and recommendations of the CEO with respect to all NEOs other than himself when makingrequirements set forth in the awards.

   
Name 

2020

LTIP
Opportunity
(% of Salary)

  Performance-
Based ($)
  Time-
Based ($)
 
   
Vincent J. Delie, Jr.  250%   1,880,552        1,158,051       
   
Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.  175        596,566        367,361       
   
Gary L. Guerrieri  90        281,636        173,432       
   
Robert M. Moorehead  90        274,325        168,930       
   

Barry C. Robinson

  90        236,994        145,946       

Our Performance-Based Awards2020 performance-based awards are designed to align management’s long-term incentive compensation with our total shareholder return objective. In order to qualify for vesting of the awards that were granted in 2017, each NEO must meet two criteria. The NEO must remain continuously employed by us from the date of the award to the vesting date and our relative total shareholder return during thefinancial performance as measured over a three-year performance period must equal or exceed the 25th percentile performance of our Peer Group. If the NEOs do not meet the criteria, thecompared to peers. These awards will not vest if we do not achieve the minimum relative performance, other than in the case of the death of the NEO during the performance

period. The combination of these metrics provides for a balanced set of goals which measure and the NEOs will not receive any shares or payment. If the NEOs meet the criteria, the number of Performance-Based Awards that vest is contingent upon the degree of achievement of certainreward using financial performance levels compared tometrics and a group of peer financial institutions. The Company’s performance levels are based on our relative total shareholder return duringmeasure, TSR, over a three-year performance period versus our Peer Groupperiod.

Currently, there are three years of long-term performance awards outstanding as set forth in the table below:follows:

 

 

  YearMeasures

2018

ROATA* with a TSR modifier

2019 & 2020    

ROATCE* and ICG Growth*, both with TSR modifier

All of stock-based performance awards vest based on the following tables:

 

Performance Level Percent Rank Vesting Percentage

Threshold

 25th Percentile 25% of Target

Target

 50th Percentile 100% of Target

Maximum

 75th Percentile 175% of Target

We target TSR in the 50th percentileAfter determination of the Peer Group, with threshold performance at the 25th percentile and a maximum payout for performance at or above the 75th percentile. Two additional restrictionsbased on the vesting ofprimary financial performance measure, the restricted stock units (RSUs) include:2018, 2019 and 2020 awards are adjusted for TSR performance versus peers as follows:

 

The vested RSUs will be limited to the target amount if FNB’s TSR is negative, and

The maximum dollar value between performance and any increase in total shareholder value will be capped at 350% of the grant date value.

We believe the size of the Peer Group (19) is large enough to reduce potential volatility that may result when peer financial institutions are acquired during the three-year performance period and, therefore, are unavailable for measurement comparison purposes.

We expect the Peer Group to provide a meaningful comparison based upon our current asset size and anticipated growth over the award performance period.

The Service-Based Awards and Performance-Based Awards granted in 2017 are described in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table below. In 2017, two cycles of Performance-Based Awards vested, the 2013 and 2014 awards. This was a result of the performance cycle for the awards changing from four years to three years in 2014, and, at the same time, changing the performance period from calendar year, to April 1st thru March 31st of the third subsequent year. The 2013 Performance-Based Awards that vested in 2017 were for the performance period from 2013-2016, and vested between the target and maximum level for all NEOs at 119 percent of the

  58    F.N.B. Corporation


TSR Performance
Level Rank (1)
Adjustment
Percent

75th percentile or above

Plus 25%

50th percentile

No adjustment

25th percentile or below

Minus 25%

 

(1)

Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

There is straight-line interpolation between all levels.

 

initial award amount. The 2014 Performance-Based Awards that vested in 2017 were for the performance period from April 1, 2014, thru March 31, 2017, and vested between the threshold and target level for all NEOs at 50 percent of the initial award amount. The shares that vested are detailed in the 2017 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End table.

Additionally, we anticipate that the performance awards granted to all NEOs in 2015 that vest in 2018 will not meet the threshold level. Overall, we anticipate that the 2015 grants as reflected in theSummary Compensation Table will vest as more particularly set forth below:

Name 2015 Long-Term Incentive  Plan Grant Anticipated Vesting Amount
 Time-Based Performance-Based Time-Based(1)  Performance-Based 

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

   25,136   51,033   27,684   0

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

   8,989   18,200   9,901   0

Gary L. Guerrieri

   6,818   13,841   7,501   0

Robert M. Moorehead

   2,636   5,352   2,903   0

Barry C. Robinson

   2,577   5,224   2,834   0
                     

 

(1)

Total includes divided equivalent units.

  60    F.N.B. Corporation

In 2014, we changed our LTIP such that shares vest based on TSR performance compared to peers. When we spoke with 10 of our largest institutional shareholders in the latter months of 2017 and early 2018, the majority, including ISS and Glass Lewis, expressed a preference for long-term performance awards to be tied to more than one performance measure. A number of our investors commented that TSR as a standalone metric may not be the most effective measure of strong executive and Company financial performance and that use of multiple metrics may better convey the alignment of shareholder value with execution of the business strategy. In tandem with this investor feedback and with the assistance of our Consultant, we studied various alternatives for changes to our LTIP. Our study determined that most of the Company’s peers use two metrics in their long-term plan and combine TSR with a profitability metric as the plan performance measures. As our shareholder outreach progressed and we shared conceptual changes to our plan in this regard, our investors generally viewed them as favorable.

Based on this analysis and shareholder feedback, the committee determined to amend the calculation of how the LTIP shares will vest. The 2018 long-term plan awards will continue to be 2/3 performance-based and 1/3 time-based; however, the calculation of how the performance-based shares will vest will change. At the time of vesting, we will measure performance using ROATA relative to peers as an initial screen. Consistent with our current plan design, target performance will be peer median and equate to an award of 100 percent of the target. Threshold performance will be at the 25th percentile and will result in an award at 25 percent of target and maximum performance will occur at the 75th percentile and will result in an award at 175 percent

of target. The result calculated using ROATA may be adjusted up or down by up to 25 percent based upon our relative TSR performance. Performance at threshold, or the 25th percentile, will reduce the award by 25 percent and performance at maximum, the 75th percentile, will increase the award 25 percent. All results in between these metrics will be interpolated such that a result at peer median for total shareholder return will not result in an adjustment to the award calculation after the ROATA measurement. Awards will continue to cliff vest over 3 years.

We believe this new LTIP design properly aligns our NEOs and shareholder interests. Moreover, the LTIP ensures that the long-term performance plan accounts for multiple measures and will help to increase our NEOs beneficial stock ownership. Nonetheless, we will continue to monitor the effectiveness of our program in properly rewarding our CEO and NEOs for delivering long-term shareholder value and strong financial results. We believe the plan does not incent unnecessary risk taking and is consistent with our Risk Appetite Statement.

Relation of Long-Term Incentive to Other Components of Compensation

Long-term incentive compensation earned by the NEOs is a component of total compensation and is benchmarked against our Company’s Peer Group and survey data provided by our independent compensation consultant. It does not impact any other component of the NEOs’ compensation or benefits. However, the program is designed to increase the NEOs’ overall compensation in alignment with an increase in shareholder value such that achievement of the performance goals will result in increased compensation.

2018 Proxy Statement    59  


 

  Compensation Discussion and AnalysisDetermination Process  

 

 

Vesting of Performance Awards

Over the year 2020 represented in the Summary Compensation Table, as well as and over the last five years noted below, our NEOs compensation levels

were significantly below the amounts disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. This result is driven in large part by the minimal vesting of the performance awards of RSUs under our LTIP as more particularly set forth below:

  
  Award Year Vesting Year     Actual Vested Percent    
  

2013

 2017 50%
  

2014

 2017   0%
  

2015

 2018   0%
  

2016

 2019   0%
  

2017

 2020 50%

The awards granted from 2013 through 2017 were based exclusively on our relative TSR performance versus our peers. Since our TSR performance relative to our peers either did not meet our minimum threshold or only slightly exceeded threshold over these performance periods, our performance-based awards either did not vest or, in only two instances, vested at 50% of the target amount. Our Board remained disciplined in terms of plan payouts despite recognizing the strong financial performance of the Company and the use of a single metric. Therefore, as noted previously, we made prospective changes to our LTIP in order to ensure appropriate compensation for our NEOs based on our investment thesis by selecting metrics that create shareholder value and support our overall corporate strategy. These balanced measures are directly influenced by management and typically result in an increase in TSR performance. Another adverse result of misalignment of management’s

performance and long-term incentive results due to the use of a single performance metric is low relative NEO equity ownership. The Committee believes that the changes it has made to the LTIP over the last several years will address this issue going forward. Nonetheless, the Committee continues to review this issue and our incentive compensation programs in order to ensure fair compensation and appropriate equity ownership for our executive officers that is aligned with shareholder interests and facilitates our attraction and retention of the appropriate executive talent.

Performance Results Relative to Peers

The following charts show how our 2018 and 2019 long-term incentive awards performed compared to the applicable peer group:

LOGO

    
 

 

Peer
Median
FNBRank  Percent  
Rank
    

2018-2020 Operating ROATA*

1.1%1.2%768%

2021 Proxy Statement    61  


  Compensation Determination Process  

This is the third year of a three-year performance cycle for the 2018 LTI award. We anticipate these awards will vest at 143%, after being modified for TSR performance on the vesting date. ROATA* performance is currently in the top of the second quartile, resulting in a payout of 155% before adjusting

for TSR performance. TSR performance as of March 8, 2021 is slightly below the 50th percentile of peers and would modify the ROATA* award by 92%, which results in an estimated final payout of 143% (155% times 92%).

LOGO

LOGO

    
 

 

Peer
Median
FNBRank  Percent  
Rank
    

2019-2020 Operating ROATCE*

12.3%15.1%295%
    

2019-2020 ICG* (Change in TBV* Per Share + Dividends)

14.5%15.4%960%

ROATCE* performance is in the top decile and ICG Growth* in the second quartile. We currently expect the ROATCE* portion of the award to vest at 193% and ICG Growth* at 143%, after being modified for

TSR performance. TSR performance as of March 8, 2021 is in the second quartile of performance. The total payout award is currently expected to vest at 168% of target.

  62    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Determination Process  

We have completed two - thirds of the performance period for the 2019 awards. The above performance metrics apply to the performance-based RSUs and, for Mr. Delie, to the cash-based PeUs, which may be earned after a specified and limited number of shares is earned under the RSUs, and which continue to provide an incentive to achieve maximum performance levels.    

The connection between our TSR performance, NEO compensation and the relative misalignment due to a focus in our LTIP on a singular performance metric,

TSR, for multiple years resulted in, among other things, the 2019 changes to our LTIP. Despite the impact of not meeting the TSR threshold and the corresponding lack of equity vesting, the Committee believes that our CEO and NEOs have led the Company admirably, as supported by our financial results and as measured by key performance metrics. In addition, we maintain a strong credit culture and continue to return a robust dividend to our shareholders. The table below demonstrates our performance in a number of key performance indicators:

LOGO

2021 Proxy Statement    63  


  Compensation Determination Process  

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices 

Management Stock Ownership Policy

We maintain a Management Stock Ownership Policy that requires the CEO, the other NEOs and certain senior management who participate in the long-term incentive plan,LTIP, the 2007F.N.B. Incentive Compensation Plan and any successor plan to have varying levels of stock ownership based upon the officer’s participation level in the plan.F.N.B. Incentive Compensation Plan. The policy requires participants to hold the lesser of a specific share amount or a number of shares equal to a specific dollar threshold that is a multiple of the

participant’s salary. We believe that this policy aligns management

and shareholder interests and acts as a risk mitigant, because our NEOs have a significant long-term stake in our success. Under our policy, acceptable forms of stock ownership include:

 

sharesShares owned individually and by immediate family;family

long-termLong-term stock awards, including all restricted stock and unit awards;awards

sharesShares held in the 401(k) Plan; and

vested stock options.Plan

 

 

Specific ownership guidelines for the NEOs are as follows:

 

  Named Executive OfficerShare
Value
 Share ValueNumber
of
Shares
  Number of SharesCompliance    
 

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

 5 x salary  250,000met
 

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

 3 x salary  100,000met
 

Gary L. Guerrieri

 3 x salary  100,000met
 

Robert M. Moorehead

 3 x salary  100,000met
 

Barry C. Robinson

 3 x salary  100,000 met

 

We annually review progress toward achieving the ownership guidelines. Our NEOs are required to reach the stock ownership guidelines within five years after the later of any of the following events: commencement of participation in the long-term incentive portion of the 2007F.N.B. Incentive Plan; promotion to a higher participation level; or, wean increase in a participant’s ownership requirement. If an NEO does not hold the required share amount after the five-year period, the NEO will receive any future incentive awards as stock, in lieu of cash, that the participant must hold until he or she reaches the applicable required ownership level. All of our NEOs currently meet the required stock ownership levels based on prior policies and are within the time period allotted to achieve the level required under our current stock ownership guidelines.

Retirement and Other Post-Employment Benefits

All employees are eligible to participate in a 401(k) Plan. All salaried employees hired before January 1, 2008, except employees of First National Insurance Agency, LLC (FNIA), participated in our defined benefit pension plan, the Retirement Income Plan (RIP), through December 31, 2010. At that time, we froze each participant’s accrued benefit amount and ceased future accruals.

Why We Pay these Benefits to Executives

In general, we have designed our retirement plans to provide NEOs and other employees with financial security after retirement. We provide matching contributions and a performance-based contribution under the 401(k) Plan for all employees, including the

NEOs. Previously, we offered a defined benefit pension plan, the RIP. We detail its benefits to employees more particularly in the narrative accompanying the 20172020 Pension Benefits table. Additionally, due to Code limits on the amount of compensation that may be recognized fortax-qualified retirement plans, certain NEOswereNEOswere unable to make the full amount of contributions to the 401(k) Plan and the amount of their total pay that is included in the calculation of their pension benefit is limited. Therefore, we offered the F.N.B. Corporation ERISA Excess Retirement Plan (Excess Plan) and continue to offer the F.N.B. Corporation ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan to allow any affected employee, including the NEO’s,NEOs, to receive the full benefit intended by the qualified retirement plans. In 2010, we amended these plansthe Excess Plan consistent with the amendments to the RIP.

  64    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Determination Process  

In addition to those plans, we previously provided to some senior executives, including Mr. Guerrieri, a supplemental executive retirement plan, called the Basic Retirement Plan (BRP), which is designed to supplement the benefits provided by the RIP and the ERISA Excess Plan. The purpose of the BRP was to insureensure a minimum level of retirement income for the NEOs and other senior officers who participated in the plan. We closed the BRP to new participants and ceased future accruals for all participants, effective December 31, 2008.

Post-Employment and Change in Control Payments

We believe post-retirement compensation is necessary to attract and retain talented executives and that our post-retirement benefits are competitive

  60    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

in the industry and provide NEOs with appropriate retirement benefits.

We provide severance and change in control payments through employment contracts that provide additional security for our NEOs. We determined that the continued retention of the services of our NEOs on a long-term basis fosters stability of senior management through retention of well-qualified officers. The 20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables and accompanying narrative detail the NEOs’ employment contracts.

How We Determine the Amount to Pay

The RIP benefit is determined by a precise formula set forth in the plan document and explained in the narrative accompanying the 2017 2020 Pension Benefits table. The ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan and ERISA Excess Plan benefit formulas are based upon the specific opportunity or the amounts lost by the participant due to Code limits and are more fully detailed in the 20172020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation and 2020 Pension Benefits table tables and narrative.narratives. The benefit under the BRP is a monthly benefit equal to a target benefit percentage based on years of service at retirement and a designated tier as determined by the Committee and detailed in the narrative accompanying the 20172020 Pension Benefits table. We do not grant extra years of credited service under any of our qualified ornon-qualified plans. The termination and change in control benefits for NEOs were set by contract and are described more fully in the 20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables and in the narrative accompanying the 20172020 Summary Compensation Table.Table.

Relation of these Benefits to Other Components of Compensation

Retirement benefits are directly linked to the amount of the NEO’s total pay, which includes base salary and annual incentive compensation. Similarly, while the NEO’s termination benefits are determined under their respective employment agreements, generally, termination benefits are a product of base compensation and in the case of Messrs. Delie, Calabrese and Moorehead, their annual bonus, if any.

Other Benefits and Perquisites

The NEOs participate in a wide array of benefit plans that are generally available to all employees of the Company, on a non-discriminatory basis including the RIP2 andRIP(5), the 401(k) Plan.Plan and disability insurance coverage. Benefits primarily consist of participation in the Company’s defined benefit, defined contribution and health and welfare benefit plans. In addition, some of the NEOs receive perquisites in the form of club membership dues, a company car and other perquisites detailed as part of the 20172020 Summary Compensation Table and accompanying narrative. We provide club membership dues to certain NEOs in order to provide them with the ability to entertainengage in business development activities, including entertaining customers, potential customers and various business, community and political contacts, which is an integral part of our industry. Similarly, we provide certain NEOs a company car for purposes of appropriate transportation for entertainment of customers, vendors and business contacts and traveling between our facilities. It is the Committee’s policy that it will not include taxgross-ups in any new or amended employment agreements.

Tax and Accounting Treatment of Compensation

 Tax and Accounting Treatment of Compensation 

In 2017, the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (Tax Act) became law and included significant changes to the executive compensation deduction rules in Section 162(m) of the Code. The Tax Act changed the scope of the employees covered by Section 162(m) of the Code and limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of one million dollars paid to the CEO, CFO and the other three most highly compensated executive officers other thanofficers. The Tax Act eliminated the CFO, unless suchperformance-based compensation qualifies as “performance-based compensation.”exception under Section 162(m) effective January 1, 2018, subject to a special rule that “grandfathers” certain awards or arrangements that were in effect on or before November 2, 2017. We intendintended for Performance-Based Awards of restricted stock unitsRSUs and annual incentive compensation granted under our 2007FNB Incentive Plan prior to the effective date of the Tax Act, to meet the performance-based compensation exception to the annualone-million-dollar million-dollar limitation. However, there can be no assurance that any amounts paid will be deductible under Section 162(m). While we are cognizant of the tax deduction limitations applicable to our compensation program for NEOs, we may set

compensation levels or structure arrangements outside the deduction limitations if we deem the amount of compensation appropriate. The Committee has the discretion to establish the compensation paid, or intended to be paid or awarded to the NEOs, as the Committee may determine is in our and our shareholders’ best interest. This is an important feature of our compensation practices because it provides the Committee with sufficient flexibility to respond to specific situations we encounter.

We are also aware of recent changes to the tax code as part of the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017” and will review compensation issues in light of such in our future

 

 

 

2(5)

As noted in the Retirement and Other Post-Employment Benefits section, we closed the RIP to employees hired after December 31, 2007, and froze all benefits for all participants effective December 31, 2010.

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    61  

2021 Proxy Statement    65  


 

  Compensation Discussion and AnalysisDetermination Process  

 

 

decisions. has the discretion to establish the compensation paid, or intended to be paid or awarded to the NEOs, as the Committee may determine it to be in our and our shareholders’ best interests. This is an important feature of our compensation practices because it provides the Committee with sufficient flexibility to respond to specific situations we encounter.

In addition, Section 409A of the Code provides for an additional tax on executives with respect to various features of deferred compensation arrangements. We have made the appropriate changes to ournon-qualified retirement plans and employment agreements to help to ensure compliance with Code Section 409A and that there are noto attempt to avoid adverse impacts on F.N.B. or its executive officers as a result of

Section 409A. We do not expect these changes to have a material tax or financial effect on us.

As discussed above, we have calculated and discussed with the Committee the tax impact to us and the executives of each of our cash and equity compensation awards and agreements. We also calculate and monitor the accounting expense related to equity-based compensation using the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718,Compensation — Stock Compensation.

For more information regarding additional policies, please see Compensation Governance and Risk Management.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this proxy statementProxy Statement with the Company’s management and, based on such review and discussion, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. Portions of this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, have been incorporated by reference into the

Company’s Annual Report on2020 Form10-K10-K. for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Respectfully submitted,

David J. Malone, Chair

Pamela A. Bena

Robert A. Hormell

David L. Motley

John S. StanikWilliam J. Strimbu

 

 

  62    F.N.B. Corporation

  66    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Compensation Committee Report  

 

 

  

 

 20172020 Summary Compensation Table 

  
 

The following table shows the total compensation paid or earned by the Company’s CEO, CFO and the three most highly-paid executive officers other than the CEO and CFO who were employed as of December 31, 2017.

2020. Each of the above is referred to as an NEO and, together,collectively, NEOs. The amounts include services rendered in all capacities to us and our subsidiaries for our year ended December 31, 2017:2020:

 

  Name and

  Principal Position

 Year 

 Salary 

($)

 

 Bonus 

($)(1)

 

Stock
 Awards 

($)(2)

 

Option
 Awards 

($)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
 Compensation 

($)(3)

 

Change in
Pension

Value and

Non-qualified
Deferred
 Compensation 
Earnings

($)(4)

 

All Other
 Compensation 

($)(5)

 

 Total 

($)

  Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

  President and CEO

   2017   1,029,808   0   2,716,739   0   1,334,340   20,128     248,348   5,349,363 
   2016   928,008   0   2,263,817   0   1,220,516   12,295     169,132   4,593,768 
   2015   905,016   0   3,548,672   0   993,635   0     201,582   5,648,905 

  Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

  Chief Financial Officer

   2017   470,769   0   787,395   0   487,987   11,104     86,825   1,844,080 
   2016   460,008   0   740,643   0   423,502   7,228     77,435   1,708,816 
   2015   445,008   0   1,359,021   0   366,438   0     99,097   2,269,564 

  Gary L. Guerrieri

  Chief Credit Officer

   2017   431,539   0   309,348   0   335,491   95,521     80,051   1,251,950 
   2016   390,000   0   285,439   0   256,464   60,571     57,870   1,050,344 
   2015   360,000   0   272,290   0   247,032   0     80,089   959,411 

  Robert M. Moorehead

  Chief Wholesale

  Banking Officer

   2017   416,827   0   298,797   0   324,054   0     61,955   1,101,633 
   2016   375,000   0   274,450   0   246,600   0     55,466   951,516 
   2015   283,874   0   105,283   0   170,370   0     58,797   618,324 

  Barry C. Robinson

  Chief Consumer

  Banking Officer

   2017   367,788   0   263,657   0   285,930   0     36,608   953,983 
   2016   350,016   0   256,160   0   230,171   0     30,760   867,107 
   

 

2015

 

 

   

 

274,676

 

 

   

 

0

 

 

   

 

102,766

 

 

   

 

0

 

 

   

 

137,242

 

 

   

 

0  

 

 

   

 

34,471

 

 

   

 

549,155 

 

 

         

  Name and

  Principal Position

 Year  

 Salary 

($)

  

 Bonus 

($) (1)

 

Stock
 Awards 

($) (2)

  Option
Awards
($)
 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
 Compensation 

($) (3)

  

Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-qualified
Deferred
 Compensation 

Earnings
($) (4)

  

All Other
 Compensation 

($) (5)

  

 Total 

($)

 
         

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

President and CEO

  2020   1,157,285  0    3,118,593  0    1,727,039   40,439       265,357       6,308,713  
 

 

2019

 

  1,128,559  0    3,056,165  0    1,962,237   40,054       247,056       6,434,071  
 

 

2018

 

  1,075,500  0    2,986,886  0    1,634,121   0       265,182       5,961,689  
         

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

  2020   524,480  0    963,927  0    549,990   19,880       125,999       2,184,276  
 

 

2019

 

  511,538  0    952,146  0    711,393   20,579       111,797       2,307,453  
 

 

2018

 

  491,769  0    868,906  0    597,760   0       98,329       2,056,764  
         

Gary L. Guerrieri

Chief Credit Officer

  2020   481,434  0    455,068  0    378,656   162,462       91,894       1,569,514  
 

 

2019

 

  469,562  0    449,512  0    489,778   171,377       77,793       1,658,022  
 

 

2018

 

  450,789  0    341,373  0    410,960   0       71,604       1,274,726  
         

Robert M. Moorehead

Chief Wholesale

Banking Officer

  2020   468,937  0    443,255  0    368,827   0       94,450       1,375,469  
 

 

2019

 

  457,381  0    437,832  0    477,064   0       76,264       1,448,541  
 

 

2018

 

  435,789  0    330,013  0    397,292   0       67,489       1,230,583  
         

Barry C. Robinson

Chief Consumer

Banking Officer

  2020   405,160  0    382,940  0    318,635   0       56,743       1,163,478  
 

 

2019

 

  395,235  0    378,279  0    412,143   0       57,843       1,243,500  
 

 

2018

 

  383,827  0    290,652  0    349,908   0       51,930       1,076,317  

 

(1)

Payments under the Company’s annual incentive plan for 20172020 are reported in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column instead of in the Bonus column, in accordance with SEC requirements.

 

(2)

The restricted stock award amounts shown in this tablecolumn represent the dollar amountgrant date fair value of awardsthe time-based and performance-based RSUs and the cash-based PeUs granted during the fiscal year determined pursuant to ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of this amountthese amounts are included in Note 1617 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2020, included in the Company’s Annual Report on2020 Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2018. The restricted stock25, 2021. These awards granted under the 2007 Plan vest either after (i) the NEO’s continued employment with the Company or one of its affiliates for three years or (ii) the Company’s achievement of performance goals and the NEO’s continued employment with the Company or one of its affiliates for three years. We issued Service-Based Awards and Performance-Based Awards in restricted stock units. The restricted stock units earn dividend equivalents, which are subject to the same restrictions and vesting schedule as the underlying restricted stock units. The amounts reflected in the table assume that each NEO will perform the requisite service and we will achieve the required performance goals for the performance-based RSUs and the cash-based PeUs, will be achieved at target levels.target. The following table provides additional information regardingactual performance cannot be determined for three years and could be zero. At the Performance-Based Awards granted during 2017. The target amounts have been included inmaximum level of performance, the above tablegrant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs and are reflected below for comparative purposes:

  At Target ($) At Maximum ($)

  Mr. Delie

   1,721,897   3,013,320

  Mr. Calabrese

   510,192   892,836

  Mr. Guerrieri

   200,436   350,763

  Mr. Moorehead

   193,606   338,811

  Mr. Robinson

   170,831   298,954

the cash-based PeUs, would be: Mr. Delie, $4,113,710; Mr. Calabrese, $1,304,986; Mr. Guerrieri, $616,076; Mr. Moorehead, $600,089; and Mr. Robinson, $518,424. The amount for Mr. Delie also includes stock awards valued at $59,289granted for service as a director in 20172020 that vested immediately upon grant. (See the narrative under Executive Directors in the sectionDirector Compensation discussion of this proxy statement discussing Director Compensation.Proxy Statement.)

 

(3)

Amount earned by the NEO as an annual incentive bonus under our EIC Plan,STIP, based upon the Company’s performance. The EIC PlanSTIP is discussed in further detail in the Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCD&A under the heading Annual Incentive Awards.

 

(4)

The amounts in this column reflect the actuarial change in the present value of the NEO’s benefit under all of our pension plans determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in our financial statements and include amounts that the NEO may not currently be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested. Our pension plans are described in the narrative accompanying the 20172020 Pension Benefits table. We do not pay or provide above-market interest underNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans.

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    63  

2021 Proxy Statement    67  


 

  Compensation Committee Report

 

 

(5)

AmountsAll other compensation as reported in this column are explained infor 2020 is comprised of the 2017 Other Compensation Table and the 2017 Perquisites Table that follow the 2017 Summary Compensation Table.following amounts:

 

 2017 Other Compensation Table 

The following table reflects the items included in the All Other Compensation column of the 2017 Summary Compensation Table shown above.

 
Name

Perquisites

($)

401(k) Match
and Company
Contributions

($)

Lost
Match

($)(1)

Excess
Liability
Insurance
Premium

($)

Other

($)(2)

Total All
Other
Compensation

($)

Perquisites and
Other Personal
Benefits
($)(a)
Executive
Insurance
Premiums
($)(b)

401(k) Match and
Company
Contributions

($)

Deferred
Compensation
Lost Match
($)(c)

Total All Other

Compensation

($)

 

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

 54,900 16,375 123,125 409 53,539 248,348 57,037 7,940 18,169 182,211 265,357
 

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

 29,401 16,375 37,986 409 2,654 86,825 40,271 6,451 18,169 61,108 125,999
 

Gary L. Guerrieri

 16,476 16,375 26,541 409 20,250 80,051 23,091 6,525 18,169 44,109 91,894
 

Robert M. Moorehead

 14,180 16,375 23,791 409 7,200 61,955 22,903 10,908 18,169 42,470 94,450
 

Barry C. Robinson

 0 16,375 19,824 409 0 36,608 565 3,796 18,169 34,213 56,743

 

(1)(a)

The dollar amount of the perquisite or other personal benefits represents the incremental cost to us of providing the benefit. This amount reflects Company contributions duringcolumn includes the year to the ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan as more fully described in the narrative accompanying the 2017Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.

(2)

The amount reported as “Other”costs of social club dues for Messrs. Delie, Calabrese, Guerrieri and Moorehead; personal financial planning for Messrs. Delie and Calabrese; personal use of company-provided automobiles for Messrs. Delie, Calabrese and Guerrieri; parking fees for Messrs. Delie, Calabrese, Guerrieri represents a lump sum payoutand Moorehead; and personal use of certain accrued vacation time under the Company’s carryover vacation time policy. The amount reported as “Other”corporate aircraft for Mr. Moorehead represents a car allowance from the Company.

 2017 Perquisites Table(1)

The NEOs receive various perquisites provided by or paid for by us pursuant to our policies or individual agreements with the executive. SEC rules require disclosure of the perquisites and other personal benefits, securities or property for an NEO unless the amount of that type of compensation is less than $10,000 in the aggregate.

The following table reflects the perquisites included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the2017 Summary Compensation Table shown above:

  Name

Club Dues

($)

Company
Provided
Automobiles

($)(2)

Financial
Planning

($)

Other

($)(3)

Total
Perquisites

Included in
All Other
Compensation

($)(4)

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

 19,080 22,960 11,000 1,860 54,900

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

 11,712 4,769 11,000 1,920 29,401

Gary L. Guerrieri

 1,242 13,314 0 1,920 16,476

Robert M. Moorehead

 12,260 0 0 1,920 14,180

Barry C. Robinson

 0 0 0 0 0

(1)

The NEOs pay taxes on these perquisites in accordance with applicable sections of the Code.

(2)

Delie. The valuation of the companyCompany provided automobiles was calculated as our current year depreciation or leasing expense for the automobile plus all costs incurred related to the automobile (including, but not limited to, the cost of insurance, gas, car washes, repairs, registration and inspection fees), less our mileage reimbursement allowance for business miles driven by employees who use their own automobile for business purposes.

(3)

The amount reported as “Other” represents While our Compensation Committee has a strong preference for our CEO to take all of his flights on the costcorporate aircraft (personal and business), our Aircraft Usage Policy limits the number of Company-paid parking feespersonal flight hours our CEO may use each year during times when it is not being used for Messrs.business travel. In authorizing such personal usage, our Compensation Committee considered the advantages that personal aircraft usage offers the Company, including mitigating security risks and encouraging reduced travel time, thereby promoting the CEO’s availability, efficiency and productivity. Mr. Delie’s use of the aircraft did not exceed five (5) personal flight hours in 2020. In regard to such personal use by Mr. Delie Calabrese, Guerrierior his approved non-business guests, income is imputed to Mr. Delie for tax purposes, for which he covers the tax liability and Moorehead.

(4)

F.N.B. Corporation’s “Aircraftno gross-up is provided by the Company. In addition, our Aircraft Usage Policy” is designedPolicy contains procedures to comply with applicable SEC, U.S. Internal Revenue Service and Federal Aviation Administration requirements, and, in accordance therewith, it detailsdocument the principles to be applied in determining the classification of a flight as business or personal and the calculation of the aggregate incremental cost for perquisite purposes, including a definition of personal use. As approved by our Boarduse and in accordance with the authority set forth in our Aircraft Usage Policy, our CEO mayappropriate methodologies for allocating cost between business and personal use the aircraft for personal travel when it is not needed for business travel; particularly in circumstances that mitigate security risks or otherwise encourage reduced travel time, thereby promoting his availability, efficiency and productivity.necessary.

  64    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Committee Report  

 

  

All businessBased upon certain operational restrictions and personal use of theadministrative efficiencies, we operate our corporate aircraft complied withunder Federal Aviation Administration rules and regulations that limit our Aircraft Usage Policy. In additionability to accept reimbursement for personal flights on our aircraft. The incremental cost to F.N.B. for personal aircraft use is calculated by dividing the amounts reported above, during 2017, Mr. Delietotal number of personal passenger hours by the total passenger hours, then multiplying that number by the Company’s total variable cost for 2020. The total variable cost includes costs related to maintenance, crew expenses, pro rata cost of extra fuel due to additional weight, meals, beverages, landing fees and ground transportation services. Since the aircraft is used our aircraftprimarily for business travel, and, on an infrequent basis, when necessary, family accompanied him. When the CEO is traveling for business purposes and is accompanied by his spouse or another guest, the incrementaltotal variable cost is reported in accordance with our policy. In these instances, we dodoes not include the calculation of fixed costs that do not change based on particular usage, such as crew salaries, insurance, aircraft management services, hangar rental, maintenance and inspection, capital improvement costs intended to cover a multi-year period, and other fixed costs not affected by the presence of additional passengers. The aggregate incremental cost attributed to guests traveling

(b)

This amount reflects Company paid premiums for executive owned life insurance coverage.

(c)

non-business purposes includesThis amount reflects Company contributions during the following variable costs directly related to personal flight activity: pro rata cost of extra fuel due to additional weight, meals, beverages, and ground transportation services. With respect to suchnon-business travel by approved guests, income is imputedyear to the CEO for income tax purposes,ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan as more fully described in the CEO coversnarrative accompanying the cost of the corresponding tax liability and is not provided a tax reimbursement by the Company. Occasionally, the CEO’s spouse is required to attend an F.N.B. business-related event where spousal attendance is expected or customary. On those occasions, we pay the cost, if any, for the CEO’s spouse to attend the event, including permitting the CEO’s spouse to travel on our corporate aircraft for a F.N.B. business purpose. There is no incremental cost for his spouse to accompany him on these business trips. The valuation for all perquisites other than Company-provided automobiles shown above is our actual cost.2020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table.

 

The foregoing20172020 Summary Compensation Table and itssub-tables dodoes not include certain fringe benefits generally made available on anon-discriminatory basis to all of our salaried employees such as group health insurance, dental insurance, vision insurance, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance and long-term disability insurance, which we consider to be ordinary and incidental business costs and expenses.

In 2010, the Committee made a policy decision not to provide a taxgross-upsgross-up in any new or amended employment agreements.

Mr. Delie became CEO in 2012 and entered into his employment agreement with us and FNBPA on December 15, 2010. Mr. Delie’s contract has an initial term of three years and, unless sooner terminated, automatically extends for one year on the anniversary of the commencement date.date such that, on the

anniversary date, the contract has a three-year term. Either party may terminate the automatic renewal provision by providing the other party with 30 days’ advance written notice ofnon-renewal prior to the anniversary of the commencement date. Currently, Mr. Delie’s employment agreement runs through December 2020.2023. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Delie is entitled to receive a base salary that may be increased from time to time as determined by the Committee. Additionally, in 2017,2020, Mr. Delie was eligible to participate in our annual incentive compensation plan at a target award level of 100% of his base salary. Thus, he had the possibility of achieving a bonus between 0% and 200% of his base salary. The severance and change in control provisions of Mr. Delie’s employment agreement are described in the narrative accompanying the20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control. tables.

  68    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Committee Report  

Mr. Calabrese serves as our CFO and entered into thehis employment agreement, the amounts for which are detailed in the20172020 Summary Compensation Table, with FNBPA on February 21, 2013. The initial term of the agreement was for two years, and automatically

extends for aone-year period on each anniversary of its commencement date such that, on the anniversary date, the contract has a two-year term unless sooner terminated. Either party may terminate the automatic renewal of the agreement by providing the other with 60 days’ advance written notice ofnon-renewal. Mr. Calabrese’s contract runs through February 2020.2023. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Calabrese receives a base salary that may be increased from time to time as determined by the Committee. Additionally, Mr. Calabrese is eligible to participate in our annual incentive compensation and bonus plans at the discretion of the Committee with a target award level of 80% of base salary for 2017.2020. Thus, he had the possibility of achieving a bonus between 0% and 160% of his base salary. The severance and change in control provisions of Mr. Calabrese’s employment agreement are described in the narrative accompanying the20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables.

Mr. Guerrieri serves as our Chief Credit Officer. He entered into an employment contract with FNBPA on January 25, 2002. Mr. Guerrieri’s contract had an initial term of two years and automatically extends for aone-year period on the anniversary of its commencement date such that, on the anniversary date, the contract has a two-year term, unless either party terminates the contract sooner. Either party may terminate the automatic renewal of the agreement by providing the other 60 days’ advance written notice ofnon-renewal. Mr. Guerrieri’s contract runs through January 2020.2023. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Guerrieri receives a base salary, as reflected in the20172020 Summary Compensation Table that may be increased from time to time as determined by the

Committee. Mr. Guerrieri is also eligible to participate in our annual incentive compensation and bonus plans at the Committee’s discretion. Mr. Guerrieri’s target award level for annual incentive compensation was 60% of his base salary for 2017.2020. Thus, he has the possibility of achieving a bonus between 0% and 120% of his base salary. The severance and change in control provisions of Mr. Guerrieri’s employment agreement are described in the narrative accompanyingthe 20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

2018 Proxy Statement    65  


  Compensation Committee Report

tables. In December 2008 and December 2012, we amended Mr. Guerrieri’s contract in order to ensure compliancecomply with and clarify certain points related to Code Section 409A.

Mr. Moorehead isserved as our Chief Wholesale Banking Officer and retired effective January 1, 2021. He entered into his current employment agreement on September 10, 2015. Mr. Moorehead’s agreement was materially the same as Mr. Robinson. Mr. Robinson serves as our Chief Consumer Banking Officer and entered into his current employment agreement on November 4, 2015. TheTheir agreements arewere for an initial term of two years and automatically renew.renew such that, on the anniversary date, they have two years remaining. Under the terms of the contracts, Messrs. Moorehead and Robinson receive base

salaries as reflected in the20172020 Summary Compensation Table that may be increased from time to time as determined by the Committee. They are eligible to participate in our annual incentive compensation and bonus plans at the Committee’s discretion. Their target award level for annual incentive compensation in 20172020 was 60% of base salary with the possibility of achieving between 0% and 120% of base salary. The severance and change in control provisions of Messrs. Moorehead’s and Robinson’s employment agreements are described in the narratives accompanying the20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables.

 

 

2021 Proxy Statement    69  


  Compensation Committee Report  

 

  

 

20172020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards 

  
 

The following table sets forth grants of plan-based awards to the NEOs for 2017:2020:

 

       Estimated Future Payouts
UnderNon-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(3)
 

All
Other
Stock
  Awards:  
Number
of
Shares
of
Stock
or Units

(#)(4)

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
  Underlying  
Options

(#)

   Exercise  
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards

($)(5)

  

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(3)

 

All
Other
Stock
  Awards:  

Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(4)

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
  Underlying  

Options
(#)

 

  Exercise  

or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)

 

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(5)

 

Name   Award  
Type
(1)
   Grant  
Date
 

  Threshold  

  ($)  

 

  Target  

  ($)  

   Maximum  
  ($)  
 

  Threshold  

  (#)  

   Target  
  (#)  
 

  Maximum  

  (#)  

 

  Award  

Type
(1)

 

  Grant  

Date

 

  Threshold  

  ($)  

 

  Target  

  ($)  

 

  Maximum  

  ($)  

 

  Threshold  

  (#)  

 

  Target  

(#)

 

Maximum
(#)

 

   

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

  EIC   n/a  0  1,050,000  2,100,000  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a

 

STIP

 

n/a

 

0

 

1,158,045

 

2,316,090

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 DIR   1-1-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  300  n/a  n/a  4,548

 

RSU-TB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

170,804

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

1,158,051

 RSU-SB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  61,590  n/a  n/a  935,552

 

RSU-PB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

48,039

 

117,398

 

117,398

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

861,701

 RSU-PB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  31,262  125,047  218,832  n/a  n/a  n/a  1,721,897

 

PeU

 

3-20-2020

 

0

 

1,018,851

 

3,252,009

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

1,018,851

 DIR   5-17-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  4,070  n/a  n/a  54,742

 

DIR

 

5-13-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

11,798

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

79,990

   

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

  EIC   n/a  0  384,000  768,000  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a

 

STIP

 

n/a

 

0

 

419,840

 

839,680

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 RSU-SB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  18,249  n/a  n/a  277,202

 

RSU-TB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

54,183

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

367,361

 RSU-PB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  9,263  37,051  64,839  n/a  n/a  n/a  510,192

 

RSU-PB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

15,239

 

81,276

 

177,791

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

596,566

   

Gary L. Guerrieri

  EIC   n/a  0  264,000  528,000  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a

 

STIP

 

n/a

 

0

 

289,050

 

578,100

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 RSU-SB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  7,170  n/a  n/a  108,912

 

RSU-TB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

25,580

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

173,432

 RSU-PB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  3,639  14,556  25,473  n/a  n/a  n/a  200,436

 

RSU-PB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

7,194

 

38,370

 

83,934

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

281,636

   

Robert M. Moorehead

  EIC   n/a  0  255,000  510,000  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a

 

STIP

 

n/a

 

0

 

281,547

 

563,094

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 RSU-SB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  6,925  n/a  n/a  105,191

 

RSU-TB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

24,916

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

168,930

 RSU-PB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  3,515  14,060  24,605  n/a  n/a  n/a  193,606

 

RSU-PB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

7,008

 

37,374

 

81,756

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

274,325

   

Barry C. Robinson

  EIC   n/a  0  225,000  450,000  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a

 

STIP

 

n/a

 

0

 

243,233

 

486,466

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 RSU-SB   4-3-2017  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  n/a  6,111  n/a  n/a  92,826

 

RSU-TB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

21,526

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

145,946

  RSU-PB   4-3-2017   n/a   n/a   n/a   3,102   12,406   21,711   n/a   n/a   n/a   170,831

 

RSU-PB

 

3-20-2020

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

6,054

 

32,288

 

70,630

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

236,994

 

(1)

Award types are as follows: EICSTIP is an annual incentive cash award,RSU-SBRSU-TB is a long-term service basedtime-based restricted stock unit award,RSU-PB is a long-term performance basedperformance-based restricted stock unit award. PeU is a long-term cash-based performance award and DIR is the annual director stock award.

 

(2)

The amounts shown for STIP represent the threshold, target and maximum amounts to be earned by the NEO under the annual incentive compensation program based upon our performance during 2017.2020. The amounts actually earned for 20172020 were above the target and are reflected in theNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the 20172020 Summary Compensation Table.

(3)

For awards granted April 3, 2017, the The amounts shown for PeU. all of which are settled in cash, represent the threshold, target and maximum unitcash amounts, subject to limitations in the Incentive Compensation Plan, that could be earned by the NEO under performance-based restricted stock unitPerformance Unit awards based upon the Company’s performance during the three-year performance period commencing April 3, 2017, and ending MarchJanuary 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020,2022, provided the NEO remains continuously employed through the April 1, 2020,February 15, 2023 vesting date. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we believe that it is probable that we will achieve the performance conditions belowbetween the threshold leveltarget and maximum levels for the awards granted April 3, 2017.March 20, 2020. We will not know the actual amount that vests until 2023. The grant date fair values of PeUs assume payout at target level and are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the year of grant. If we meet the performance conditions and the NEO terminates service prior to the vesting date, the program may provide partial vesting depending on the reason for termination as more particularly detailed in the 20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables. In 2017,

(3)

For awards granted March 20, 2020, the amounts shown represent the threshold, target and maximum unit amounts, subject to limitations in the FNB Incentive Plan, that could be earned by the NEO under performance-based RSU awards based upon the Company’s performance during a three-year performance period commencing January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2022, provided the NEO remains continuously employed through the February 15, 2023 vesting date. As of December 31, 2020, we believe that it is probable that we will achieve the performance conditions between the target and maximum levels for the awards were in restricted stock unitsgranted March 20, 2020. We will not know the actual amount that vests until 2023. If we meet the performance conditions, and the NEO terminates service prior to the vesting date, the program may provide partial vesting depending on the reason for termination as more particularly describeddetailed in the Long-Term Awards Section above.2020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables.

  66    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Committee Report  

 

(4)

The amount shown represents the number of service-based restricted stock unitstime-based RSUs granted April 3, 2017,March 20, 2020, which will vest if the NEO remains continuously employed until the April 1, 2020,January 4, 2021, January 3, 2022, and January 2, 2023, vesting date.dates. The amount for Mr. Delie also includes annual director stock awards as more particularly detailed in the20172020 Summary Compensation Table and the narrative under the Executive DirectorsDirector Compensation in the sectiondiscussion of this proxy statement discussingDirector Compensation.Proxy Statement.

 

(5)

The amount shown represents the grant date fair value as determined under ASC Topic 718 of all service-basedtime-based restricted stock unit awards, all performance-based restricted stock unit awards and all performance-based restricted stock unit awards,PeUs, assuming payout at target levels, granted in 2017.2020.

  70    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Committee Report  

 

Participants who terminate service prior toyear-end year end are not eligible for annual incentive compensation under the program. In the event of death, disability, or retirement (i.e., age 55 with five years of service) during the year or before we make payment of the annual incentive award amount, the Committee may approve a discretionarypro-rata award. The program provides for payment in the case of a change in control as more particularly detailed in the 20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables.

We issue service-basedtime-based and performance-based awards in the form of restricted stock unitsRSUs that earn

dividend equivalents that

are subject to the same restrictions and vesting schedule as the underlying restricted stock units.RSUs. The program allows for accelerated orpro-rated vesting of the restricted stock unitsRSUs in the case of death, disability, retirement, or change in control as more particularly detailed in the20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables.

There are 2,642,0205,504,721 shares remaining available for awards under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan, which represent 0.8%1.7% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.stock as of December 31, 2020.

 

 

  

 

20172020 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End(1) 

  
 

The following table sets forth certain information summarizing the outstanding equity awards of each NEO as of December 31, 2017.2020.

 

  
 Option Awards(2) Stock Awards(3) 
 Option Awards(2) Stock Awards(3)    
Name 

Number

of

Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)

  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
 

Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested

(#)(4)

  

Market

Value of

Shares

or Units

of Stock

That

Have Not

Vested

($)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan

Awards:

Number

of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or
Other

Rights

That

Have Not

Vested

(#)(5)

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or
Payout

Value of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other

Rights

That

Have Not

Vested

($)

  Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number  of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  

Option  

Expiration  

Date  

 Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)(4)
  Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units  or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(5)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 
   

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

  0           0             0           0       n/a  152,479   2,107,260   277,135   3,830,006   0          0          0          0       n/a  377,900  3,590,050  600,629  5,705,976
   

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

  0           0             0           0       n/a  49,189   679,792   104,895   1,449,649   0          0          0          0      n/a  118,151  1,122,435  187,021  1,776,700
   

Gary L. Guerrieri

  0           0             0           0       n/a  22,791   314,972   11,507   159,027   0          0          0          0      n/a  53,835  511,433  84,355  801,373
   

Robert M. Moorehead

  0           0             0           0       n/a  17,629   243,633   8,891   122,874   0          0          0          0      n/a  52,366  497,477  57,204  543,438
   

Barry C. Robinson

  0           0             0           0       n/a  16,218   224,133   8,177   113,006   0          0          0          0      n/a  45,398  431,281  71,177  676,182

 

(1)

All awards were made under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan.

 

(2)

Options may be granted under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan with up to aten-year expiration date and with a strike price of no less than 100% of the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on the business day preceding the award date. Options cannot be transferred or assigned by a participant under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan, other than by will or pursuant to the laws of succession. We have not issued stock options for any year reported in the20172020 Summary Compensation Table.

 

(3)

Stock Awards are restricted stock unitsRSUs and cash-based PeUs awarded under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan subject to a restriction period and/or satisfaction of one or more performance-based criteria, as determined by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, if a participant terminates employment with us or our subsidiaries for a reason other than retirement, disability, death or change in control, as detailed in the20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables, before the expiration of the applicable restriction period, the participant will forfeit any restricted stock unitsRSUs and PeUs that are still subject to a restriction. When restricted stock unitsawards vest, the participant recognizes ordinary income on the then market value of the shares, in the case of RSUs, or cash amount received, in the case of PeUs, and we receive a tax deduction in that same amount.

 

(4)

RSUs in this column consist of all time-based RSUs outstanding that will vest if the NEO remains employed on the vesting date. These RSUs are scheduled to vest as follows:

     
 Vesting Date Mr. Delie  Mr. Calabrese  Mr. Guerrieri  Mr. Moorehead  Mr. Robinson 
     

 January 4, 2021

  59,522      18,882        8,914        0         7,501     
     

 April 1, 2021

  82,862      24,558        9,648        0         8,217     
     

 July 1, 2021

  0      0        0        35,000         0     
     

 January 3, 2022

  59,522      18,882        8,914        8,683         7,501     
     

 April 1, 2022

  116,470      36,947        17,444        0         14,677     
     

 January 2, 2023

  59,524      18,882        8,915        8,683         7,502     

 

2018 Proxy Statement    67  

2021 Proxy Statement    71  


 

  Compensation Committee Report

 

 

(4)(5)

Restricted stockThis column represents the performance-based RSUs and the cash-based PeUs that may be issued to Mr. Delie. For the purposes of the disclosure requirements related to this table, we have reported the awards granted in 2018 at the target level, awards granted in 2019 at the maximum level, which in the case of Mr. Delie are comprised of a portion of performance-based RSUs and performance-based cash units, and awards granted in this column consist of2020 at the threshold level, all service-based restricted stock units outstanding. These restricted stock unitssubject to the limitations in the FNB Incentive Plan. Based on these assumptions, these performance-based RSUs and cash-based PeUs are scheduled to vest as follows:

 

 Vesting Date Mr. Delie  Mr. Calabrese  Mr. Guerrieri  Mr. Moorehead  Mr. Robinson 

 April 1, 2018

  27,684   9,901   7,510   2,903   2,834 

 April 1, 2019

  61,563   20,552   7,920   7,616   7,110 

 April 1, 2020

  63,232   18,736   7,361   7,110   6,274 

(5)

As of December 31, 2017, the awards granted in 2015, 2016 and 2017 were tracking below threshold. For the purposes of the table, we have reported them at threshold. The tables also assume that the Company will achieve its performance goals at target for the supplemental Performance-Based Awards granted to Messrs. Delie and Calabrese in December 2015. Based on these assumptions, these restricted stock units are scheduled to vest as follows:

 Vesting Date Mr. Delie  Mr. Calabrese  Mr. Guerrieri  Mr. Moorehead  Mr. Robinson 

 April 1, 2018

  14,052   5,026   3,811   1,474   1,439 

 January 16, 2019

  200,206   80,083   0   0   0 

 April 1, 2019

  30,782   10,276   3,960   3,808   3,554 

 April 1, 2020

  32,095   9,510   3,736   3,609   3,184 
     
 Vesting DateMr. DelieMr. CalabreseMr. GuerrieriMr. MooreheadMr. Robinson     
     

 April 1, 2021

 168,235 49,857 19,589 0 16,677     
     

 July 1, 2021

 0 0 0 17,358 0     
     

 April 1, 2022

 382,170 121,232 57,244 32,520 48,170     
     

 February 15, 2023

 50,224 15,932 7,522 7,326 6,330     

 

  

 

 20172020 Option Exercises and Stock Vested(1) 

  
 

The following table contains information concerning the aggregate option exercises and the vesting of restricted stock by the NEOs in 2017.2020.

 

  
 Option Awards Stock Awards(2) 
Option AwardsStock Awards(2)  
Name

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Exercise

(#)

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Vesting

(#)

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)

 Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
 Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
  Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
 
  

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

 0 0 80,437 1,222,611 0 0  139,680            1,029,442     
  

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

 0 0 26,065 394,659 0 0  41,390            305,044     
  

Gary L. Guerrieri

 0 0 24,614 373,083 0 0  16,259            119,829     
  

Robert M. Moorehead

 0 0 10,630 161,604 0 0  15,705            115,746     
  

Barry C. Robinson

 0 0 10,498 159,641 0 0  13,859            102,141     
             

 

(1)

All awards were made under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan.

 

(2)

The amount included in the table above reflects a value realized upon vesting by multiplying the number of shares of stock by the market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date. Vested shares included (i) time-based shares that vested as a result of the NEO being employed by us during the entire required period and (ii) performance-based shares which vested at 50% of their target amounts.

 

  

 

 20172020 Pension Benefits 

  
 

The following table contains information concerning the pension benefits for each NEO as of December 31, 2017:2020:

 

  
NamePlan Name

Number

of Years

Credited

Service

(#)(2)

Present

Value of

Accumulated

Benefit

($)(3)

Payments During

Last Fiscal Year

($)

Plan NameNumber
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)(2)
Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)(3)
Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
  

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

 F.N.B. Corporation Retirement Income Plan

 F.N.B. Corporation ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

 

5.17

5.17


 

124,457

42,227


 

0

0


 F.N.B. Corporation Retirement Income Plan

 F.N.B. Corporation ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

 

5.17

5.17


 

171,306

60,140


 

0

0


  

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

 F.N.B. Corporation Retirement Income Plan

 F.N.B. Corporation ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

 

3.75

3.75


 

89,120

6,548


 

0

0


 F.N.B. Corporation Retirement Income Plan

 F.N.B. Corporation ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

 

3.75

3.75


 

119,492

9,044


 

0

0


  

Gary L. Guerrieri

 F.N.B. Corporation Retirement Income Plan

 F.N.B. Corporation ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

 F.N.B. Corporation Basic Retirement Plan

 

24.17

24.17

22.17


 

704,367

109,139

64,669


 

0

0

0


 F.N.B. Corporation Retirement Income Plan

 F.N.B. Corporation ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

 F.N.B. Corporation Basic Retirement Plan

 

24.17

24.17

22.17


 

919,968

146,182

86,618


 

0

0

0


  

Robert M. Moorehead(1)

 n/a n/a 0 0 n/a n/a 0 0
  

Barry C. Robinson(1)

 n/a n/a 0 0 n/a n/a 0 0
    

 

(1)

Messrs. Moorehead and Robinson do not participate in the RIP, BRP or the Excess Plan which were frozen to new participants before Mr. Moorehead and Mr. Robinson commenced employment with us.

 

  68    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Committee Report  

(2)

Our pension plans do not provide credit for additional years of service to any of the NEOs.

 

(3)

For the RIP, the Excess Plan and the BRP, the present value of accumulated benefits reflected above was determined using the same assumptions as used for the December 31, 2017,2020, financial statement disclosures, except assuming retirement at the normalearlier of age 65 or the earliest unreduced retirement age of 65.age. We have assumed a discount rate of 3.55%2.35% for the RIP and 3.35%1.95% for the BRP and the Excess Plan. For post-retirement mortality, we are using the 2007 base rates fromRP-2014Pri-2012 nondisabled annuitant table projected linearly to 2017 to a long-termgenerationally with the MP-2020 improvement of 0.8% (grading down linearly to 0.0% from ages 85 to 95).scale.

 

  72    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Committee Report  

The following is a summary of our qualified andnon-qualified plans mentioned in the 20172020 Pension Benefits table:

Retirement Income Plan

Until 2008, the RIP, a traditional defined benefit plan qualified under the Code and subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), was available to all salaried employees, except FNIA employees. In 2007, we closed the RIP to employees who commenced employment with us or our affiliates on or after January 1, 2008, and in 2010, we froze the plan and we have not made accruals for participants after December 31, 2010. The RIP provides for benefit payments in the form of a lifetime annuity with five years guaranteed and provides the participant with the ability to select from several choices for the form of the annuity. The election that the participant chooses may affect the amount of the annual benefit as reflected in the 20172020 Pension Benefits table. Effective January 1, 2007, we amended the plan such that the benefit is calculated in two pieces. First, for the period worked by a participant prior to January 1, 2007(Pre-2007 Benefit), the annual annuity benefit is payable without reduction to participants with five years of service who retire after age 62 and is calculated by multiplying each participant’s final average base salary by 1.2% plus, if appropriate, 0.5% of the participant’s final average base salary that is in excess of covered compensation (as defined in Section 401(1)(5)(E) of the Code), with the sum being multiplied by the participant’s years of credited service, not to exceed 25 years including service through December 31, 2006. A participant’s final average base salary is calculated using the highest 60 consecutive months of base salary, not including incentive compensation, within the last 120 months of the participant’sparticipant���s service with us or our affiliates prior to January 1, 2007. ThePre-2007 Benefit was frozen as of December 31, 2006. Beginning in 2007, we calculated each participant’s benefit by adding thePre-2007 Benefit to the benefit determined under the post-2007 formula detailed below. For 2007 through 2010 (Post-2007 Benefit), we calculated each participant’s annual retirement benefit by taking the participant’s total pay earned from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2010, and multiplying it by 1%. The benefit earned after 2007 is payable without reduction to participants who retire on or after age 65. The RIP provides for cliff vesting after five years of

employment. The RIP provides for an early commencement reduction factor that decreases as the participant’s age approaches the normal retirement age of 62 for thePre-2007 Benefit and 65 for the Post-2007 Benefit. The early reduction factor is multiplied by the participant’s benefit as determined by the RIP to arrive at the reduced benefit.

ERISA Excess Retirement Plan

The Excess Plan is anon-qualified plan under ERISA and was available to all participants of the RIP until December 31, 2010, when we ceased all future accruals. The Excess Plan provides retirement benefits equal to the difference, if any, between the maximum benefit allowable under the Code and the amount that would be provided under the RIP formula if the Code did not impose limits on the amount of compensation included for purposes of calculating a qualified plan benefit. The Excess Plan provides the full amount of benefit that would have been paid under the formula of the RIP but for the Code limits, reduced by the amount of benefit that is actually provided by the RIP. The participant’s rights to benefits under the Excess Plan cliff vest at 100% if the participant terminates service due to death, after a “change in control” (as defined in the Excess Plan), or upon retirement on or after reaching age 55 with five years of service. Benefits are payable either in an annuity or a lump sum depending upon the reason for termination, with payments commencing the first day of the month following six months after the participant separates from service.

Basic Retirement Plan

The BRP is a separate supplemental executive retirement benefit plan. Mr. Guerrieri is the only NEO to which the plan currently only applicable to Mr. Guerrieri.applies. Effective December 31, 2008, we amended the BRP such that there willhave not bebeen any new participants in the plan and noor additional accruals for existing participants.participants since the amendment. Officers participating in the BRP receive a benefit based on a target benefit percentage that is based on the officer’s years of service at retirement. The target percentages are based upon the tier assigned to the participant by the Committee. The tier percentages are as follows: Tier 1,3.00% for each of the first ten years of employment, plus 1.50% for each of the next ten years of employment, plus 0.75% for each of the next ten years of employment; Tier 2, 3.50% for each of the first ten years of employment, plus 2.00% for each of the next ten years of

2018 Proxy Statement    69  


  Compensation Committee Report

employment, plus 0.75% for each of the next ten years of employment.

When a participant retires, the benefit under the BRP is a monthly benefit equal to the participant’s aggregate target benefit percentage multiplied by the participant’s highest average monthly cash compensation including bonuses during five consecutive calendar years within the last ten calendar years of employment before 2009. This monthly

2021 Proxy Statement    73  


  Compensation Committee Report  

benefit is reduced by the monthly benefit the participant receives from the Social Security Administration, the RIP, the Excess Plan and the annuity equivalent of the automatic contributions paid to participants under the 401(k) and Lost Match Plans.

Before the plan was frozen, Mr. Guerrieri participated at the Tier 1 level.

The participant’s rights to benefits under the BRP vest at 100% if the participant terminates service due to

death, disability, after a “change in control” (as defined in the BRP), or normal retirement (age 65). The BRP contains a provision for reducing the basic benefit if the participant retires prior to normal retirement but on or after early retirement (age 55 with five years of service). A participant forfeits benefits in the event we terminate the participant’s employment for cause or a participant voluntarily terminates employment prior to early retirement.

 

 

  

 

20172020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation 

  
 

The following table contains information concerning thenon-qualified deferred compensation plan account balances for each NEO for 2017.2020. All contributions are under the ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan as described below.

 

 
Name 

Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year

($)

 

Company
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year

($)(1)

 

Aggregate
Earnings in

Last Fiscal Year

($)(2)

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

 

Aggregate

Balance at

Last Fiscal Year
End

($)(3)

 Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
 Company
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(1)
 Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(2)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
 Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal Year
End
($)(3)

Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

 0 123,125 6,489 0 567,604 

 

0

 

 

182,211

 

 

12,941

 

 

0

 

 

1,065,161

Vincent J. Calabrese, Jr.

 0   37,986 2,033 0 181,170 

 

0

 

 

  61,108

 

 

  4,168

 

 

0

 

 

   346,623

Gary L. Guerrieri

 0   26,541 1,468 0 132,801 

 

0

 

 

  44,109

 

 

  3,011

 

 

0

 

 

   252,508

Robert M. Moorehead

 0   23,791    816 0   79,151 

 

0

 

 

  42,470

 

 

  2,239

 

 

0

 

 

   191,779

Barry C. Robinson

 0   19,824    727 0   70,228 

 

0

 

 

  34,213

 

 

  1,888

 

 

0

 

 

   161,597

 

 

(1)

Note that the amount of our contributions is also included in the All Other Compensation column of the 20172020 Summary Compensation Table.Table. These contributions are not in addition to the amount reported there.

 

(2)

This plan does not provide for above-market interest.

 

(3)

Our contributions during each fiscal year have historically been reported in the Summary Compensation Table for each year in which the NEO was considered such, and aggregate earnings during the fiscal year have been historically excluded from the Summary Compensation Table. Additionally, the amounts reflected represent the NEO’s entire balance under this plan which is fully vested.

 

The amounts reflected in the 20172020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table were contributed to accounts for the NEOs under the ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan. The ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan provides for Company contributions, equal to the difference, if any, between the maximum benefit allowable under the Code and the amount that would be provided under the 401(k) Plan if the IRS did not impose contribution or pay limitations. Under the ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan, the amount credited to the participant’s account accrues interest at the rate set by FNBPA as its highest interest rate on the first day of the year on the longest termlongest-term IRA account that it offers. The benefit is then paid as a single lump sum on the first of the month following six months after the participant terminates employment.

WeIn addition to the Lost Match Plan, which is the deferred compensation plan detailed in the table above, we also maintain a deferred compensation plan known as the F.N.B. CorporationNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (Deferred Compensation Plan). The Committee may select a group of management employees to participate in the plan. Currently, there are no participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan provides participantsa participant the ability to defer into the plan a portion of his or her annual cash compensation, including 50% of base salary and 100% of any annual incentive compensation he or she would otherwise receive to help postpone and minimize taxes while accumulating capital on apre-tax basis until termination of employment. A participant may elect to defer his or her compensation into a fixed interest rate option, with the interest rate determined by the Committee. Currently, there are no participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

 

 

  70    F.N.B. Corporation

  74    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Compensation Committee Report  

 

 

  

 

 20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination 

or Change in Control

  
 

 

Our current NEOs are each a party to an employment agreement that provides for certain salary and benefits upon termination of employment under various scenarios. heThe agreements are all described more fully in the narrative and tables below. The tables below set forth the estimated current value of benefits that could be paid to each of our NEOs upon various termination events. The actual amounts paid upon any of these termination events will only be known at the time that the benefits become payable. The tables reflect the amounts that could be payable under the various arrangements if the event in question occurred as of December 31, 2017.2020. The NEOs’ employment agreements do not provide for any additional payments

payments or benefits in the event of a voluntary termination of employment by the executive without good reason or an involuntary termination by us for cause. Under those scenarios, the NEOs are only entitled to their accrued and unpaid obligations, such as salary, unused vacation and vested benefits. The following tables contain common information about our qualified andnon-qualified plans and policies, as well as assumptions used by us in arriving at the amounts contained in the tables. To the extent the information is common it is contained in the endnotes to the 20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control tables and is indicated by letters.

 

 

2017 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
VINCENT J. DELIE, JR.
 

2020 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

VINCENT J. DELIE, JR.

2020 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

VINCENT J. DELIE, JR.

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon Termination
 

  Retirement  

($)

  

Change in
Control –
  Termination  

($)

  

Change in
Control – No
  Termination  

($)

  

  Good Reason or  

Involuntary Not
for Cause
Termination

($)

  

  Death  

($)

  

  Disability  

($)

  

Retirement

($)

 Change in
Control –
Termination
($)
 

Change in
Control – No
Termination

($)

 

Good Reason or

Involuntary Not
for Cause
Termination

($)

 Death
($)
 Disability
($)
 
Compensation:      

Compensation:

      
Accrued Base Salary (a)  20,192   20,192   0   20,192   20,192   20,192   40,086   40,086   0   40,086   40,086   40,086 
Base Salary Continuation(1)  0   3,150,000   0   3,150,000   0   757,500  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,474,135

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,474,135

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

982,548

 

 

Executive Incentive Compensation (b)(2)  0   1,334,340   1,334,340   0   1,334,340   1,334,340  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,727,039

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,727,039

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,727,039

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,727,039

 

 

Bonus(1)  0   3,548,491   0   3,548,491   0   0  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,323,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,323,397

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

Restricted Stock:      

Restricted Stock and PeUs:

      
Unvested and Accelerated (c)(2)  0   9,126,659   6,359,812   0   9,126,659   3,951,824  

 

 

 

9,192,224

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,973,612

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,973,612

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,192,224

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,632,335

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,515,364

 

 

Benefits and Perquisites:            
Accrued Vacation (d)  40,385   40,385   0   40,385   40,385   40,385  

 

 

 

44,540

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,540

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,540

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,540

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,540

 

 

Post-Termination Health Care(3)  0   37,654   0   37,654   0   0  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

401(k) Plan (e)(4)  261,178   261,178   0   261,178   261,178   261,178  

 

 

 

259,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

259,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

259,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

259,354

 

 

 

 

 

 

259,354

 

 

RIP (f)(4)  0   124,457   0   124,457   95,560   124,457  

 

 

 

133,194

 

 

 

 

 

 

133,194

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

133,194

 

 

 

 

 

 

126,587

 

 

 

 

 

 

171,306

 

 

Excess Plan (g)(5)  0   36,711   0   0   31,040   42,227 
ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan(6)  567,604   567,604   0   567,604   567,604   567,604 

Excess Plan (g)(4)

 

 

 

 

44,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,637

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,961

 

 

 

 

 

 

60,140

 

 

ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan(5)

 

 

 

 

1,065,161

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,065,161

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,065,161

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,065,161

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,065,161

 

 

Total:  889,359   18,247,671   7,694,152   7,749,961   11,476,958   7,099,707  

 

 

 

10,778,622

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,129,184

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,700,651

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,623,183

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,937,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,865,538

 

 

 

(1)

In the event that we terminate Mr. Delie’s employment without cause, or if he terminates his employment for good reason, he is entitled to base salary continuation and a bonus payment for three years. In the event of a change in control resulting in his termination, he is entitled to three times his base salary plus a bonus amount payable immediately as a lump sum. The bonus amount is calculated by taking the average of the annual amounts paid, whether paid in cash, company stock or other form, to Mr. Delie as a bonus for the last three completed fiscal years. In the event of disability, he is entitled to the amount set forth in our Officers’ Disability salary continuation program. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Delie is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(2)

Based on Mr. Delie’s age and length of service, he is not eligible for retirement; therefore, inearly retirement under the FNB Incentive Plan. In the case of retirement, no benefit is immediately payable.the amount reflected represents the value of restricted stock and Performance Unit awards that vest upon early retirement. Refer to the endnotes to these tables for when the shares or cash, respectively, would be distributed to Mr. Delie.

 

(3)

In the event that we terminate Mr. Delie’s employment without cause, or if he terminates his employment for good reason, he is entitled to continue to participate in our group health plan on the same terms and at the same cost as active employees for 36 months or until he first becomes eligible for coverage under any group health plan of another employer. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Delie is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(4)

Mr. Delie is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan.

 

(5)

Based on Mr. Delie’s age and length of service, he is 0% vested in his benefit under this plan, but will become 100% vested in this plan in the event of death, disability or upon a change in control.

2018 Proxy Statement    71  


  Compensation Committee Report

(6)

Mr. Delie is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan. heThe amounts reflected represent the cash value of Mr. Delie’s account balance under this plan as of December 31, 2017.2020. Upon termination of employment for any reason, Mr. Delie is entitled to receive a lump sum distribution of his entire account balance under this plan on the first of the month following six months from his termination of employment. In the case of a change in control that does not result in termination, no benefit is immediately payable.

2021 Proxy Statement    75  


  Compensation Committee Report  

 

Mr. Delie’s employment agreement does not provide for any additional benefits, other than the payment of accrued and unpaid obligations existing at the time of a voluntary termination of employment by Mr. Delie without good reason or by us for cause. Mr. Delie’s agreement allows him to terminate the agreement for good reason and obtain the same termination benefits as if he was terminated by the Company for a reason other than cause. Under the terms of his agreement, good reason exists if Mr. Delie experiences any of the following: reduction in base salary unless the reduction is less than 10% and part of an overall reduction; a material diminution in compensation and benefits unless part of an overall reduction; a material diminution of his authority, duties and responsibilities; a change of material duties that are inconsistent with the position; a material diminution of the budget over which he maintains control; relocation of his office more than 50 miles from both Pittsburgh and Hermitage, Pennsylvania; or there occurs material

diminution of the

duties of his supervisor or a material breach of the agreement by us. Mr. Delie’s contract does not provide agross-up under Section 280G of the Code.

For purposes of Mr. Delie’s and all other NEO’s employment agreements, “change in control” means any merger or consolidation with another corporation, and as a result of such merger or consolidation, our shareholders as of the day preceding such transaction will own less than 51% of the outstanding voting securities of the surviving corporation, or in the event that there is (in a single transaction or series of related transactions) a sale or exchange of 80% or more of our common stock for securities of another entity in which our shareholders will own less than 51% of such entity’s outstanding voting securities, or in the event of the sale of a substantial portion of our assets (including the capital stock we own in our subsidiaries) to an unrelated third party.

 

 

2017 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
VINCENT J. CALABRESE, JR.
 

2020 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

VINCENT J. CALABRESE, JR.

2020 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

VINCENT J. CALABRESE, JR.

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon Termination
 

Retirement

($)

  

Change in
Control –
Termination

($)

  

Change in
Control – No
Termination

($)

  

Good Reason or

Involuntary Not
for Cause
Termination

($)

  

Death

($)

  

Disability

($)

  Retirement
($)
 Change in
Control –
Termination
($)
 Change in
Control – No
Termination
($)
 

 

Good Reason or
Involuntary Not
for Cause
Termination
($)

 Death
($)
 Disability
($)
 
Compensation:            
Accrued Base Salary (a)  9,231   9,231   0   9,231   9,231   9,231  

 

 

 

18,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,166

 

 

Base Salary Continuation(1)  0   1,440,000   0   1,440,000   0   264,000  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,574,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,574,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

349,296

 

 

Executive Incentive Compensation (b)(2)  0   487,987   487,987   0   487,987   487,987  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

549,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

549,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

549,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

549,990

 

 

Bonus(1)  0   1,277,927   0   1,277,927   0   0  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,859,143

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,859,143

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

Restricted Stock:      

Restricted Stock and PeUs:

      
Unvested and Accelerated (c)(2)  1,093,677   3,158,077   2,051,330   0   3,158,077   1,417,623  

 

 

 

2,867,631

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,426,346

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,426,346

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,867,631

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,000,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,334,316

 

 

Benefits and Perquisites:            
Accrued Vacation (d)  18,462   18,462   0   18,462   18,462   18,462  

 

 

 

20,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,185

 

 

Post-Termination Health Care(3)  0   37,654   0   37,654   0   0  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

401(k) Plan (e)(4)  247,100   247,100   0   247,100   247,100   247,100  

 

 

 

246,589

 

 

 

 

 

 

246,589

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

246,589

 

 

 

 

 

 

246,589

 

 

 

 

 

 

246,589

 

 

RIP (f)(4)  70,032   70,032   0   70,032   66,589   89,120  

 

 

 

95,683

 

 

 

 

 

 

95,683

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

95,683

 

 

 

 

 

 

89,742

 

 

 

 

 

 

119,492

 

 

Excess Plan (g)(4)  5,079   4,932   0   5,079   4,838   6,548  

 

 

 

7,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,794

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,704

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,044

 

 

ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan(5)  181,170   181,170   0   181,170   181,170   181,170  

 

 

 

346,623

 

 

 

 

 

 

346,623

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

346,623

 

 

 

 

 

 

346,623

 

 

 

 

 

 

346,623

 

 

Total:  1,624,751   6,932,572   2,539,317   3,286,655   4,173,454   2,721,241  

 

 

 

3,602,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,190,948

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,976,336

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,082,572

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,278,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,993,701

 

 

 

(1)

In the event that we terminate Mr. Calabrese’s employment without cause or if he terminates his employment for good reason, he is entitled to base salary continuation and a bonus payment for three years. In the event of a change in control resulting in his termination, he is entitled to three times his base salary plus a bonus amount payable immediately as a lump sum. The bonus amount is calculated by taking the average of the annual amounts paid, whether paid in cash, company stock or other form, to Mr. Calabrese as a bonus for the last three completed fiscal years. In the event of disability, he is entitled to the amount set forth in our Officers’ Disability salary continuation program. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Calabrese is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(2)

Based on Mr. Calabrese’s age and length of service, he is eligible for early retirement under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan. In the case of retirement, the amount reflected represents the value of restricted stock and Performance Unit awards that vest upon early retirement. Refer to the endnotes to these tables for when the shares or cash, respectively, would be distributed to Mr. Calabrese.

  72    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Committee Report  

 

(3)

In the event that we terminate Mr. Calabrese’s employment without cause, or if he terminates his employment for good reason, he is entitled to continue to participate in our group health plan on the same terms and at the same cost as active employees for 36 months or until he first becomes eligible for coverage under any group health plan of another employer. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Calabrese is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(4)

Mr. Calabrese is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan.

 

  76    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Committee Report  

(5)

Mr. Calabrese is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan. The amounts reflected represent the cash value of Mr. Calabrese’s account balance under this plan as of December 31, 2017.2020. Upon termination of employment for any reason, Mr. Calabrese is entitled to receive a lump sum distribution of his entire account balance under this plan on the first of the month following six months from his termination of employment. In the case of a change in control that does not result in termination, no benefit is immediately payable.

 

2017 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
GARY L. GUERRIERI
 

2020 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

GARY L. GUERRIERI

2020 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

GARY L. GUERRIERI

 

 

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon Termination
 

 Retirement 

($)

  

Change in
Control –
 Termination 

($)

  

Change in
Control – No
 Termination 

($)

  

Good Reason
 Termination(1) 

($)

  

Involuntary

 Not for Cause 
Termination

($)

  

 Death 

($)

  

 Disability 

($)

  Retirement
($)
 Change in
Control –
Termination
($)
 Change in
Control – No
Termination
($)
 Good Reason
Termination(1)
($)
 Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
($)
 Death
($)
 Disability
($)
 
Compensation:       

Compensation:

       
Accrued Base Salary (a)  8,462   8,462   0   8,462   8,462   8,462   8,462  

 

 

 

16,676

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,676

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,676

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,676

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,676

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,676

 

 

Base Salary Continuation(1)  0   880,000   0   746,641   880,000   0   242,004  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

963,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

903,064

 

 

 

 

 

 

963,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

306,252

 

 

Executive Incentive
Compensation (b)(2)
  0   335,491   335,491   335,491   0   335,491   335,491  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

378,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

378,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

378,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

378,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

378,656

 

 

Restricted Stock:       

Restricted Stock and PeUs:

       
Unvested and Accelerated (c)(2)  184,420   951,051   951,051   951,051   184,420   951,051   314,972  

 

 

 

1,299,452

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,556,072

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,556,072

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,556,072

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,299,452

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,355,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,046,121

 

 

Benefits and Perquisites:              
Accrued Vacation (d)  16,923   16,923   0   16,923   16,923   16,923   16,923  

 

 

 

18,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,529

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,529

 

 

Post-Termination Health Care(3)  0   821   0   0   821   0   0  

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

720

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

720

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

401(k) Plan (e)(4)  336,955   336,955   0   336,955   336,955   336,955   336,955  

 

 

 

323,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

323,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

323,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

323,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

323,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

323,032

 

 

RIP (f)(4)  529,017   529,017   0   529,017   529,017   489,871   704,367  

 

 

 

761,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

761,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

761,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

761,018

 

 

 

 

 

 

695,392

 

 

 

 

 

 

919,968

 

 

Excess Plan (g)(4)  76,954   75,247   0   76,954   76,954   70,808   109,139  

 

 

 

113,842

 

 

 

 

 

 

109,627

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

113,842

 

 

 

 

 

 

113,842

 

 

 

 

 

 

103,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

146,182

 

 

BRP (g)(4)  62,666   61,276   0   62,666   62,666   59,190   64,669  

 

 

 

93,010

 

 

 

 

 

 

89,567

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

93,010

 

 

 

 

 

 

93,010

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,536

 

 

 

 

 

 

86,618

 

 

ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan(5)  132,801   132,801   0   132,801   132,801   132,801   132,801  

 

 

 

252,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

252,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

252,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

252,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

252,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

252,508

 

 

Total:  1,348,198   3,328,044   1,286,542   3,196,961   2,229,019   2,401,552   2,265,783  

 

 

 

2,878,067

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,469,905

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,934,728

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,416,407

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,842,287

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,230,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,494,542

 

 

 

(1)

In the event that we terminate Mr. Guerrieri’s employment without cause, he is entitled to base salary continuation for two years. In the event that Mr. Guerrieri voluntarily terminates his employment within 90 days of a change in control, he is entitled to a cash payment, equal to one times his base amount as defined in Section 280(G)(b)(3) of the Code, paid in three equal installments with the first payment to be made on the effective date of his termination of employment, the second payment to be made on the last day of the sixth month following such effective date and the third payment to be made on the last day of the 12th month following such effective date. In the event of disability, he is entitled to the amount set forth in our Officers’ Disability salary continuation program. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Guerrieri is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(2)

Based on Mr. Guerrieri’s age and length of service, he is eligible for early retirement under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan. In the case of retirement, the amount reflected represents the value of restricted stock and Performance Unit awards that vest upon early retirement. Refer to the endnotes to these tables for when the shares or cash, respectively, would be distributed to Mr. Guerrieri.

 

(3)

In the event that we terminate Mr. Guerrieri’s employment without cause, he is entitled to an amount sufficient to pay COBRA premiums for medical insurance for 18 months less the amount that Mr. Guerrieri would have paid towards medical insurance if he were still employed during that time. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Guerrieri is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(4)

Mr. Guerrieri is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan.

 

(5)

Mr. Guerrieri is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan. The amounts reflected represent the cash value of Mr. Guerrieri’s account balance under this plan as of December 31, 2017.2020. Upon termination of employment for any reason, Mr. Guerrieri is entitled to receive a lump sum distribution of his entire account balance under this plan on the first of the month following six months from his termination of employment. In the case of a change in control that does not result in termination, no benefit is immediately payable.

 

2018 Proxy Statement    73  


  Compensation Committee Report

Mr. Guerrieri’s employment agreement provides that Mr. Guerrieri may voluntarily terminate his employment after a change of control and receive a bonus payment payable in three installments equal to his Base Amount as defined in the Code. His contract does not provide for agross-up under Section 280G of the Code. It was our intention when structuring the amendment to his agreement that any payments will comply with Code Section 409A. He is not entitled to any additional benefits other than accrued and unpaid obligations under a termination of employment voluntarily by Mr. Guerrieri or by the Company for cause. Mr. Guerrieri’s agreement provides for a reduction of

reduction of certain amounts in the above tables after the first 12 months of payments if Mr. Guerrieri obtains new employment. Mr. Guerrieri’s employment agreement provides that upon a change in control, if the acquiring company terminates Mr. Guerrieri’s employment, Mr. Guerrieri may obtain employment with a competitive enterprise, which new employment would otherwise be restricted by the employment agreement, provided Mr. Guerrieri releases the acquiring company from any payment obligations under the terms of the employment agreement. “Change in control” has the same definition as noted above for Mr. Delie.

 

 

2017 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

ROBERT M. MOOREHEAD

 

 

  Executive Benefits and

  Payments Upon Termination

 

 Retirement 

($)

  

Change in
Control –
 Termination 

($)

  

Change in
Control – No
 Termination 

($)

  

Good Reason

 Termination(1)
($)

  

Involuntary

Not for
Cause
 Termination 

($)

  

Death

($)

  

Disability

($)

 
  Compensation:       
  Accrued Base Salary (a)  8,173   8,173   0   8,173   8,173   8,173   8,173 
  Base Salary Continuation(2)  0   850,000   0   850,000   850,000   0   233,754 

  Executive Incentive

  Compensation (b)(3)

  0   324,054   324,054   0   0   324,054   324,054 
  Bonus(2)  0   494,016   0   494,016   494,016   0   0 

  Restricted Stock:

       

    Unvested and Accelerated (c)(3)

  122,739   735,086   735,086   735,086   122,739   735,086   243,633 
  Benefits and Perquisites:       
  Accrued Vacation (c)  16,346   16,346   0   16,346   16,346   16,346   16,346 
  Post-Termination Health Care(4)  0   26,593   0   26,593   26,593   0   0 
  401(k) Plan (e)(5)  160,020   160,020   0   160,020   160,020   160,020   160,020 
  RIP (f)(6)  0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
  ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan(7)  79,151   79,151   0   79,151   79,151   79,151   79,151 
  Total:  386,429   2,693,439   1,059,140   2,369,385   1,757,038   1,322,830   1,065,131 

2021 Proxy Statement    77  


  Compensation Committee Report  

Mr. Moorehead retired from the company effective January 1, 2021. As a result of his retirement, Mr. Moorehead received the following:

2020 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

ROBERT M. MOOREHEAD

Executive Benefits and

Payments Upon Termination

Retirement
($)

Compensation:

Accrued Base Salary (a)

16,243

Executive Incentive Compensation (b)(1)

368,827

Restricted Stock and PeUs:

Unvested and Accelerated (c)(2)

1,236,961

Benefits and Perquisites:

401(k) Plan (e)(3)

237,685

ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan(4)

191,779

Total:

2,051,495

 

(1)

Amounts reportedThis amount is also reflected in this column apply to good reason termination within two years following a change in control. If Mr. Moorehead terminates his employment for good reason at any other time, he is not entitled to any additional amounts.the 2020 Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)

In the event we terminate Mr. Moorehead’s employment without cause, he is entitled to base salary continuation and a bonus payment for two years. In the event of a change in control resulting in his termination, or if he terminates his employment for good reason within two years of a change in control, he is entitled to two times his base salary, plus a bonus amount payable in a lump sum within 15 business days. The bonus amount is calculated by taking the average of the annual amounts paid, whether paid in cash, company stock or other form, to Mr. Moorehead as a bonus for the last three completed fiscal years. In the event of disability, he is entitled to the amount set forth in our Officers’ Disability salary continuation program. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Moorehead is not entitled to any additional amounts.

(3)

Based on Mr. Moorehead’s age and length of service, he iswas eligible for earlynormal retirement under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan. In the case of retirement, theThe amount reflected represents the value of restricted stock and Performance Unit awards that vestvested upon earlynormal retirement. Refer to the endnotes to these tables for when the shares wouldor cash, respectively, will be distributed to Mr. Moorehead.

 

(4)

In the event that the Company terminates Mr. Moorehead’s employment without cause or following a change in control, or Mr. Moorehead terminates his employment for good reason within two years of a change in control, he is entitled to an amount sufficient to pay COBRA premiums for medical insurance, to the same extent as we contributed to such premium while he was an active employee, for the period beginning on the termination date and ending on the earlier of (a) the later of (x) the expiration of Mr. Moorehead’s, or his applicable dependents, as the case may be, COBRA coverage, or (y) the 24 month anniversary of his separation from service, or (b) the date Mr. Moorehead or such dependents, as the case may be, first become eligible for coverage under another group health plan of another employer. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Moorehead is not entitled to any additional amounts.

(5)(3)

Mr. Moorehead is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan.

 

(6)

Mr. Moorehead does not participate in this plan.

  74    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Committee Report  

(7)(4)

Mr. Moorehead is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan. The amountsamount reflected representrepresents the cash value of Mr. Moorehead’s account balance under this plan as of December 31, 2017. Upon termination of employment for any reason,2020. Mr. Moorehead is entitled to receive a lump sum distribution of his entire account balance under this plan on the first of the month following six months from his termination of employment. In the case of a change in control that does not result in termination, no benefit is immediately payable.July 1, 2021.

 

2017 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

BARRY C. ROBINSON

 

 

  Executive Benefits and
  Payments Upon Termination
 

Retirement

($)

  

Change in
Control –
Termination

($)

  

Change in
Control – No
Termination

($)

  

Good Reason(1)
or Involuntary

Not for Cause
Termination

($)

  

Death

($)

  

Disability

($)

 
  Compensation:      
  Accrued Base Salary (a)  7,212   7,212   0   7,212   7,212   7,212 
  Base Salary Continuation(2)  0   750,000   0   750,000   0   206,250 
  Executive Incentive Compensation (b)(2)  0   285,930   285,930   0   285,930   285,930 

  Restricted Stock:

      
    Unvested and Accelerated (c)(3)  0   676,144   676,144   0   676,144   224,133 
  Benefits and Perquisites:      
  Accrued Vacation (d)  14,423   14,423   0   14,423   14,423   14,423 
  Post-Termination Health Care(4)  0   26,995   0   26,995   0   0 
  401(k) Plan (e)(5)  174,681   174,681   0   174,681   174,681   174,681 
  RIP (f)(6)  0   0   0   0   0   0 
  ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan(7)  70,228   70,228   0   70,228   70,228   70,228 
  Total:  266,544   2,005,613   962,074   1,043,539   1,228,618   982,857 

  78    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Committee Report  

 

2020 POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
BARRY C. ROBINSON

 

 

Executive Benefits and

Payments Upon Termination

 Retirement
($)
  Change in
Control –
Termination
($)
  Change in
Control – No
Termination
($)
  

 

Good Reason(1)
or Involuntary
Not for Cause
Termination
($)

  Death
($)
  Disability
($)
 

 

Compensation:

      

Accrued Base Salary (a)

 

 

14,033  

 

 

 

14,033 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,033    

 

 

 

14,033  

 

 

 

14,033 

 

Base Salary Continuation(2)

 

 

0  

 

 

 

810,775 

 

 

 

 

 

 

810,775    

 

 

 

0  

 

 

 

229,884 

 

 

Executive Incentive Compensation (b)(2)

 

 

0  

 

 

 

318,635 

 

 

 

318,635 

 

 

 

0    

 

 

 

318,635  

 

 

 

318,635 

 

 

Restricted Stock and PeUs:

 

      

    Unvested and Accelerated (c)(3)

 

 

 

1,105,814  

 

 

 

1,322,980 

 

 

 

1,322,980 

 

 

 

1,105,814    

 

 

 

1,153,918  

 

 

 

893,596 

 

 

Benefits and Perquisites:

      

Accrued Vacation (d)

 

 

15,592  

 

 

 

15,592 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,592    

 

 

 

15,592  

 

 

 

15,592 

 

Post-Termination Health Care(4)

 

 

0  

 

 

 

32,701 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,701    

 

 

 

0  

 

 

 

 

401(k) Plan (e)(5)

 

 

186,135  

 

 

 

186,135 

 

 

 

 

 

 

186,135    

 

 

 

186,135  

 

 

 

186,135 

 

RIP (f)(6)

 

 

0  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0    

 

 

 

0  

 

 

 

 

ERISA Excess Lost Match Plan(7)

 

 

161,597  

 

 

 

161,597 

 

 

 

 

 

 

161,597    

 

 

 

161,597  

 

 

 

161,597 

 

Total:

 

 

1,483,171  

 

 

 

2,862,448 

 

 

 

1,641,615 

 

 

 

2,326,647    

 

 

 

1,849,910  

 

 

 

1,819,472 

 

 

(1)

Amounts reported in this column apply to good reason termination within one year following a change in control. If Mr. Robinson terminates his employment for good reason at any other time, Mr. Robinson is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(2)

In the event that we terminate Mr. Robinson’s employment without cause or following a change in control, or if he terminates his employment for good reason within one year of a change in control, he is entitled to base salary continuation for two years. In the event of disability, he is entitled to the amount set forth in our Officers’ Disability salary continuation program. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Robinson is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(3)

Based on Mr. Robinson’s age and length of service, he is not eligible for retirement; therefore, inearly retirement under the FNB Incentive Plan. In the case of retirement, no benefit is immediately payable.the amount reflected represents the value of restricted stock and Performance Unit awards that vest upon early retirement. Refer to the endnotes to these tables for when the shares or cash, respectively, would be distributed to Mr. Robinson.

 

(4)

In the event that the Company terminates Mr. Robinson’s employment without cause or following a change in control, or Mr. Robinson terminates his employment for good reason within one year of a change in control, he is entitled to an amount sufficient to pay COBRA premiums for medical insurance, to the same extent as we contributed to such premium while he was an active employee, for 18 months or until Mr. Robinson or such dependents, as the case may be, first become eligible for coverage under another group health plan of another employer, if earlier. In the case of termination for any other reason, Mr. Robinson is not entitled to any additional amounts.

 

(5)

Mr. Robinson is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan.

 

(6)

Mr. Robinson does not participate in this plan.

 

(7)

Mr. Robinson is 100% vested in his benefit under this plan. The amounts reflected represent the cash value of Mr. Robinson’s account balance under this plan as of December 31, 2017.2020. Upon termination of employment for any reason, Mr. Robinson is entitled to receive a lump sum distribution of his entire account balance under this plan on the first of the month following six months from his termination of employment. In the case of a change in control that does not result in termination, no benefit is immediately payable.

Messrs. Calabrese, Guerrieri, Moorehead and Robinson’s contracts do not provide for any additional benefits other than payment of accrued and unpaid obligations existing at the time of a voluntary termination of employment or by the Company for

cause. Additionally, none of the NEOs are entitled to any type ofgross-up under Section 280G of the Code. “Change in control”Control” has the same definition as noted for Mr. Delie.

2018 Proxy Statement    75  


  Compensation Committee Report

 

Endnotes to All 20172020 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Tables

(a) Upon termination for any reason, the NEOs are entitled to an immediate lump sum payment of accrued salary due to us paying employees one week in arrears. In the case of Change in Control — No Termination, the NEOs would still be employed and would, therefore, receive these accrued salary dollars consistent with our normal payroll practice of paying all employees one week in arrears.

(b) The amounts reflected in the Executive Incentive Compensation row represent the payout earned under the annual incentive portion of the 2007FNB Incentive Plan. We make the payout in a lump sum approximately 60 days after the end of the year provided the participant is still employed by us on December 31st. For purposes of this table, in the event of death, disability or retirement, the Committee may approve apro-rated award. The amount in the table is based on the assumption that the Committee would approve the

2021 Proxy Statement    79  


  Compensation Committee Report  

award. Since the table assumes termination of employment as of December 31, 2017,2020, pro-ration is not necessary. In the case of a change in control, the participant is entitled to receive apro-rated award based on the date of termination not less than his targeted award. Therefore, the amount shown in the case of a change in control is based on the amount the NEO earned for 2017,2020, not the NEO’s targeted award. In the event we terminate any of the NEOs for cause, we do not owe the NEO any additional amount.

(c) The amounts reflected represent the taxable income realized by the NEOs under each potential termination scenario based on the terms of the 2007FNB Incentive Plan. Under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan, both service-basedtime-based and performance-based outstanding restricted stock awards, excluding the supplemental performance-based awards granted in December 2015, will become 100% vested at target levels in the event of the death of the participant or upon a change in control, except for the performance-based awards granted in 2019 and 2020 which will become 100% vested at the higher of target or actual performance in the event of a change in control. Under the 2007FNB Incentive Plan, a change in control occurs when there is a merger or other consolidation which results in a 50% or greater change in the ownership of the common stock of the resulting company. In the event a current NEO becomes disabled, or terminates employment due to normal retirement, all service-basedtime-based restricted stock awards will become 100% vested. If an NEO terminates employment due to retirement (normal or early), all time-based awards of restricted stock will become 100% vested, except that if the NEO retirestime-based awards granted in 2018 and 2019 will vest on a pro-rated basis, based on the period worked, in the same calendar year asevent of early retirement. In the event an NEO terminates employment due to retirement (normal or early) and we achieve the performance objectives, the performance-based shares granted in 2018 and 2019 will vest on the award, the number of shares that shall vest will bevesting date in a pro-rated foramount based on the period worked and the shares granted in 2020 will become 100% vested. In the event an NEO terminates employment due to disability, the performance-based shares will vest on the vesting date in a pro-rated amount based on the period worked. In the event of the death of the participant or if an NEO terminates employment due to disability and we achieve the performance objectives, any PeUs will vest on the vesting date in a pro-rated amount based on the period worked. If an NEO terminates employment due to early retirement all service-based awards of restricted stock will bepro-rated for the period worked. In the event an NEO terminates employment due to retirement or disability and we

achieve the performance objectives, the performance-based shares, excluding the supplemental performance-based awards granted in December 2015, will vest on the vesting date in apro-rated amount based on the period worked. The supplemental performance-based awards granted in December 2015 will become 100% vested at target levels in the event of death of the participant or upon termination without cause or the participant terminates for good reason within two years of a change in control. If an NEO terminates employment due to early retirement or disability and we achieve the performance objectives, the supplemental performance-based awardsany Performance Unit granted in December 20152019 will vest on the vesting date in apro-ratapro-rated amountbasis, based on the period worked.worked, and any Performance Unit granted in 2020 will become 100% vested. Upon a change in control, any PeUs will become 100% vested at the higher of target or actual performance.

As of December 31, 2017, the awards were tracking below threshold and thus,2020, for purposes of these tables, we have assumed that the performance-based shares for the awards granted in 2015, 20162018 will vest between the threshold and 2017 will not vest;target levels, and the awards granted in December 20152019 and 2020 will vest atbetween the target levels, in the case of disability or retirement.and maximum levels. The NEOs will forfeit all unvested awards if we terminate them without cause or if they terminate their employment for any other reason.

(d) Upon termination for any reason, the NEOs are entitled to an immediate lump sum payment of earned but unused vacation days. In the case of a Change in Control — No Termination, the NEOs would still be employed and would therefore be entitled to carry over the earned but unused vacation days for use in 2018.2021.

(e) The amounts reflected represent the dollar amount of our matching and Company contributions into the 401(k) Plan as of December 31, 2017.2020. Distributions from the 401(k) Plan will be paid at the NEO’s election in a single lump sum, in a partial lump sum, or in monthly, quarterly or annual installments after termination of employment. For purposes of these tables, we have assumed that the NEOs would elect a single lump sum form of payment. In the case of a change in control that does not result in termination, the NEO would still be employed, thus no benefit is immediately payable.

(f) The present values reflected above for the RIP were determined using the following assumptions: benefit payments paid as a monthly annuity commencing at age 65, except in the case of disability where payments would commence at age 65 once long-term disability benefits cease; an interest rate of 3.55%2.35%; nopre-retirement mortality; and for post-retirement mortality, the 2007 base rates fromRP-2014Pri-2012 nondisabled table projected linearly to 2017 to a long-termgenerationally with the MP-2020 improvement rate of

  76    F.N.B. Corporation


Compensation Committee Report  

0.8% (grading down linearly to 0.0% from ages 85 to 95).scale. The present values for Retirement, Change in Control — Termination, Good Reason or Involuntary Not for Cause Termination, and Disability were calculated based on a five-year certain and continuous annuity option. The present value for Death was calculated based on a 100% joint and survivor annuity option and assumes that the NEO and his spouse are the same age. In addition, the death benefit is assumed to commence immediately if the NEO is over age 55 or otherwise at age 55. In the case of a change in control that does not result in termination, no benefit is immediately payable. Note that we have shown the present value of the benefit available for consistency with the20172020 Pension Benefits Table. However, table; however, the participant is only entitled to a lump sum distribution if the lump sum benefit under the RIP is less than $60,000.

(g) The present values reflected above for the Excess Plan and BRP were determined using the following

  80    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Committee Report  

assumptions: benefit payment paid as a monthly annuity commencing at age 65, except in the case of disability where payments would commence at age 65 once long-term disability benefits cease, and in the case of termination following a change in control where the payment would be in the form of an immediate lump sum; an interest rate of 3.35%1.95% for annuity payments and the IRS mandatedIRS-mandated segment rates for distributions in 20182021 for the lump sum payment triggered due to Change in Control — Termination; nopre-retirement mortality; and for post-retirement mortality, the 2007 base rates fromRP-2014Pri-2012 nondisabled table projected linearly to 2017 to a long-termgenerationally with the MP-2020 improvement rate of 0.8% (grading down linearly to 0.0% from ages 85 to 95)scale for annuity payments and the IRS mandatedIRS-mandated mortality for the lump sum payment due upon Change in Control — Termination. The present values for Retirement, Involuntary Not for Cause Termination, and Disability were calculated based on a five-year certain and continuous annuity option. The present value for Death was calculated based on a 100% joint and survivor annuity option and assumes that the NEO and his spouse are the same age. In addition, the death benefit is assumed to commence immediately if the NEO is over age 55 or, if the NEO is under age 55, the benefit is assumed to commence when the NEO reaches age 55. Note that we have shown the present value of the benefit available for consistency with the20172020 Pension Benefits Table. table. The participant is not entitled to a lump sum payment unless there is a change in control. See the20172020 Pension Benefits Table table and accompanying narrative for more information about the pension benefits under this plan.

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

As required by Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information:

For fiscal 2017,2020, our last completed fiscal year:

 

The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our Company was $42,810;$58,731; and

 

The annual total compensation of Mr. Delie, our Chief Executive Officer,CEO, was $5,349,363.$6,324,684.

Based on this information, the ratio for 20172020 of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive OfficerCEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees is one hundred twenty-five to one.108.

We completed the following steps to identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees and to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and CEO:

 

1.

As of October 30, 2017, our employee population consisted of approximately 4,604 individuals, including any full-time, part-time, temporary, or seasonal employees employed on that date.

As of November 1, 2020, our employee population consisted of approximately 4,269 individuals, including any full-time, part-time, temporary or seasonal employees employed on that date.

To find the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, we used wages from our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 for fiscal 2020. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of full-time and part-time permanent employees who were employed on November 1, 2020 but did not work for us the entire year. No full-time equivalent adjustments were made for part-time employees.

 

2.

To find the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, we used wages from our payroll records as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on FormW-2 for fiscal 2017. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of full-time and part-time permanent employees who were employed on October 30, 2017, but did not work for us the entire year. No full-time equivalent adjustments were made for part-time employees.

3.

After identifying the median employee, we added together all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2017 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of RegulationS-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $42,810.

4.

With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our2017 Summary Compensation Table.

Compensation Risk AssessmentAfter identifying the median employee, we added together all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2020 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $58,731.

We calculated the annual total compensation for the median employee in accordance with SEC rules, and using the same methodology used to calculate Mr. Delie’s total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table, and we also included F.N.B.’s health care plan premium contributions for both the employee and Mr. Delie. As a result, Mr. Delie’s annual total compensation for pay ratio purposes is slightly higher than the amount reported for him in the Summary Compensation Table.

In addition to the information provided above required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we conducted a risk assessmentadditional analysis of our compensation programs forCEO pay versus our employee population using alternative methodologies that we believe are more reflective of our business model and our employee population. We have a significant portion of our employees in our retail network who primarily work fewer and a variable number of hours than most employees. When comparing our CEO’s pay to our average employee the purposeratio is 83 to 1 and when compared to our average full-time employee the ratio is 79 to 1.

The pay ratio disclosure rules of Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K provide companies with a great deal of flexibility in determining inherent riskstheir pay ratio reporting methodologies and in estimating the overall compensation program. Our Chief Risk Officer conducted the assessment with the assistanceratio of the Executive Vice Presidentannual total compensation of Human Resourcesthe CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees. Our methodology may differ materially from the methodology used by other companies, which, among other factors such as differences in employee populations, geographic locations, business strategies, and Corporate Servicescompensation practices, may contribute to a lack of comparability between our pay ratio and the Compensation and Benefits Accounting Manager, and reviewedpay ratio reported by other companies, including other companies within the riskfinancial services industry. Therefore, we do not believe the ratio should be used as a comparison between companies.

 

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    77  

2021 Proxy Statement    81  


 

  Compensation Committee Report

Compensation Governance and Risk Management

Below is a summary of policies and practices we employ to ensure appropriate compensation practices and risk management.

Policy

Description

Stock Ownership Policy

Our directors and senior level managers who participate in the LTIP, including our NEOs, are currently in compliance with our stock ownership policy.

Anti-Hedging Policy

Our anti-hedging policy prohibits our directors, NEOs’ executive officers, and senior officers from engaging in hedging transactions with Company stock, and requires F.N.B. employees to consult with the Company Legal Department regarding these restrictions.

Clawback Policy

Our compensation recoupment or clawback policy allows our Board to recoup any excess compensation, whether in the form of cash or equity, paid to our NEOs if the Company restates its financial results upon which an award is based due to fraud, intentional misconduct or gross negligence.

Risk Assessment

We annually conduct a risk assessment of all of our compensation plans, and the Committee annually reviews the assessment to ensure the compensation programs do not encourage inappropriate risk taking.

Tax Gross-Ups

Our Board adopted a policy that we will not permit tax gross-up payments.

Compensation Approval

The Compensation Committee approves all elements of compensation for all executive officers.

Control Functions

Audit, Risk Management, Finance, Human Resources and Legal all review and advise the Compensation Committee on executive officer compensation.

Management Compensation Committee

Senior management reviews all incentive compensation plans and programs to ensure an appropriate balance between risk and compensation outcomes.

 

 

assessmentIncentive Plan Process: As a key component to our incentive plan review process, each line of business reviews its annual performance goals and adjusts overall incentive compensation goals for the business unit staff, if necessary. This review includes establishing key performance indicators for participants and individual employee objectives and ensures that neither will incent unnecessary risk-taking. The plans also consider key risk indicators (KRIs) designed to measure quality control standards, compliance results and asset quality. When appropriate, the KRIs serve to modify the results generated solely by the KPIs and reduce compensation for actions that are not consistent with our risk appetite or that are not in the best interests of our customers. These plans are then vetted through our Wholesale Banking and Consumer Banking Solutions Departments for any plan related to our customer-facing employees and others involved in sales activities, and the compensation consultant. In conductingfunction of our review, we were also keenly aware of the OCC’s Horizontal Sales reviewHuman Resources Department, and its focus. Ourfinally our Management Compensation Committee.

Management Compensation Committee: This group is led by our CEO, CFO, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Wholesale Banking Officer, Chief Consumer Banking

Officer, Chief Risk Officer reviewedand EVP of Human Resources. Each business unit, in conjunction with our Human Resources and Finance Departments, presents any new incentive plans and changes to existing plans for review and approval. The committee reviews the plans to ensure that the plans are appropriately balanced between risk and reward, do not promote unnecessary risk-taking, motivate our employees to take actions that always consider the best interests of our clients and are fiscally responsible in supporting our financial plan. Additionally, at the conclusion of each fiscal year, the committee approves all awards, under all plans, including awards to all equity recipients, to ensure that the awards are consistent with our risk appetite statement and do not incent unnecessary risk-taking.

Independent Plan Reviews: Annually, our Chief Risk Officer conducts a review of all compensation planplans to identify any plan features that could lead an employee to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threatenpose a threat to our value. He conductedfinancial performance. The Chief Risk Officer conducts a business unit review and a review of employee incentive plans and executive incentive plans, including company-wide benefit plans. He used a decision tree analysis to determine if the business unit compensation practices or the compensation plans fostered risk-taking and if so, conducted further analysis to determine if there were compensating controls or mitigants to limit the risk. OurThis review of the executive incentive plans consideredconsiders design features including: pay

  82    F.N.B. Corporation


  Compensation Committee Report  

profiles, performance metrics, performance goals, payout curves, equity incentives, stock ownership requirements performance appraisal management, and our recoupment policy. OurUpon completion of his review, the Chief Risk Officer reviewedprovides his report to the Management Compensation Committee, the Risk Management Committee and the Compensation Committee.

Additionally, our Internal Audit Department conducts an annual review of risks associated with activities existing in all lines of business, including compensation-related risks. Based on such review, the Audit Department determines whether an activity has a low, medium or high risk. That determination provides the audit team a framework from which to set its annual plan and will audit an activity at an appropriate corresponding interval.

Compensation Committee: Our compensation philosophy supports and reflects F.N.B.’s risk appetite

and risk management culture. Our Compensation Committee, in consultation with an experienced and independent executive compensation advisor, monitors and evaluates our compensation practices from a risk management perspective to ensure that such compensation and incentive plans for design features that may have the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. Specifically, he reviewed the compensation program for the following features, among others: pay profiles that provide for low salaries and high annual incentives; the use of performance metrics thatpractices do not benefitencourage undue risk-taking and are consistent with the Company overCompany’s risk appetite. Our risk policies and procedures guide our management’s decisions, including how we pay employees. By setting and communicating our risk appetite in advance, we seek to manage and control the long term; plan goalsrisks that employees can take or effectively influence, consistent with their roles and payouts that did not consider the impact of decisions; steep payout curves where a very high threshold level of performance is requiredresponsibilities to achieve a threshold level of incentive payout; and an over emphasisserve our clients. Based on the useabove, including the report of long-term incentives paid in cash.

Similarly, in the review of employee compensation plans, our Chief Risk Officer, used a decision tree analysis that considered whether each plan was incentive based, and if so, whether the incentive was material relative to the participant’s total compensation. If the incentive was material, he further reviewed the

plan to determine if the plan appeared to foster risk-taking. If the plan fostered risk-taking, he evaluated the plan to determine whether there were compensating controls or mitigants to limit our risk.

Finally, in the business unit compensation review, our Chief Risk Officer assessed whether the business unit generated a materially higher level of risk to us by considering various factors about the plans within each business unit. The factors he considered, among others, included: whether the business unit carried a significant portion of our risk profile; the business unit compensation structure and whether it was different from our other units; the business units’ profitability; whether the employees in the business unit were awarded a short-term bonus while income and risk to us extended over a significantly longer period of time; and whether the compensation expenses comprise a significant percentage of the business unit revenues.

We noted a number of compensation design features that we believe reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking. Inthat our compensation programs applicable to our NEOs, the Committee has downward discretion over incentive program payouts; the program provides a balanced mix of cash and equity, and short-term and long-term incentives, includes multiple meaningful performance metrics, and we maintain a Recoupment Policy that provides for a clawback of payouts under certain circumstances. The employee plans include performance indicators designed to measure quality control standards, compliance results and asset quality. Based upon the risk assessment presented to the Committee, we believe our employee compensation policies and procedures do not encourage unnecessary or excessive and unnecessary risk-taking and the level of risk resulting from our compensation policies and procedures is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

 

 

LOGO

  78    F.N.B. Corporation

2021 Proxy Statement    83  


 

Compensation Committee Report  

 

 

  

 

 20172020 Director Compensation 

  
 

The following table shows the compensation paid to our directors for services rendered in all capacities during 2017.2020. Mr. Delie is not included as his compensation as a director is disclosed in the 20172020 Summary Compensation Table. Ms. Dively and Ms. Bena are also not included as they joined the Board of the Company on January 1, 2018. They currently receive compensation asnon-employeeTable. directors in accordance with the Company’snon-employee director compensation practices and plans described herein.

 

 
Name

Fees Earned  
or Paid in

Cash

($)(1)

Stock

  Awards  

($)(2)

Option

  Awards  

($)

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

  Compensation  

($)

Change in

Pension

Value and

Non-qualified

Deferred

  Compensation  

Earnings

($)(3)

All Other

  Compensation  

($)(4)

  Total  

($)

  Fees Earned  

or Paid in
Cash
($)(1)

Stock

  Awards  

($)(2)

Option

  Awards  
($)

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

  Compensation  

($)

Change in

Pension

Value and

Non-qualified

Deferred

  Compensation  

Earnings

($)

All Other

  Compensation  

($)(3)

  TOTAL  

($)

Pamela A. Bena

 

82,917

 

79,990

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

162,907

William B. Campbell 103,270 59,289 0 0 0 0 162,559

 

123,750

 

80,485

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

204,235

James D. Chiafullo 70,296 59,289 0 0 0 0 129,585

 

84,375

 

80,485

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

164,860

Scott M. Custer(5) 2,352 7,985 0 0 0 784,841 795,178
Laura E. Ellsworth 47,823 59,289 0 0 0 0 107,112
Stephen J. Gurgovits 172,151 59,289 0 0 465,588 0 697,028

Mary Jo Dively

 

85,625

 

80,485

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

166,110

Robert A. Hormell 71,553 59,289 0 0 0 0 130,842

 

75,417

 

79,990

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

155,407

David J. Malone 93,750 59,289 0 0 0 0 153,039

 

92,917

 

79,990

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

172,907

D. Stephen Martz 104,188 59,289 0 0 0 0 163,477
Robert J. McCarthy, Jr. 86,020 59,289 0 0 0 0 145,309
Frank C. Mencini 80,712 59,289 0 0 0 0 140,001

 

111,250

 

80,485

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

191,735

David L. Motley 85,000 59,289 0 0 0 0 144,289

 

86,875

 

79,990

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

166,865

Gary L. Nalbandian(6) 11,073 9,524 0 0 0 0 20,597
Heidi A. Nicholas 75,296 59,289 0 0 0 0 134,585

 

105,417

 

80,485

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

185,902

John S. Stanik 65,000 59,289 0 0 0 0 124,289

 

80,000

 

79,990

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

159,990

William J. Strimbu 78,750 59,289 0 0 0 0 138,039

 

106,875

 

79,990

 

0

 

0

 

0  

 

0

 

186,865

 

(1)

Represents fees earned as a director of the Company. The dollar amounts of the fees earned as a director of the Company were as follows:

 

 
NameAnnual Retainer Fee ($)(A)Committee Chairman Fees ($)(B)

Annual Retainer Fee ($)(A)

Committee Chair Fee ($)(B)

Pamela A. Bena

 

82,917        

0  

William B. Campbell

 

62,722

 

 

 

40,548

 

 

123,750        

0  

James D. Chiafullo

69,778 518

 

74,375        

10,000  

Scott M. Custer

2,352 0

Laura E. Ellsworth

47,823 0

Stephen J. Gurgovits

70,000 102,151

Mary Jo Dively

 

85,625        

0  

Robert A. Hormell

71,553 0

 

75,417        

0  

David J. Malone

73,750 20,000

 

82,917        

10,000  

D. Stephen Martz

69,120 35,068

Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.

61,472 24,548

Frank C. Mencini

79,973 739

 

93,750        

17,500  

David L. Motley

85,000 0

 

86,875        

0  

Gary L. Nalbandian

11,073 0

Heidi A. Nicholas

74,778 518

 

90,417        

15,000  

John S. Stanik

65,000 0

 

80,000        

0  

William J. Strimbu

68,750 10,000

 

91,875        

15,000  

 

 (A)

The amount reflected for Mr. Campbell includes the fee for his service as Independent Lead Director of the Board.

 

 (B)

The amount reflected for Mr. Gurgovits is for service as Chairman of the Board and the Executive Committee. The amounts reflected for all other directors are for service as Committee Chair. Directors Gurgovits, Martz and McCarthy no longer receive Board or Committee Chair fees after December 2017 since their service as Board and Committee Chairs ended on December 19, 2017.

2018 Proxy Statement    79  


  Compensation Committee Report

 

(2)

Annually each director, including Mr. Delie, is awarded shares of our common stock. Awards granted were valued at $50,000$75,000 rounded up or down to the nearest 100 shareswhole share at a price determined in accordance with the 2007FNB Incentive Plan. The shares were issued on May 17, 2017,13, 2020, after our Annual Meeting, with a fair market value of $13.45 per share. Prior to 2017, the value of the annual stock grants was $40,000 rounded up or down to the nearest 100 shares at a price determined in accordance with the 2007 Plan. In conjunction with the value increasing to $50,000 effective January 1, 2017, apro-rata issuance of 300 shares each was made on January 18, 2017, with a fair market value of $15.16$6.78 per share. Additionally, each director, including Mr. Delie, who completes a relevant educational program during the preceding calendar year is awarded $5,000 of our common stock, rounded up or down to the nearest 10 shareswhole share at a price determined in accordance with the 2007FNB Incentive Plan. These shares were issued on May 17, 2017,13, 2020, after our Annual Meeting, with a fair market value of $13.45$6.78 per share. Mr. Custer was elected asFinally, each director who attended a director effective March 11, 2017. At that time,Special Committee meeting during the Companypreceding calendar year is awarded him 500$500 per meeting of our common stock, rounded up or down to the nearest whole share at a price determined in accordance with the FNB Incentive Plan. These shares which represents apro-rated amount of the $50,000 annual award basedwere issued on the length of time remaining in the prior award period,May 13, 2020, after our Annual Meeting, with a fair market value of $15.97$6.78 per share. SeeAnnual Grant of Stock Awards for stock awards to directors that remained outstanding at December 31, 2017.2020.

 

(3)

Mr. Gurgovits is entitled to pension benefits under the RIP, the Excess Plan and the BRP. During 2017, he received $89,184 from the RIP; $123,744 from the Excess Plan and $312,528 from the BRP. Mr. Gurgovits also has a Deferred Compensation Agreement with FNBPA. The present value of the accumulated benefit under that agreement is calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 715,Compensation-Retirement Benefits, assuming an interest rate of 4.00% and assuming that payments commenced on January 1, 2014, and will continue for nine andone-half years. During 2017, Mr. Gurgovits received $43,262 under this agreement. The present value in the amount of $213,980 is reflected as an accrued liability in the financial statements of FNBPA as of December 31, 2017.

(4)

The valuation of all perquisites is at our actual cost. SEC rules require disclosure of the perquisites to any one director unless the amount of perquisites is less than $10,000 in the aggregate. There were no perquisites required to be disclosed for 2017.2020.

 

(5)

Mr. Custer became a director of the Company on March 11, 2017, in conjunction with its acquisition of Yadkin. Mr. Custer was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Yadkin. As a result of the merger, Mr. Custer was entitled to severance pay as follows: (i) $76,247, paid in a lump sum during 2017, (ii) $1,940,000, payable in equal installments over 24 months, of which $687,083 was paid during 2017, and (iii) up to $18,708 in COBRA continuation payments, payable in equal installments over 18 months, of which $8,834 was paid during 2017. Mr. Custer also realized $1,034,856 of taxable income in 2017 resulting from the vesting of restricted stock upon change in control of Yadkin. During 2017, the Company also paid Mr. Custer $12,677 in consulting fees under a Consulting Agreement, dated March 11, 2017, under which Mr. Custer’s duties as a consultant included the retention and recruitment of employees and meeting with customers. Mr. Custer resigned as a director and consultant, effective March 24, 2017; therefore, director compensation and consulting fees reflect partial year service. Additionally, no additional payments are due under the Consulting Agreement.

 

(6)

Mr. Nalbandian became a director of the Company on March 1, 2016, in conjunction with its acquisition of Metro Bancorp, Inc. (Metro). Mr. Nalbandian was the Chairman and the CEO of Metro. Mr. Nalbandian is entitled to disability, hospitalization and life insurance benefits for three years following his termination from Metro. Furthermore, Mr. Nalbandian is entitled to medical insurance coverage for himself and his dependents, if any, for his lifetime. If coverage is not possible under the Company’s medical plan, the Company shall reimburse him for the cost of such coverage. During 2017, the Company reimbursed him $574 to cover the cost of these benefits. Mr. Nalbandian resigned as a director of the Company on February 28, 2017. Therefore, compensation reflects partial year service.

  84    F.N.B. Corporation

Executive Director

The Company’s Executive Director, Mr. Delie, received compensation for his position with the Company. Such compensation is disclosed in the2017 Summary Compensation Table. Executive directors are entitled to receive an annual common stock award valued at $50,000 rounded up or down to the nearest 100 shares at a price determined in accordance with the 2007 Plan. As such, we awarded shares to Mr. Delie in May 2017 at the same time that we made the stock awards to all other directors. Prior to 2017, the value of the annual stock grants was $40,000 rounded up or down to the nearest 100 shares at a price determined in accordance

with the 2007 Plan. In conjunction with the value increasing to $50,000 effective January 1, 2017, apro-rata issuance of 300 shares was made to Mr. Delie in January 2017 at the same time we made this stock award to all other directors. Additionally, Executive Directors who complete a relevant educational program during the preceding calendar year are awarded $5,000 of our common stock, rounded up or down to the nearest 10 shares at a price determined in accordance with the 2007 Plan. As such, we awarded shares to Mr. Delie on May 17, 2017, with a fair market value of $13.45 per share. These stock awards are also reflected in the2017 Summary Compensation Table.

  80    F.N.B. Corporation


 

Compensation Committee Report  

 

 

Annual Board/Committee Retainer Fees

We pay our annual fees and fees for committee meetings to our directors on a retainer basis. We annualize the fees and pay them monthly. The current annual Board and committee fees are as follows:

 

 
Member Fee ($)Chairman Fee ($)

Member Fee ($)

Chairman Fee ($)

Board(1)

 

 

 

55,000

 

 

 

 

55,000

 

 

60,000

 

55,000

Audit Committee(2)

 12,500 25,000

 

15,000

 

32,500

Compensation Committee(2)

 10,000 20,000

 

10,000

 

20,000

Credit Risk and CRA Committee(2)

 7,500 10,000

 

10,000

 

25,000

Executive Committee(2)

 7,500 10,000

 

7,500

 

10,000

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee(2)

 7,500 17,500

 

7,500

 

17,500

Risk Committee(2)

 7,500 17,500

 

10,000

 

25,000

Special Ad Hoc Committee(2)(3)

 

500

 

500

 

 (1)

The Independent Lead Director is entitled to an additional fee of $16,000$55,000 per year.

 

 (2)

Committee chairs do not receive a member fee in addition to the chairman’s fee.

 

(3)

Members of the Special Ad Hoc Committee were paid for their July 2, 2019 meeting as part of their May 13, 2020 Director Stock Award. The Special Ad Hoc Committee did not meet in 2020.

For information regarding the number of full Board and committee meetings held during 2017,2020, see the section titledOur Board of Directors and Its Committees.under Corporate Governance. We reimbursed various directors for amounts the directors expended in traveling to our meetings and determined these amounts were consistent with our guidelines and thus are not included in the20172020 Director Compensation Table. table.

Annual Grant of Stock Awards

We awarded each director shares of stock under the Company’s 2007FNB Incentive Plan as detailed in the20172020 Director Compensation Table and theExecutive Director disclosuretable above. The stock awarded vested immediately without any restrictions. There were no outstanding director equity incentive awards as of December 31, 2017.2020.

Director Stock Ownership Requirement

Our Board believes that each director’s equity ownership in the Corporation should be aligned with the Corporation’s shareholders. Accordingly, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require each of our directors to have beneficial ownership of the lesser of 40,000 shares of Corporation common stock (or common stock equivalent) or $400,000 in value of the Corporation’s common stock (or common stock equivalent). The Corporation’s director stock ownership requirement is progressively phased in over a six-year period. As of December 31, 2020, each F.N.B. director is in compliance with the stock ownership requirement.

 

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    81  

2021 Proxy Statement    85  


 

  Proposal 2. Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation

 

 

PROPOSAL 2. ADVISORY RESOLUTION ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which was adopted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), we are asking shareholders to adopt an advisory resolution approving our executive compensation for our NEOs as reported in this proxy statement.

We have designed our executive compensation programs to support our long-term success. We believe that our performance-based executive compensation programs provide incentives that are aligned with the best interests of our shareholders and have helped to drive our performance.

In the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we describe in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives. Please read it in conjunction with the2017 Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative that provide detailed information on the compensation of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that the policies and procedures as set forth in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our NEOs reported in this proxy statement has supported and contributed to our success.

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which was adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act, we are asking shareholders to adopt an advisory resolution approving our executive compensation for our NEOs as reported in this proxy statement. We are pleased that in 2020 92 percent of our shareholders voted in favor of our advisory say-on-pay resolution.

We have designed our executive compensation programs to support our long-term success and believe our executive compensation programs, including our performance-based plans provide incentive compensation aligned with the best interests of our shareholders and have helped to drive our performance.

In the CD&A, we describe in more detail how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives. Please read it in conjunction with the 2020 Summary Compensation Table and related compensation tables and narrative that provide detailed information on the compensation of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that the policies and procedures as set forth in the CD&A are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our NEOs reported in this proxy statement has supported and contributed to our success.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”
THE ADOPTION OF AN
ADVISORY SAY-ON-PAY

RESOLUTION.

LOGO

 

  

 

Why You Should Approve Our 

Executive Compensation Program 

  
 

 

Our compensation philosophy is designed to attract and retain executive talent and emphasizes pay for performance, primarily through the creation of shareholder value. Our compensation program includes base salary, short-term annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation, retirement benefits and perquisites.

We believe our compensation programs and policies are appropriate and effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving our goals and are strongly aligned with long-term shareholder interests and worthy of continued shareholder support.

We believe the shareholders should consider the following information in determining whether to approve this proposal:

The Compensation Program is Highly Aligned with Shareholder Value

A significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation is directly linked to our performance and the creation of shareholder value, because a significant portion of the direct and total compensation is in the form of incentive compensation, including annual incentive compensation and a significant long-term incentive award. Our long-term awards are in the form of restricted stock unitsRSUs

PeUs and divided into a time vestedtime-vested portion and a performance portion. The performance portion for our most recent awards, which istwo-thirds 60% of the overall award, only vests at the conclusion of three years if all performance measures are met. We believe these long-term awards motivate our executives to achieve long-term performance and reward them for increases in total shareholder return.increases. Furthermore, we

do not award stock options, and only the Compensation Committee may approve equity grants.

Summary of Key Compensation Practices

We seek to align our compensation programs and practices with evolving governance best practices. The Compensation Committee has followedstrives to meet best practices with respect to executive compensation including the following:

 

We primarily use peer-based metrics in our incentive plans.

We target base compensation at peer medianto be competitive with peers and structure our compensation plans to increase compensation when our performance under various measures, including total shareholder return,TSR, is better than peers;peers.

  86    F.N.B. Corporation


  Proposal 2. Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation  

We do not maintain an active supplemental executive retirement plan.

 

Elimination of our supplemental executive retirement plan effective December 31, 2008;

No taxgross-up payments for executive perquisites;perquisites exist.

 

The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy that it will not approve any employment contracts that contain a taxgross-up;gross-up.

 

None of our most recent employment contracts provide for a single trigger parachute payment;payment.

 

No severance payments are made for “cause” terminations or resignations other than for good reason;reason.

 

No extraordinary relocation benefits;benefits are provided.

 

The short-term incentive plan contains maximum limits;limits.

 

We do not grant stock options or allow there-pricing or exchange of stock options;options.

 

  82    F.N.B. Corporation


Proposal 2. Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation  

Only the Compensation Committee may authorize equity grants;grants.

 

No payment of dividendsEarned dividend equivalents on unvested restricted stock units;RSUs are not paid until vesting.

 

Stock ownership guidelines are in place for our executive officers and directors;directors.

 

We conduct an annual robust risk assessment of alleach of our compensation programs, including the executive annual incentive program and long-term incentive program;program.

 

We maintain a compensation recoupment or “clawback” policy; andpolicy.

 

We maintain a prohibition on executive officers and directors engaging in hedging transactions using Company common stock or common stock equivalents.

Our Compensation Program Has Appropriate Long-Term Orientation

Our compensation programs and policies have a long-term focus:

 

We encourage our executives to maintain a long-term focus by using a three-year performance period and vesting schedule for long-term Performance-Based Awards and Service-Based Awards;Awards.

 

Our long-term incentive planLTIP is based upon total shareholder returnperformance metrics, ROATCE*, ICG Growth* and in addition, going forward, we have added a second financial performance metric, ROATA; andTSR.

 

We have robust stock ownership requirements for executive officers and directors, to ensure thatso our executive officers and directors have a substantial personal stake in our long-term success.

officers and directors have a meaningful personal stake in our long-term success.

Our Compensation Committee Stays Current on Best Practices

We regularly update our Compensation Committee on compensation best practices and trends. In addition, the Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to provide advice on compensation trends and market information to assist the Compensation Committee in designing our compensation programs and making compensation decisions.

The Compensation Committee directly engaged an independent compensation consultantsconsultant that reported directly to the Compensation Committee and had no prior relationship with our CEO or any other NEO. Our

directors are elected annually and meet without management present as a Compensation Committee and Board when necessary. The Compensation Committee maintains a charter and reviews its provisions annually. All committee charters and our Code of Conduct are posted on our website.website (see Key Corporate Governance Documents).

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which was adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act, we are asking shareholders to adopt an advisory resolution approving our executive compensation for NEOs, as reported in this Proxy Statement.proxy statement.

We submitted an advisory resolution to approve 20162019 executive compensation to our shareholders at our 20172020 Annual Meeting. Shareholders owning more than 96%approximately 92% of the shares for which votes were cast regarding the advisory resolution on executive compensation approved the compensation of our NEOs as stated in our 2017 proxy statement.2020 Proxy Statement. Additionally, at our 2017 Annual Meeting, our shareholders supported an annual advisory vote frequency and asfrequency. As a result, the Committee and the Board are again submitting for the vote of shareholders an advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our NEOs and will include this shareholder advisory vote annually until our shareholder vote at a future meeting recommends a change based upon how frequently we conduct a“say-on-pay”Say-on-Pay vote.

Following the last shareholder vote on executive compensation, the Committee considered the results of the advisory vote in determining compensation policies and decisions. The advisory vote reaffirms ourpay-for-performance philosophy, and the Committee

2021 Proxy Statement    87  


  Proposal 2. Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation  

will continue to use this philosophy and past practices in determining future compensation decisions.

We are asking shareholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the 20182021 Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of F.N.B. Corporation (the Company) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers listed in the20172020 Summary Compensation Table included in the proxy statement for this meeting, as such compensation is disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K in this proxy statement under the Section entitledExecutive Compensation and Other Proxy Disclosure, including theCompensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and other narrative and other executive compensation disclosures set forth under that section.”

2018 Proxy Statement    83  


  Proposal 2. Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation

This advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs, commonly referred to as asay-on-pay”Say-on-Pay” vote, gives shareholders another mechanism to convey their views about our compensation programs and policies. Althoughnon-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will carefully review and consider the voting results when evaluating our executive compensation

programs. The Board has determined to provide shareholders with an annual advisory vote on executive compensation at each Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Accordingly, the next annual advisory vote on executive compensation will be provided at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2019.2022.

 

 

  88    F.N.B. Corporation


Proposal 3. Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as                        

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 2 TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (PROPOSAL 2 ON THE PROXY CARD).

PROPOSAL 3. PROPOSAL TO RATIFYRATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS F.N.B.’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2021

 

The Audit Committee selected Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit the books of the Company and its subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, 2018, to report on our internal controls and our consolidated statement of financial position and related statements of income of us and our subsidiaries, and to perform such other appropriate accounting services as our Board may require. Ernst & Young LLP has advised us that they are independent accountants with respect to us, within the meaning of standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Independence Standards Board and federal securities laws administered by the SEC. In the event a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, we anticipate that we would make no change in our independent

registered public accounting firm for the current year because of the difficulty and expense of making any change so long after the beginning of the current year, but that vote would be considered when we consider the appointment of auditors for 2019.

The Audit Committee selected Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit the books of the Company and its subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, 2021, to report on our internal controls and our consolidated statement of financial position and related statements of income of us and our subsidiaries, and to perform such other appropriate accounting services as our Board may require. Ernst & Young LLP has advised us that they are independent accountants with respect to us, within the meaning of standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Independence Standards Board and federal securities laws administered by the SEC. In the event a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, we anticipate that we would make no change in our independent registered public accounting firm for the current year because of the difficulty and expense of making any change so long after the beginning of the current year, but that vote would be considered when we consider the appointment of auditors for 2022.









THE BOARD
RECOMMENDS THAT YOU
VOTE “FOR” RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS
ITS INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
FOR 2021

LOGO









Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. We expect that a representative of Ernst & Young LLP will attend our Annual Meeting, be available to respond to appropriate questions and, if the representative desires, which we do not anticipate, make a statement.

The discussion underAudit andNon-Audit Fees describes the aggregate fees for professional services provided by Ernst & Young LLP to us for the calendar years 20162019 and 2017.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 3 THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2018 (PROPOSAL 3 ON THE PROXY CARD).2020.

 

 

  84    2021 Proxy StatementF.N.B. Corporation    89  


 

Report of  Audit Committee Report

 

 

REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

To Our Shareholders:

The Audit Committee oversees the Corporation’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal control. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, its independent registered public accounting firm who is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, the matters we and Ernst & Young LLP must discuss pursuant to Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, including Ernst & Young LLP’s judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Corporation’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards.by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC.

The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from management and the Corporation, including the matters in the required written disclosures. The Audit Committee has

considered whether the provision ofnon-audit services by Ernst & Young LLP is compatible with maintaining its independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Corporation’s internal auditors and Ernst & Young LLP the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal auditors and Ernst & Young LLP, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on2020 Form10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2017, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

Respectfully submitted,

Frank C. Mencini, Chair

Pamela A. Bena

Mary Jo Dively

David J. Malone

D. Stephen Martz

David L. Motley

Heidi A. Nicholas

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement  90    F.N.B. Corporation    85  


 

  Audit andNon-Audit Fees

 

 

AUDIT ANDNON-AUDIT FEES

Ernst & Young LLP served as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017,2020, and 2016.2019. The Company has been advised by such firm that none of its members or any of its associates has any direct financial interest or material indirect financial interest in the Corporation or its subsidiaries.

Fees andout-of-pocket expenses billed by Ernst & Young LLP for professional services during 20172020 and 20162019 were as follows:

 

   Audit     Audit-Related   Tax   All Other 

2017

  $2,000,689      $0           $323,693   $1,995 

2016

  $1,685,542      $0           $303,526   $121,995 
    
    

Audit   

     

Audit-Related

   

Tax 

   

All Other

 

2020

  

$

2,187,985  

 

    

 

$85,000   

 

  

$

432,397 

 

  

 

$3,600

 

2019

  

$

2,262,973  

 

    

 

$79,000   

 

  

$

535,779 

 

  

 

$7,200

 

                       

 

Audit Fees relate to the audit of the Corporation’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, review of the financial statements included in the Corporation’s Reports on Forms10-Q and10-K and other SEC filings, services provided in connection with regulatory filings including registration statements filed with the SEC, and accounting consultations related to the audit.

Audit-Related Fees relate to mergerService and acquisition consultation services.Organizations Controls (SOC) report and custody exam work.

Tax Fees relate to tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice services.

All Other Fees relate to subscriptions for Ernst & Young’sweb-based accounting and auditing research library.library and for FDIC assessment advisory services.

 

 

  

 

Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy 

  
 

 

The Audit Committee mustpre-approve the audit andnon-audit services the independent registered public accounting firm will perform in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. The Audit Committee annually reviews andpre-approves the services that the independent registered public accounting firm may provide. The Audit Committee will revise the list ofpre-approved services from time to time, based on subsequent determinations. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities topre-approve services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm to management, but may delegatepre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member or members to whom the Audit Committee delegates such authority must report anypre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee annually establishespre-approval fee levels for all services the independent registered public accounting firm may provide. Any proposed services exceeding these levels require specificpre-approval.

The annual audit services engagement terms and fees are subject to thepre-approval of the Audit Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee may grantpre-approval for other audit services, including statutory audits or financial audits for our subsidiaries or our

or our affiliates and services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC.

Our Audit Committee must alsopre-approve audit-related services. Audit-related services include, among others, due diligence services pertaining to potential business acquisitions/dispositions, accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as “Audit”“audit” services, assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities, financial audits of employee benefit plans, agreed upon or expanded audit procedures related to accounting and/or billing records required to respond to or comply with financial, accounting or regulatory reporting matters and assistance with internal control reporting requirements. Tax services include tax compliance, tax planning and tax advisory services.

Our Audit Committee may grantpre-approval to those permissiblenon-audit services classified as “All Other” services that it believes are routine and recurring services and when suchpre-approval would not impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firms.

 

 

 

  86    F.N.B. Corporation

2021 Proxy Statement    91  


 

  About Our Annual Meeting-Frequently Asked Questions  

About Our Annual Meeting-Frequently Asked Questions

GENERAL

When and where is our Annual Meeting?

We will hold our Annual Meeting of Shareholders at 8:30 AM, Eastern Time, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021. This year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held in a virtual format through a live webcast. We will provide the webcast of the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FNB21.

Why is F.N.B. holding its Annual Meeting virtually?

The Board believes that, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, holding the Annual Meeting in a virtual format permits us to protect the health and well-being of our shareholders, employees, customers and communities. The Board intends that the virtual meeting format provides shareholders with a level of transparency as close as possible to the traditional in-person meeting format and will take the following steps to create such an experience:

Providing shareholders with the ability to submit appropriate questions in advance of the meeting to allow thoughtful responses from management and the Board;

Providing shareholders with the ability to submit appropriate questions in real-time via the meeting website;

Answering as many questions as possible submitted in accordance with the meeting rules of conduct in the time allotted for the meeting;

Publishing a replay of virtual meeting on our website promptly following the conclusion of the meeting; and

Offering separate engagement opportunities with shareholders after the meeting on appropriate matters of governance or other relevant topics.

Who can attend our Annual Meeting?

All shareholders as of the close of business on March 5, 2021 (the record date), or their duly appointed proxies, may virtually attend our Annual Meeting. Even if you currently plan to attend our Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote in advance of the meeting by any of the applicable methods described in the response to the question, “How do I vote?” so that your vote will be counted at our Annual Meeting if you later are unable attend.

What are the requirements for admittance to the Annual Meeting?

You are only entitled to attend the virtual Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder of record as of the record date for the meeting or you hold a valid proxy for the meeting. While it is not necessary for you to attend the meeting in order to vote your shares, you may attend the virtual meeting and submit a question during the meeting by visiting the website listed above and using your 16-digit control number included on your proxy card, notice of internet availability of proxy materials or voting instructions. Once admitted, you may submit questions, vote, or view our list of shareholders during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions that will be available on the meeting website. Shareholders should refer to the Rules of Conduct and Procedures that will be posted on the meeting website

During the meeting, you will participate in an audio webcast as a “listen only” participant. Shareholders may submit written questions either in advance of or while participating in the meeting, using the virtual meeting website. The meeting will start at 8:30 A.M., Eastern Time, on Tuesday May 11, 2021. We encourage you to access the meeting website prior to the start time. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check in or meeting time, please contact the technical support number that will be posted on the website log-in page. We will follow established meeting rules and procedures which afford the same treatment to all participating shareholders. Additionally, we will use software that verifies the identity of each participating shareholder and ensures that they are granted the same access rights as they would have at an in-person meeting.

What is a proxy?

Your proxy gives us authority to vote your shares and tells us how to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment. Three of our employees, who are called “proxy holders” (or “proxies” for short) and are named on the proxy card, will vote your shares at the Annual Meeting according to the instructions you give on the proxy card.

  92    F.N.B. Corporation


About Our Annual Meeting-Frequently Asked Questions                        

Why are you soliciting a proxy from me?

Our Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to make sure that your vote is properly submitted and received on time, and to improve the efficiency of the Annual Meeting. We may ask for, or solicit, proxies using several methods.

We may solicit proxies by mail, personal interviews, telephone or fax. We may also use the Internet to solicit proxies. F.N.B. officers or employees may solicit proxies but will not receive any special compensation for doing so. We have engaged the firm of Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC to assist us with soliciting proxies.

What is included in our proxy materials?

Our proxy materials, which are available on our website (see Resources — Proxy Materials), include:

i

Our Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

ii

Our 2021 Proxy Statement;

iii

Our 2020 Annual Report and 2020 Form 10-K; and

iv

Our 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report.

If you received printed versions of these materials by mail (rather than through electronic delivery), the materials also included a proxy card or voting instruction form. For further information, see Information about Paper and Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials below.

What will our shareholders vote on at our Annual Meeting?

Our shareholders will vote on each of the following proposals which our Board recommends you vote “FOR,” at our Annual Meeting:

Proposal 1. Election of the 12 nominees for directors named in this proxy statement, each to serve for a term of one year and until the election of their successors;

Proposal 2. Adoption of an advisory resolution to approve the 2020 compensation of our named executive officers;

Proposal 3. Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021; and

Any other business that may come before our Annual Meeting in compliance with the advance notice and other applicable provisions of our bylaws

(described in the Shareholder Proposals discussion in this Proxy Statement).

VOTING AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Who can vote at our Annual Meeting?

Our Board has set March 5, 2021, as the record date for our Annual Meeting. Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at our Annual Meeting and any adjournment of our Annual Meeting.

What constitutes a quorum in order to conduct the Annual Meeting?

On our March 5, 2021 record date, we had 320,533,058 shares of our common stock outstanding, which are eligible to be voted. Under Pennsylvania law, we must have a quorum before we can consider proposals at our Annual Meeting. A quorum is the number of shares that must be present at the meeting. In determining if a quorum exists, we count the number of shares represented by shareholders virtually, as well as the number of shares represented by proxies. If you return a signed and dated proxy card, vote by Internet, vote by our QR Code feature, vote by telephone or vote virtually at our Annual Meeting, you will be considered present for purposes of establishing a quorum.

To have a quorum, we need the presence of shareholders or their proxies who are entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast. Although a quorum may be achieved, not all proposals will be subject to the same voting or approval requirement. We discuss the vote required to approve each proposal below.

Shareholders who hold their shares in an account at a bank or brokerage firm (street name) may need to take additional precautions to ensure that their vote counts.

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?

Shareholder of Record: If your shares of F.N.B. common stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Broadridge Financial Solutions (Broadridge), you are considered a “shareholder of record” of those shares.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name: If your shares are held in an account at a bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar

2021 Proxy Statement    93  


  About Our Annual Meeting-Frequently Asked Questions

organization, then you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name. In that case, you will have received these proxy materials, as well as a voting instruction form, from the organization holding your shares and, as a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the organization as to how to vote them. Most individual shareholders are beneficial owners of shares held in street name.

How do I vote?

You can vote by proxy whether or not you attend our Annual Meeting virtually. When you or your authorized attorney-in-fact grants us your proxy, you authorize us to vote your shares of our common stock in the manner you specify on your proxy card. Giving a proxy allows your shares to be voted at our Annual Meeting even if you do not attend the Annual Meeting virtually. If your shares are held in street name, you will receive a separate card from your bank or brokerage firm with instructions about the manner in which you may vote your shares.

If you hold your shares directly, to vote by proxy you must do one of the following:

Vote by mail.(6) Complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided (the envelope requires no postage if mailed in the U.S.) or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

Vote during the virtual Annual Meeting. If you are a registered shareholder and attend our virtual Annual Meeting, to be admitted to the virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FNB21, you must enter the 16-digit control number found next to the label “Control Number” on your notice of internet availability, proxy card, or voting instruction form, or in the email sending you the Proxy Statement. Even if you returned a proxy to us before our virtual Annual Meeting, you may revoke it and vote during the virtual Annual Meeting.

Vote by Internet(6) at www.proxyvote.com. Instructions are provided on your proxy card. If you vote by Internet, you should not return your proxy card.

Vote by QR Code(6) by scanning the QR Code on your proxy card with your mobile device. If you vote by QR Code, you should not return your proxy card.

Vote by telephone(6) at 1-800-690-6903. Instructions are provided on your proxy card. If you vote by telephone, you should not return your proxy card.

(6) Proxies voted by mail, by Internet, by QR Code or by telephone must be received by 11:59 PM EDT, on May 10, 2021, in order to be counted in the vote.

If you hold your F.N.B. shares in an account at a bank or brokerage firm, and you want to vote virtually at our Annual Meeting, you will need to obtain a signed proxy card from the brokerage firm or the bank that holds your F.N.B. stock. If your F.N.B. stock is registered in the name of a bank or brokerage firm, you may be eligible to vote your shares electronically by Internet, by the QR Code on your proxy card and/or notice card, or by telephone. Many banks and brokerage firms participate in programs such as the Broadridge online program. These programs provide eligible shareholders who receive a paper copy of this proxy statement the opportunity to vote by the Internet, by QR Code or by telephone. If your bank or brokerage firm is participating in one of these programs, your proxy card will contain instructions for voting by Internet, by QR Code or by telephone. If your proxy card does not reference Internet, QR Code or telephone information, please complete and return the proxy card in the enclosed self-addressed, postage-paid envelope.

How will my shares be voted if I do not give specific voting instructions?

If you sign, date and return your proxy card, but do not provide voting instructions, or if you do not provide voting instructions when voting over the Internet, we will vote your shares represented by that proxy as recommended by our Board of Directors, and this vote will count as a vote cast.

Can I change my vote after I voted?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before it is voted at our Annual Meeting. You may change your vote by delivering a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Suite 503, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, by signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date, by voting by the Internet, by scanning the QR Code on your proxy card with your mobile device at a later date, by telephone, or by attending the virtual Annual Meeting and voting online. Only your latest instruction will be counted; however, your attendance at our virtual Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at our Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering a written notice of revocation prior to our Annual Meeting to our Corporate Secretary at F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Suite 503, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212.

  94    F.N.B. Corporation


About Our Annual Meeting-Frequently Asked Questions                        

If my shares are held in “street name,” which proposals are considered “routine” or “non-routine” in connection with broker discretionary voting of my shares?

Please ensure that you instruct your bank or brokerage firm how to vote your shares. Under NYSE rules applicable to brokers, your broker has discretionary authority to vote your shares without receiving your instructions on “routine” matters. The only routine matter before our Annual Meeting will be the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2021. All of the other proposals that will be considered at our Annual Meeting are “non-routine” matters. Your bank or brokerage firm does not have discretionary authority to vote on a non-routine matter unless you provide them with your voting instructions. The inability of your bank or brokerage firm to vote on a matter absent direction from you (while using its discretionary authority to vote on routine matters) is known as a “broker non-vote” on the non-routine matter. Therefore, in order to have your vote counted, please ensure that you instruct your bank or brokerage firm how to vote your shares with respect to the election of our directors, the advisory resolution to approve the 2020 compensation of our named executive officers and the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.

If I am a participant in the 401(k) Savings Plan, how do I vote the shares held in the plan?

If you participate in the F.N.B. Corporation Progress Savings 401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan), you may vote the number of shares of common stock credited to your account as of the record date. You may vote by instructing T. Rowe Price, the trustee of our 401(k) Plan, pursuant to the voting instruction card being mailed with this proxy statement to plan participants. The trustee will vote your shares in accordance with your duly executed voting instruction card, provided that the trustee receives it by 3:00 AM, Eastern Time, on Friday, May 7, 2021.

In the case of the 401(k) Plan, if you do not return your voting instruction card, the shares credited to your plan account will be voted by the trustee in the same proportion that it votes the shares for which it timely received voting instruction cards.

You may also revoke a previously given proxy card until 3:00 AM, Eastern Time, on Friday, May 7, 2021, by filing with the trustee either a written notice of revocation or a properly completed and signed voting instruction card or Internet vote, telephone vote or scanned QR code vote having a later date.

What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?

In general, for a proposal to be approved, it requires a majority of the votes “cast” on the matter. Votes “cast” are votes “for” or “against” the proposal. If you abstain from voting, it will not count as a vote “cast.” Please see the summaries below for more specific information about how proposals are approved and how abstentions will be counted with respect to each proposal. With respect to Proposals 2 and 3, if you desire to abstain, you must check the “Abstain” box on your proxy card or select the appropriate option when voting by the Internet, by QR Code or by telephone.

PROPOSAL 1:    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our bylaws provide that in the circumstance of an uncontested director election, which is the case for this year’s director election, our directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at our Annual Meeting. Our Articles of Incorporation do not authorize cumulative voting for the election of directors. To receive a majority of votes cast means that the shares voted for a director’s election exceed the number of votes withheld. Our bylaws provide that any incumbent director who does not receive a majority of votes cast will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board. Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board shall determine whether to accept the resignation. If there is a contested election (which is not the case in 2021), directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast at the meeting.

PROPOSAL 2.    SAY-ON-PAY ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

A majority of the votes cast will be required to approve the advisory vote on 2020 executive compensation. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board or the Corporation. This matter is considered a non-routine matter and, as a result, there may be broker non-votes (see description of broker non-votes in the next section, below).

PROPOSAL 3.    RATIFICATION OF AUDITOR

A majority of the votes cast will be required to approve the ratification of our Audit Committee’s selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021. This matter is considered a routine item, and brokers have the discretion to vote uninstructed shares on behalf of clients.

2021 Proxy Statement    95  


  About Our Annual Meeting-Frequently Asked Questions

OTHER MATTERS REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF THE ANNUAL MEETING

Impact of Broker Non-Votes or Abstentions

With respect to Proposals 1, 2 and 3, any broker non-votes or abstentions will not be included in the total votes cast and will not affect the results of the voting on these proposals.

Is my vote confidential?

We process proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders in a manner that protects your voting privacy. We will not disclose your vote either within the Company or to third parties, except:

As necessary to meet applicable legal requirements;

To allow for the tabulation and certification of votes; and

To facilitate a successful proxy solicitation.

Could other matters be decided at the 2021 Annual Meeting?

We do not know of any matters that will be considered at the Annual Meeting other than those described above. If a shareholder proposal that was properly excluded from this proxy statement or is otherwise not properly presented at the meeting is nevertheless brought before the meeting, the Chairman will declare such a proposal out of order, and it will be disregarded. If any other matters arise at the Annual Meeting that are properly presented at the meeting, the proxies will be voted at the discretion of the proxy holders.

What happens if the meeting is postponed or adjourned?

Your proxy will still be good and may be voted at the postponed or adjourned meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.

Who counts the votes cast at our annual meeting?

Judges of Election, who will be F.N.B. employees approved by the F.N.B. Board of Directors, will tabulate the votes cast at our Annual Meeting, and Broadridge will act as the independent inspector of election.

Where can I find the voting results of our Annual Meeting?

We will announce the preliminary voting results at our Annual Meeting. The judges of election will tally the final voting results, and we will include the final voting

results in a Form 8-K, which we will file with the SEC by May 14, 2021.

Who is paying the costs of this proxy solicitation?

The Company is paying the costs of the solicitation of proxies. The Company has retained Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC to assist in obtaining proxies by mail, facsimile or email from registered holders, brokerage firms, bank nominees and other institutions for the Annual Meeting. The estimated cost of such service is $8,000 including out-of-pocket expenses. Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC may be contacted at 888-742-1305.

The Company will also reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares held in street name for their reasonable costs associated with:

Forwarding the Notice of our Annual Meeting to beneficial owners.

Forwarding printed proxy materials by mail to beneficial owners who specifically request them.

Obtaining beneficial owners’ voting instructions.

In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, certain of our directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies on our behalf personally or by telephone, facsimile or email.

INFORMATION ABOUT PAPER AND ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS

How do I sign up for electronic delivery of proxy materials?

This proxy statement, our 2020 Annual Report, 2020 Form 10-K and 2021 Corporate Responsibility Report are available on our website (see Resources — Proxy Materials). We encourage our shareholders to voluntarily elect to receive future proxy materials electronically. If you would like to help reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meetings and our costs of printing and mailing future materials, you can agree to access these documents over the Internet rather than receiving printed copies in the mail. For your convenience, you may find links to sign up for electronic delivery for both shareholders of record and beneficial owners who hold in street name at www.proxyvote.com. You may also scan the QR code on your proxy card to vote using your mobile device, sign up for e-delivery and download the Annual Meeting materials.

  96    F.N.B. Corporation


About Our Annual Meeting-Frequently Asked Questions                        

How can I avoid receiving more than one set of proxy materials in future years?

If two or more registered shareholders live in your household or if a registered shareholder maintains two or more shareholder accounts, you may have received more than one set of our proxy materials. At your request, we will “household” your proxy materials (i.e., only one annual report and one proxy statement will be delivered to your address); however, a separate proxy card will be delivered for each account. On the proxy card, there will be a householding election where you

will indicate if you consent to receive your proxy materials in a single package per household. Please refer to the section titled, Householding of Proxy Materials at the end of this proxy statement.

Who can answer my questions?

Should you have questions concerning these proxy materials or our Annual Meeting or should you wish to request additional copies of this proxy statement or proxy card, you may contact our Corporate Secretary at (724) 983-3435.

2021 Proxy Statement    97  


Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 20192022 Annual Meeting  

 

 

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS

FOR THE 20192022 ANNUAL MEETING

 

  

 

SEC Rule 14a-8 

  
 

 

If you are a shareholder who would like us to include your proposal in our notice of the 20192022 Annual Meeting and related proxy materials, you must follow SEC Rule14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In submitting your proposal, our Corporate Secretary must receive your proposal, in writing, at our principal

executive offices at One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, no later than December 1, 2018.November 26, 2021. If you do not follow SEC Rule14a-8, we will not consider your proposal for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement.

 

 

  

 

Advance Notice Requirements Under Our Bylaws 

  
 

 

Pursuant to Article I, Section 1.11 of our bylaws, a shareholder who wishes to nominate an individual for election to the Board of Directors directly at an Annual Meeting, or to propose any business to be considered at an Annual Meeting, must deliver advance notice of such nomination or business to our Corporate Secretary. The notice must be delivered in person, by first-class United StatesU.S. mail postage prepaid or by reputable overnight delivery service to the attention of our Corporate Secretary, at our principal executive offices at F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212 during the period commencing at the close of business on December 1, 2018,November 26, 2021, and ending at the close of business on January 1, 2019.December 26, 2021. The shareholder must be a shareholder of record as of the date the notice is delivered and at the time of the Annual Meeting and must be entitled to vote at the meeting. The notice must be in writing and contain the information specified in our bylaws for a director nomination or other business. The notice must contain certain information about the proposal or nominee, as applicable, which is generally equivalent to the information that would be required to be disclosed

be disclosed under the proxy rules of the SEC if proxies were solicited for shareholder consideration of the matter at a meeting of shareholders, as well as certain information about the shareholder who is making the proposal or nomination. Nominees also will be required to submit a completed and signed questionnaire. The questionnaire will be provided by our Corporate Secretary upon request and is similar to the annual questionnaire completed by all of our directors regarding their background, experience and independence.

Only shareholder proposals and nominations submitted in accordance with the Company bylaw provisions will be eligible for presentation at our 20192022 Annual Meeting, and any other matter not submitted to our Board in accordance with such provisions will not be considered or acted upon at our 20192022 Annual Meeting. The Board Chairman is authorized to determine whether a nomination or proposal was made in accordance with our bylaws and to declare that a defective nomination or proposal be disregarded.

 

 

 

2018 Proxy Statement    87  

  98    F.N.B. Corporation


 

  Other Matters

 

 

OTHER MATTERS

 

As of March 30, 2018,5, 2021, our Board does not know of any other matter to be presented for consideration at our Annual Meeting other than the matters described above. However, if any other matter is presented in conformance with our bylaws, proxies in the enclosed

form returned to us will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of our Board or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the individuals designated as proxies.

 

 

  

 

  “Householding”Householding of Proxy Materials.Materials 

  
 

 

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy materials with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single annual report, proxy statement or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially provides extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies. We, and some brokers who household proxy materials, may deliver a single copy of these proxy materials to multiple shareholders who share the same address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your broker or us that they or we will be

householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate copy of the proxy materials, or if you are receiving multiple copies of the proxy materials and wish to receive only one, please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account, or us if you hold registered shares. You can notify us by sending a written request to: Shareholder Services, F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, or by calling our Transfer Agent representative at844-877-8750. Upon written or oral request to us or our Transfer Agent representative, a separate copy of our proxy materials will promptly be sent to you.

 

 

  

 

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials 

  
 

 

You can also access our proxy statement,2021 Proxy Statement, 2020 Annual Report, 2020 Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and our Annual2021 Corporate Responsibility Report to shareholders, by Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com.

For our 20192021 Annual Meeting, you can help us save significant printing and mailing expenses by consenting to access our proxy materials and Annual Report electronically by the Internet. If you hold your shares in your own name (instead of street name through a bank, broker or other nominee), you can choose this option by appropriately marking the box on your proxy card denoting your consent to electronic access or, if voting by telephone at800-690-6903, following the prompts for consenting to electronic access, or following the instructions at the Internet voting website at http://www.proxyvote.com which has been established for you to vote your shares for the meeting. If you choose to receive your proxy materials and Annual

Report electronically, then prior to next year’s Annual Meeting you will receive notification when the proxy materials and Annual Report are available for review by the Internet, as well as the instructions for voting electronically by the Internet. Your choice for electronic distribution will remain in effect until you revoke it by sending a written request to: Shareholder

Services, F.N.B. Corporation, One North Shore Center, 12 Federal Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212. If you hold your shares in street name through a bank, broker or other nominee, you should follow the instructions provided by that entity if you wish to access our proxy materials electronically by the Internet.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

LOGO

James G. Orie

Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary

March 30, 201826, 2021

 

 

 

2021 Proxy Statement    99  


                         Resources

  88    F.N.B. CorporationRESOURCES

Proxy Materials

DocumentWebsite

2021 Proxy Statement

https://fnb-online.com/2021proxystatement

2020 Annual Report

https://www.fnb-online.com/2020annualreport

2020 Form 10-K

https://www.fnb-online.com/2020form10k

2021 Corporate Responsibility Report

https://www.fnb-online.com/ 2021corporateresponsibilityreport

Company Information

DocumentWebsite

Company Website

https://www.fnb-online.com

Company Profile

https://www.fnb-online.com/about-us/corporate-
information/corporate-overview

Our Leadership

https://www.fnb-online.com/about-us/corporate-
information/leadership-team

Press Releases

https://www.fnb-online.com/about-us/newsroom/press-
releases

SEC Filings

https://www.fnb-online.com/about-us/investor-
information/reports-and-filings

  100    F.N.B. Corporation


Annex A (Non-GAAP to GAAP Reconciliations)  

ANNEX A (NON-GAAP TO GAAP RECONCILIATIONS)

The information below is provided to reconcile to GAAP those financial metrics included in this Proxy Statement that are non-GAAP financial metrics. The reconciliations of non-GAAP operating measures and key performance indicators discussed in this Proxy Statement to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the following tables.

Operating Net Income Available to Common Shareholders

   
  Year Ended December 31 2020  2019  2018 
   

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Net income available to common shareholders

 $277,965 $379,208 $364,817
   

COVID-19 expense

  11,276      
   

Tax benefit of COVID-19 expense

  (2,368      
   

Discretionary 401(k) contribution

        874
   

Tax benefit of discretionary 401(k) contribution

        (184
   

Gain on sale of Visa class B stock

  (13,818      
   

Tax expense of gain on sale of Visa class B stock

  2,902      
   

Loss on FHLB debt extinguishment and related hedge terminations

  25,611      
   

Tax benefit of loss on FHLB debt extinguishment and related hedge terminations

  (5,378      
   

Gain on sale of subsidiary

        (5,135
   

Tax expense of gain on sale of subsidiary

        1,078
   

Branch consolidation costs

  18,745  4,505  6,616
   

Tax benefit of branch consolidation costs

  (3,936  (946  (1,389
   

Service charge refunds

  3,780  4,279   
   

Tax benefit of service charge refunds

  (794  (899   
   

Operating net income available to common shareholders (non-GAAP)

  313,985  386,147  366,677
   

Preferred stock dividends

  8,041  8,041  8,041
   

Operating net income (non-GAAP)

 $322,026 $394,188 $374,718

2021 Proxy Statement    A - 1  


                         Annex A (Non-GAAP to GAAP Reconciliations)

Operating Earnings per Diluted Common Share

   
  Year Ended December 31 2020  2019  2018 
   

Net income per diluted common share

 

$

0.85

 

$

1.16

 

$

1.12

   

COVID-19 expense

 

 

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Tax benefit of COVID-19 expense

 

 

(0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Discretionary 401(k) contribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Tax benefit of discretionary 401(k) contribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Gain on sale of Visa class B stock

 

 

(0.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Tax expense of gain on sale of Visa class B stock

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Loss on FHLB debt extinguishment and related hedge terminations

 

 

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Tax benefit of loss on FHLB debt extinguishment and related hedge terminations

 

 

(0.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Gain on sale of subsidiary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.01

   

Tax expense of gain on sale of subsidiary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.01

   

Branch consolidation costs

 

 

0.06

 

 

0.01

 

 

0.02

   

Tax benefit of branch consolidation costs

 

 

(0.01

 

 

 

 

 

(0.01

   

Service charge refunds

 

 

0.01

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

   

Tax benefit of service charge refunds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Operating earnings per diluted common share (non-GAAP)

 

$

0.96

 

$

1.18

 

$

1.13

Tangible Book Value per Common Share

   
  December 31 2020  2019  2018 
   

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Total shareholders’ equity

 $4,958,903 $4,883,198 $4,608,285
   

Less: Preferred shareholders’ equity

  (106,882  (106,882  (106,882
   

Less: Intangible assets(1)

  (2,316,527  (2,329,545  (2,333,375
   

Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

 $2,535,494 $2,446,771 $2,168,028
   

Ending common shares outstanding (000’s)

  321,630  325,015  324,315
   

Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP)

 $7.88 $7.53 $6.68

(1)

Excludes loan servicing rights.

  A - 2    F.N.B. Corporation


Annex A (Non-GAAP to GAAP Reconciliations)  

Return on Average Tangible Common Equity

   
  Year Ended December 31  2020  2019  2018 
   

(dollars in thousands)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Net income available to common shareholders

  

$

277,965

 

$

379,208

 

$

364,817

   

Amortization of intangibles, net of tax

  

 

10,556

 

 

11,192

 

 

12,365

   

Tangible net income available to common shareholders (non-GAAP)

  

$

288,521

 

$

390,400

 

$

377,182

   

Average total shareholders’ equity

  

$

4,904,300

 

$

4,757,465

 

$

4,490,833

   

Less: Average preferred shareholders’ equity

  

 

(106,882

 

 

(106,882

 

 

(106,882

   

Less: Average intangible assets(1)

  

 

(2,322,981

 

 

(2,331,630

 

 

(2,334,727

   

Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

  

$

2,474,437

 

$

2,318,953

 

$

2,049,224

   

Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

  

 

11.66

 

 

16.84

 

 

18.41

(1)

Excludes loan servicing rights.

Operating Return on Average Tangible Common Equity

   
  Year Ended December 31  2020  2019  2018 
   

(dollars in thousands)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Operating net income available to common shareholders

  

$

313,985

 

$

386,147

 

$

366,677

   

Amortization of intangibles, net of tax

  

 

10,556

 

 

11,192

 

 

12,365

   

Tangible operating net income available to common shareholders (non-GAAP)

  

$

324,541

 

$

397,339

 

$

379,042

   

Average total shareholders’ equity

  

$

4,904,300

 

$

4,757,465

 

$

4,490,833

   

Less: Average preferred shareholders’ equity

  

 

(106,882

 

 

(106,882

 

 

(106,882

   

Less: Average intangible assets(1)

  

 

(2,322,981

 

 

(2,331,630

 

 

(2,334,727

   

Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

  

$

2,474,437

 

$

2,318,953

 

$

2,049,224

   

Operating return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

  

 

13.12

 

 

17.13

 

 

18.50

(1)

Excludes loan servicing rights.

2021 Proxy Statement    A - 3  


                         Annex A (Non-GAAP to GAAP Reconciliations)

Efficiency Ratio

 

  Year Ended December 31

  

2020

 
 

(dollars in thousands)

  

 

 

 

 

Non-interest expense

  

$

750,349

 

Less: Amortization of intangibles

  

 

(13,362

 

Less: OREO expense

  

 

(4,434

 

Less: COVID-19 costs

  

 

(11,276

 

Less: Branch consolidation costs

  

 

(18,745

 

Less: Tax credit-related project impairment

  

 

(4,101

 

Adjusted non-interest expense

  

$

698,431

 

Net interest income

  

$

922,082

 

Taxable equivalent adjustment

  

 

12,470

 

Non-interest income

  

 

294,556

 

Less: Net securities gains

  

 

(282

 

Less: Gain on sale of Visa class B stock

  

 

(13,818

 

Add: Loss on FHLB debt extinguishment and related hedge terminations

  

 

25,611

 

Add: Service charge refunds

  

 

3,780

 

Adjusted net interest income (FTE) + non-interest income

  

$

  1,244,399

 

Efficiency ratio (FTE) (non-GAAP)

  

 

56.1

Return on Average Tangible Assets

   

  Year Ended December 31

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 
   

(dollars in thousands)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Net income

  

$

286,006

 

$

387,249

 

$

372,858

   

Amortization of intangibles, net of tax

  

 

10,556

 

 

11,192

 

 

12,365

   

Tangible net income (non-GAAP)

  

$

296,562

 

$

398,441

 

$

385,223

   

Average total assets

  

$

36,607,430

 

$

33,850,763

 

$

32,138,497

   

Less: Average intangible assets(1)

  

 

(2,322,981

 

 

(2,331,630

 

 

(2,334,727

   

Average tangible assets (non-GAAP)

  

$

34,284,449

 

$

31,519,133

 

$

29,803,770

   

Return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP)

  

 

0.87

 

 

1.26

 

 

1.29

(1)

Excludes loan servicing rights.

Operating Return on Average Tangible Assets

   

  Year Ended December 31

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 
   

(dollars in thousands)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Operating net income

  

$

322,026

 

$

394,188

 

$

374,718

   

Amortization of intangibles, net of tax

  

 

10,556

 

 

11,192

 

 

12,365

   

Tangible operating net income (non-GAAP)

  

$

332,582

 

$

405,380

 

$

387,083

   

Average total assets

  

$

36,607,430

 

$

33,850,763

 

$

32,138,497

   

Less: Average intangible assets(1)

  

 

(2,322,981

 

 

(2,331,630

 

 

(2,334,727

   

Average tangible assets (non-GAAP)

  

$

34,284,449

 

$

31,519,133

 

$

29,803,770

   

Operating return on average tangible assets (non-GAAP)

  

 

0.97

 

 

1.29

 

 

1.30

(1)

Excludes loan servicing rights.

  A - 4    F.N.B. Corporation


Annex A (Non-GAAP to GAAP Reconciliations)  

Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets (Period-End)

 

  December 31

  

2020

 
 

(dollars in thousands)

  

 

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

  

$

4,958,903

 

Less: Preferred shareholders’ equity

  

 

(106,882

 

Less: Intangible assets(1)

  

 

(2,316,527

 

Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

  

$

2,535,494

 

Total assets

  

 

37,354,351

 

Less: Intangible assets(1)

  

 

(2,316,527

 

Tangible assets (non-GAAP)

  

 

35,037,824

 

Less: PPP loans outstanding

  

 

(2,158,452

 

Tangible assets, excluding PPP loans (non-GAAP)

  

$

32,879,372

 

Tangible common equity / tangible assets (period-end) (non-GAAP)

  

 

7.2

 

Tangible common equity / tangible assets, excluding PPP loans (period-end) (non-GAAP)

  

 

7.7

(1)

Excludes loan servicing rights.

Pre-Provision Net Revenue to Average Tangible Common Equity

 

  Year Ended December 31

 

2020

 
 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

$

922,082

 

Non-interest income

 

 

294,556

 

Less non-interest expense

 

 

(750,349

 

Pre-provision net revenue (as reported)

 

$

466,289

 

Adjustments:

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add: Service charge refunds (non-interest income)

 

 

3,780

 

Less: Gain on sale of Visa class B stock (non-interest income)

 

 

(13,818

 

Add: Loss on FHLB debt extinguishment and related hedge terminations (non-interest income)

 

 

25,611

 

Add: COVID-19 expense (non-interest expense)

 

 

11,276

 

Add: Branch consolidation costs (non-interest expense)

 

 

18,745

 

Add: Tax credit-related impairment project (non-interest expense)

 

 

4,101

 

Pre-provision net revenue (operating) (non-GAAP)

 

$

515,984

 

Average total shareholders’ equity

 

$

4,904,300

 

Less: Average preferred shareholders’ equity

 

 

(106,882

 

Less: Average intangible assets(1)

 

 

(2,322,981

 

Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

 

$

2,474,437

 

Pre-provision net revenue (as reported) / average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

 

 

18.8

 

Pre-provision net revenue (operating) / average tangible common equity (non-GAAP)

 

 

20.9

(1)

Excludes loan servicing rights.

2021 Proxy Statement    A - 5  


LOGOLOGO


 

LOGO

 

C/O BROADRIDGE

P.O. BOX 1342

BRENTWOOD, NY 11717

  

      LOGO

  

 

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.comwww.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up untilinformation. For your vote to count, vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 10, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2021 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Followwebsite and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

  

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would likeDuring The Meeting - Go to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FNB21

  

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the instructions that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

  

 

VOTE BY TELEPHONEPHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up untilinstructions. For your vote to count, vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date.on May 10, 2021 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 7, 2021 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in handavailable when you call and then follow the instructions.

  

 

VOTE BY MAIL

  

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

Your mailed proxy card must be received by 11:59 p.m. on May 10, 2021 in order for it to be counted.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: 
 E42375-P02452D34357-P49959                                 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

 

F.N.B. CORPORATION

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:      

For

All

Withhold

All

For All

Except

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the corresponding number of each

                       

 Vote on Proposal 1:

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR each of the Nominees listed below:

       For   Against  such nominee(s) below. Abstain

Vote on Directors

             
 

 1. 

Election of 13 Director Nominees named below12 Directors

 

                
   

1a.  Pamela A. BenaNominees:

 

1b.  William B. Campbell

     

01) Pamela A. Bena

 

02) William B. Campbell

03) James D. Chiafullo

04) Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

05) Mary Jo Dively

06) Robert A. Hormell

 

            

 

          07) David J. Malone

 

          08) Frank C. Mencini

          09) David L. Motley

10) Heidi A. Nicholas

11) John S. Stanik

12) William J. Strimbu

 

 

Vote on Proposal 2:

 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:

 

    For

  Against

Abstain

1c.  James D. Chiafullo

        

2.

Advisory approval of the 2017 named executive officer   compensation.

    ☐

    For 

1d.  Vincent J. Delie, Jr.

1e.  Mary Jo Dively

Against
Abstain
2.Advisory approval of the 2020 named executive officer compensation.       

  

 

 

 

Vote on Proposal 3:

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:

   
     

1f.   Stephen J. Gurgovits

1g.  Robert A. Hormell

  ForAgainstAbstain  
 

3.
 

3.

Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as F.N.B.'s’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 20182021 fiscal year.

 

    ☐

    

1h.  David J. Malone

1i.   Frank C. Mencini

1j.   David L. Motley

  ☐
 ☐
       

 

Yes

 

 

No

 

 

HOUSEHOLDING ELECTION - Please indicate if you consent to receive certain future investor communications in a single package per household.Note:Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

1k.  Heidi A. Nicholas

     
  

  

1l.   John S. Stanik

1m.  William J. Strimbu

Yes

No

    YesNo

HOUSEHOLDING ELECTION - please indicate if you consent to receive certain future investor communications in a single package per household.

Please indicate if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.
             
   
 
                 
    
                          
                
 

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

 

Date

 

  

Signature (Joint Owners)

   Date   

Date

  


F.N.B. Corporation 20182021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Wednesday,Tuesday, May 16, 2018

Doors open at 8:00 a.m. local time11, 2021

Meeting begins at 8:30 a.m. local timeEastern Time

Regional Learning Alliance

Great Room

850 Cranberry Woods Dr.

Cranberry Twp., PA 16066www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/FNB21

 

Directions from Interstate 76 & Interstate 79

If taking Interstate 76, take Exit 28 (Old Exit 3) – follow signs to Interstate 79 North

From Interstate 79, take Exit 78 – Route 228 – Cranberry/Mars

Turn onto Route 228 East

At the first traffic light, turn right onto Cranberry Woods Drive (the Marriott Hotel will be on the right)

Follow Cranberry Woods Drive to the stop sign

Continue straight through the stop sign

In approximately 100 yards turn right (there is no street sign)

Continue for 250 yards to the entrance to the Regional Learning Alliance

The meeting will be held in the Great Room

Note: If you plan on attending the Annual Meeting in person, please bring a valid picture identification. The use of cell phones, video or still photography at the Annual Meeting is not permitted. For the safety of attendees, all bags, packages and briefcases are subject to inspection. Your compliance is appreciated.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice, and2021 Proxy Statement, and 20172020 Annual Report, are2020 Form 10-K and 2021 Corporate Responsibility

Report is available at www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

E42376-P02452

D34358-P49959           

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

May 16, 201811, 2021 8:30 AM

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

The undersignedShareholder(s), by their signature on the proxy card, hereby appointsappoint(s) Vincent J. Calabrese, James L. Dutey and Thomas M. Whitesel, and each of them,as proxies, with full power of substitution, to vote all shares of common stock of F.N.B. Corporation held of record by the undersigned on March 7, 20185, 2021 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held onMay 16, 2018,11, 2021, and at any adjournment thereof, upon all subjects that may properly come before the meeting, including the matters described in the proxy statement furnished herewith, in accordance with the directions indicated on the reverse side of this card or provided through the telephone or Internet proxy procedures, and at the discretion of the proxies on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.

If specific voting directions are not given with respect to the matters to be acted upon and the signed and dated card is returned, it will be treated as an instruction to vote such shares in accordance with the Board of Directors'Directors’ recommendations on the matters listed on the reverse side of this card and at the discretion of the proxies on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFORall nominees in Proposal 1, FORProposal 2 - An advisory resolution on 20172020 named executive officer compensation andFORProposal 3 - Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP in 2018, and listed on the reverse side of this card2021 (each of whichproposal is described more fully in the proxy statement). The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that are to be presented at the meeting.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side